RolePlay onLine RPoL Logo

, welcome to Pathfinder Arena

22:25, 27th April 2024 (GMT+0)

OOC Discussion 7.

Posted by GM ArkrimFor group 0
GM Arkrim
GM, 6095 posts
Game Master
Fri 8 Jul 2016
at 04:47
  • msg #1

OOC Discussion 7

New and improved! Discussion thread 7! Can you believe we're all so chatty?
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,404 BP, 1113 posts
Human Antipaladin/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Fri 8 Jul 2016
at 08:05
  • msg #2

OOC Discussion 7

FIRST!!!

Erin, once you're a higher level, you and I need to have a go. You're basically everything i hate compressed into one solitary fleshy being. ;P
This message was last edited by the player at 08:12, Fri 08 July 2016.
Ugrim
Barbarian 1,172 BP, 503 posts
Advanced Orc Barbarian
Shadow's Caress
Fri 8 Jul 2016
at 08:09
  • msg #3

OOC Discussion 7

So anyways, here's the proposed challenge

Just need Boadicea to fill out her details.

UGRIM challenges BOADICEA to a 1v1 Barbarian-fest!

Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: {No Limit}/0
      Referee: Oreo
Participant 1: Ugrim, Advanced Orc, Barbarian10/Fighter1, Headband, Cloak, Shirt, Chain Shirt, Belt, Boots, Nodachi, Wayfinder, Ioun Stone x2, Potion x3
Participant 2: Boadicea, Advanced Human, Barbarian/Brawler
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Large Colosseum
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1
       Extras: No using hero points, no flying, no invisibility

Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 960 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Fri 8 Jul 2016
at 08:55
  • msg #4

OOC Discussion 7

Hiro, you want that belt or not?
Otherwise I'll challenge my artillery nemesis Ario ;)
If Haran Madar was still around, we could go at it threeways.
Jayce the Tamer
Summoner 785 BP, 267 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 8 Jul 2016
at 12:30
  • msg #5

OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Josep Gavinho (msg # 4):

Haran is around and he will fight. He has too!
Boadicea
Barbarian 999 BP, 599 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 8 Jul 2016
at 12:46
  • msg #6

OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Ugrim (msg # 3):

Applying my BP be ready in a bit, had to move things around that was not a good build to go up against anyone it turns out :)
Hiro
Monk 2,038 BP, 1171 posts
Dwarf Monk
SotVD
Fri 8 Jul 2016
at 13:45
  • msg #7

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep Gavinho:
Hiro, you want that belt or not?
Otherwise I'll challenge my artillery nemesis Ario ;)
If Haran Madar was still around, we could go at it threeways.


I do! I'm pretty much ready but will not be around this weekend.

Do you want to wear the belt, or pick the arena?

1 prep round?
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 961 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Fri 8 Jul 2016
at 14:53
  • msg #8

Re: OOC Discussion 7

1 prep round is fine.
I will pick the arena :)
Hiro
Monk 2,038 BP, 1172 posts
Dwarf Monk
SotVD
Fri 8 Jul 2016
at 16:46
  • msg #9

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Josep Gavinho (msg # 8):

That's good, I'd hate to get your blood all over my belt :)
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 962 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Fri 8 Jul 2016
at 19:23
  • msg #10

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Duel #200 no less ;)
Boadicea
Barbarian 999 BP, 601 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 9 Jul 2016
at 02:50
  • msg #11

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sorry I swooped in and stole your duel, Ugrim was just waiting on me and I got busy with family.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,386 BP, 529 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Sat 9 Jul 2016
at 23:42
  • msg #12

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Latro!
Fight me!!
GM Arkrim
GM, 6097 posts
Game Master
Sat 9 Jul 2016
at 23:46
  • msg #13

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Grunyar, Latro, Josep and Tina should do a Monstrous Battle Royal or a Suicidal Monster Hunt.

Their power levels have exploded in the last couple of months and at their levels a battle royal would be INTENSE.
This message was last edited by the GM at 23:46, Sat 09 July 2016.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 530 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Sat 9 Jul 2016
at 23:53
  • msg #14

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Suicidal is right, that'd be a CR 20+ enemy. Josep might have to do something other than cast Scorching Ray just to deal with the spell resistance :P
GM Arkrim
GM, 6098 posts
Game Master
Sun 10 Jul 2016
at 00:27
  • msg #15

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I know. That'd be a pretty crazy fight, but between 4 high level power gamers, I'm sure you could really wreck some crazy stuff. I'm fairly certain 4 players with 2.5k BP each could take on the Tarrasque if they went in prepared.
This message was last edited by the GM at 00:28, Sun 10 July 2016.
Boadicea
Barbarian 999 BP, 602 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 10 Jul 2016
at 00:29
  • msg #16

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Did I mess the challenge post up or am I OK to repost challenge?
Boadicea
Barbarian 999 BP, 603 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 10 Jul 2016
at 01:45
  • msg #17

Re: OOC Discussion 7

UGRIM challenges BOADICEA to a 1v1 Barbarian-fest!

Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: {No Limit}/0
      Referee: Oreo (Ario)
Participant 1: Ugrim, Advanced Orc, Barbarian10/Fighter1, Headband, Cloak, Shirt, Chain Shirt, Belt, Boots, Nodachi, Wayfinder, Ioun Stone x2, Potion x3
Participant 2: Boadicea, Advanced Human, Barbarian2/Brawler8, Amulet, Cloak, Gloves, Shirt, Ioun Stone X2, Wayfinder, Armor, Potion, Belt, Bandolier
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Large Colosseum
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1
       Extras: No using hero points, no flying, no invisibility, suspend 48 hour rule Monday thru Thursday

Ugrim put this up when your ready, you don't have to put the last part I won't call 48 hour on you on those days any way just figured I'd put in.
Ugrim
Barbarian 1,172 BP, 504 posts
Advanced Orc Barbarian
Shadow's Caress
Sun 10 Jul 2016
at 13:55
  • msg #18

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sorry. Haven't been around. Been playing the heck out of Pokemon GO.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,404 BP, 1114 posts
Human Antipaladin/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Sun 10 Jul 2016
at 14:08
  • msg #19

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Tinny Tina:
Latro!
Fight me!!

Name your terms, foolish one.
Boadicea
Barbarian 999 BP, 605 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 10 Jul 2016
at 14:25
  • msg #20

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Ugrim (msg # 18):

Wow didn't know that was out, thats is interesting looking.  I used to play a RPG with similar mechanics it used your location and generated resources NPCs on the map and when in radious you could interact with others

And all of my devices are not supported :(
This message was last edited by the player at 15:06, Sun 10 July 2016.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 531 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Sun 10 Jul 2016
at 19:44
  • msg #21

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Latro Dectus:
Tinny Tina:
Latro!
Fight me!!

Name your terms, foolish one.



   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / No Limit Hero Points
      Referee: {Name}
Participant 1: Tinny Tina, Wyrwood, Alchemist 12, Longbow, Chain Shirt, Headband, Lenses, Cloak, Belt, Boots, Arrows, More Arrows, Acid, Wayfinder, Dust, Ioun Stone, Ioun Stone, Ioun Stone, Cloak, Gloves, Saddle
Participant 2: Latro Dectus, {Race, Class Level, Gear}
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Small King of the Hill
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Dungeon
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: Each edge of the arena connects to the opposite edge

This message was last edited by the player at 19:44, Sun 10 July 2016.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6101 posts
Game Master
Sun 10 Jul 2016
at 20:48
  • msg #22

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Boadicea
Barbarian 999 BP, 607 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 10 Jul 2016
at 20:50
  • msg #23

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 22):

Lol
Erin Zilryn
Monk Paladin 298 BP, 41 posts
Monk(MoMS)/Paladin(Hosp)
/Champion of Irori
Tue 12 Jul 2016
at 02:02
  • msg #24

Re: OOC Discussion 7

How is up for a CR 10 Monster Mash?
Hiro
Monk 2,038 BP, 1173 posts
Dwarf Monk
SotVD
Tue 12 Jul 2016
at 19:27
  • msg #25

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep, this week is turning out far more nuts than I anticipated. Go ahead with another match if you want, I doubt I'll be able to do it this week..

Sorry!
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 963 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Tue 12 Jul 2016
at 22:31
  • msg #26

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Hiro (msg # 25):
 Fair enough. I'll be waiting ;)

 Who wants a fight? Ario, you in?
 Anyone else? A summoner maybe?
Ario
Kineticist 1,293 BP, 408 posts
Drider Oreo
Wed 13 Jul 2016
at 04:11
  • msg #27

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'd be up for a fight.  How's:


Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: {No Limit}/{None}
      Referee: [yournamehere]
Participant 1:  Ario, Drider Kineticist 11
Participant 2:  Josep, Human Sorcerer 11
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Coliseum (small)
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: none
       Extras: 3 consecutive matches (reset to original square with no effects after each win), no need to declare items until initiative post

Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 964 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Wed 13 Jul 2016
at 08:41
  • msg #28

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sounds intriguing. Winner is whoever gets two wins, I suppose?
We should get a ballistics expert as referee. Any takers?
Ario
Kineticist 1,293 BP, 409 posts
Drider Oreo
Wed 13 Jul 2016
at 11:30
  • msg #29

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I was thinking three actual separate matches without needing to go through re-drafting a ref and having arkrim re-make the thread.
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,408 BP, 615 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Wed 13 Jul 2016
at 12:11
  • msg #30

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Tina is your true range master, if she passes I'm always lurking about if you need a Ref.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 532 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Wed 13 Jul 2016
at 13:43
  • msg #31

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Latro!!!

   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / No Limit Hero Points
      Referee: {Name}
Participant 1: Tinny Tina, Wyrwood, Alchemist 12, Longbow, Chain Shirt, Headband, Lenses, Cloak, Belt, Boots, Arrows, More Arrows, Acid, Wayfinder, Dust, Ioun Stone, Ioun Stone, Ioun Stone, Cloak, Gloves, Saddle
Participant 2: Latro Dectus, {Race, Class Level, Gear}
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Small King of the Hill
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Dungeon
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: Each edge of the arena connects to the opposite edge, suspend 48 hour rule Monday thru Thursday

Fight me!!!!


I'll ref for you guys.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,404 BP, 1115 posts
Human Antipaladin/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Wed 13 Jul 2016
at 13:50
  • msg #32

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Tinny Tina:
Latro!!!

   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / No Limit Hero Points
      Referee: {Name}
Participant 1: Tinny Tina, Wyrwood, Alchemist 12, Longbow, Chain Shirt, Headband, Lenses, Cloak, Belt, Boots, Arrows, More Arrows, Acid, Wayfinder, Dust, Ioun Stone, Ioun Stone, Ioun Stone, Cloak, Gloves, Saddle
Participant 2: Latro Dectus, {Race, Class Level, Gear}
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Small King of the Hill
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Dungeon
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: Each edge of the arena connects to the opposite edge, suspend 48 hour rule Monday thru Thursday

Fight me!!!!



Seems legit. Give me a week or so to update my character sheet. Believe it or not, my standard sheet is built specifically to combat melee foes (like hiro) so i'll need to make a few tweeks to deal with you and your ranged shenanigans. ;P
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 965 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Wed 13 Jul 2016
at 15:37
  • msg #33

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'd love to make it three games, but is that really legit?
Seems like a quick and dirty way to generate a lot of BP and score on the leaderships board!
If it's all kosher though, let's do it and have Tina ref it.
Ario
Kineticist 1,293 BP, 410 posts
Drider Oreo
Wed 13 Jul 2016
at 16:11
  • msg #34

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm quite certain in reading through old matches, that I found one where they did just what I'm proposing.  It's only quick if we fight quick - in some of the drawn out matches it'd be committing to months of play.  I'd be fine with adding an extra that 2/3 winner is the only credit for leader board.
Erin Zilryn
Monk Paladin 298 BP, 42 posts
Monk(MoMS)/Paladin(Hosp)
/Champion of Irori
Wed 13 Jul 2016
at 17:34
  • msg #35

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Airo if are levels are not to far apart I would be up for a match with you. 3 rounds sounds fine with me.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6102 posts
Game Master
Thu 14 Jul 2016
at 05:41
  • msg #36

Re: OOC Discussion 7

If I don't see a championship or battle royal soon, I'm going to have to do something drastic...
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 533 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Thu 14 Jul 2016
at 05:48
  • msg #37

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Just how drastic are we talking here? On a scale from "increased rewards for battles royal" to "choose four gladiators at random and force them into a battle royal"
This message was last edited by the player at 05:53, Thu 14 July 2016.
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,408 BP, 616 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Thu 14 Jul 2016
at 13:14
  • msg #38

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 36):

Sounds fun but lets do this on our terms ..., Tina, Hiro, Thraxis you all want to do a monster battle royale?
Ario
Kineticist 1,293 BP, 411 posts
Drider Oreo
Thu 14 Jul 2016
at 19:20
  • msg #39

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hey all, internet failed and I'll be off until Saturday or Sunday while it's getting fixed.
Boadicea
Barbarian 999 BP, 612 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Thu 14 Jul 2016
at 19:26
  • msg #40

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Ario (msg # 39):

That sux
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 966 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Thu 14 Jul 2016
at 22:49
  • msg #41

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Ario (msg # 39):
 You'll have a challenge waiting for you ;)

 Arkrim, do you have anything against our setting up a three-battle-in-one challenge?
 Absent a restriction from you, I'll assume that the precedent holds and that we can proceed with it.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6103 posts
Game Master
Fri 15 Jul 2016
at 00:38
  • msg #42

Re: OOC Discussion 7

If by "three-battle-in-one" you mean "battle royal with 3 people" go ahead.
Haran Madar
Sorcerer 721 BP, 245 posts
Human Sorcerer
Sat 16 Jul 2016
at 04:09
  • msg #43

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Battle Royales can certainly be messy.

Yes, Jayce, I am still around. Lurking in the shadows, waiting for you to get stronger so I can fight you. Don't throw Josep to the wolves because you're scared.
Bruhli
Barbarian 819 BP, 298 posts
Suli Barbarian
Sat 16 Jul 2016
at 15:17
  • msg #44

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm just about ready to fight somebody if anyone's out there.
Boadicea
Barbarian 999 BP, 615 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 17 Jul 2016
at 16:00
  • msg #45

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Bruhli (msg # 44):

As always I am ready for a fight when not in th arena already, however GM wants some entertainment so how about a Barbarian Battle Royal (or just a Martial Battle Royal if another martial type wants in), with large map Boxed in or Tunnels or Collosseum maps, no prep just bell ringing fun :)
Ankou
Inquisitor 906 BP, 401 posts
Dwarf Inquisitor
Thaumaturgical Alliance
Sun 17 Jul 2016
at 16:50
  • msg #46

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Ankou has been quiet for too long ; I'll happy enlist him in the Battle Royale.
If you want to make it a Martial Battle Royale, I can modify his build slightly to accommodate.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 968 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Sun 17 Jul 2016
at 18:17
  • msg #47

Re: OOC Discussion 7

 Sorry Ario, I rushed into the challenge thread, didn't realise I had updated Josep since... I guess I can't repost the challenge right now, but if you want to do it, update the line to reflect Josep is Noble Drow Sorcerer 11.
Jayce the Tamer
Summoner 785 BP, 268 posts
Human Summoner
Sun 17 Jul 2016
at 18:38
  • msg #48

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I have been on a Pokemon Go kick. I'm starting to come down from that high. However, I will be on vacation July 30th until August 8th-9th. So I will be quiet a little longer.

I have discovered a location in my city so that I can actually evolve pikachu into a riachu. Already got a charizard. Gyrados is taking a while...
Boadicea
Barbarian 999 BP, 616 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 17 Jul 2016
at 20:52
  • msg #49

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Ankou (msg # 46):

I'm down, Bruhli & Ugrim you in?
Ugrim
Barbarian 1,249 BP, 512 posts
Advanced Orc Barbarian
Shadow's Caress
Mon 18 Jul 2016
at 07:57
  • msg #50

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Boadicea (msg # 49):

BARBARIAN BATTLE ROYAL!!!!!!!!!
GM Arkrim
GM, 6104 posts
Game Master
Tue 19 Jul 2016
at 03:11
  • msg #51

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Ugrim (msg # 50):

YES!

I'll go get the popcorn and watch your characters TEAR EACH OTHER LIMB FROM LIMB. This is what people go to the arena to see!
Bruhli
Barbarian 819 BP, 299 posts
Suli Barbarian
Tue 19 Jul 2016
at 03:50
  • msg #52

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Ironically, I'll probably be a Warpriest so I can further test that out. But I agree if you guys are cool with me not being a barbarian
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,034 BP, 617 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 19 Jul 2016
at 06:34
  • msg #53

Re: OOC Discussion 7

AWSOME, so the roster is Ugrim, Boadicea, Bruhli, Ankou.

What kind of map? I like the ones I mentioned earlier

Standard walls, lighting, ...?

I say if we do anything other than Colosseum no prep round, just my thoughts

Extras: low ceiling (+5), no invisible, no hero points, no need to declare items until first combat post

What do you all think?

We could go on the wild side and do all random :)
Ankou
Inquisitor 906 BP, 402 posts
Dwarf Inquisitor
Thaumaturgical Alliance
Tue 19 Jul 2016
at 11:58
  • msg #54

Re: OOC Discussion 7

 All random !!

 Or Bone walls, checkered floor with Italian marble and lava, three pillars of electricity that radiate, and a 50ft high ceiling that lowers 5ft per round until we're all crushed.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 969 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Tue 19 Jul 2016
at 12:29
  • msg #55

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Ario, you still on?
After 48h have passed, can I reissue the challenge? Or is that a week?
Otherwise, you could go ahead and issue it.
Ugrim
Barbarian 1,249 BP, 513 posts
Advanced Orc Barbarian
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Jul 2016
at 12:34
  • msg #56

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Ankou:
a 50ft high ceiling that lowers 5ft per round until we're all crushed.

I actually really like this one!

Maybe make it 25 feet so it pressures us more?

Or maybe the water level rises 5 feet every round until we're all submerged in an arena with lots of raised platforms?

maybe both until the water and the ceiling meet?
Bruhli
Barbarian 819 BP, 300 posts
Suli Barbarian
Wed 20 Jul 2016
at 01:30
  • msg #57

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Ugrim (msg # 56):

This is what I normally like:

quote:
PLAYER1 challenges PLAYER2.

   Match Type: {1v1; 1v2; 1v3; 2v2; FFA; etc}
          Map: Standard
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras:



Good old Standard! But I'd be willing to compromise with the below:

quote:
PLAYER1 challenges PLAYER2.

 Match Type: {1v1; 1v2; 1v3; 2v2; FFA; etc}
          Map: Random
     Lighting: Random
      Terrain: Random
        Walls: Random
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: No hero points, no need to declare items until first combat post

Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 534 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Wed 20 Jul 2016
at 01:35
  • msg #58

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Do a bar fight
Ario
Kineticist 1,328 BP, 415 posts
Drider Oreo
Wed 20 Jul 2016
at 02:14
  • msg #59

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Tinny, our (Josep vs me) challenge is up if you could accept refsponsibilities.
Ankou
Inquisitor 906 BP, 403 posts
Dwarf Inquisitor
Thaumaturgical Alliance
Wed 20 Jul 2016
at 06:13
  • msg #60

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Bruhli (msg # 57):

Fine with me.
Ugrim
Barbarian 1,249 BP, 514 posts
Advanced Orc Barbarian
Shadow's Caress
Wed 20 Jul 2016
at 12:18
  • msg #61

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Bruhli (msg # 57):

booooriiing!

But i'll accept that. :P
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,034 BP, 618 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Wed 20 Jul 2016
at 12:18
  • msg #62

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Bruhli (msg # 57):

I'm down with Random but no prep rounds
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 536 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Wed 20 Jul 2016
at 23:53
  • msg #63

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Latro!!!!!
It's been a week, you ready yet??????

   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / No Limit Hero Points
      Referee: {Name}
Participant 1: Tinny Tina, Wyrwood, Alchemist 11, Chain Shirt, Headband, Cloak, Belt, Boots, Acid, Ioun Stone, Ioun Stone, Ioun Stone, Trebuchet, Dust, Dust, Wayfinder, Cloak, Gloves, Cloak, Ioun Stone
Participant 2: Latro Dectus, {Race, Class Level, Gear}
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Small King of the Hill
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Dungeon
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: Each edge of the arena connects to the opposite edge, suspend 48 hour rule Monday thru Thursday

Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,404 BP, 1116 posts
Human Antipaladin/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Thu 21 Jul 2016
at 12:18
  • msg #64

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Tinny Tina:
Latro!!!!!
It's been a week, you ready yet??????

   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / No Limit Hero Points
      Referee: {Name}
Participant 1: Tinny Tina, Wyrwood, Alchemist 11, Chain Shirt, Headband, Cloak, Belt, Boots, Acid, Ioun Stone, Ioun Stone, Ioun Stone, Trebuchet, Dust, Dust, Wayfinder, Cloak, Gloves, Cloak, Ioun Stone
Participant 2: Latro Dectus, {Race, Class Level, Gear}
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Small King of the Hill
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Dungeon
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: Each edge of the arena connects to the opposite edge, suspend 48 hour rule Monday thru Thursday

Not quite yet but i am working on it.

I realized recently that i'm gonna have to figure out a way to get around all your construct shenanigans as well as your ranged shenanigans so props to making me think harder than i need to. ;P
This message was last edited by the player at 12:55, Thu 21 July 2016.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 537 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Thu 21 Jul 2016
at 15:37
  • msg #65

Re: OOC Discussion 7

You could just, like, not think at all and let me kill you super hard. That's always an option.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 2 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 22 Jul 2016
at 04:29
  • msg #66

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hello all! I'm new, and looking for a fight >:D

...a level appropriate fight, that is. I'm only a 6th level Summoner (might go up to 7 with the initial BP bonus but still), and it looks like people are at around level 10+ mostly. Any potential fights for me?
Bruhli
Barbarian 819 BP, 301 posts
Suli Barbarian
Fri 22 Jul 2016
at 12:39
  • msg #67

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Actually, I like Tiny's idea. How about the below. I've also taken out the prep round. If not, I'd be fine with random map too. Also, for you adrenaline junkies, we could always do 1 random extra chosen by the ref/GM.

quote:
PLAYER1 challenges PLAYER2.

 Match Type: {1v1; 1v2; 1v3; 2v2; FFA; etc}
          Map: The Tavern
     Lighting: Random
      Terrain: Random
        Walls: Random
         Prep:
       Extras: No hero points, no need to declare items until first combat post, 1 random extra chosen by ref/GM



Welcome Kecil! I'm sure there are some other weaklings ready to fight you ;)
This message was last edited by the player at 12:43, Fri 22 July 2016.
Thraxis
Summoner 1,162 BP, 385 posts
Half-orc Summoner
Fri 22 Jul 2016
at 12:48
  • msg #68

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Kecil:
Hello all! I'm new, and looking for a fight >:D

...a level appropriate fight, that is. I'm only a 6th level Summoner (might go up to 7 with the initial BP bonus but still), and it looks like people are at around level 10+ mostly. Any potential fights for me?


If our Monster Mash Battle Royale is not happening, I'd be willing to drop to 300-500 bp for a level 6-7 match with you.  You can pick my bp limit - higher bp means lower chance of you winning but bigger rewards whether for the win or loss.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,034 BP, 619 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 22 Jul 2016
at 13:02
  • msg #69

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Bruhli (msg # 67):

Sounds good to me
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 3 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 22 Jul 2016
at 21:18
  • msg #70

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Thraxis (msg # 68):

Why, that's awfully kind of you :D

Let's go with 300 BP - That should be fastest to rebuild and "even", right?
Erin Zilryn
Monk Paladin 298 BP, 43 posts
Monk(MoMS)/Paladin(Hosp)
/Champion of Irori
Fri 22 Jul 2016
at 22:24
  • msg #71

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Not to be rude and step in but I would not mind a go with Kecil. We are both the same area in the game. A few back to back matches may do us both good.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 4 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 22 Jul 2016
at 23:26
  • msg #72

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Erin Zilryn (msg # 71):

...Hm, yeah that might work better. Mind postponing for a few matches? I'll take you on when I've grown stronger :D

(Also, I love the Irelia avatar :D)


Edit: Actually, nothing wrong with fighting two people at once. If you've already made the lower level character, Thraxis, I'd be happy to take you on as well ;) but if you haven't, it'll probably be easier to fight when we're higher up.
This message was last edited by the player at 00:23, Sat 23 July 2016.
Erin Zilryn
Monk Paladin 298 BP, 44 posts
Monk(MoMS)/Paladin(Hosp)
/Champion of Irori
Fri 22 Jul 2016
at 23:33
  • msg #73

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Thanks.
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,408 BP, 617 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Sat 23 Jul 2016
at 11:10
  • msg #74

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Kecil you should always get a referee for the match, GM is very busy you may have to wait for a long while if a ruling needs to be made on something.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 6 posts
Human Summoner
Sat 23 Jul 2016
at 13:31
  • msg #75

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Grunyar Fangblood (msg # 74):

Hm, didn't know how important it was. Is there any way to get a ref now (beyond cancelling the challenge and resubmitting, I guess)? What do you recommend?

And, on a related note, to everyone: Anyone want to ref a match? :P
Erin Zilryn
Monk Paladin 298 BP, 46 posts
Monk(MoMS)/Paladin(Hosp)
/Champion of Irori
Sat 23 Jul 2016
at 13:43
  • msg #76

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Priddy much ask someone accept the duty for the ref. and we move forward.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 7 posts
Human Summoner
Sat 23 Jul 2016
at 14:19
  • msg #77

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Should we edit the challenge/acceptance to reflect the ref? Or repost?
Erin Zilryn
Monk Paladin 298 BP, 47 posts
Monk(MoMS)/Paladin(Hosp)
/Champion of Irori
Sat 23 Jul 2016
at 14:44
  • msg #78

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Fine a ref and they will accept it like did to the challenge?
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 8 posts
Human Summoner
Sat 23 Jul 2016
at 14:48
  • msg #79

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Erin Zilryn (msg # 78):

I get that much, but the challenge itself says "Referee: None". Not sure if it's considered OK to edit a challenge post-acceptance, but I was guessing it's ok if both players do so. Then we wouldn't need to post again.

The alternative, as far as I can see, is simply nullifying the previous challenge and posting again. Then a ref can simply accept ref duties on the new, accurate post.

Unless there's something I'm missing?
Erin Zilryn
Monk Paladin 298 BP, 48 posts
Monk(MoMS)/Paladin(Hosp)
/Champion of Irori
Sat 23 Jul 2016
at 14:56
  • msg #80

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Honestly dont ask me.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 9 posts
Human Summoner
Sat 23 Jul 2016
at 15:06
  • msg #81

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Erin Zilryn (msg # 80):

I'm mostly asking the more experienced people around here - I'm hoping someone knows more than us, and can help out :D
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,408 BP, 618 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Sat 23 Jul 2016
at 15:12
  • msg #82

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I will ref for you two if you like

Just both delete your posts and then Erin needs to post as challenger (after both are deleted)
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 10 posts
Human Summoner
Sat 23 Jul 2016
at 16:20
  • msg #83

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Grunyar Fangblood (msg # 82):

Cool, will do. Thanks! :)
GM Arkrim
GM, 6107 posts
Game Master
Sat 23 Jul 2016
at 17:15
  • msg #84

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Challenge thread has been cleared. You guys can repost when ready. Make sure you have someone who will volunteer as referee for you.
Bruhli
Barbarian 819 BP, 302 posts
Suli Barbarian
Sun 24 Jul 2016
at 06:43
  • msg #85

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Kecil (msg # 83):

I'll be a ref for y'all
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 11 posts
Human Summoner
Sun 24 Jul 2016
at 07:06
  • msg #86

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Bruhli (msg # 85):

Grunyar (kinda) volunteered already, I think. That said I do hope to do, as suggested by Erin, back to back fights, so maybe that'll work out?

Grunyar Fangblood:
I will ref for you two if you like

Just both delete your posts and then Erin needs to post as challenger (after both are deleted)


I'll post a challenge, since I'm about to sleep - if there's a reason Erin needs to challenge, she can get the next one?

Edit: Challenge up!
This message was last edited by the player at 07:21, Sun 24 July 2016.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 978 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Sun 24 Jul 2016
at 12:45
  • msg #87

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hiro, you still want your belt back?
Just got my ass kicked by Ario, but I'm ready.
Bruhli
Barbarian 819 BP, 303 posts
Suli Barbarian
Sun 24 Jul 2016
at 17:06
  • msg #88

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Kecil (msg # 86):

Whoops, you're right. Grunyar did volunteer.

If you did everything right in your challenge, Erin should just quote your post and say "I accept."

If you did something wrong, she should quote your challenge and say "I reject." She can then reissue the corrected challenge and you can accept. You can accept her challenge, but you can't reissue the challenge yourself for a week.

If you made a mistake, Erin doesn't catch it and accepts your challenge; then your challenge will be rejected by rule of law and neither of you can issue the challenge for a week.

If you guys do everything correctly, have your match, and want to fight again; I don't think there is any restriction on who has to issue the second challenge. Just make sure no one else has a challenge pending in the thread.

I could be wrong about some of this. So someone can step in and make any clarifications.
This message was last edited by the player at 17:11, Sun 24 July 2016.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 13 posts
Human Summoner
Sun 24 Jul 2016
at 18:55
  • msg #89

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Bruhli (msg # 88):

Ah, so that's why Grunyar said Erin had to re-issue. I guess since the GM was kind enough to just clear it, that's no longer an issue, though?

In any case, I'm excited to get the first game in :D
Thraxis
Summoner 1,162 BP, 386 posts
Half-orc Summoner
Mon 25 Jul 2016
at 03:57
  • msg #90

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Thraxis is looking for a game - duel, Battle Royale, or Monster Battle Royale preferred.

Match Type: Any
BP/Hero Limit: {No Limit}/{None}
      Referee: [volunteers welcome]
Participant 1:  Thraxis, Half Orc Summoner 11
Participant 2:
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Coliseum (small)
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: none/any
       Extras: No need to declare items until initiative post

Anyone game?
Erin Zilryn
Monk Paladin 298 BP, 51 posts
Monk(MoMS)/Paladin(Hosp)
/Champion of Irori
Mon 25 Jul 2016
at 06:13
  • msg #91

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sure after this match or during I have no problem being in two matches at the same time.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 979 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Mon 25 Jul 2016
at 09:32
  • msg #92

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Thraxis (msg # 90):
 If Hiro isn't ready for our fight, I'll join you for a Battle Royale (no monster)

@Erin: you can't be in two fights at once, I think.
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,408 BP, 620 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Mon 25 Jul 2016
at 12:25
  • msg #93

Re: OOC Discussion 7

If you guys (Josep, Thraxis) want a third I'm down for a battle Royal

Erin could referee but other wise its one fight per gladiator and one referee per account
Thraxis
Summoner 1,162 BP, 387 posts
Half-orc Summoner
Mon 25 Jul 2016
at 16:03
  • msg #94

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm going to poke the democratic representatives again.  I figured I'd open a discussion about Battle Royale BP rewards.

As it stands, you get the reward for defeating (or losing to, or drawing) the average of the BP of your opponents.  For a 3 player match without a draw for top two this works out to the same BP average multiplier as for a 1v1 with 90/60/30 averaging out to 60 just like the 90/30 for a 1v1 duel. For a 3 player with a draw (60/60/30) or a 4 player match of any kind (90/60/30/30 or 60/60/30/30) it works out to less for a game that is 50% to 100% longer to play out.

Monster Battles Royale auto-correct by adding the monster BP and that without hero point cost.  But without that bump it makes it much less attractive to play battle royales, which are among the most fun for everyone to watch (I think anyways).    I propose as a fix, increasing rewards to compensate for longer play times and decreased odds of winning.

My ballpark thoughts were 110/75/40 for 3 players, and 130/90/60 for 4.  Anyone else have any thoughts?
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 24 posts
Human Summoner
Tue 26 Jul 2016
at 05:45
  • msg #95

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well, I think I've come out of this with a much better understanding of how the heck things work. Thanks, Grunyar, Erin, and everyone else who helped me out :)

I might just be overhyped, but I'm up for another round, if someone wants to fight :D

I do have one question though - Can you sell things? The only mention of "sell" I found in character creation is "You cannot sell (items) for a profit." Does that mean you can sell them neutrally? At 50%?
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 540 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Tue 26 Jul 2016
at 05:58
  • msg #96

Re: OOC Discussion 7

There is no "buying" or "selling". You have a pool of gold (based on the amount of BP you put into equipment) which can be freely allocated to items between battles. If you don't want the item anymore, you simply get rid of it and get all your gold back.

This also means that consumables, effectively, are restored after every battle. So if you spend 50 gold on a potion of bless, you only get one potion per battle, but can use that one potion in as many battles as you like.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 25 posts
Human Summoner
Tue 26 Jul 2016
at 06:35
  • msg #97

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 96):

I see, makes sense. Thanks!

So I suppose that means you can't "return" gold and get BP back. Unless you do a full wipe for 1% BP, I guess?


@Battle Royale proposition: I've never played in one, so maybe my perspective is moot, but from a mathematical standpoint, you want to make it so BP/turn is about the same, right? So, with X players instead of 2 players, you'd want overall rewards to be X/2 times as high. Additionally, you want rewards for victory to scale with the lowered chance of victory - If we want victory rewards to be about the same % increase on average, we go from +200% base BP 1/2 of the time, to +X*100% base BP 1/X of the time. So, I'll just try a final formula of:

LoseXPot = 10*number of players*total BP among losers
WinXPot = 10*number of players*Winner's BP

Winner's rewards are: LoseXPot/Winner's BP
Loser's rewards are: WinnerXPot/Loser's BP

So, let's say you have four competitors, at 900 (P1), 1200 (P2), 1500 (P3), and 1800 (P4) BP. The winner is P3.

P1 would earn 1500 BP*10*4/900 = 66 BP. Compared to fighting and losing to an average of the other players (1500/900*30 = 50 BP), they earn about 32% more. If they had won, they would have earned 4500 BP*20*4/900 = 400 BP! But what are the chances of that :P

P2 would earn 1500 BP*10*4/1200 = 50 BP. Compared to fighting and losing to an average of the other players (1400/1200*30 = 35 BP), they earn about 42% more. If they had won, they would have earned 4200 BP*20*4/1200 = 280 BP - Unlikely, but a big payout.

P3 would earn 3900 BP*20*4/1500 = 208 BP. Compared to fighting and winning to an average of the other players (1500/1300*90 = 103 BP), they earn about 101% more. If they had lost... well, that's a bit more complicated. Working on getting a win% chart working so I can get an accurate number here.

P4 would earn 1500 BP*10*4/1800 = 33 BP. Compared to fighting and losing to an average of the other players (1800/1200*30 = 20 BP), they earn about 65% more. If they had won, they would have earned 3600 BP*20*4/1800 = 160 BP - A reasonably likely outcome with reasonable rewards.

As I mentioned in P3, you can work out the win% to have equal rewards across the board. The closest I got was at P1 = 8%, P2 = 18%, P3 = 27%, P4 = 47%, with all of them at about 91-93 BP/round.

Nothing conclusive, but if those win%s look about accurate to you, you'd want exactly the formula I put up if a Battle Royal is "50% more effort" than a duel, 30% higher numbers if it's twice the effort, etc.
This message was last edited by the player at 06:38, Tue 26 July 2016.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 541 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Tue 26 Jul 2016
at 06:47
  • msg #98

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Kecil:
In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 96):

I see, makes sense. Thanks!

So I suppose that means you can't "return" gold and get BP back. Unless you do a full wipe for 1% BP, I guess?

You can absolutely return gold and get BP back. BP can also be freely allocated between battles.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 26 posts
Human Summoner
Tue 26 Jul 2016
at 07:07
  • msg #99

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 98):

Wait, huh? What's the full wipe for, then?

*rereads*

...oh. Right.

Apologies for being all over the place, everyone - I'm pretty scatterbrained :P
Erin Zilryn
Monk Paladin 298 BP, 60 posts
Tue 26 Jul 2016
at 08:58
  • [deleted]
  • msg #100

Re: OOC Discussion 7

This message was deleted by the player at 10:18, Tue 26 July 2016.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 980 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Tue 26 Jul 2016
at 10:31
  • msg #101

Re: OOC Discussion 7

@Kecil, Erin:
 Don't worry guys, things have changed a lot around the arena, an fighting is the only way to learn I think!
 You could consider ganging up on a veteran.

@Hiro: are we on or what?

@Thraxis, Grunyar: I owe Hiro a fight for the belt, but if he's not around, Battle Royale it is. If a fourth wants to join, that's cool too.
Erin Zilryn
Monk Paladin 298 BP, 61 posts
Monk(MoMS)/Paladin(Hosp)
/Champion of Irori
Tue 26 Jul 2016
at 11:13
  • msg #102

Re: OOC Discussion 7

JUGGERNAUT BATTLE (1v2)
I am game if Kecil is. The question is who do we fight?
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,034 BP, 620 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 26 Jul 2016
at 12:18
  • msg #103

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Bruhli:
Actually, I like Tiny's idea. How about the below. I've also taken out the prep round. If not, I'd be fine with random map too. Also, for you adrenaline junkies, we could always do 1 random extra chosen by the ref/GM.

quote:
PLAYER1 challenges PLAYER2.

 Match Type: {1v1; 1v2; 1v3; 2v2; FFA; etc}
          Map: The Tavern
     Lighting: Random
      Terrain: Random
        Walls: Random
         Prep:
       Extras: No hero points, no need to declare items until first combat post, 1 random extra chosen by ref/GM


Ankou, Bruhli, Ugrim we still on and is tavern ok?
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 981 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Tue 26 Jul 2016
at 13:44
  • msg #104

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Boadicea (msg # 103):
 Yes and yes.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 982 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Tue 26 Jul 2016
at 13:45
  • msg #105

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Erin Zilryn (msg # 102):

 You should grab a third and fight Ugrim
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 27 posts
Human Summoner
Tue 26 Jul 2016
at 23:46
  • msg #106

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Josep Gavinho (msg # 105):

If he's not busy tavern brawling, I'd be up for doing it with 2 :D
Bruhli
Barbarian 819 BP, 304 posts
Suli Barbarian
Wed 27 Jul 2016
at 02:04
  • msg #107

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Boadicea (msg # 103):

Yep, that works for me. I'm still deciding on a build, but should be good to go in a day or two.
Erin Zilryn
Monk Paladin 298 BP, 62 posts
Monk(MoMS)/Paladin(Hosp)
/Champion of Irori
Wed 27 Jul 2016
at 02:57
  • msg #108

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Why Ugrim?
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 28 posts
Human Summoner
Wed 27 Jul 2016
at 03:58
  • msg #109

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Erin Zilryn (msg # 108):

Honestly I'd be up to fighting anyone >.<
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 542 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Wed 27 Jul 2016
at 04:00
  • msg #110

Re: OOC Discussion 7

If Latro doesn't get back to me soon, I'll juggernaut for y'all.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 29 posts
Human Summoner
Wed 27 Jul 2016
at 04:14
  • msg #111

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Awesome! Erin?

Quick incomplete challenge, so we can start talking about what we want:


   Match Type: 1v2 Juggernaut
BP/Hero Limit: {No Limit} or {Number} BP / {No Limit} or {Number} Hero Points
      Referee: {Name}
Participant 1: Kecil
Participant 2: Erin Zilryn
Participant 3: Tinny Tina (Juggernaut)
Participant 4:
          Map: Colosseum
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: None


Or we can do that in PM if you want. Wasn't sure if that's the thing to do if you're still waiting to see if you'll fight at all.
This message was last edited by the player at 04:27, Wed 27 July 2016.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 983 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Wed 27 Jul 2016
at 10:25
  • msg #112

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Kecil (msg # 111):
 Not to curb your enthusiasm needlessly, but you're going to need a third if you mean to last one round, and a fourth if you want even a sliver of a fighting chance against our resident full tin alchemist ;)
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 30 posts
Human Summoner
Wed 27 Jul 2016
at 10:31
  • msg #113

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Josep Gavinho (msg # 112):

I got this :D
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 31 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 29 Jul 2016
at 03:54
  • msg #114

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So... are people around? :P
Erin Zilryn
Monk Paladin 298 BP, 64 posts
Monk(MoMS)/Paladin(Hosp)
/Champion of Irori
Mon 1 Aug 2016
at 11:22
  • msg #115

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yep I am here.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 32 posts
Human Summoner
Mon 1 Aug 2016
at 12:09
  • msg #116

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Uhh... Want to do a no-invis duel while we wait? :P
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 984 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Mon 1 Aug 2016
at 15:42
  • msg #117

Re: OOC Discussion 7

 If no one else is available, I'll fight you. You can name a few conditions to balance the odds (your choice of arena, no flight, ...)
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 33 posts
Human Summoner
Tue 2 Aug 2016
at 06:01
  • msg #118

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Josep Gavinho (msg # 117):

Sure, we can try that.

Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No BP limit / 0 Hero Points
      Referee: ???
Participant 1: Kecil, Human Summoner 8
Participant 2: Josep Gavinho, Human Sorcerer 12
          Map: Small Colloseum
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: No Flight


Can't think of much else that's not ridiculous (no sorcerer spells :P).

Just to 100% clarify something - can we make changes to our characters that were previously decided, e.g. feats?
This message was last edited by the player at 13:49, Tue 02 Aug 2016.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 985 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Tue 2 Aug 2016
at 09:28
  • msg #119

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Kecil (msg # 118):
 You can change everything, including feats, spells known, equipment, abilities, even race.

 I was thinking of Eryn teaming up with you to take on Josep. No flight, no hero point interruption, your choice of arena/terrain/light.
 That all right ?
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 34 posts
Human Summoner
Tue 2 Aug 2016
at 10:10
  • msg #120

Re: OOC Discussion 7

If Erin wants to... I'd be up for a 1v1 or a juggernaut battle, either way.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 986 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Tue 2 Aug 2016
at 13:12
  • msg #121

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Let's give Erin 12h to chime in ; otherwise go ahead and issue the challenge.
Josep is human sorcerer 12.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 35 posts
Human Summoner
Tue 2 Aug 2016
at 13:39
  • msg #122

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I suppose there won't be anyone to ref? :/

Edit: Also, I won't be awake 12 hours from now, but I'll Challenge in... 16-17 hours? If I think of anything I'll edit it in my post above before putting it into the challenge.
This message was last edited by the player at 13:48, Tue 02 Aug 2016.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6110 posts
Game Master
Tue 2 Aug 2016
at 17:23
  • msg #123

Re: OOC Discussion 7

If you guys need more refs, invite people from other games to join in. Just make sure they're aware that they have to read the rules and already know how to play Pathfinder RPG.
Erin Zilryn
Monk Paladin 298 BP, 65 posts
Monk(MoMS)/Paladin(Hosp)
/Champion of Irori
Tue 2 Aug 2016
at 20:12
  • msg #124

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I will Ref. If that is okay.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 36 posts
Human Summoner
Wed 3 Aug 2016
at 04:54
  • msg #125

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Erin Zilryn (msg # 124):

I'd be cool with that.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 987 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Wed 3 Aug 2016
at 06:11
  • msg #126

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Let's do this then...
Make sure you quote my whole message when you accept the challenge.
This message was last edited by the player at 06:14, Wed 03 Aug 2016.
Ario
Kineticist 1,328 BP, 421 posts
Drider Oreo
Thu 4 Aug 2016
at 12:00
  • msg #127

Re: OOC Discussion 7

DUEL (1v1 PvP)
Anyone can challenge anyone else to a duel so long as they are within 3 levels of each other and both agree on a map and terms (any optional rules being used). Challenges are made in the OOC thread and discussed before the match. Once you're ready, use the Challenge Thread and a GM will open a new thread for your duel.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 38 posts
Human Summoner
Thu 4 Aug 2016
at 14:00
  • msg #128

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Ario (msg # 127):

Oh. Welp.

...think you could lower your level one, Josep?
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 989 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Thu 4 Aug 2016
at 14:09
  • msg #129

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I could. We would still need to reissue the challenge.

How about you join forces with Erin and make this a Juggernaut ?

Ario can ref if he's up for it.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 39 posts
Human Summoner
Thu 4 Aug 2016
at 14:41
  • msg #130

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Either works, though if you've got a fast way to delevel, I think I'd prefer to get in a quicker duel.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 990 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Thu 4 Aug 2016
at 15:06
  • msg #131

Re: OOC Discussion 7

However fast it is, it would still be faster to not do it ;)
I can't edit the challenge anyway.

You could even go ahead and issue a new challenge to Erin and Josep...
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 40 posts
Human Summoner
Thu 4 Aug 2016
at 16:18
  • msg #132

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Josep Gavinho (msg # 131):

We'll need both Erin and Ario on board for that, though. Erin, Ario, thoughts?
Ario
Kineticist 1,328 BP, 422 posts
Drider Oreo
Thu 4 Aug 2016
at 16:59
  • msg #133

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm on board for watching murder happen reffing for you guys.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6112 posts
Game Master
Fri 5 Aug 2016
at 06:06
  • msg #134

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Guys, it is specifically against the rules to post a challenge while you're in a match. Your match isn't over until it is closed by the GM and the awards sent.

Even agreeing to referee such a match will cost you BP loss for attempting to open another one while you're already in one.

I'm tired of giving warnings about this.

No more warnings. From now on, it's just BP penalties. No ifs, ands or buts guys. Just don't do it.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 41 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 5 Aug 2016
at 07:30
  • msg #135

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sorry >.< I thought the match was over when the ref calls it.
Erin Zilryn
Monk Paladin 298 BP, 67 posts
Monk(MoMS)/Paladin(Hosp)
/Champion of Irori
Fri 5 Aug 2016
at 09:11
  • msg #136

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Double that.
Checking post times Josep Gavinho Challenge post issued Wed 3 Aug 2016
at 01:14.

Duel #202: Kecil vs. Erin.
Grunyar Fangblood Fri 29 Jul 2016 at 19:13

quote:
WINNER(S)
Kecil (300 BP) used 0 hero points

LOSER(S)
Erin Zilryn (298 BP) used 0 hero points

DETAILS
Duration: 4 rounds.
Players: 2 players.

(4*2*2) + 15 = 31 Total Rewards for Referee.

Loser 298 * 90 = 26,820 / 300 = 89 Total Rewards for Winner. (max reward for referee)

Winner 300 * 30 = 9000 / 298 = 30 Total Rewards for Loser. (min reward for referee)


sorry about that guys life decided to get crazy



Did I miss something in the rules...on when I match is declared over?
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 991 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Fri 5 Aug 2016
at 13:21
  • msg #137

Re: OOC Discussion 7

GM Arkrim:
Your match isn't over until it is closed by the GM.

Enough said.

I understand where you guys come from, but let's not argue.

Kecil or Erin, once could you issue the new challenge?
It can still be a juggernaut.

I'm fine with the conditions we discussed earlier, and leave the choice of arena/light etc to you guys.
 Ario, you still ref?
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 543 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Fri 5 Aug 2016
at 15:15
  • msg #138

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Kecil (msg # 135):

In reply to Erin Zilryn (msg # 136):

Match isn't actually over until a GM gives you your BP reward.


In other news, Josep seems to have stolen one of my competitors over the long weekend, and Latro hasn't been on in over a week, so now I need someone new to fight.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 42 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 5 Aug 2016
at 18:37
  • msg #139

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yeah, it's clear now, I just didn't understand beforehand. No arguments here :P

I suppose I can just challenge now, hopefully Erin's up for it.

Tina, I'll take you on after this one's finished if you'd like.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 993 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Sat 6 Aug 2016
at 17:44
  • msg #140

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 138):
 Sorry about that !
 You should spar with Ario in the meantime, he's a mean motherfucker.
Ruven
Shaman 200 BP, 1 post
Half-Elf Shaman
Sat 6 Aug 2016
at 19:42
  • msg #141

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I have a few questions about my build... I have most of the numbers crunched and the general build made... just, I am not quite sure how shaman familiar actually interacts with other familiar sources. it says they stack in levels for the sake of spirit animal abilities... but then if I look at the spirit animal buffs I dont see any that are really level dependent.

a common example for this is eldritch heritage.... So how would those extra levels effect a shamans spirit animal?

Additionally, does this games DM's require the greater school familiar feat for the school familiar to have the greater school power?
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 544 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Sat 6 Aug 2016
at 20:15
  • msg #142

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Alright, I'm not really familiar with the Shaman, but lemme take a crack at this

Ruven:
I have a few questions about my build... I have most of the numbers crunched and the general build made... just, I am not quite sure how shaman familiar actually interacts with other familiar sources. it says they stack in levels for the sake of spirit animal abilities... but then if I look at the spirit animal buffs I dont see any that are really level dependent.

Well, a spirit animal still has familiar abilities, so the levels would stack for the purposes of the spirit animal's Intelligence score, natural armor bonus etc.

Ruven:
a common example for this is eldritch heritage.... So how would those extra levels effect a shamans spirit animal?

I'd say no, since spirit animal states it stacks with classes that grant familiars, and Eldritch Heritage is a feat, not a class. If you took Eldritch Heritage for a familiar, you'd end up with a spirit animal and a Familiar.

Ruven:
Additionally, does this games DM's require the greater school familiar feat for the school familiar to have the greater school power?

Yes.
Ruven
Shaman 200 BP, 2 posts
Sat 6 Aug 2016
at 23:30
  • [deleted]
  • msg #143

Re: OOC Discussion 7

This message was deleted by the player at 19:32, Wed 10 Aug 2016.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 44 posts
Human Summoner
Sun 7 Aug 2016
at 07:15
  • msg #144

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Erin, I don't think the declarations have to happen during the challenge. "{Name, Race, Class Level, Mythic Tier}" is all that's on the challenge template.

Either way, you're supposed to quote exactly the challenge from the previous poster, so, uh, I think that challenge is voided. Welp. Since that was my challenge, I believe you're the only one who can retry, unless Josep can technically challenge you without being a "repeat".
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 994 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Sun 7 Aug 2016
at 12:30
  • msg #145

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Ruven (msg # 143):
 I think all sources that provide a familiar simply stack. Some of the features even specify that you can't get a second familiar. That is RAI at least.
Ruven
Shaman 200 BP, 3 posts
Mon 8 Aug 2016
at 06:12
  • [deleted]
  • msg #146

Re: OOC Discussion 7

This message was deleted by the player at 19:32, Wed 10 Aug 2016.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 545 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Mon 8 Aug 2016
at 06:57
  • msg #147

Re: OOC Discussion 7

The easy answer would be "don't take eldritch heritage for a familiar if you already have a familiar", imo

Like, nothing will probably break if you let Eldritch Heritage stack with other familiars, the biggest issue would probably be with Spell Resistance, but that probably won't actually be an issue unless you're one of those weirdos that tries to make your familiar actually fight.



Kecil:
Erin, I don't think the declarations have to happen during the challenge. "{Name, Race, Class Level, Mythic Tier}" is all that's on the challenge template.

You missed something
Arena Competition Rules - Declarations:
You declare your character's race, class(es), mythic tier, level, total BP used and equipment

(emphasis mine)



Hey Ario, I'm calling you out!

 
   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / 0 Hero Points
      Referee: {Name}
Participant 1: Tinny Tina, Wyrwood, Alchemist 11, 1491/1503 BP
Participant 2: Ario, Drider, Kineticist ???
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Small colosseum
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Dungeon
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: No flying, no burrowing, no item declarations required

Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 45 posts
Human Summoner
Mon 8 Aug 2016
at 07:28
  • msg #148

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 147):

Is that part of the challenge, though, or just something you have to declare during initiative? Because I looked through most of the recent fights, and the latter seems to be the case.

Edit: Full block of your quote:

Arena Competition Rules - Declarations:
You declare your character's race, class(es), mythic tier, level, total BP used and equipment (max 20 items regardless of carrying capacity). You don't have to list what magic or alchemy is on your items, just the items ("longsword", "heavy shield", "vial", "scroll"). You PM the details to the referee during your initiative roll, along with your spells, extracts, feats, archetype, and so forth ("+1 flaming longsword", "+2 heavy mithral shield", "potion of healing", "scroll of explosive fists").


Since most people seem to have been declaring full details after the challenge is confirmed and sent through, I assumed that the fact that the later parts of the paragraph refer to the initiative roll meant that this was also where declarations were completed.

Additionally, both types of challenges have been accepted many times, including at one from Tina and more or less everyone else. So, as far as I can tell, either is acceptable.

Any GM ruling?
This message was last edited by the player at 07:46, Mon 08 Aug 2016.
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 351 BP, 70 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 6
Mon 8 Aug 2016
at 07:30
  • msg #149

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I recommend doing it to be on the safe side.

A question does Fast Movement add to all forms of movement you have?
This message was last edited by the player at 07:31, Mon 08 Aug 2016.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 546 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Mon 8 Aug 2016
at 15:44
  • msg #150

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Kecil (msg # 148):

Maybe? I don't even know at this point. We let a lot of things slide that we strictly shouldn't, and Arkrim hasn't yelled at us either way yet, so I guess either is good.

In reply to Erelace Barrityl (msg # 149):

It depends on the wording. The barbarian, bloodrager, and monk fast movement specify land speed, so it only affects your land speed.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 547 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Mon 8 Aug 2016
at 15:45
  • msg #151

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Post 30 000! Woo!
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 351 BP, 71 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 6
Mon 8 Aug 2016
at 21:48
  • msg #152

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hey this is Erin if I altered my char. but the match is still a go. Can I just alter the quote on the last post for the match and accept with new char.?
GM Arkrim
GM, 6114 posts
Game Master
Tue 9 Aug 2016
at 05:13
  • msg #153

Re: OOC Discussion 7

If you were a referee it'd be no problem.

If you're a participant in the match it has to be completely reposted because you changed your character.
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 351 BP, 72 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 6
Tue 9 Aug 2016
at 06:43
  • msg #154

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Can we delete the original challenge and repost then?
GM Arkrim
GM, 6115 posts
Game Master
Wed 10 Aug 2016
at 05:46
  • msg #155

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yes.
Ruven
Shaman 200 BP, 4 posts
Wed 10 Aug 2016
at 06:33
  • [deleted]
  • msg #156

Re: OOC Discussion 7

This message was deleted by the player at 19:32, Wed 10 Aug 2016.
Thraxis
Summoner 1,162 BP, 388 posts
Half-orc Summoner
Wed 10 Aug 2016
at 10:50
  • msg #157

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Using stealth you PM everything related to location to the ref - actions that can't be seen (though not what kind  of actions were taken - that stays public), position, etc.  Then you post the dc to locate, for example: DC 14 + distance, and if they make the free check at the start of their turn (or using another action during their turn) you tell them where you are.

Fog on the map has to be marked, usually with a tilde (~) in each square, and hiding things inside it still takes a stealth check.
Jayce the Tamer
Summoner 785 BP, 269 posts
Human Summoner
Wed 10 Aug 2016
at 11:10
  • msg #158

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Just got back from vacation. I'll be editing my character and ready to fight. :)
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 548 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Wed 10 Aug 2016
at 19:55
  • msg #159

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Ario! Fight me!!

Tinny Tina:

   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / 0 Hero Points
      Referee: {Name}
Participant 1: Tinny Tina, Wyrwood, Alchemist 11, 1491/1503 BP
Participant 2: Ario, Drider, Kineticist ???
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Small colosseum
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Dungeon
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: No flying, no burrowing, no item declarations required

Ruven
Shaman 200 BP, 5 posts
Half-Elf Shaman
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 03:19
  • msg #160

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 159):

am I allowed to referee before I have an approved char? cause I wouldn't mind refereeing.
Ario
Kineticist 1,328 BP, 423 posts
Drider Oreo
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 03:24
  • msg #161

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Was this an earlier post I missed originally?  (If so, sorry!)  I'd be happy to fight you with the 2 changes included below:

Tinny Tina:

   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / 0 Hero Points
      Referee: {Name}
Participant 1: Tinny Tina, Wyrwood, Alchemist 11, 1491/1503 BP
Participant 2: Ario, Drider, Kineticist 11, 1406/1427 BP
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Small colosseum
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Dungeon
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 0 rounds
       Extras: No flying, no burrowing, no invisibility, no item declarations required

GM Arkrim
GM, 6116 posts
Game Master
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 04:01
  • msg #162

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Ruven (msg # 160):

No, I'd prefer people have some practice under their belts before trying to call shots. Even if you already know the game well, we want you to get a feel for what things are like here in this arena first.

Battle in a couple of duels first.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 549 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 13:15
  • msg #163

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Ario (msg # 161):

How about 1d2-1 prep rounds?
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 996 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 18:16
  • msg #164

Re: OOC Discussion 7

 No burrowing?! Who burrows?

 I like the 1d2-1 prep round idea. I think that should come as standard.
 An other way of saying "flip a coin; heads you have a prep round, tails you don't"
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 550 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 18:17
  • msg #165

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Ario burrows.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 997 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 18:20
  • msg #166

Re: OOC Discussion 7

That guy...

@Kecil, @Erelace, you guys need to stop editing posts. Especially in the challenge thread.
I know there probably is a good reason for you to do it, like typos ans autocorrect, but it is a big fat no no in any situation.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 551 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 18:21
  • msg #167

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Technically, I could burrow if I had a reason to.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 998 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 18:48
  • msg #168

Re: OOC Discussion 7

To show off? I guess we all could, I was surprised anyone would though.
Although now that I think about it, it could be potent...
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 999 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 18:50
  • msg #169

Re: OOC Discussion 7

 After my fight, I'm tempted to throw the Champion Belt in a Battle Royale.
 Any takers? I owe Hiro a spot in that fight, but that leaves two spots open... Tina? Latro? Ario?
Ario
Kineticist 1,328 BP, 424 posts
Drider Oreo
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 19:29
  • msg #170

Re: OOC Discussion 7

@Josep - I'd be up for taking it after I take Tina.

@Tina - You'll have to offer me something nice for the chance at a prep round - you (even without chompers) would get way more out of a prep round than I would, and you're already higher BP and disabled my burrowing.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 552 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 20:46
  • msg #171

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Very well.

Anyone want to ref?
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 351 BP, 74 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 6
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 21:13
  • msg #172

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Did we lose our Ref? Ario?
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 1000 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 22:32
  • msg #173

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 171):
 I can ref you guys
Ario
Kineticist 1,328 BP, 425 posts
Drider Oreo
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 22:58
  • msg #174

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm still available to ref, but I'm not going to put my name anywhere near that challenge - Erelace deviated from format and 2/3 of you edited your posts.  You should all delete your posts and have Josep post the challenge (as he's the last one in your group not to have an aborted challenge) and then quote his challenge and reply to it correctly, and without edits.  Hopefully Josep's words to you guys about edits and you deleting for one last try will let us all get this launched without a penalty.
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 351 BP, 75 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 6
Thu 11 Aug 2016
at 23:04
  • msg #175

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Can we please figure out what we are doing where I can just fight please? I honestly do not care what the challenge is anymore or what is going on I just want at fight please.
This message was last edited by the player at 04:11, Fri 12 Aug 2016.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 1001 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Fri 12 Aug 2016
at 08:55
  • msg #176

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Erelace Barrityl (msg # 175):
 Sadly I think Ario is right.
 I've posted an illegal challenge as well (though I can't remember what the problem was, something with Erin changing character I think ?)

 I understand your frustration guys, I was like that too when I first joined.
 We need to be very thorough though when doing this, it would be too easy to just edit your posts when things don't work out the way you wanted them to.

 If one one of the newer players wants to join in this fight, they could post the challenge. Just follow the instructions in the thread, to the letter.

 It would make for a more interesting juggernaut if it's a 3v1 anyways.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 47 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 12 Aug 2016
at 11:09
  • msg #177

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I edited because the rules are to "NEVER edit your challenge or acceptance posts after someone else has responded", emphasis mine. I'm feeling really tangled up in the rules here, because I can't really tell what "the letter" of "following rules to the letter" is.
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 351 BP, 76 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 6
Fri 12 Aug 2016
at 12:49
  • msg #178

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Okay I will delete my challenge post and we will try this again.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 1002 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Fri 12 Aug 2016
at 16:49
  • msg #179

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Erelace Barrityl:
Okay I will delete my challenge post and we will try this again.

 Sounds good !
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 553 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Fri 19 Aug 2016
at 15:28
  • msg #180

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Josep Gavinho (msg # 169):

You know, I'd love to, but I can't. Championship matches are veteran-only, and even after my match with Ario I'm one fight short of the 10 needed.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 1005 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA
Fri 19 Aug 2016
at 20:01
  • msg #181

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 180):
 Well if you wrap it fast enough, maybe you can squeeze an other fight before that ;)
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 555 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Sun 21 Aug 2016
at 22:52
  • msg #182

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well I can't wrap it up fast if it doesn't start!
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,476 BP, 556 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Mon 22 Aug 2016
at 15:02
  • msg #183

Re: OOC Discussion 7

dammit josep you're holding up my match!!
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,467 BP, 1013 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA - 1,494 BP
Mon 22 Aug 2016
at 17:28
  • msg #184

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 183):
 Aargh sorry dude I had forgotten I was meant to ref that.
 And here I was, wondering what Arkrim was waiting for...
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,531 BP, 575 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Tue 30 Aug 2016
at 19:25
  • msg #185

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Someone! Fight me!
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,522 BP, 1043 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA - 1,494 BP
Wed 31 Aug 2016
at 07:13
  • msg #186

Re: OOC Discussion 7

 Are you going to bring catapults to the fight?!
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,531 BP, 576 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Wed 31 Aug 2016
at 13:33
  • msg #187

Re: OOC Discussion 7

You already ruled against that!!
GM Arkrim
GM, 6122 posts
Game Master
Thu 1 Sep 2016
at 04:01
  • msg #188

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep Gavinho:
The more I play, the more I think the Arena would benefit in terms of competitiveness and sportsmanship if we had fewer options and less need to refer to a dozen obscure books for a ruling.

You guys want to put "books" as a new option for Challenges? We only use Corebook + Arena threads + Book x and Book y" so the ref knows exactly where to look? I mean, it's all online anyhoo, I didn't think that part was difficult.

Also...

quote:
RULES EXPLANATION
Only the rules in the Pathfinder RPG Core Rule Book, official Paizo-published PFRPG errata, and GM-posted rules listed here in this forum will be allowed. NO OTHER RULES OR VARIANTS ARE ALLOWED. However, you CAN use any base class, item, spell, feat or race with a listed RP cost from any official Paizo-published Pathfinder RPG source. Be wary, though. If any of these things require variant rules in order to function, they will not be allowed. Adding something to your sheet that is not allowed could get you disqualified and possibly even banned. Consult fellow gladiators (NOT THE GM) before adding something you're unsure of.

This has always been the INTENT of the arena, but I added a full explanation of it when I updated the rules into a consolidated thread.
This message was last edited by the GM at 04:41, Thu 01 Sept 2016.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6124 posts
Game Master
Sun 18 Sep 2016
at 04:02
  • msg #189

Re: OOC Discussion 7

A new challenger has entered the arena! Everyone please welcome Cronwier!
Cronwier
Spiritualist 335 BP, 1 post
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Sun 18 Sep 2016
at 04:53
  • msg #190

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yes, hello all...
Please go easy, it has been a while since I built a character entirely for combat.
Looking forward to many a pleasant match xD.
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,408 BP, 626 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Sun 18 Sep 2016
at 12:14
  • msg #191

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Welcome Cronwier
Cronwier
Spiritualist 335 BP, 2 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Sat 24 Sep 2016
at 11:22
  • msg #192

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So who wants to be my first opponent?
It is probably an easy win, I don't really know how this build will go so....
Bruhli
Barbarian 819 BP, 305 posts
Suli Barbarian
Sun 25 Sep 2016
at 00:16
  • msg #193

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Welcome Cronwier!

Yeah, the other people your level are locked in epic combat with J. Gavinho.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 335 BP, 3 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Sun 25 Sep 2016
at 01:52
  • msg #194

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yeah I see he still holds the champions belt and the most damage in a round record...
GM Arkrim
GM, 6125 posts
Game Master
Sun 25 Sep 2016
at 07:53
  • msg #195

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Don't forget guys, you can always LOWER your BP for a match to pick on the new---erhm, I mean, fairly compete with other gladiators despite having different BP levels.
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,408 BP, 627 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Sun 25 Sep 2016
at 14:34
  • msg #196

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm reworking a little for a match with Tina just been very busy lately so is taking a while :)
Bruhli
Barbarian 819 BP, 306 posts
Suli Barbarian
Wed 28 Sep 2016
at 01:03
  • msg #197

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In that case Cronwier, Outside to Outsider, wanna have a match?

I wouldn't mind reducing my BP to 450. It might take me awhile to build my character to that level.

What say you?
Cronwier
Spiritualist 335 BP, 4 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Wed 28 Sep 2016
at 05:56
  • msg #198

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sure, I need to mess with my character to use up my remaining BP anyway so I'm happy to wait a little, I'll probably get wrecked given that you'd have a 115bp advantage on me but I'm willing to get slapped around by a suli barbarian. Do you have any special requests?
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 91 posts
Human Summoner
Thu 29 Sep 2016
at 05:36
  • msg #199

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well, I just jumped to level 10, once the BP is confirmed and the match officially closed. I thought my life would continue to be stressful and busy, but it looks okay for awhile (Oct 6-8th is going to be rough but should be fine other than that). Anyone want to start thinking about a fight?

(Also, welcome Cronwier, good luck and have fun!)
This message was last edited by the player at 05:38, Thu 29 Sept 2016.
Bruhli
Barbarian 819 BP, 307 posts
Suli Barbarian
Fri 30 Sep 2016
at 04:47
  • msg #200

Re: OOC Discussion 7

How about this?

Cronwier foolishly challenges Bruhli to a duel.

Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: 450 BP/ Hero Points
      Referee: ??????????
Participant 1: Cronwier, ????????
Participant 2: Bruhli, ????????
          Map: Random
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep:
       Extras: No flying, no invisibility or invisibility like effects, no burrowing, no climbing


We'll say no hero points because you likely don't have any.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 335 BP, 5 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Fri 30 Sep 2016
at 05:00
  • msg #201

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'll need 1 prep round as it is a full round action to summon my weapons. But otherwise sure, anyone want to ref for us?

Edit to clarify:

Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: 450 BP/ 0 Hero Points
      Referee: ??????????
Participant 1: Cronwier, Aasimar, Spiritualist(Ectoplasmatist) 6/Monk(Martial Artist) 1, 322/335 BP
Participant 2: Bruhli, ????????
          Map: Random
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: No flying, no invisibility or invisibility like effects, no burrowing, no climbing
This message was last edited by the player at 05:38, Fri 30 Sept 2016.
Kecil
Summoner 300 BP, 92 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 30 Sep 2016
at 23:32
  • msg #202

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Oh boy. I believe there aren't any restrictions on refereeing that prevent me from doing so, maybe it's time for me to try it? At the very least, it'll increase my appreciation for the work that goes in...

Sure, if it works, I'll ref.
Bruhli
Barbarian 819, 308 posts
Suli Barbarian
Sun 2 Oct 2016
at 20:04
  • msg #203

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Thanks Kecil. Also, I reduced the BP limit to 400. So we should be very close. I'm ready to go when you are

Bruhli challenges Cronwier.


   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: 400 BP / 0 Hero Points
      Referee: Kecil
Participant 1: Cronwier, Aasimar, Spiritualist(Ectoplasmatist) 6/Monk(Martial Artist) 1, 322/335 BP
Participant 2: Bruhli, Suli, Warpriest 6/Barbarian 2, 400/819
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Random
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 prep round
       Extras: No flying, no invisibility or invisibility like effects, no burrowing, no climbing

OOC: Friendly smack-talk and sportsmanship.
This message was last edited by the player at 20:08, Sun 02 Oct 2016.
Ugrim
Barbarian 1,249, 515 posts
Advanced Orc Barbarian
Shadow's Caress
Tue 4 Oct 2016
at 11:21
  • msg #204

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Dang you guys, I'm gone for two and a half months and one of my battles is still on the front page? Step it up!
GM Arkrim
GM, 6130 posts
Game Master
Wed 5 Oct 2016
at 14:07
  • msg #205

Re: OOC Discussion 7

BTW, please continue to use the original BP table until everything is finalized.

Also, be aware, that this means we still don't truly advance beyond 20th level. We're just using mythic ranks to simulate level 21-30. Although, people can get them earlier by RAW in order to use them here it must be agreed upon beforehand.
This message was last edited by the GM at 14:08, Wed 05 Oct 2016.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6134 posts
Game Master
Sun 9 Oct 2016
at 22:13
  • msg #206

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Everyone voting "yes" in the poll please select option 1 or option 2.
This message was last edited by the GM at 22:13, Sun 09 Oct 2016.
Kecil
Summoner 562, 100 posts
Human Summoner
Tue 11 Oct 2016
at 22:52
  • msg #207

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Dang, I should've stalled the game with Josep for awhile, could've gotten a huge payout XD

Edit: Speaking of which: Anyone know the procedure for lowered BP cap? I've seen a few where people simply didn't use all of the BP, which makes it seem like I should just use each player's max BP, but it feels kind of bad giving someone less BP because they offered to drop down to fight someone.
This message was last edited by the player at 02:35, Wed 12 Oct 2016.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6135 posts
Game Master
Wed 12 Oct 2016
at 03:27
  • msg #208

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I will retroactively update everyone's last battle (whenever it was) to the new rewards system once it goes into effect. Still waiting on a few stragglers. I may just have to ignore their vote if they don't choose an option.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 335, 20 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Wed 12 Oct 2016
at 14:35
  • msg #209

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well that went better than I thought it would....
Bruhli
Barbarian 819, 321 posts
Suli Barbarian
Thu 13 Oct 2016
at 04:12
  • msg #210

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Cronwier (msg # 209):

Yeah, 26 AC is nothing to sneeze at. Well done, I look forward to seeing your other matches.

One thing I've realized, people have crazy builds here. One of my favorite aspects is just to see what people come up with.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 335, 21 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Thu 13 Oct 2016
at 04:42
  • msg #211

Re: OOC Discussion 7

That was with me being two feats down.... As I thought racial sla's would allow me to use arcane strike....
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 543, 97 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 6
Thu 13 Oct 2016
at 19:02
  • msg #212

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Okay. I have been gone for a bit. I finally getting up and active again. I do have two questions.

One, I having a little trouble with Natural weapon rules in pathfinder. My Main problem is that I have 2x claws that count as primary weapon. Now what I don't understand is if I have a BAB that Allows me to have 3 Attacks a round can the all three be claw attacks or not? I do understand that I lose the benefit of them being primary on the 3rd attack. But it seems like the rules say I can't use them at all.


Two, I have Chthonic Steel Marked on my sheet for my armor. I pulls this off of the http://www.d20pfsrd.com/equipm...al/special-materials. Now the GM Arkrim has not pulled it from my sheet. But in my last match it was ruled as  Chthonic steel is not a legal arena material. I will happily remove from my sheet I don't feel like getting disqualified and possibly even banned for it. It does come from this book https://www.opengamingstore.co...and-power-components which does carry the pathfinder logo from Rites Publishing. I do not mean to cheat or break any rules just wish for father clarification is all.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,531, 579 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Thu 13 Oct 2016
at 19:19
  • msg #213

Re: OOC Discussion 7

1) Additional attacks from high base attack bonus only apply to manufactured weapons and unarmed strikes (with one exception). You can only make one attack with each natural weapon. If you make a full attack and use natural weapons, you have two options:
  1. You only use your natural weapons. Any natural weapons that are primary use your your full base attack bonus and add your full strength modifier to damage. Any natural weapons that are secondary use your base attack bonus -5 and only add half your strength to damage
  2. You make attacks with both manufactured weapons and natural weapons. Your manufactured weapons use your base attack bonus, including any extra attacks from having a high base attack bonus. All natural weapons are treated as secondary weapons, so they all use your BAB -5 to hit, and only add half your strength to damage

The only exception to this is the feat Feral Combat Training, which lets you use one natural weapon with the monk's flurry of blows (and ONLY flurry of blows, if you use any other full-attack equivalent, your chosen natural weapon uses the normal natural weapon rules above).


2) link to a message in this game
DA RULEZ:
However, you CAN use any base class, item, spell, feat or race with a listed RP cost from any official Paizo-published Pathfinder RPG source

Emphasis mine
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 543, 98 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 6
Thu 13 Oct 2016
at 19:23
  • msg #214

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well in that case I will pull it from my sheet. I am sorry for the confusion on my part.
Kecil
Summoner 562, 102 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 14 Oct 2016
at 01:22
  • msg #215

Re: OOC Discussion 7

GM Arkrim:
I will retroactively update everyone's last battle (whenever it was) to the new rewards system once it goes into effect.


Awesome, thanks!

Cronwier:
That was with me being two feats down.... As I thought racial sla's would allow me to use arcane strike....


Yeah, I'm not sure it would have made the difference, but being two feats down is rough. Would've been closer, though.
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 543, 99 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 8
Fri 14 Oct 2016
at 04:36
  • msg #216

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Match Type: SURVIVAL MISSION
BP/Hero Limit: No limit/No limit
      Referee: ??????????
Participant 1: Erelace Barrityl Bloodrager 8 493/543 BP
          Map: Random
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: None

Looking for anyone wishing to join or not. Would not mind someone with some range in case of flyers. I do not want any time between waves if that is possible without adding a Hero point cost. Need a Referee.
Hiro
Monk 2,038, 1175 posts
Dwarf Monk
SotVD
Fri 14 Oct 2016
at 23:15
  • msg #217

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hi All!

Guess what? I'm still alive!
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 543, 100 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 8
Sat 15 Oct 2016
at 02:22
  • msg #218

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So anyone alive want to ref or join me?
Maelstrom
Monk 1,056, 365 posts
Human Monk
SotVD
Sat 15 Oct 2016
at 02:24
  • msg #219

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Maelstrom rocks back in forth in his armchair. So Erelace, you want to do a survival mission. I did one of those when I was your age.

Good luck
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 543, 101 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 8
Sat 15 Oct 2016
at 02:51
  • msg #220

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Not worried I am on a time limit so I want to test the speed at which I can kill targets. My only concern is fliers and burrows. Beyond that I have a 23 round limit till I burned out and I am all but useless. This will be a test of the limits of my character atm. Plus a good bump to my BP.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 335, 22 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Sat 15 Oct 2016
at 04:43
  • msg #221

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I would join in if I had a hero point to buy in, though I'm limited by spells per day so it would mainly just be me taking aoos at people.
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 543, 102 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 8
Sat 15 Oct 2016
at 04:49
  • msg #222

Re: OOC Discussion 7

If it is allowed I be nice an pay your buy in. Not really worried about you AOO I have a decent SR.
This message was last edited by the player at 04:50, Sat 15 Oct 2016.
Kecil
Summoner 562, 103 posts
Human Summoner
Sat 15 Oct 2016
at 07:05
  • msg #223

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'd be up for a survival mission if there was time between waves to heal and such (if buffs and/or summoning are allowed in that time, even better).
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 543, 103 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 8
Sat 15 Oct 2016
at 07:20
  • msg #224

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I could be fine if you got spells to pull me out of fatigue quick enough Kecil.
Kecil
Summoner 562, 104 posts
Human Summoner
Sat 15 Oct 2016
at 08:08
  • msg #225

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Erelace Barrityl (msg # 224):

I don't have any in my spell list, but I can get points in UMD and pick up a wand or some scrolls of Lesser Restoration.

Edit: Actually, without time between combats, would my summons persist into the next fight? If so, it's probably better for me if there's no break, too.
This message was last edited by the player at 08:38, Sat 15 Oct 2016.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6138 posts
Game Master
Sat 15 Oct 2016
at 19:38
  • msg #226

Re: OOC Discussion 7

NEW BP SYSTEM IMPLEMENTED 10/15/2016

The rewards have more than tripled. I highly encourage everyone to start taking advantage of the new rewards!
This message was last edited by the GM at 19:38, Sat 15 Oct 2016.
Maelstrom
Monk 1,056, 366 posts
Human Monk
SotVD
Sun 16 Oct 2016
at 18:09
  • msg #227

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hiro:
Hi All!

Guess what? I'm still alive!


Lol, welcome back Hiro! Does this mean the guild is no longer mine? Maybe you can so these youngin's how survival missions are supposed to happen.

Erelace, I see what you did there. Funny

Because the GM determines the monster waves, does this mean survival missions run by the GM? If so, we'd have to see if the GM has the time
GM Arkrim
GM, 6140 posts
Game Master
Tue 18 Oct 2016
at 01:02
  • msg #228

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Maelstrom (msg # 227):

A referee can run a survival match or monster hunt.

And welcome back Hiro! Any chance you'll try to claim that championship belt again? Or perhaps train a pupil to do so for you?
Haran Madar
Sorcerer 721, 246 posts
Human Sorcerer
Tue 18 Oct 2016
at 02:23
  • msg #229

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'll have to see how work is going to go, but I might join y'all in this survival mission.
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 543, 104 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 8
Wed 19 Oct 2016
at 14:33
  • msg #230

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sounds good.

Anyone else getting this error in pm
quote:
Error! Partial database read detected! (966 records read)
I have not been able to send a private message for two days.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 454, 23 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Wed 19 Oct 2016
at 15:00
  • msg #231

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I too am receiving that error.
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 543, 105 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 8
Wed 19 Oct 2016
at 16:25
  • msg #232

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I sent out an rMail to the mods. I will let someone know as soon as I know something.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 454, 24 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Thu 20 Oct 2016
at 14:10
  • msg #233

Re: OOC Discussion 7

It is just for this game. I'm assuming a pm limit was hit.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6142 posts
Game Master
Fri 21 Oct 2016
at 01:20
  • msg #234

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I tried deleting some PMs. That didn't seem to work. I'm getting the error too.
Erelace Barrityl
Bloodrager 543, 106 posts
Primalist Bloodrager 8
Fri 21 Oct 2016
at 04:19
  • msg #235

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I heard back from the modrator its a site problem its been passed up to a Adim.
Kecil
Summoner 681, 105 posts
Human Summoner
Sun 23 Oct 2016
at 06:16
  • msg #236

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Welp, since this seems to have come to a halt, I suppose I'll ask: Anyone want to fight me in a standard 1v1 duel? Simple, easy, shouldn't require PMs.

That is, if I can. The BP changes and lack of final GM post on my last match make me think i might have to wait for an update on that front. GM, verdict? And if I can begin a new duel, and do so, would I lose the increase BP from my last match?
Thraxis
Summoner 1,162, 389 posts
Half-orc Summoner
Sun 23 Oct 2016
at 13:14
  • msg #237

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Don't need a final gm post - look to see if it's been locked and if your bp has been added to your sheet.
Kecil
Summoner 681, 106 posts
Human Summoner
Sun 23 Oct 2016
at 22:32
  • msg #238

Re: OOC Discussion 7

The thread's locked, and BP has been added, but apparently we're getting the new BP for our last fight (and in this case, that BP would get me one, maybe two levels)?

I suppose I can probably fight at my current BP, but would that make my "last fight" the new one, and deprive me of the increased payout from the previous? My instinct says no, in which case I can just fight someone at my current 681 BP. If that's the case, anyone at 10th-14th level want to fight me?
Cronwier
Spiritualist 454, 25 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Wed 26 Oct 2016
at 05:26
  • msg #239

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I like Kecil's idea. Anyone with less than 600 BP willing to duel me before we get into a survival match?
Kecil
Summoner 681, 107 posts
Human Summoner
Wed 26 Oct 2016
at 05:40
  • msg #240

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Cronwier (msg # 239):

I could duel you at 450?
Cronwier
Spiritualist 454, 26 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Wed 26 Oct 2016
at 06:23
  • msg #241

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Okay, I'm seriously scared of summoners but lets do it. Other than at least 1 prep round I don't have any special requests. Though I'll need to quickly change my sheet as I have a different build for dueling than I do for the survival match.
Kecil
Summoner 681, 108 posts
Human Summoner
Wed 26 Oct 2016
at 08:33
  • msg #242

Re: OOC Discussion 7

How's this look?

Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: 454 BP limit / 0 Hero Points
      Referee: ???
Participant 1: Kecil, Human Summoner 8
Participant 2: Cronwier, (info)
          Map: Small Colloseum
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: None

Also, any refs?
Cronwier
Spiritualist 454, 27 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Fri 28 Oct 2016
at 00:38
  • msg #243

Re: OOC Discussion 7


Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: 454 BP limit / 0 Hero Points
      Referee: ???
Participant 1: Kecil, Human Summoner 8
Participant 2: Cronwier, Aasimar Spiritualist 7, Monk 1
          Map: Small Colloseum
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: None

And done with editing the sheet.
This message was last edited by the player at 00:38, Fri 28 Oct 2016.
Kecil
Summoner 681, 109 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 28 Oct 2016
at 02:37
  • msg #244

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Okay, now all we need is a referee. Any takers?
Thraxis
Summoner 1,162, 390 posts
Half-orc Summoner
Fri 28 Oct 2016
at 17:17
  • msg #245

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'll ref for you guys.
Hiro
Monk 2,038, 1176 posts
Dwarf Monk
SotVD
Fri 28 Oct 2016
at 21:31
  • msg #246

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'd be up for some kind of match... 2v1 juggernaut? 1v1 melee combat? Survival?
Cronwier
Spiritualist 454, 28 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Sun 30 Oct 2016
at 09:08
  • msg #247

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So we fine with this?
Cronwier:
Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: 454 BP limit / 0 Hero Points
      Referee: Thraxis
Participant 1: Kecil, Human Summoner 8
Participant 2: Cronwier, Aasimar Spiritualist 7, Monk 1
          Map: Small Colloseum
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: None

Kecil
Summoner 681, 110 posts
Human Summoner
Sun 30 Oct 2016
at 10:14
  • msg #248

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Cronwier (msg # 247):

Yep. I'll challenge now.
Jayce the Tamer
Summoner 785, 271 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 4 Nov 2016
at 06:09
  • msg #249

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I do apologize for my absence. Work was my opportune time to play. Due to policy changes, because some people stopped getting their work done, we no longer have free reign on the PC while working. But we are starting to get it back a few hours a day. literally 2 hours. So I might start being active once more. Sorry for the silence.

Instant gratification and power up! YAY.

I'll also reread the rules thread and see what I need to do. Changes are faster and faster it in here.

----

Anyone up for a match?
This message was last edited by the player at 07:47, Sun 06 Nov 2016.
Dharam Nire
Monk 200, 1 post
Catfolk Monk
Mon 7 Nov 2016
at 22:30
  • msg #250

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Are the Unchained classes allowed? I'm unsure of whether they count as base classes or not.
Jayce the Tamer
Summoner 785, 272 posts
Human Summoner
Wed 9 Nov 2016
at 04:48
  • msg #251

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Dharam Nire (msg # 250):

A few people have used them. I imagine that would be a yes unless anything has changed. I would look over a few of that past polls and rules thread. Anything Paizo is explicitly legal unless they are explicitly banned. The banned material is listed. Double check it.

Ugrim/Latro are you available for a Match? Kinda dead at the moment. If you need time between posts, we can set a 4 day rule or something. That, or I may have to bug wait for Ario to finish and see if he will run a monster match for me or something.

-----

Edit Note:

GM Arkrim, with the slow down happening, would you run something if I can't get a response within a week or something?
This message was last edited by the player at 09:23, Sun 13 Nov 2016.
Dharam Nire
Monk 200, 2 posts
Catfolk Monk
Mon 14 Nov 2016
at 19:40
  • msg #252

Re: OOC Discussion 7

On advancing in level, do we get our previous level purchase refunded when we level up? for example, if I am 5th level and want to buy 6th level, will it cost me an additional 55 BP (160-105) or an additional 160 BP?
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,531, 580 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Mon 14 Nov 2016
at 19:56
  • msg #253

Re: OOC Discussion 7

The cost next to each level on the table is the total cost. So yes, if you're level 5 and want to advance to level 6, you only have to spend an additional 55 BP to do so.
Dharam Nire
Monk 200, 3 posts
Catfolk Monk
Mon 14 Nov 2016
at 21:24
  • msg #254

Re: OOC Discussion 7

OK thank you, that is a much more elegant way of doing it. Otherwise, I would have saved up instead of buying level 6 now.
Kecil
Summoner 974, 127 posts
Human Summoner
Tue 15 Nov 2016
at 21:35
  • msg #255

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Jayce the Tamer (msg # 251):

Looks like my battle's closed. I'd be up for a duel if the people you mentioned aren't up for it.
Thraxis
Summoner 1,162, 399 posts
Half-orc Summoner
Tue 15 Nov 2016
at 22:30
  • msg #256

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hey Arkrim, it looks like I did not get the 101 BP when you locked duel 206.  (mentioning it here b/c the pm's are still not working for me)
This message was last edited by the player at 22:30, Tue 15 Nov 2016.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6144 posts
Game Master
Wed 16 Nov 2016
at 02:34
  • msg #257

Re: OOC Discussion 7

For future reference, if anything is wrong with the character sheet, guys, please mention it before you edit the sheet. Thanks.

Thraxis, you're updated.
This message was last edited by the GM at 03:47, Wed 16 Nov 2016.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 555, 40 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Wed 16 Nov 2016
at 08:46
  • msg #258

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm free to duel again if anyone is interested.
Jayce the Tamer
Summoner 785, 273 posts
Human Summoner
Thu 17 Nov 2016
at 08:30
  • msg #259

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Kecil (msg # 255):

You're a little more powerful than myself. but I'm okay with that. I need a few to finish my sheet. just little tid bits.

Edit Note:

You are welcomed to start negotiating arena and lighting. etc.
This message was last edited by the player at 10:07, Thu 17 Nov 2016.
Dharam Nire
Monk 200, 4 posts
Catfolk Monk
Thu 17 Nov 2016
at 17:14
  • msg #260

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Cronwier, I'm up to duel if you'd like, I believe. I need to allocate some last BP from char. sheet accuracy (I'm not sure whether I got the full 140 that you mentioned from accurate racial traits, GM, please confirm) and then I'll be ready to go.

As for arena preferences, I'd like something with interesting terrain, and for anything else I don't care much. Low light could be fun.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 555, 41 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Fri 18 Nov 2016
at 05:59
  • msg #261

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Dharam Nire (msg # 260):

Would you like a bp limit? I can do 507 really easy with basically no changes, anything lower and it might take a little while.


Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit:
      Referee: ???
Participant 1: Cronwier, Aasimar Spiritualist ?, Monk 1
Participant 2: Dharam Nire, Catfolk Monk ?
          Map: Cliffhanger Small or Large
     Lighting: Low Light
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: None
Dharam Nire
Monk 200, 5 posts
Catfolk Monk
Fri 18 Nov 2016
at 06:38
  • msg #262

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Don't really care about a limit. I'm probably going to get my ass whupped anywas, I'm just in it for the experience and the BP. No expectations of winning
Kecil
Summoner 974, 128 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 18 Nov 2016
at 07:06
  • msg #263

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Jayce the Tamer (msg # 259):

Is this okay?
Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No BP Limit / 0 Hero Points
      Referee: ???
Participant 1: Kecil
Participant 2: Jayce the Tamer
          Map: Small Colloseum
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: None
       Extras: None
Cronwier
Spiritualist 555, 42 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Fri 18 Nov 2016
at 07:20
  • msg #264

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Do you have any other preferences then or a map other than cliffhanger that you would like?
You might win, I haven't had much luck in my last two matches.

Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No BP Limit/ 0 Hero Points
      Referee: ???
Participant 1: Cronwier, Aasimar Spiritualist 8, Monk 1, 547/555 BP Used
Participant 2: Dharam Nire, Catfolk Monk ?
          Map: Cliffhanger Small or Large
     Lighting: Low Light
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: None
Jayce the Tamer
Summoner 785, 274 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 18 Nov 2016
at 07:33
  • msg #265

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Kecil:
In reply to Jayce the Tamer (msg # 259):

Is this okay?
Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No BP Limit / 0 Hero Points
      Referee: ???
Participant 1: Kecil
Participant 2: Jayce the Tamer
          Map: Small Colloseum
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: None
       Extras: None

Yes I'm fine with it. Tinny Tina, would you be willing to ref?
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,531, 581 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Fri 18 Nov 2016
at 16:13
  • msg #266

Re: OOC Discussion 7

yea sure
Kecil
Summoner 974, 129 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 18 Nov 2016
at 17:55
  • msg #267

Re: OOC Discussion 7

PM because PMs aren't working...
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,531, 582 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Fri 18 Nov 2016
at 18:17
  • msg #268

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Response
Jayce the Tamer
Summoner 785, 275 posts
Human Summoner
Sat 19 Nov 2016
at 10:40
  • msg #269

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Alright, if you are ok, I'll get started or you can get started initiating the challenge.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6145 posts
Game Master
Sat 19 Nov 2016
at 13:51
  • msg #270

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So, since it doesn't look like the Admins are coming anytime soon, I purged all the PMs in hopes that they would start working again...and it seems to have worked for me.

I can send Private Messages here again.

Everyone who needs to send me a PM, please list the subject as:

Access to The Arena [Pathfinder]

(copy/paste the above exactly, please)

This will create a new PM thread with the GM that you will use any time you need to contact me.

Also, feel free to PM your fellow gladiators to test it out. Let me know how its working for everyone.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6146 posts
Game Master
Sun 20 Nov 2016
at 05:11
  • msg #271

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So I got PMs from several of you. All but one of them seemed to run perfectly fine. If you don't see your PM, try sending another one.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6147 posts
Game Master
Sun 20 Nov 2016
at 20:16
  • msg #272

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Dharam, I'm getting your PMs but can't respond to them without getting an error. You're sending them in a different format than everyone else. Try just a regular PM to just me with the subject listed above.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6150 posts
Game Master
Tue 22 Nov 2016
at 02:39
  • msg #273

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Can everyone see the Private Note at the bottom of their character sheets?
Ario
Kineticist 1,585, 480 posts
Drider Oreo
Tue 22 Nov 2016
at 02:41
  • msg #274

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yep, they are visible but uneditable by players.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6151 posts
Game Master
Tue 22 Nov 2016
at 06:04
  • msg #275

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Okay just double checking.
Annie Mossity
Oracle 200, 1 post
Gathlain Oracle
Tue 22 Nov 2016
at 23:59
  • msg #276

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hi, guys. I'm new here! Anyone want to pop my arena cherry and be a bit patient while I learn? I'm just getting approved for the character now.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 555, 45 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Wed 23 Nov 2016
at 02:03
  • msg #277

Re: OOC Discussion 7

'Ello, welcome to the game.

Dharam, perhaps you should fight Annie for your first match instead of me. You two would be on a more even playing field. I could ref it if you wanted. If not I am happy to fight either or both of you...
Dharam Nire
Monk 340, 6 posts
Catfolk Monk
Wed 23 Nov 2016
at 18:47
  • msg #278

Re: OOC Discussion 7

That sounds like a good idea. Annie, I am also brand new! You up for a battle once you're all sorted?
Annie Mossity
Oracle 200, 2 posts
Gathlain Oracle
Wed 23 Nov 2016
at 18:51
  • msg #279

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Love to! I'd request a 1-or-more-rounds of prep time match, but otherwise I leave all the details up to you!
Dharam Nire
Monk 340, 7 posts
Catfolk Monk
Wed 23 Nov 2016
at 19:35
  • msg #280

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No BP Limit/ 0 Hero Points
      Referee: ???
Participant 1: Annie Mossity, Gathlain Oracle ?
Participant 2: Dharam Nire, Catfolk Monk 7
          Map: Cliffhanger Small or Large
     Lighting: Low Light
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: None


Howsabout?
Annie Mossity
Oracle 200, 3 posts
Gathlain Oracle
Wed 23 Nov 2016
at 19:43
  • msg #281

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sounds good, will post when I'm confirmed. I should note for the Cliffhanger map than I am a flying race if you still want to go that route.
This message was last edited by the player at 19:43, Wed 23 Nov 2016.
Dharam Nire
Monk 340, 8 posts
Catfolk Monk
Wed 23 Nov 2016
at 19:53
  • msg #282

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I am aware and buying nets
Cronwier
Spiritualist 555, 46 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Thu 24 Nov 2016
at 04:22
  • msg #283

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'll ref if no one else wants to...

Edit: Dharam that will get declined. It should be something like this:
Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No BP Limit/ 0 Hero Points
      Referee: Cronwier
Participant 1: Annie Mossity, Gathlain Oracle ?
Participant 2: Dharam Nire, Catfolk Monk 7
          Map: Cliffhanger Small or Large
     Lighting: Low Light
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: None
And you'd need to fill in what level Annie is and your BP Spent/Total. Or at least that is my understanding...
Never mind that, Kecil and Jayce's match got accepted without it so don't worry about it, though you should have listed me or someone else as ref... So it still might be declined.
This message was last edited by the player at 13:39, Thu 24 Nov 2016.
Jayce the Tamer
Summoner 785, 287 posts
Human Summoner
Tue 29 Nov 2016
at 17:51
  • msg #284

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well Kecil, one round in and you are giving me a run for my money. I like it. I am going to rules lawyer to death. Do the same.
Kecil
Summoner 974, 141 posts
Human Summoner
Tue 29 Nov 2016
at 23:05
  • msg #285

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Y'see, I'm not here to rules lawyer people to death, I'm here to see how my builds stand up to others'. It's precisely that sort of thing that makes me think this arena is not for me.
Annie Mossity
Oracle 200, 4 posts
Gathlain Oracle
Mon 5 Dec 2016
at 21:18
  • msg #286

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Dharam - I wanted to let you know I'm going to have to cancel the duel request.
This message was last edited by the player at 15:47, Fri 16 Dec 2016.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 555, 47 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Tue 6 Dec 2016
at 10:03
  • msg #287

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So anyone up for a duel?
Kecil
Summoner 974, 154 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 9 Dec 2016
at 06:22
  • msg #288

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I believe this is how I request a most damage in one round record:

link to a message in this game

(page 3)

Hopefully it's valid?
Jayce the Tamer
Summoner 1,009, 299 posts
Human Summoner
Sun 11 Dec 2016
at 09:03
  • msg #289

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Cronwier (msg # 287):

I will be soon. But I'm like, way overpowered for you. so we can duel either with me dropping power or you increasing in power. Or a mixture of both. Such as finding a good in between point.
Annie Mossity
Oracle 275, 5 posts
Gathlain Oracle
Fri 16 Dec 2016
at 19:06
  • msg #290

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Dharam, sorry it took so long - lots of miscommunication. Ready to go if you are.
Groppo
Fighter 330, 1 post
Gnome
Fri 16 Dec 2016
at 19:10
  • msg #291

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'll be ready soon too :)
Groppo
Fighter 330, 2 posts
Gnome
Fri 16 Dec 2016
at 19:34
  • msg #292

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Like, tomorrow. I don't know how many we are with low bp... But if we're three maybe we could do a cool battle together, battle royale or juggernaut fight? :D
Kecil
Summoner 1,215, 155 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 16 Dec 2016
at 23:14
  • msg #293

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'd be up for juggernauting. I'd even be up for lowering my BP to Dominator level (so my BP is lower than any two of the three)
This message was last edited by the player at 23:15, Fri 16 Dec 2016.
Groppo
Fighter 330, 3 posts
Gnome
Sat 17 Dec 2016
at 12:33
  • msg #294

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Or perhaps a Monster Mash, Kecil? :D I need BP and to try out the arena a little bit!
Kecil
Summoner 1,215, 157 posts
Human Summoner
Sat 17 Dec 2016
at 22:35
  • msg #295

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Ehhh, I'd prefer to do normal PvP, sorry.
Groppo
Fighter 330, 5 posts
Gnome
Sun 18 Dec 2016
at 08:58
  • msg #296

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Oh well, I'm up for normal PvPs as well. Juggernaut would be cool!
Kecil
Summoner 1,215, 158 posts
Human Summoner
Mon 19 Dec 2016
at 01:18
  • msg #297

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Anyone else want to fight? Otherwise we've got no juggernauting at all.
Groppo
Fighter 330, 6 posts
Gnome
Fri 23 Dec 2016
at 14:53
  • msg #298

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Excited to try this out! Anyone want to fight? I could probably recalculate my character to fight on a higher level or so, if that's allowed. Or fight in any other way :)
Annie Mossity
Oracle 275, 6 posts
Gathlain Oracle
Fri 23 Dec 2016
at 15:26
  • msg #299

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'd love to, Groppo. We'll have to wait until after the holidays, though - I won't be back 'til the 28th.
Groppo
Fighter 330, 7 posts
Gnome
Fri 23 Dec 2016
at 15:31
  • msg #300

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Cool! I'll wait then :D
Kecil
Summoner 1,215, 160 posts
Human Summoner
Sun 25 Dec 2016
at 06:02
  • msg #301

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Are you up for facing a juggernaut, Annie? I'd be happy to lower my BP to up to the minimum (495 vs you two). Or if we can get another, ideally, I'd put it at just less than the highest two BP totals.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6155 posts
Game Master
Sun 25 Dec 2016
at 07:33
  • msg #302

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Merry Christmas, to all, and to all, a Good Night!
Annie Mossity
Oracle 275, 7 posts
Gathlain Oracle
Wed 28 Dec 2016
at 15:30
  • msg #303

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm back! Groppo, let's roll 1v1 and we'll do a juggernaut match after! One round prep, any arena of your choice.
Groppo
Fighter 430, 9 posts
Gnome
Wed 28 Dec 2016
at 15:36
  • msg #304

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sure! I'll look at it tomorrow or day after, off to work now :)
Grace
Magus 300, 1 post
Advanced Aasimar Magus
Wed 28 Dec 2016
at 23:59
  • msg #305

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hi everyone - first-time in an arena game, looking forward to getting my arse handed to me. ^_^

I'd be happy to be the third for the aforementioned juggernaut match if that's still on the table.
Annie Mossity
Oracle 275, 8 posts
Gathlain Oracle
Thu 29 Dec 2016
at 00:56
  • msg #306

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hi, Grace. Love the description.
Grace
Magus 300, 2 posts
Advanced Aasimar Magus
Thu 29 Dec 2016
at 03:48
  • msg #307

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Thanks - glad you liked it!
Cronwier
Spiritualist 655, 50 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Thu 29 Dec 2016
at 14:04
  • msg #308

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I call dibs on having a crack at the aasimar after she has had a match or two.... Cronwier doesn't like his kind for a variety of reasons.
This message was last edited by the player at 14:04, Thu 29 Dec 2016.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6157 posts
Game Master
Thu 29 Dec 2016
at 14:45
  • msg #309

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Nobody responded to Dharam Nire's request. I deleted his challenge.

You guys can set up a new match if someone wants.
Grace
Magus 300, 3 posts
Advanced Aasimar Magus
Fri 30 Dec 2016
at 00:09
  • msg #310

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Cronwier:
I call dibs on having a crack at the aasimar after she has had a match or two.... Cronwier doesn't like his kind for a variety of reasons.


Clearly. I suspect that match will be significantly less friendly than Grace might usually prefer.

I'll wait and see if the Juggernaut's going to happen first. I do admit I'm having fun thinking about other aspects of the gladiatorial arena, and Swordaine's culture in general. For example - given that every PC here is presumably the setting's equivalent of elite sportspeople, there's almost definitely merchandise of us somewhere. What would that look like?
Groppo
Fighter 430, 10 posts
Gnome
Fri 30 Dec 2016
at 15:24
  • msg #311

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Annie Mossity:
I'm back! Groppo, let's roll 1v1 and we'll do a juggernaut match after! One round prep, any arena of your choice.


Ok!
Small Quatravo, low ceiling (25ft), dungeon/underground, standard light.
Groppo
Fighter 430, 11 posts
Gnome
Fri 30 Dec 2016
at 15:27
  • msg #312

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Oh, a question... My race is stated as "gnome" as that's what I sent to the GMs before I got to build my character. Can I still add other racial features (play 'advanced gnome')?
Annie Mossity
Oracle 275, 9 posts
Gathlain Oracle
Fri 30 Dec 2016
at 15:28
  • msg #313

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sounds good. How to we alert a GM to set one up?
Groppo
Fighter 430, 12 posts
Gnome
Fri 30 Dec 2016
at 15:31
  • msg #314

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sorry, still need to look over my character sheet so I'm sure not to have any penalties on me (considering the race thing for example) :) Will be done tomorrow. And it seems I got 100 points from the poll, I'll stick with the 330 I had when we started talking about this though, ok?
Groppo
Fighter 430, 13 posts
Gnome
Fri 30 Dec 2016
at 23:25
  • msg #315

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Done and ready! So we need a ref?
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 624 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 31 Dec 2016
at 04:23
  • msg #316

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Groppo (msg # 312):
As long as nothing has changed just on your next challenge post identify yourself as new race and put it in the extras
Boadicea:
Bruhli:
Bruhli challenges Boadicea

    Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / No Limit Hero Points
           Referee: Ario
  Participant 1: Boadicea, Advanced Human, Barbarian 8 / Brawler 1, 833/850 BP, amulet X 2, Belt, Cloak, Shirt, Pill, Potion X 2
  Participant 2: Bruhli, Suli, Barbarian 3/Warpriest 6, 757/762 bp used, greatsword, shoes, potion, amulet, cloak, shirt, belt
  Participant 3: None
  Participant 4: None
                 Map: Random
          Lighting: Standard
            Terrain: Random
               Walls: Standard
                Prep: 1d2-1
             Extras: No interrupting other player's turns with hero points, Boadicea is now Advanced Human

OOC: May the best Barbarian win. Swapped out items which affected bp amount.


Boadicea accepts your challenge

This message was last edited by the player at 04:23, Sat 31 Dec 2016.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 655, 51 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Sat 31 Dec 2016
at 09:02
  • msg #317

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'll ref if no one else is interested...
Kecil
Summoner 1,315, 161 posts
Human Summoner
Sat 31 Dec 2016
at 12:20
  • msg #318

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm still around for the juggernaut, just letting popping in since it's been awhile. Good luck with your match, and I'll be setting up at 730 BP for Annie, Groppo, and Grace :)

Edit: Wait, shoot. I'll actually be setting up at the total left after the fight, so that'll be higher.
This message was last edited by the player at 12:27, Sat 31 Dec 2016.
Groppo
Fighter 430, 14 posts
Gnome
Sat 31 Dec 2016
at 13:00
  • msg #319

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Cool, looking forward to that Juggernaut, although I'm not looking forward to fighting your zoo... :P
Groppo
Fighter 430, 15 posts
Gnome
Sat 31 Dec 2016
at 13:31
  • msg #320

Re: OOC Discussion 7

How about this? Fill in your details and we'll post it as a challenge :)

Groppo challenges Annie Mossity.


   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: 330 BP / 0 Hero Points
      Referee: Cronwier
Participant 1: Groppo, Advanced Gnome, Fighter 6; 2x gnome hooked hammer, chainmail, composite longbow, arrows, belt, cloak, 3 potions, free gear
Participant 2: {Name, Race, Class Level, Mythic Tier} or {Monster Name CR00}
          Map: Small Quatravo
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Dungeon/Underground
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 prep round
       Extras: Low ceiling (25ft from floor to ceiling). Groppo is now Advanced Gnome.

This message was last edited by the player at 13:35, Sat 31 Dec 2016.
Annie Mossity
Oracle 275, 10 posts
Gathlain Oracle
Sat 31 Dec 2016
at 18:46
  • msg #321

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Challenge accepted. I look forward to running out of spells before you run out of hp.
Annie Mossity, Gathlain, Oracle 4/Arcanist 1; bracers, headband, belt, dagger. component pouch, whittled divine focus
This message was last edited by the player at 18:47, Sat 31 Dec 2016.
Groppo
Fighter 430, 16 posts
Gnome
Sat 31 Dec 2016
at 18:52
  • msg #322

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Haha, I'm more afraid I won't come anywhere near you :) I'll post it to the challenge thread tomorrow when I'm at a computer. First fight of the year!
Cronwier
Spiritualist 655, 52 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Sun 1 Jan 2017
at 02:14
  • msg #323

Re: OOC Discussion 7

okay now you just have to do it properly in the challenge thread.....
Groppo
Fighter 430, 18 posts
Gnome
Sun 1 Jan 2017
at 14:35
  • msg #324

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Haha, thanks Cronwier, I'm just trying to get everything right so I don't get in trouble - there are so many rules! :P
Ruven
Shaman 200, 6 posts
Aasimar-human Shaman
Tue 3 Jan 2017
at 03:38
  • msg #325

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Groppo (msg # 324):
GM Arkrim
GM, 6158 posts
Game Master
Sat 7 Jan 2017
at 17:37
  • msg #326

Re: OOC Discussion 7

What is it with people not responding to challenges lately?

Sorry, Groppo. Annie hasn't responded in over a business week. Challenge cancelled.

Anyone else want to put up a match? Maybe with someone who will participate?
Groppo
Fighter 430, 19 posts
Gnome
Sat 7 Jan 2017
at 17:42
  • msg #327

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Oh well, thanks for taking care of it :) I'm up for discussing other arrangements, people!
Grace
Magus 300, 4 posts
Advanced Aasimar Magus
Sat 7 Jan 2017
at 23:23
  • msg #328

Re: OOC Discussion 7

What about that Juggernaut match that was getting discussed earlier?
Groppo
Fighter 430, 20 posts
Gnome
Sun 8 Jan 2017
at 00:26
  • msg #329

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sure! You, me, and maybe Ruven or someone else? Or just the two of us... vs. Kecil?
Grace
Magus 300, 5 posts
Advanced Aasimar Magus
Sun 8 Jan 2017
at 01:38
  • msg #330

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I don't mind - no matter what, it'll be my first arena battle ever so I'll probably get my arse handed to me. ;-)
Cronwier
Spiritualist 655, 53 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Sun 8 Jan 2017
at 07:34
  • msg #332

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm still waiting in the wings for either a match or to ref, if any of you new guys want a standard match or a 2v1 juggernaut, I am game.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6159 posts
Game Master
Sun 8 Jan 2017
at 19:51
  • msg #333

Re: OOC Discussion 7

My apologies. Apparently, Annie Mossity really had her name sake. She was a really angry player who liked to throw profanities instead of ask for help or read the threads.

Anyway, the challenges thread is now open for you guys. You shouldn't have anything or anyone gumming up the pipeline now.
This message was last edited by the GM at 22:15, Sun 08 Jan 2017.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 625 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Mon 9 Jan 2017
at 03:43
  • msg #334

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I need to shake the dust off these old bones anyone want a duel?  I will move to your BP if lower than mine and always welcome anyone equal or higher to challenge.
Kecil
Summoner 1,315, 162 posts
Human Summoner
Mon 9 Jan 2017
at 05:58
  • msg #335

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm up for a duel, but we were trying to get the juggernaut in first. If you haven't been taken on by then, I'd be happy to fight :)

As for the juggernaut - I'd prefer 3v1. Cronweir, you up to be the third? If so:

Match Type: Juggernaut 3v1
BP/Hero Limit: 1085 BP limit / 0 Hero Points
      Referee: ?
Participant 1: Cronweir
Participant 2: Grace
Participant 3: Groppo
Participant 4: Kecil
           Map: Small Colloseum
     Lighting: Darkness
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras:

How's this look? I'm open to any extras you'd like (e.g. no burrow). Also, if you'd like, I'm up for lowering my BP as low as 900, I just put it at max for dominator for mow.
This message was last edited by the player at 05:59, Mon 09 Jan 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 430, 21 posts
Gnome
Mon 9 Jan 2017
at 06:59
  • msg #336

Re: OOC Discussion 7

No burrow, no flying? :)
Cronwier
Spiritualist 655, 54 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Mon 9 Jan 2017
at 15:16
  • msg #337

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm certainly game, plus the Rp attached to working with grace would be entertaining...

Edit: Also Boadicea if no one takes you up on the duel before this jugg finishes I'd be happy to...
This message was last edited by the player at 15:20, Mon 09 Jan 2017.
Grace
Magus 300, 6 posts
Advanced Aasimar Magus
Mon 9 Jan 2017
at 19:17
  • msg #338

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sounds good to me!
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 626 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 10 Jan 2017
at 14:10
  • msg #339

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sounds good
Groppo
Fighter 430, 22 posts
Gnome
Tue 10 Jan 2017
at 14:40
  • msg #340

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I think you can lower that BP yeah, I've seen what a beast you are in the arena - and I believe you will still outnumber us ;)
Kecil
Summoner 1,315, 163 posts
Human Summoner
Wed 11 Jan 2017
at 07:33
  • msg #341

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sure, how low do you think would be fair?

Also, we still need a judge - anyone up for it?
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,408, 628 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Wed 11 Jan 2017
at 15:13
  • msg #342

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Guess I could quit lurking about in the shadows and do some socializing, I will referee if you like
Groppo
Fighter 430, 23 posts
Gnome
Thu 12 Jan 2017
at 12:26
  • msg #343

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Kecil:
Sure, how low do you think would be fair?


Hm, I dunno, about half the way - 1000BP?
Kecil
Summoner 1,315, 164 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 13 Jan 2017
at 05:25
  • msg #344

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So, last check before I challenge (or anyone can challenge, I guess):

Match Type: Juggernaut 3v1
BP/Hero Limit: 1000 BP limit / 0 Hero Points
      Referee: Grunyar Fangblood
Participant 1: Cronweir, Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Participant 2: Grace, Aasimar Magus
Participant 3: Groppo, Gnome Fighter
Participant 4: Kecil, Human Summoner
           Map: Small Colloseum
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Standard
        Walls: Standard
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: No Flight, No Burrow
This message was last edited by the player at 05:25, Fri 13 Jan 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 430, 24 posts
Gnome
Fri 13 Jan 2017
at 06:08
  • msg #345

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Looks good!
Kecil
Summoner 1,315, 166 posts
Human Summoner
Sun 15 Jan 2017
at 05:54
  • msg #346

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Alright, took a couple day's silence from the other two as confirmation and posted the challenge. GLHF :)
Groppo
Fighter 430, 25 posts
Gnome
Sun 15 Jan 2017
at 11:15
  • msg #347

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Finishing my sheet up, accepting in a moment. What is the terrain when set to "standard"? I could just write standard in my sheet (where it needs to be specified), but not sure if that's legal :)
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,408, 630 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Sun 15 Jan 2017
at 16:23
  • msg #348

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Groppo (msg # 347):

I will ponder this, just as a friendly reminder as some of you are new (even old crusties forget sometimes), please have your character sheets or the required information per Arena Competition Rules Thread in initiative post
Groppo
Fighter 430, 27 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 15 Jan 2017
at 16:44
  • msg #349

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Grunyar Fangblood (msg # 348):

Thanks for the reminder! Sheet private to you, then?
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,408, 631 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Sun 15 Jan 2017
at 16:51
  • msg #350

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Groppo (msg # 349):

Yep
Grace
Magus 300, 8 posts
Advanced Aasimar Magus
Sun 15 Jan 2017
at 19:40
  • msg #351

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Will do once the thread's up.
Groppo
Fighter 430, 29 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 15 Jan 2017
at 22:16
  • msg #352

Re: OOC Discussion 7

New to the arena, even new to the forum, honestly I just feel like I will /@#! up every time I post :P
Grace
Magus 300, 10 posts
Advanced Aasimar Magus
Sun 15 Jan 2017
at 22:20
  • msg #353

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Oh good - I was a little worried I was the only one! I think I posted right.
Groppo
Fighter 430, 30 posts
Advanced Gnome
Tue 17 Jan 2017
at 06:37
  • msg #354

Re: OOC Discussion 7

We're allowed to discussin secret in PM, right? :)
Grace
Magus 300, 12 posts
Advanced Aasimar Magus
Wed 18 Jan 2017
at 01:20
  • msg #355

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hey, am I right in assuming that we have a paying audience watching our fights?
Grace
Magus 300, 13 posts
Advanced Aasimar Magus
Fri 20 Jan 2017
at 04:42
  • msg #356

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sorry about the saving modifier I missed - I guess I haven't fully recovered from night shifts yet. That shouldn't happen again.
This message was last edited by the player at 05:14, Fri 20 Jan 2017.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 655, 58 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Fri 20 Jan 2017
at 07:12
  • msg #357

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Good luck with the rest of the fight lols, I'm very much dead...
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 593 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Mon 23 Jan 2017
at 15:10
  • msg #358

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hey Latro!
It's been six months, are you ready to fight yet?

   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / No Limit Hero Points
      Referee: {Name}
Participant 1: Tinny Tina, Wyrwood, Alchemist 11
Participant 2: Latro Dectus, {Race, Class Level}
          Map: Small King of the Hill
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Dungeon
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: No flying, each edge of the arena connects to the opposite edge, suspend 48 hour rule Monday thru Thursday

Groppo
Fighter 430, 41 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 23 Jan 2017
at 17:04
  • msg #359

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I want to see that one! Are we allowed to bet with BPs?! :D
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 594 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Mon 23 Jan 2017
at 17:13
  • msg #360

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Unfortunately, no transferring BP between characters.

What you could do is gamble match conditions against each other ;)
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 595 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Mon 23 Jan 2017
at 19:35
  • msg #361

Re: OOC Discussion 7

wait a second
when did cronwier join the emo squad?
and since when was his name cronwier and not crownier????
Cronwier
Spiritualist 655, 59 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Fri 27 Jan 2017
at 08:06
  • msg #362

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I've always been Cronwier as for rejoining the Shadow's Caress.... Well some of you might remember me as Thumock the Gnoll Samurai. Who will most likely be returning at some point....

Edit: So are we ready for declarations?
This message was last edited by the player at 08:07, Fri 27 Jan 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 430, 50 posts
Advanced Gnome
Fri 27 Jan 2017
at 09:04
  • msg #363

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I guess we are? Why does one declare used consumables? The BPs spent on them aren't lost anyway, right?
Grace
Magus 300, 16 posts
Advanced Aasimar Magus
Fri 27 Jan 2017
at 09:33
  • msg #364

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I think I'm ready.

I'm not sure about the consumables - the arena rules imply they might be returned to us, but I'm definitely not 100% on that.
Groppo
Fighter 430, 52 posts
Advanced Gnome
Fri 27 Jan 2017
at 09:37
  • msg #365

Re: OOC Discussion 7

No I believe they are returned, but I don't find it in the rules that anyone should declare consumables (and not in the last games either), maybe it's just something from long ago.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 655, 60 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Fri 27 Jan 2017
at 11:48
  • msg #366

Re: OOC Discussion 7

It is from back before the BP system. Back when you had gp and xp to spend....
Groppo
Fighter 430, 53 posts
Advanced Gnome
Fri 27 Jan 2017
at 11:59
  • msg #367

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm glad we got the BP system then, wouldn't have been fun playing a potion carrying fighter back then :)
Groppo
Fighter 430, 54 posts
Advanced Gnome
Fri 27 Jan 2017
at 12:47
  • msg #368

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'll want some more fighting after this! A Battle Royale would be cool! Or just a simple duel :)
About the new Tag Teams, when one gladiator gets killed - does the other (one of the others) enter the arena on the coming round, or what?
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 596 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Fri 27 Jan 2017
at 16:10
  • msg #369

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So is it just me or are the rules for spellcombat missing?
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 627 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 27 Jan 2017
at 16:18
  • msg #370

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Wow so used to them being there did not notice them being gone
Groppo
Fighter 430, 55 posts
Advanced Gnome
Fri 27 Jan 2017
at 16:22
  • msg #371

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hah, who needs spells!
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 597 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Fri 27 Jan 2017
at 16:25
  • msg #372

Re: OOC Discussion 7

You joke, but spellcombat also applied to potions and magic items.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 628 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 27 Jan 2017
at 16:28
  • msg #373

Re: OOC Discussion 7

The rule focussed on prep rounds, the more prep the shorter spells lasted.  It was something like for ever 2 prep rounds spell duration dropped one step minutes per level to rounds per level something like that
This message was last edited by the player at 16:30, Fri 27 Jan 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 430, 56 posts
Advanced Gnome
Fri 27 Jan 2017
at 16:33
  • msg #374

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well then, I joke no more! Where did they go?! :P
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 629 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 27 Jan 2017
at 16:39
  • msg #375

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Due to the spell combat 3 prep was the most I had seen and most battles only had 1 prep guess Arkrim didn't see a need for it any more
Groppo
Fighter 430, 57 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sat 28 Jan 2017
at 08:35
  • msg #376

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Grace, a duel? :D We'll be at nearly exactly the same BP now!
Grace
Magus 300, 18 posts
Advanced Aasimar Magus
Sat 28 Jan 2017
at 09:13
  • msg #377

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Let me spend them first, and get back to you.
Groppo
Fighter 430, 58 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sat 28 Jan 2017
at 09:32
  • msg #378

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hehe, I gotta spend them too :)
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 630 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 28 Jan 2017
at 21:06
  • msg #379

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Anyone up for a duel?
Cronwier
Spiritualist 655, 62 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Sat 28 Jan 2017
at 23:04
  • msg #380

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Me, though I'll probably get thrashed.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 631 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 28 Jan 2017
at 23:45
  • msg #381

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sounds good want me to come down a little or you good withthe diffrence, and do you have any requests
Cronwier
Spiritualist 807, 63 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Sun 29 Jan 2017
at 02:46
  • msg #382

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm fine with the difference. 1 prep round and an interesting map...
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 632 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 29 Jan 2017
at 02:55
  • msg #383

Re: OOC Discussion 7



PLAYER1 challenges PLAYER2.


   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit/ No Hero Points
      Referee: NEED ONE
Participant 1: Boadicea, Advanced Human, Barbarian/Brawler
Participant 2: {Name, Race, Class Level, Mythic Tier} or {Monster Name CR00}
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Random small
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Random
        Walls: Random
         Prep: 1
       Extras: None

OOC: These are the options I like add/change whatever you like, whats your idea of interesting?
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 598 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Sun 29 Jan 2017
at 03:01
  • msg #384

Re: OOC Discussion 7

do guerrilla station but the floor is lava
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 633 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 29 Jan 2017
at 03:28
  • msg #385

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I believe Cronwier has a small advantage with the lava floor, but I like the idea
Cronwier
Spiritualist 807, 64 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Sun 29 Jan 2017
at 04:47
  • msg #386

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Not a huge one, I can't get wings till next level.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 59 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 29 Jan 2017
at 09:53
  • msg #387

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Ooh, Arkrim is quick! And my points are now spent, just need some minor fixing. Up for a duel any time, Grace or anyone else :)
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1123 posts
Human Antipaladin/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Sun 29 Jan 2017
at 19:02
  • msg #388

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So in my absence it appears fresh blood has arrived and old rivals have grown stronger.

Me thinks the time is ripe to return to the arena.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 599 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Sun 29 Jan 2017
at 19:05
  • msg #389

Re: OOC Discussion 7

And you know what would be a great warmup? Fighting me!


   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / No Limit Hero Points
      Referee: {Name}
Participant 1: Tinny Tina, Wyrwood, Alchemist 11
Participant 2: Latro Dectus, {Race, Class Level}
          Map: Small King of the Hill
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Dungeon
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: No flying, each edge of the arena connects to the opposite edge, suspend 48 hour rule Monday thru Thursday

Kecil
Summoner 1,418, 186 posts
Human Summoner
Sun 29 Jan 2017
at 19:53
  • msg #390

Re: OOC Discussion 7

"Warmup?" :P

(also, if anyone else wants to fight, I'm up for it)
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 600 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Sun 29 Jan 2017
at 19:56
  • msg #391

Re: OOC Discussion 7

yeah my bombs will warm him up real good
Groppo
Fighter 662, 60 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 29 Jan 2017
at 19:56
  • msg #392

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Looking up old matches to see who I want to bet for in this upcoming (not yet confirmed), cool duel... Found one that seemed great, the monk-champion-dude vs Latro! It took one round (excluding prep), then Latro died of appendicitis! LOL Only makes me want to see this duel even more though.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 61 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 29 Jan 2017
at 19:58
  • msg #393

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Did you know that Latro "never backs down from a fight."? Oh, this is going to be good!
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 601 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Sun 29 Jan 2017
at 20:02
  • msg #394

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well I would hope so, otherwise I waited six months for nothing.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 807, 65 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Mon 30 Jan 2017
at 00:59
  • msg #395

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So something like this...

Boadicea challenges Cronwier.


   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit/ No Hero Points
      Referee: NEED ONE
Participant 1: Boadicea, Advanced Human, Barbarian/Brawler
Participant 2: Cronwier, Aasimar, Spiritualist/Monk
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Small Guerilla Station
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Random
        Walls: Random
         Prep: 1
       Extras: Floor is lava

Kecil
Summoner 1,418, 187 posts
Human Summoner
Mon 30 Jan 2017
at 01:58
  • msg #396

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I suppose I could ref one of these, if nobody's up for a fight...?
Groppo
Fighter 662, 62 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 30 Jan 2017
at 05:44
  • msg #397

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'll take you on in a few fights, when I got more BP, Kecil :)
Kecil
Summoner 1,418, 188 posts
Human Summoner
Mon 30 Jan 2017
at 06:14
  • msg #398

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Also, random thing I realized (now that I start building my character) - Juggernauting rewards are kinda weird. I get less BP from that than if I fought just one of them? Something to think about, at least, I don't mind that much.

So, I could ref for Cronwier vs Boadicea if you want?
Groppo
Fighter 662, 63 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 30 Jan 2017
at 06:42
  • msg #399

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well, Grunyar did ask us to double check but I noticed just now:
Grunyar:
1385 * 300 = 415500 / 4 = 103875
1) 103875 / 1000 = 103 Total Rewards for Winner 1. (1/2 this is max reward for referee)


He divided our BPs by four, should've been three - right? The average of our BPs.
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,560, 640 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Mon 30 Jan 2017
at 13:45
  • msg #400

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well that sucks I even double checked my math making sure it was right I just over looked the fat finger.  Thats 35 BP for Kecil and 18 BP for me ugh sorry Kecil.


Kecil you want to ref Boadicea/Crownier and I'll do whoever is ready next
Kecil
Summoner 1,418, 189 posts
Human Summoner
Mon 30 Jan 2017
at 17:16
  • msg #401

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Grunyar Fangblood (msg # 400):

Nah, it was my bad too, I didn't notice until it affected me like the self-centered character builder I am :P

Still, I was more thinking about the overall formula - even when it is average of the people I fight, that still is less than if the juggernaut just fought the highest BP opponent 1v1.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 634 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Mon 30 Jan 2017
at 19:10
  • msg #402

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Cronwier (msg # 395):

If you are set on guerilla station I would be ok with the walls made of lava or fire, if its the lava floor your set on I think cliff hanger or maybe anything below ground level in sniper valley a better option
GM Arkrim
GM, 6162 posts
Game Master
Tue 31 Jan 2017
at 03:10
  • msg #403

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I didn't really have time to check the math.

For juggernaut the winner's reward is supposed to be based on the accumulative sum of all those they fought.

So a 800 BP juggernaut vs. three 400 BP gladiators is essentially a 800 BP player vs. 1,200 BP player as far as the juggernaut is concerned.

Same should apply to the gladiators only the reward that would normally go to the 1,200 BP player is split among them according to their own BP.

If the thread isn't clear about that I can redo it.

But for now can you guys come to an agreement on the math and just let me know when you have an update? I'm reopening the thread for you to post it.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 64 posts
Advanced Gnome
Tue 31 Jan 2017
at 05:24
  • msg #404

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Does that mean that Kecil should get three times the amount we intended before? Cool :o And hero point too!
Kecil
Summoner 1,418, 190 posts
Human Summoner
Tue 31 Jan 2017
at 05:28
  • msg #405

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yeah, I definitely thought it was just as if you were fighting the average (the same when me and Erelace fought Josep if I remember correctly). If I'm getting this correctly:

1385 * 300 = 415500
1) 415500 / 1000 = 415 Total Rewards for Winner 1. (1/2 this is max reward for referee)


1000 * 100 = 100000 / 1 = 100000
1) 100000 / 430 = 232 Total Rewards for Loser 1. (1/2 this is min reward for referee)
2) 100000 / 655 = 152 Total Rewards for Loser 2. (1/2 this is min reward for referee)
3) 100000 / 300 = 333 Total Rewards for Loser 3. (1/2 this is min reward for referee)

Kecil recieves     415 BP
Groppo recieves    232 BP
Cronwier recieves  152 BP
Grace recieves     333 BP
Grunyar recieves    161 BP

(Assuming all minimums are minimums, thus the highest minimum is the ref reward).

Also: If minimum is higher than the maximum, what happens?
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,560, 641 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Tue 31 Jan 2017
at 08:11
  • msg #406

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Kecil (msg # 405):

LoserTeamTotal #BP * 300 = LoseX / (# of losers) = LoseXPot
1) LoseXPot / Winner 1 #BP = Total Rewards for Winner 1. (1/2 this is max reward for referee)
2) LoseXPot / Winner 2 #BP = Total Rewards for Winner 2. (1/2 this is max reward for referee)

WinnerTeamTotal #BP * 100 = WinX / (# of winners) = WinXPot
1) WinXPot / Loser 1 #BP = Total Rewards for Loser 1. (1/2 this is min reward for referee)
2) WinXPot / Loser 2 #BP = Total Rewards for Loser 2. (1/2 this is min reward for referee)

This is the formula I used the way its written it is awarding by average of the opposing team, I did fat finger and divide by 4 instead of 3.

I guess could come up with a formula that adds all the bp up and awards it to the team treating each team as a single player then splitting the bp and awarding it to each player based on the  % of the total team bp they brought to the table
Cronwier
Spiritualist 807, 66 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Tue 31 Jan 2017
at 08:21
  • msg #407

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Okay then cliffhanger with lava floors.
Kecil
Summoner 1,418, 191 posts
Human Summoner
Tue 31 Jan 2017
at 18:35
  • msg #408

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Grunyar Fangblood (msg # 406):

Yeah, that's what the formula says, but it seems it's not what the GM intended. The second bit (averaging the BP, then splitting it based on BP contributed) also may or may not be intended, but if it were, you'd take:

Pot/(team's total BP)*(individual BP/team's total BP)

Which is also:

Pot/(team's BP total squared)*(individual's BP).
Groppo
Fighter 662, 65 posts
Advanced Gnome
Tue 31 Jan 2017
at 18:57
  • msg #409

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Alright, new calculations are done correct and in line with the rules-thread. But what that thread says is not the same as what Arkrim says:

GM Arkrim:
For juggernaut the winner's reward is supposed to be based on the accumulative sum of all those they fought


In this case, it's the average and not the sum of all those they fought. So yeah, perhaps it needs to be rewritten.

(also, Kecil, in your bottom line it isn't supposed to be "Pot/(team's total BP squared) * (Individual BP)"; but rather "Pot/Individual BP")
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 602 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Tue 31 Jan 2017
at 18:59
  • msg #410

Re: OOC Discussion 7

The problem is that the winner's reward is getting divided based on the number of losers, not the number of winners (and vice-versa for the losers).
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1124 posts
Human Antipaladin/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Tue 31 Jan 2017
at 19:17
  • msg #411

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 389):

Seems fair, Tina. I'll have to look over all the rules again and adjust my sheet to match but i think we can actually get this going.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 603 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Tue 31 Jan 2017
at 19:28
  • msg #412

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Excellent! So who wants to ref for me and Latro?
Groppo
Fighter 662, 66 posts
Advanced Gnome
Tue 31 Jan 2017
at 19:33
  • msg #413

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Whoo! This gon' be gooood! I think Latro will take it, willing to bet on it! Reward: A duel, 2 prep rounds, where winner of the bet has X BP and loser has 0.85*X BP (where X is a limit we agree on) and loser cannot take a single action for the prep rounds. Any takers?! (ps. if you bet you can't ref the game!)
(ps2. my internet is crapping all over me right now, sorry if I'm quadruple-posting)
GM Arkrim
GM, 6163 posts
Game Master
Wed 1 Feb 2017
at 02:21
  • msg #414

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hmmm, I double checked the calculations listed in the rules thread. They are indeed correct as I specified. I guess you guys are having a little trouble understanding the code. I thought the word "team" would be an obvious give away, but I guess not.

So maybe I can break this down for you guys.

quote:
LoserTeamTotal #BP * 300 = LoseX / (# of losers) = LoseXPot
1) LoseXPot / Winner 1 #BP = Total Rewards for Winner 1. (1/2 this is max reward for referee)
2) LoseXPot / Winner 2 #BP = Total Rewards for Winner 2. (1/2 this is max reward for referee)

WinnerTeamTotal #BP * 100 = WinX / (# of winners) = WinXPot
1) WinXPot / Loser 1 #BP = Total Rewards for Loser 1. (1/2 this is min reward for referee)
2) WinXPot / Loser 2 #BP = Total Rewards for Loser 2. (1/2 this is min reward for referee)


LoserTeamTotal #BP = Total accumulative sum of all BP from losing team.

WinnerTeamTotal #BP = Total accumulative sum of all BP from winning team.

When you divide the rewards by "# of losers" or "# of winners" that's the number of gladiators on each team.

So dividing the "LoseX" by that gives you a number average to determine how much reward is pulled from EACH loser.

Loser 1 gets a reward.
Loser 2 gets a reward.
Loser 3 gets a reward.
Winner 1 gets a reward.
Winner 2 gets a reward.
Winner 3 gets a reward.

If there is only 1 winner, they take all 3 rewards.

If there are multiple winners, you divvy this up accordingly as per the calculation.

This making more sense to you guys?

I did fix min/max ref rewards to make a little more sense and separate it from the calculation since it wasn't necessary.
This message was last edited by the GM at 02:38, Wed 01 Feb 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 68 posts
Advanced Gnome
Fri 3 Feb 2017
at 16:48
  • msg #415

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Grace, a duel? :D

   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: -
      Referee: ?
Participant 1: Groppo, Advanced Gnome, Fighter
Participant 2: Grace, Advanced Aasimar, Magus
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Small Barricades
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Urban
        Walls: Random, weak walls
         Prep: -
       Extras: -
Kecil
Summoner 1,418, 193 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 3 Feb 2017
at 20:53
  • msg #416

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So, Boadicea/Cronwier:


   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit/ No Hero Points
      Referee: Kecil
Participant 1: Boadicea, Advanced Human, Barbarian/Brawler
Participant 2: Cronwier, Aasimar, Spiritualist/Monk
          Map: Small Cliffhanger
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Random
        Walls: Random
         Prep: 1
       Extras: Floor is lava

This message was last edited by the player at 20:55, Fri 03 Feb 2017.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1125 posts
Human Antipaladin/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Fri 3 Feb 2017
at 23:22
  • msg #417

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Ok, i think i might actually be ready now


   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / No Limit Hero Points
      Referee: {Name}
Participant 1: Tinny Tina, Wyrwood, Alchemist 11
Participant 2: Latro Dectus, Drow Noble, Antipaladin 10/Oracle 1 (lvl 11)
          Map: Small King of the Hill
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Dungeon
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: No flying, each edge of the arena connects to the opposite edge, suspend 48 hour rule Monday thru Thursday


All we need now is a ref and we're good to go.

Edit: Perhaps, if you'd be interested, we can do something interesting with this.
Seeing as each side of the arena connects to the other, it makes no sense that we should start at opposing corners as the distance between us no longer matters. In fact we'd be starting as close to one another as possible.
Suppose, instead, we started in random positions on the map. That way at least one of us (probably me) has to put forth some effort in getting to you.
This message was last edited by the player at 00:58, Sat 04 Feb 2017.
Cronwier
Spiritualist 807, 71 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Sat 4 Feb 2017
at 02:04
  • msg #418

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Kecil (msg # 416):

Sounds good to me...
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 604 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Sat 4 Feb 2017
at 06:15
  • msg #419

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Latro Dectus (msg # 417):

Yeah, sure, I'm down for that.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 635 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 4 Feb 2017
at 14:39
  • msg #420

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Kecil (msg # 416):

Sounds good, will post challenge this evening gonna give charracter sheet a ounce over
Cronwier
Spiritualist 807, 72 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Sun 5 Feb 2017
at 01:37
  • msg #421

Re: OOC Discussion 7

No rush, I don't think my match is officially closed yet anyway?

Edit: No it is, but still I'm not in that much of a rush to get minced.
This message was last edited by the player at 01:38, Sun 05 Feb 2017.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6172 posts
Game Master
Sun 5 Feb 2017
at 02:16
  • msg #422

Re: OOC Discussion 7

It's been a while since we had a championship. Anyone think they can kick a powerful sorcerer's butt? Hmmm???
Grace
Magus 633, 20 posts
Advanced Aasimar Magus
Sun 5 Feb 2017
at 03:37
  • msg #423

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Groppo:
Grace, a duel? :D

   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: -
      Referee: ?
Participant 1: Groppo, Advanced Gnome, Fighter
Participant 2: Grace, Advanced Aasimar, Magus
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Small Barricades
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Urban
        Walls: Random, weak walls
         Prep: -
       Extras: -


Sure, sounds good.
Kecil
Summoner 1,729, 194 posts
Human Summoner
Sun 5 Feb 2017
at 04:50
  • msg #424

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 422):

I'd be up for it but I don't have 10 wins under my belt yet :/

However, I'd be happy to fight Josep anyway :D or anyone, really.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1126 posts
Human Antipaladin/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Sun 5 Feb 2017
at 05:24
  • msg #425

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 422):

Maybe once i get my BP racked up and my hero points stocked. then... maybe
Groppo
Fighter 662, 69 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 5 Feb 2017
at 16:57
  • msg #426

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So, anyone up for reffing our newbie fight? :D Anklebiters straight out of the arena, now off to bite each other!
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 644 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Sun 5 Feb 2017
at 17:05
  • msg #427

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'll ref whoever is ready after challenge thread clears.  I think Tina/Latro is next in line if they are ready.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 637 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Mon 6 Feb 2017
at 04:00
  • msg #428

Re: OOC Discussion 7

My team didn't make it to the big game, so I was part of the anyone but the Patriot(and Steelers) ban wagon. Why oh why did the Ravens have to give the game away 31 to 0 run OMG (had to be paid off...just kidding, maybe not ;))
Groppo
Fighter 662, 70 posts
Advanced Gnome
Tue 7 Feb 2017
at 12:57
  • msg #429

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Boadicea (msg # 428):

Same bandwagon. Went to bed at 3-4 in the morning, halfway through 3rd quarter. "28-3, sure I'd enjoy seeing the end - but the game is over and I need to get up early tomorrow." Got quite a surprise when I woke up and found out the score :P
Groppo
Fighter 662, 71 posts
Advanced Gnome
Fri 10 Feb 2017
at 12:34
  • msg #430

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Wow, wow, things sure are heating up above all that lava! First strike gonna go to Boadicea?!
Cronwier
Spiritualist 807, 83 posts
Aasimar Ectoplasmatist
Shadow's Caress
Fri 10 Feb 2017
at 14:01
  • msg #431

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Probably, she is about to throw a shield at me so...
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 645 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 10 Feb 2017
at 15:43
  • msg #432

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Maybe, made a couple dumb moves and completely over looked you can fly
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 608 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Fri 10 Feb 2017
at 15:47
  • msg #433

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So, anyone want to take Groppo's bet before Latro takes his prep round?
Groppo
Fighter 662, 72 posts
Advanced Gnome
Fri 10 Feb 2017
at 21:29
  • msg #434

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yeah, bet is still available :)
Groppo
Fighter 662, 73 posts
Advanced Gnome
Fri 10 Feb 2017
at 21:42
  • msg #435

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Nevermind, the show is on! :D
Groppo
Fighter 662, 74 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sat 11 Feb 2017
at 06:59
  • msg #436

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Oooh, Tina has the coolest strats- but is there always something in the way? I would have loved to see that catapult strat for real :p
Kecil
Summoner 1,729, 201 posts
Human Summoner
Mon 13 Feb 2017
at 02:40
  • msg #437

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So, anyone want to fight? Grunyar, maybe?
Thraxis
Summoner 1,263, 400 posts
Half-orc Summoner
Wed 15 Feb 2017
at 16:09
  • msg #438

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'd be up for a fight in a day or two once I finish updating since my last fight, which was about forever ago.  Then I'll have veteran status and get to make dooder 3, play mythic, and/or try to mob the current champion with minions and claim the credit for it.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 75 posts
Advanced Gnome
Thu 16 Feb 2017
at 20:05
  • msg #439

Re: OOC Discussion 7

1 distance and no modifier for thick ground! EXCITING! I wish Tinny Tina was a barbarian about to erupt out of the earth with muscles like King Kong, swallowing Latro whole! Like an earth-shark. With huge monkey muscles.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 76 posts
Advanced Gnome
Thu 16 Feb 2017
at 20:08
  • msg #440

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Stick your sword into the ground, Latro!!! At random! It might just work!
Kecil
Summoner 1,729, 204 posts
Human Summoner
Fri 17 Feb 2017
at 06:26
  • msg #441

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Thraxis (msg # 438):

Fight me maybe? :D
Thraxis
Summoner 1,263, 401 posts
Half-orc Summoner
Fri 17 Feb 2017
at 12:43
  • msg #442

Re: OOC Discussion 7

All the other guys try to kill me so here's my challenge: fight me maybe?


In spite of what Kecil started there, any volunteers to ref?
Groppo
Fighter 662, 77 posts
Advanced Gnome
Thu 23 Feb 2017
at 12:57
  • msg #443

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Grace:
Groppo:
Grace, a duel? :D

   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: -
      Referee: ?
Participant 1: Groppo, Advanced Gnome, Fighter
Participant 2: Grace, Advanced Aasimar, Magus
Participant 3: {None}
Participant 4: {None}
          Map: Small Barricades
     Lighting: Standard
      Terrain: Urban
        Walls: Random, weak walls
         Prep: -
       Extras: -


Sure, sounds good.


I'm still hoping to do this duel soon :) And since there isn't a lot of fighting going on right now, maybe someone could consider reffing for us even though they are 'on paper' busy in another duel (as a fighter or as a ref)? :)
Groppo
Fighter 662, 78 posts
Advanced Gnome
Thu 23 Feb 2017
at 12:58
  • msg #444

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Personally, I'll volunteer to ref as soon as I've tried a couple of fights!
GM Arkrim
GM, 6178 posts
Game Master
Tue 28 Feb 2017
at 04:43
  • msg #445

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Tinny Tina:
Also, given that I just cast an actual spell, I'm pretty sure I'm immediately kicked out of the School of the Voiceless Dragon.

XD

Oh man, it's been a while since guild rules came into play. I wonder what your guildmaster would say?
Gabriel Solem
Swashbrawler 340, 1 post
Advanced Ifrit
Swashbuckler/Brawler
Sun 26 Mar 2017
at 21:47
  • msg #446

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Newbie here, itching for a fight. Who's game?
Groppo
Fighter 662, 79 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 27 Mar 2017
at 04:25
  • msg #447

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Welcome! As soon as anyone is ready to be the referee, I'm up for a fight! But I might be having one with Grace first if she's still around by then :)
Gabriel Solem
Swashbrawler 340, 2 posts
Advanced Ifrit
Mon 27 Mar 2017
at 13:53
  • msg #448

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Looking forward to it!
GM Arkrim
GM, 6179 posts
Game Master
Tue 4 Apr 2017
at 01:54
  • msg #449

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hey guys! So I've been designing my own RPG for a while now and the story behind it is actually based off this arena. The City of Swordaine and the Grand Colosseum will be part of the story that appears in the game.

It will not be a Pathfinder supplement but it's own d20 variant using the OGL. It's technically compatible with other d20 games, but it's significantly different...enough to be it's own thing.

Here's a preview of the cover art. It's a little fuzzy because it's a screenshot of the work-in-progress but it's looking promising so far:



I'm looking for betatesters to run some online games if anyone is interested.
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 655 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Tue 4 Apr 2017
at 13:29
  • msg #450

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sounds fun, do you have a game up?
GM Arkrim
GM, 6180 posts
Game Master
Tue 4 Apr 2017
at 16:27
  • msg #451

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Checking for interest first, but yeah, I'll have a separate game up.
Kecil
Summoner 1,729, 215 posts
Human Summoner
Sat 8 Apr 2017
at 16:38
  • msg #452

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm interested.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6181 posts
Game Master
Wed 12 Apr 2017
at 02:34
  • msg #453

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Still setting things up for Ultimatum, but you guys are welcome to poke around while I get everything ready:

link to another game
Hiro
Monk 2,038, 1177 posts
Dwarf Monk
SotVD
Fri 5 May 2017
at 18:14
  • msg #454

Re: OOC Discussion 7

GM Arkrim:
Tinny Tina:
Also, given that I just cast an actual spell, I'm pretty sure I'm immediately kicked out of the School of the Voiceless Dragon.

XD

Oh man, it's been a while since guild rules came into play. I wonder what your guildmaster would say?


YOU DID WHAT???
GM Arkrim
GM, 6182 posts
Game Master
Fri 19 May 2017
at 21:02
  • msg #455

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So, summer vacation for those of you in school. Anyone care to knock someone else's teeth out (in character of course). :P
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 671 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 19 May 2017
at 21:47
  • msg #456

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Lol, trying :-)
Groppo
Fighter 662, 80 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 21 May 2017
at 21:14
  • msg #457

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Such arena, much blood, very combat! :p I'm still up for playing, and especially in June.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6183 posts
Game Master
Mon 5 Jun 2017
at 11:32
  • msg #458

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hey everyone, arena battles will continue here but I'm also starting my own gaming forum.

I'm hoping to start an arena there as well and even set up a method for GMs to have their own boards to run games.

I just got it started so everything is still in the works (don't mind the mess), but feel free to join up: http://lividlizard.proboards.com/
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 661 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Mon 5 Jun 2017
at 12:44
  • msg #459

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sounds fun will have to poke around, Thanks for the invite
GM Arkrim
GM, 6184 posts
Game Master
Sun 25 Jun 2017
at 17:47
  • msg #460

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So I noticed activity has slowed down here. Anything you guys would prefer to be changed to improve combat flow or draw in more people?

Anything you'd like ADDED or REMOVED from this game to make it more fun?
Groppo
Fighter 662, 81 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 25 Jun 2017
at 18:33
  • msg #461

Re: OOC Discussion 7

GM Arkrim:
Anything you'd like REMOVED?

The two duels that started 4.5 months ago ;) Nah I don't know... But I've been keeping an eye out for a duel or other fight since that time, and there's never been more than two active players here in addition to the ones currently tied up in the duels. Having been in just one fight, I'd like to go through one more before actually reffing a game myself.
Either way, I can't start a game before the middle of july so it's no stress for me... But it would be sad to see six players locked up in these two duels for another couple of months, assuming they would do something else otherwise. If none of them are actually intending to be active, then I think more recruitment is the thing to go for :)
GM Arkrim
GM, 6185 posts
Game Master
Sun 25 Jun 2017
at 21:26
  • msg #462

Re: OOC Discussion 7

The 48 hour rule was supposed to prevent that. The "problem" is that you guys are SUCH good sports that a lot of you refuse to enforce it.

Giving someone 48 hours is necessary as to be fair. Giving them a week is just extra courteous. Giving them 2 weeks is excessive. Giving them more than 2 weeks might be a sign that both players want to give up on the fight but neither are willing to take the forfeit penalty...

What if we offer "mutual surrender" terms? So if both agree to forfeit there's no penalty. You can offer that instead of the 48 hour rule?

Would that help?
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1169 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Wed 28 Jun 2017
at 13:45
  • msg #463

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm just waiting on Gryunyar to tell me where the source of every magical aura in my detect magic cone is so i can smite Tina as hard as i possibly can before giving her 48 hours to try and do something to me.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6186 posts
Game Master
Thu 29 Jun 2017
at 03:32
  • msg #464

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Oh geez, I guess we need a fallback in case the referee abandons ship.

I guess you and Tina can request someone else step in as ref if they don't respond within 48 hours.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1170 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Fri 30 Jun 2017
at 11:42
  • msg #465

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I've had to call 48 on tina two times in a row at this point and she hasn't even logged in since april 18th. Grunyar hasn't been on since the 8th of june. I think this match may just need to end before any more time is wasted. Maybe i can get BP for it. Maybe we just call it a mulligan and pretend the whole thing never happened.
Either way, the way things are most likely going to go is as follows:
I learn where Tina is via Detect magic. I launch as much damage at that square as humanly possible. Chances are it wont be enough and then i'll wait 48 hours before calling the 48 on her for the third time, resulting in a forfeited match and no BP rewards and a lost Hero Point for both of us.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6187 posts
Game Master
Sat 1 Jul 2017
at 05:37
  • msg #466

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Okay, I'm ending the matches.

From now on, if your referee doesn't respond in 48 hours you can negotiate with the other players for a decision. If both a player AND the referee don't respond in 48 hours each (4 days total for both) then the match will be cancelled if you ask the head GM to step in (me).

You guys are free from match limbo.
This message was last edited by the GM at 06:14, Sat 01 July 2017.
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 662 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Sat 1 Jul 2017
at 12:38
  • msg #467

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I apologise for disappearing life got crazy, Thank you GM.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6190 posts
Game Master
Sat 1 Jul 2017
at 21:55
  • msg #468

Re: OOC Discussion 7

No worries.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 672 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Mon 3 Jul 2017
at 00:32
  • msg #469

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Groppo, what kind of match would you be looking for?
Groppo
Fighter 662, 82 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 3 Jul 2017
at 11:13
  • msg #470

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Boadicea (msg # 469):

Any kind! :)
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 673 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Mon 3 Jul 2017
at 12:12
  • msg #471

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Any map, terrain, lighting preference?
You want me to come down to your BP or stay off set?
Groppo
Fighter 662, 83 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 3 Jul 2017
at 23:02
  • msg #472

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Any map, I guess... Any terrain decided before challenge. Normal lighting and low ceiling prefered :) And as long as I have a somewhat fair chance, I'm fine - but that takes some BP adjustment. Going down to my level might be the easiest then?
Also, I can't start until monday two weeks from now. Vacation!
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 674 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 4 Jul 2017
at 18:51
  • msg #473

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Saw that in your earlier post gives me time to make changes and we have to find a ref.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6191 posts
Game Master
Wed 26 Jul 2017
at 03:28
  • msg #474

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Anyone willing to accept these terms and my seething hatred for all things "time consuming and messy"?

If so, I will run a free Monstrous Battle Royal for the first 4 players to respond and agree to these terms.

Extras:
  • No hero points outside your turn.
  • 48 hour rule: Enforced and called at every opportunity.
  • Hidden But Still On the Map (Optional Rule): link to a message in this game
  • Map Update: Everyone must update map every turn if they move something. Not doing so or doing so incorrectly = skipped turn...unless the very next player corrects it for you and bestows forgiveness.
  • Swift Justice: If you take an action that you could not have taken and another player calls you out before the next person takes their turn, then your ENTIRE TURN is instead skipped. If no one calls you out at this time, then you get away scot-free like the loathsome criminal you are.
  • No Redos: No editing your post AFTER someone has responded otherwise the GM will retcon your turn (usually just skipping you).
  • Item Limit: Maximum 10 items. More than 1 of the same consumable, light weapon, or ammunition counts as 1 item (Ex. 20 CLW potions is still 1 item for these purposes). Items granted by class features and the freebie items don't count against this limit (Ex. alchemist's bombs, wizard's item familiar, spell component pouch, backpack).
  • What is Skipped?: Your character and all their minions take the Total Defense action and get a +4 bonus to all saving throws until the start of your next turn.
  • Starting this match: Paste a copy of your basic stats in a PM to the Referee/GM during Initiative rolls. This way you don't have to fiddle with your actual character sheet. This should include ONLY the following: Total BP used, Race [RP Value] (alternate racial traits), Class, Level, Ability scores (and mods), Feats, Spells prepared/known, Daily abilities, Gear.
  • No making extra work for the GM: Don't give me extra work that isn't necessary to play the game and don't give me a hard time. Just be nice and be fair.

Any takers?
This message was last edited by the GM at 04:52, Thu 27 July 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 84 posts
Advanced Gnome
Thu 27 Jul 2017
at 16:32
  • msg #475

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 474):

Sign me up, boss!

I take it the "pm your info" is instead of copy-pasting the sheet in private in the game?
GM Arkrim
GM, 6192 posts
Game Master
Fri 28 Jul 2017
at 01:54
  • msg #476

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'll create the game once I have enough takers. Yes because it's NOT your whole character sheet.

A good example of what you'll PM would be something like:

[Private to GM: 1,000 BP, Dwarf 12 (rockstepper), Unchained Monk 10, Str 16 (18), Con 16 (18), Dex 16 (18), Int 10, Wis 16 (18), Cha 8, Iron Will, Dodge, Imp. Grapple, Imp. Trip, Following Step, Lunge, Combat Reflexes, Vicious Stomp, Medusa's Wrath, Stunning Fist 10/day, Ki Pool 8/day, High Jump, Furious Defense, Diamond Mind, Abundant Step, Belt of Physical Perfection +2, Headband of Wisdom +2, bracers of armor +1, amulet of mighty fist (corrosive), ring of protection +1, shurikens x20, potion of enlarge person, potion of heroism, potion of fly, cloak of resistance +2, AC23, TAC22, FFAC18, CMD30, FFCMD25, Fort +13, Refl +13, Will +11, +14 melee (FA +14/+14/+9/+9), +14 range (FA +14/+9), +14 CMB, unarmed 1d8+4 bludgeoning + 1d6 acid, shuriken 1d2 piercing, Acrobatics +17, Climb +17, Perception +17, Sense Motive +17, Swim +17]

Most characters will take up a chunk of text about this long. Particularly complex characters (like those with animal companions and spells) might take up double this size.
This message was last edited by the GM at 02:26, Sat 29 July 2017.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 675 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 28 Jul 2017
at 04:04
  • msg #477

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sounds like fun, just back from vacation all rested and ready to kill :)
GM Arkrim
GM, 6193 posts
Game Master
Sat 29 Jul 2017
at 02:20
  • msg #478

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Awesome. I need at least 1 more taker, preferably 2.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1171 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Sun 30 Jul 2017
at 14:19
  • msg #479

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Latro is feeling particularly masochistic today. Sign me up.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6194 posts
Game Master
Mon 31 Jul 2017
at 12:45
  • msg #480

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Perfect. Okay, I'll start making the match. If anyone else wants to join we have 1 slot left.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 85 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 31 Jul 2017
at 13:40
  • msg #481

Re: OOC Discussion 7

You decided what arena specifics to go with?
GM Arkrim
GM, 6196 posts
Game Master
Wed 2 Aug 2017
at 03:45
  • msg #482

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I updated it with some interesting extras for you guys.

One more slot left. Any takers?
This message was last edited by the GM at 04:21, Wed 02 Aug 2017.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1172 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Wed 2 Aug 2017
at 14:14
  • msg #483

Re: OOC Discussion 7

two questions before we begin:
1. could you put the posting format for how you want us to PM you our characters in the fight thread?
2. As far as the ten item limit goes, is that per character we bring into the area or for the entire team? ay for those of us who may or may not have a cohort, do both the master and the cohort get 10 items each or is it 10 items split between both the master and the cohort?
GM Arkrim
GM, 6197 posts
Game Master
Thu 3 Aug 2017
at 04:07
  • msg #484

Re: OOC Discussion 7

1) Already did. See msg #476 above.


2) Yup, it's "per person" just like the regular match rules but instead of 20 I've cut it down to 10. So your cohort gets their own gear and whatnot.

3) Go ahead and post in the match.
This message was last edited by the GM at 13:25, Thu 03 Aug 2017.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1176 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Wed 9 Aug 2017
at 15:23
  • msg #485

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Huh, so its fire resist 10. Interesting.
but no spell resistance to speak of at least so spells away!
This message was last edited by the player at 15:41, Wed 09 Aug 2017.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6199 posts
Game Master
Sun 13 Aug 2017
at 07:26
  • msg #486

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Groppo:
OCC: I believe I'm flying in a way simple enough to avoid rolling any checks, but it's honestly my first time flying if we don't count airplanes, so it's kind of exciting!
Rules question - ref ruling not necessary
From Fly-spell: "The subject can fly at a speed of 60 feet (or 40 feet if it wears medium or heavy armor, or if it carries a medium or heavy load)."
It does not say that speed reduction from these sources apply to fly movement speed, but it references things that do already reduce your speed. If I have full movement speed in spite of wearing a heavy armor, do I get the 60ft fly speed? I used 40 this round,
 and might not get another chance for 60, but maybe...

Speed reduction listed in fly spell is its own thing because it's listed in the spell.

This is how the game works. Specific rule beats general rule.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 90 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 13 Aug 2017
at 10:46
  • msg #487

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Alright, I made the right choice then :) I thought it was gain fly speed equal to my own speed before I looked it up anyway, so I'm happy!
Groppo
Fighter 662, 91 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 13 Aug 2017
at 16:37
  • msg #488

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Monday-friday I'll have little access to internet, this week. If that's alright, you could decrease the 48hr rule to 24 hours for me and just let me full defense if I didn't reply in that time. There's a chance I can be there to write, but I don't want to slow things down unnecessarily.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1180 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Wed 23 Aug 2017
at 12:25
  • msg #489

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Question pertaining to the match:
Considering that the creature is large and large creatures are of a hight anywhere between 8 and 16 feet tall and the creature is described as hanging off the ledge, would the creature not end up hanging within Latro's threatened range and by way of pulling itself up, be moving out of Latro's threatened area granting him an AoO as well? (considering Latro's threatened area consists of the +7 spaces above him, the +6 spaces around him, and the +5 spaces below him.)
This message was last edited by the player at 12:31, Wed 23 Aug 2017.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6201 posts
Game Master
Fri 25 Aug 2017
at 02:29
  • msg #490

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hmmm, I suppose so, but if we take the map literally he'd have cover against the attack and I was thinking cover means no AoO? But I guess that depends on the angle. Hold on.

21:28, Today: GM Arkrim, for the NPC monster, rolled 5 using 1d8 with rolls of 5.  which way did he slip?

Yeah, sure, take it! I actually marked where the monster would've fallen too and it looks like Latro could take a swing. Add up that damage with Groppo.
This message was last edited by the GM at 02:46, Fri 25 Aug 2017.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1181 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Fri 25 Aug 2017
at 11:49
  • msg #491

Re: OOC Discussion 7

cool beans! This may result in an alternant timeline where the creature falls to the goop below but we'll see what happens.
Also also, it falling off the map put it in range of my Anti-paladin auras. I'll need will saves for those as well. :P
This message was last edited by the player at 12:18, Fri 25 Aug 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 94 posts
Advanced Gnome
Fri 25 Aug 2017
at 12:22
  • msg #492

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Haha, alternate timelines :P Assuming it cannot use dex to ac vs my attack, and is prone (FFAC26-4prone) my 20 to hit still doesn't hit :/
GM Arkrim
GM, 6202 posts
Game Master
Sat 26 Aug 2017
at 22:52
  • msg #493

Re: OOC Discussion 7

No will saves. It is immune.

Also, no alternate timelines. Moving on.

:P
This message was last edited by the GM at 22:55, Sat 26 Aug 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 95 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 28 Aug 2017
at 12:20
  • msg #494

Re: OOC Discussion 7

48 hours!
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 682 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Mon 28 Aug 2017
at 12:40
  • msg #495

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hold your horses I have until 1900ish
Groppo
Fighter 662, 96 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 28 Aug 2017
at 12:53
  • msg #496

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Glad to see you're here! :) But Latro posted this Friday, that's why my horses started running ;)
Groppo
Fighter 662, 97 posts
Advanced Gnome
Tue 29 Aug 2017
at 06:09
  • msg #497

Re: OOC Discussion 7

The excitement begins! ;D
Groppo
Fighter 662, 98 posts
Advanced Gnome
Tue 29 Aug 2017
at 13:24
  • msg #498

Re: OOC Discussion 7

GM Arkrim, Groppo has an AC of 35 this round meaning only the third attack rolled enough to hit - and if Grab is the rule in this situation as indicated by your rolls - I think Groppo does not become grappled before the last attack as it only works with a successfull attack (if he were to be grappled sooner, the second attack would hit too). Is this correct?
GM Arkrim
GM, 6204 posts
Game Master
Wed 30 Aug 2017
at 01:19
  • msg #499

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Oh yeah, the 34 would miss but no, Groppo is still grappled unless he has a way of increasing his CMD to 49+ as a free action before his turn.

I rolled separately for each attack not cumulatively. You can see them separated by commas and lined up accordingly.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 100 posts
Advanced Gnome
Wed 30 Aug 2017
at 08:27
  • msg #500

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Ah yes, grappled of course! But if I was grappled before the second attack, that one would have hit - so I thought maybe that's how you did it.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6205 posts
Game Master
Thu 31 Aug 2017
at 02:13
  • msg #501

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Nah. Not when you're dealing with a monster that has 3 attacks. You just roll 3 attacks, 3 secondary attacks (if any), and 3 damage rolls and see what sticks. Easiest way to do it.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 101 posts
Advanced Gnome
Thu 31 Aug 2017
at 18:25
  • msg #502

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Haha, as a roleplayer I love Boadiea's contribution to the action! As the player of the grappled under-powered fighter, not so much ;)
Groppo
Fighter 662, 106 posts
Advanced Gnome
Fri 8 Sep 2017
at 21:26
  • msg #503

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So many different map maneuvers :p
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 690 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 8 Sep 2017
at 21:32
  • msg #504

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Lol, I like them just keep forgetting to use 'em
Groppo
Fighter 662, 108 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sat 9 Sep 2017
at 20:27
  • msg #505

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Scared to death of doing something wrong (I was in my last match too though) but I love the anal rulings :) so much ambiguity and unclear interactions and rules in pathfinder, that it's nice to just go with "do it right, or not at all". Fits the pvp well, too.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 692 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 9 Sep 2017
at 20:39
  • msg #506

Re: OOC Discussion 7

GM I respectfully disagree with your ruling.

First off because of Martial Flexibility the feats of Improved Charging Hurler and Greater Weapon Focus are in my effects not my original post because I did not know which feats I would be using and they are not locked in and can be changed round to round as long as I have uses, and no where in my break down is PBS.

Improved Charging Hurler removes the range restrictions on Charging Hurler and adds +2 damage if within the 30'.

I disagree with your interpretation of the charge the definition say toward the opponent and as long as my starting position is farther away than my ending position I have moved toward the target and the closest stop that I am able to attack from but that is a matter of opinion so I am at your will and interpretation.

As far as the socketed wayfinder socketing a gem is an action that needs no special skill to do and is a standard action, the rule on everything comes into the arena unloaded has been removed so it can be socketed outside of it.

My apologies for the mix up on the cracked stone it does not state it has to be pristine but upon more research I did just find that threw method 1 it is only pristine but threw method 2 it can be a lesser quality
This message was last edited by the player at 03:04, Sun 10 Sept 2017.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6209 posts
Game Master
Sat 9 Sep 2017
at 22:19
  • msg #507

Re: OOC Discussion 7

You can disagree, but you've been overruled by the GM. Like it or not, that is the cost of doing business in an arena. You won't always agree with the ref. Even if there's a bad call, the call has been made and you can complain later.

Even with those feats (which admittedly, I missed because you put it with your gear instead of with your spell effects), you're still faced with the problem of the charge parameters. Nothing can escape that without a way of overcoming difficult terrain (buy some cool boots or a potion or something for your next match).

No matter how much it "makes sense" or "should be" or "could be interpreted another way", if the feat, spell, item, or whatever did not SPECIFICALLY state you could do it: you can't do it. The only flexibility I'll give is on the core rules themselves and errata specifically pertaining to core rules, but not anything outside that.

That may be anal but it's also fair.

Sorry, Boadicea, you can shake your fist at me if you want but you're just going to have to bite the bullet.
This message was last edited by the GM at 22:44, Sat 09 Sept 2017.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 693 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 10 Sep 2017
at 02:49
  • msg #508

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Part of my earlier post regarding the Ion Stone is in correct I was going off what I was able to read forum wise and have now had time to page threw my books and found this
quote:
75% of ioun stones grant resonant powers when placed in a wayfinder. 25% of cracked or flawed ioun stones have resonant powers (see Wayfinders and Ioun Stones) compared to the 75% chance for typical ioun stones; only 10% of scorched ioun stones have resonant powers.


That said a PFS specific resource referred in some post as a Bible for PFS, I am unable to see outlaws inferior stones and only allows method 1 due to method 2 if 94-96 is rolled your stone becomes inferior and you roll again. GM on this we using the PFS or book (Seeker of Secrets pg 46 just above Cracked Ion Stones in bold)?
GM Arkrim
GM, 6210 posts
Game Master
Sun 10 Sep 2017
at 19:29
  • msg #509

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Errata & Rulings:
Only the rules in the Pathfinder RPG Core Rule Book, official Paizo-published PFRPG errata pertaining to core rules, and GM-posted rules listed here in this forum will be allowed. NO OTHER RULES OR VARIANTS ARE ALLOWED. However, you CAN use any base class, spell, feat, item that you can carry, or race with a listed RP cost from any official Paizo-published Pathfinder RPG source. Be wary, though. If any of these things require variant rules in order to function, they will not be allowed. Adding something to your sheet that is not allowed merits immediate disqualification. Consult fellow gladiators (NOT THE GM) before adding something if you're unsure.

No. If you have to roll a % to see IF an item works or not, is not a core rule or function nor is it a part of activating a spell/feat/item/racial trait. Therefore, it is a variant rule.

I'm not disqualifying you obviously, that's only for extreme cases of blatant cheating but in this case it's a lesson learned about incorporating things that MIGHT work or require special rolls outside of what is listed in the core rules to function.

Assume it's not allowed unless you've analyzed it against this quote AND the BANNED stuff.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 695 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 10 Sep 2017
at 19:39
  • msg #510

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So that is a no to all wayfinder socketed ion stones?  Just asking to make sure I understand your response as even the pristine only have a 75% chance of working.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6211 posts
Game Master
Sun 10 Sep 2017
at 20:01
  • msg #511

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yes. If people have been using wayfinder stones they shouldn't have and in the future you can call them out on it.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 109 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 11 Sep 2017
at 05:18
  • msg #512

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Groppo and Latro are in different spaces, right?
GM Arkrim
GM, 6212 posts
Game Master
Mon 11 Sep 2017
at 06:48
  • msg #513

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Obviously. That's why you have separate air and your pockets have separate hit points.
This message was last edited by the GM at 06:49, Mon 11 Sept 2017.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 696 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 12 Sep 2017
at 23:22
  • msg #514

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Taotieh is my guess extra deminsonal gut makes me think so.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6213 posts
Game Master
Wed 13 Sep 2017
at 13:05
  • msg #515

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Good guess. If you're willing to extrapolate the data (CR, hp, saves, attack bonuses, special abilities such as extradimensional guts) and search through monsters you can actually figure out what most monsters are.

This one has a unique ability so that was simple enough.

The question is how badly do you want to know? Are you willing to put skill ranks in it, or are you going to scour the online monster manuals to figure it out? :P
Groppo
Fighter 662, 111 posts
Advanced Gnome
Thu 14 Sep 2017
at 20:24
  • msg #516

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm going to need to know if there's anything weird happening in the gut of the monster, or if I should just expect everything to be normal, before I take Groppo's turn!
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 700 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 17 Sep 2017
at 14:58
  • msg #517

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I tried Groppo, won't have a post up till late this evening
Groppo
Fighter 662, 117 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 17 Sep 2017
at 15:37
  • msg #518

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Haha, it's probably more fun with everyone participating anyway :p Still, I would've called 48h same as you B :)

@Latro: probably still have that HP to edit?
Groppo
Fighter 662, 118 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 17 Sep 2017
at 15:44
  • msg #519

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I count 67 damage taken after DR. The first hit is valid and dr applies once - only to the normal crit damage.
This message was last edited by the player at 15:46, Sun 17 Sept 2017.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1200 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Sun 17 Sep 2017
at 16:08
  • msg #520

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Groppo:
I count 67 damage taken after DR. The first hit is valid and dr applies once - only to the normal crit damage.

I thought i had forgotten something. Changing that here now
Groppo
Fighter 662, 119 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 17 Sep 2017
at 21:46
  • msg #521

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Oooh, that's tough... But dead strict rules are the foundation of the arena... With that immediate action and map maneuver in your pocket, I have a hard time seeing you'd die before the next round anyway!
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 703 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Mon 18 Sep 2017
at 17:02
  • msg #522

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Groppo I would have moved away last round in full defense no AoO ...
Groppo
Fighter 662, 122 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 18 Sep 2017
at 18:33
  • msg #523

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Last round I had the chance to kill him :) A very slight chance though, with a possible +1d10ac I could've never made a sure hit nor crit.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 124 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 18 Sep 2017
at 23:07
  • msg #524

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Haha, can't imagine a better death than to Latro. So cinematic!
Got the potion contents ready for next round :)
GM Arkrim
GM, 6217 posts
Game Master
Tue 19 Sep 2017
at 02:13
  • msg #525

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Damn Latro, you always go the extra mile to make those CUTscenes... :P

Brutal. Like watching this match through Game of Thrones Vision.

Surprised he didn't go for the Floor Kill achievement though. Shoving you over the edge into the acid pool would've given him that extra map maneuver each round. I'd have been interested to see how someone utilized that power.
This message was last edited by the GM at 02:28, Tue 19 Sept 2017.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1205 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Sep 2017
at 11:49
  • msg #526

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Man, i totally would have, but if theres one thing i know about barbarians its that they deal heck tons of damage and Boadicea just so happens to be a barbarian. Personally i'll take the DR 4/- and a +2 to hit and damage from deadly juggernaut.

There is a part of me that wishes Groppo had passed his fly check though. Cause then i would have just dispelled the fly spell and Groppo would have dropped from +8 to +4 taking falling damage, becoming prone, and been forced to make a reflex save to catch the edge or fall into the acid.

Man what a turn that would have been. THEN I would have gotten the extra map maneuver.

And just to sate your curiosity Arkim these are the things i would have done with it should i have gotten it

Standerd action heal + AC bonus

AC Bonus + Roll boost

Roll boost x2

Trade attack for a spell x2 - so in one full attack action i would cast a lvl 2 spell and a lvl 1 spell and then NOT be stunned for the round!

That's pretty much all the combos there are as most of the map maneuvers specify that they have to be taken as some kind of action.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 125 posts
Advanced Gnome
Tue 19 Sep 2017
at 12:43
  • msg #527

Re: OOC Discussion 7

The roll boost is sick! Have kept that in mind throughout the game, but the only real roll I could boost for a success was vs the nausea - and then I didn't have access to it until my next turn. Was hoping to be able to confirm crits with it and stuff :)
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1206 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Sep 2017
at 12:51
  • msg #528

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yo, i just realized something terrifying. The only way i'm not hitting Boadicea is if I roll a 1 (assuming she doesn't boost her AC) and even then, she'll have to boost it to at least 26 before i miss on a 2 (assuming I don't take any to hit penalties from Power attack or the like.)
GM Arkrim
GM, 6218 posts
Game Master
Tue 19 Sep 2017
at 13:01
  • msg #529

Re: OOC Discussion 7

The roll boost pretty much means if you HAVEN'T used your maneuver you're immune to the first natural 1 you face each round. You can turn that nat 1 into a 2-7.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6219 posts
Game Master
Wed 20 Sep 2017
at 01:53
  • msg #530

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Boadicea:
OOC: Steal is a standard action, an item listed as visible on a standing opponent is easily visible but on a dead/dieing one can be lying on it or items could be spread out in his square hence the perception check (move) to locate an item which is not a stretch.

Anything not exclusively shoved into your backpack is visible.

For gaming purposes, there is no "falling on top of your item".

Anyone can steal a visible item.

On the other hand, drawing a visible item is only a move or part of a move (or free if you have quick draw) while drawing a hidden item is a standard action.

Then again, "backpack" is a visible item so you can steal ALL hidden items by taking the backpack and just using a standard action every round to slowly swindle its contents.

This is the arena though. Stealing stuff only lasts for the match.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 707 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Wed 20 Sep 2017
at 02:22
  • msg #531

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Is Latro's action of picking up Groppo's potion a move action?  He is not using the steal action which is a standard action.  Beings he did not place the potion where ever it is to use the move action to retrieve it from the ground/Groppo's body would he not need to locate it first or at least take the standard action like removing an item from a bag where again it takes more time because you have to locate it in the bag.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6220 posts
Game Master
Wed 20 Sep 2017
at 02:43
  • msg #532

Re: OOC Discussion 7

It's not a steal combat maneuver if the target is dead. They are effectively an object once they are dead and it's the same as picking up an item lying on the floor.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 126 posts
Advanced Gnome
Wed 20 Sep 2017
at 04:52
  • msg #533

Re: OOC Discussion 7

This is interesting, I don't think I knew about these rules...
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1208 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Thu 21 Sep 2017
at 19:20
  • msg #534

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Is it possible to take Groppo's cloak in a single move action or will that require more time than that? Cause that's what i'm planning to do after i drink this here potion.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 127 posts
Advanced Gnome
Thu 21 Sep 2017
at 19:24
  • msg #535

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Haha, did not see this coming!
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1209 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Thu 21 Sep 2017
at 19:31
  • msg #536

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Gotta grab all the advantages from your small sized corpse that I can. ;P
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 709 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Thu 21 Sep 2017
at 19:36
  • msg #537

Re: OOC Discussion 7

And down the slippery slope we go...and why I was arguing that more than just a move is needed it's not like the potion was secured to the body or anything and the cloak tied, buttoned, or secured with a brooch.  We shall see what GM says...
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1210 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Thu 21 Sep 2017
at 19:41
  • msg #538

Re: OOC Discussion 7

that's part of the reason i'm asking about the cloak. Potions are easy enough. just pop em out of the sack they're visible in and go.
The cloak might be a different story as would any other worn item on Groppo's person. And assuming i can actually take the cloak, it'll be the only other thing I take. I have no need for Groppo's hammer, his longbow is to smol for me and i already have a belt I like very much.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 128 posts
Advanced Gnome
Thu 21 Sep 2017
at 19:43
  • msg #539

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I do recommend the both of you to grab the hooked hammer. It's a fantastic weapon! :P
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1211 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Thu 21 Sep 2017
at 19:49
  • msg #540

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I mean, yeah, but i dont really feel like taking a -6 to hit due to both non-proficiany and it being to tiny for my large elvish hands to use correctly.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6221 posts
Game Master
Fri 22 Sep 2017
at 00:28
  • msg #541

Re: OOC Discussion 7

The cloak won't do you any good just holding it. At the very minimum, donning an article of clothing is a full-round action that provokes. Nothing says anything about what items cost what actions to don other than armor and a few examples, but I'll just say it's a full-rounder for simple stuff and 1 minute for complex stuff (like an outfit or girdle would be 1 minute but a belt or cloak would be full rounds).

Remember, you're still limited to the item limit set at the match. Once you cap, additional items don't do anything.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1212 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Fri 22 Sep 2017
at 08:49
  • msg #542

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 541):

Cool beans. that's all i need to know.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 130 posts
Advanced Gnome
Fri 22 Sep 2017
at 09:10
  • msg #543

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I had long planned to drink my Potion of Bull's Strength in the belly of the beast, until I remembered I had swapped it out to guard against tricky players with spellcasting classes and other tactics than move up->full attack :P
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1214 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Fri 22 Sep 2017
at 09:17
  • msg #544

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Lol. so just making sure that you could see me in the event i went invisible, huh?
Well, at the very least, now I can see boadicea in the event she has a way to go invisible as well.
I was seriously hoping for a cure potion of some kind though. :P
This message was last edited by the player at 09:18, Fri 22 Sept 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 131 posts
Advanced Gnome
Fri 22 Sep 2017
at 09:52
  • msg #545

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I was doubting anyone would have time for even one round of healing, but I've been proven quite mistaken. :)
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 710 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 22 Sep 2017
at 10:51
  • msg #546

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I see it in roller but roll is missing from post latro
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 711 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 22 Sep 2017
at 13:10
  • msg #547

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Latro which is your ac I need to beat the 25 or 27
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1215 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Fri 22 Sep 2017
at 13:16
  • msg #548

Re: OOC Discussion 7

outside parentheses is static AC. Inside is after spell mods, immediate action boosts, and the like. so basically, shoot for whats in the parentheses.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6222 posts
Game Master
Sat 23 Sep 2017
at 04:32
  • msg #549

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Groppo (msg # 543):

From now on, everyone keep a vial of cheap ingestible poison on them at all times. Just to scare off anyone trying to loot your corpse. LOL.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 716 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 23 Sep 2017
at 04:36
  • msg #550

Re: OOC Discussion 7

The dice God's hate me, I thought with Latro falling on his ass the Gods where looking upon me favorably.


Any chance to get the d100 added to the hero point usage under extra bonus/extra dice?  I understand why it's not any die people would use it for damage but d100 is primarily just miss chance.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6223 posts
Game Master
Sat 23 Sep 2017
at 04:40
  • msg #551

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Latro Dectus:
Very true, but arena rules state i take a solid -20 for certain actions. And while falling on my ass isn't explicitly listed, droping objects is and Latro's body dropping probably creates a bit more noise than an item. Still not entirely certain why i should take that -20 to a stealth roll made after the fact but thems the rules. *shrug*
GM will probably say that yeah, thats -20 to stealth, but i'd be interested to see if he said otherwise.

Nope. Penalty applies, invisible or not but bonus is only if you are invisible.

Boadicea:
The dice God's hate me, I thought with Latro falling on his ass the Gods where looking upon me favorably.


Any chance to get the d100 added to the hero point usage under extra bonus/extra dice?  I understand why it's not any die people would use it for damage but d100 is primarily just miss chance.

No, but don't forget MAP MANEUVERS. :P
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 717 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 23 Sep 2017
at 04:47
  • msg #552

Re: OOC Discussion 7

It specifies d20 as well I checked
GM Arkrim
GM, 6224 posts
Game Master
Sat 23 Sep 2017
at 05:02
  • msg #553

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Boadicea (msg # 552):

If you're clever enough, you'll find a way to make them more useful than you think.

But yeah, the dice gods hate your miss chances.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6225 posts
Game Master
Sat 23 Sep 2017
at 16:13
  • msg #554

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Added to the FAQ & NOTES

quote:
EQUIPING GEAR
Unless noted otherwise, equipping a worn item is either a full-round action that provokes an attack of opportunity (for simple items) or 1 minute (for complex items). Simple items are things like belts, headbands, rings, etc. Complex items would be things like an outfit, boots, girdle, gloves, etc. You can "rush" putting on an item (equipping a simple in a standard action or a complex as a full-round action) but then there is a 50% chance every round that it doesn't work (determined after you activate/attempt to use it and/or at the start of each of your turns).

Groppo
Fighter 662, 132 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 24 Sep 2017
at 19:46
  • msg #555

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Is there any inflow of arena competitors at all? :)
GM Arkrim
GM, 6226 posts
Game Master
Sun 24 Sep 2017
at 21:19
  • msg #556

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Nothing recently. Last new post was a few months ago. I could bump the ad.

[Language unknown: Wi houwheand, lat mo risabe ut esni ngel uteswa illibeho ort artei pa.]
This message was last edited by the GM at 21:24, Sun 24 Sept 2017.
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 663 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Sun 24 Sep 2017
at 21:41
  • msg #557

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I understand
GM Arkrim
GM, 6227 posts
Game Master
Mon 25 Sep 2017
at 01:50
  • msg #558

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hey, Grunyar's back. Looking to find a tussle in the ol' arena?
Groppo
Fighter 662, 133 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 25 Sep 2017
at 05:11
  • msg #559

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 474):

Arkrim:
No Redos: No editing your post AFTER someone has responded otherwise the GM will retcon your turn (usually just skipping you).

Seeing the ruling now, I'm not sure I ever understood this match-specific rule... Anyway, it's because of this that I've been editing my post to fill in whatever I've missed before.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6229 posts
Game Master
Tue 26 Sep 2017
at 01:57
  • msg #560

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Groppo:
In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 474):

Arkrim:
No Redos: No editing your post AFTER someone has responded otherwise the GM will retcon your turn (usually just skipping you).

Seeing the ruling now, I'm not sure I ever understood this match-specific rule... Anyway, it's because of this that I've been editing my post to fill in whatever I've missed before.

That is NOT a match specific rule. That is an arena rule. If you can read and understand English, it is not unclear in any way. It is as clear as the language can get. A lack of understanding after having read it would be ENTIRELY the result of willful ignorance on the player's part. No excuses.

I merely added that reminder for those who have a bad habit of not reading the Arena rules.

*narrows eyes accusingly*

The only reason you got away with it Groppo is because neither Latro nor Boadicea called you out on it (or each other for that matter).


That's why you should always be careful to follow them. You should be reading these threads just as carefully as you do the resources used to build your character. Otherwise, you might get taken out by technicality, an embarrassing way to go. Thus, why you're all incentivized to read those rules. Calling people out on breaking rules is how players keep each other in check.
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 664 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Tue 26 Sep 2017
at 05:26
  • msg #561

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 558):

I have been eyeballing the survival mission Josep was doing one or something like it when I first joined.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6230 posts
Game Master
Tue 26 Sep 2017
at 12:49
  • msg #562

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Grunyar Fangblood (msg # 561):

You want to get any other players to join you?
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 665 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Tue 26 Sep 2017
at 13:53
  • msg #563

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 562):

I don't care, whatever is most fun for you, that is why we are all here.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 134 posts
Advanced Gnome
Tue 26 Sep 2017
at 14:52
  • msg #564

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Impressive tricks, B!

Also, once those two are done I'll be up for playing or reffing anything.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6231 posts
Game Master
Wed 27 Sep 2017
at 03:37
  • msg #565

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Grunyar Fangblood (msg # 563):

Anyone can referee/run a match now. So you can start the match whenever you want. No waiting on me.

Just get other players to agree to join/run and I'll create the thread for you.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1225 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Wed 27 Sep 2017
at 12:43
  • msg #566

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Theory confirmed: Latro is one slippery jerk off. :P
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1227 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Wed 27 Sep 2017
at 21:16
  • msg #567

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Arkrim, we need your wisdom over in the battle thread.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1229 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Thu 28 Sep 2017
at 13:21
  • msg #568

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Question:

if i use the "Add 1d6 to a d20 roll you make and treat your roll as the new number. This can negate the "nat 1 autofail" but can't create the "nat 20 autosuccess"." map maneuver and using this puts my roll into my weapon's crit range, do i get to treat my roll as if i had threatened a crit?
GM Arkrim
GM, 6234 posts
Game Master
Thu 28 Sep 2017
at 13:45
  • msg #569

Re: OOC Discussion 7

What is my answer to ALL questions about specificity?

That's your answer.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 735 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 30 Sep 2017
at 12:20
  • msg #570

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In matches past Latro I and others just repost the original combat post with the rest of the actions inserted.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6237 posts
Game Master
Sat 30 Sep 2017
at 16:13
  • msg #571

Re: OOC Discussion 7

That works too.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1238 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Sat 30 Sep 2017
at 16:23
  • msg #572

Re: OOC Discussion 7

GM Arkrim:
That works too.

*Thumbs up emoji*
Groppo
Fighter 662, 135 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sat 30 Sep 2017
at 16:27
  • msg #573

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Following the rules lawyering with intense interest! ;D ;D ;D
Groppo
Fighter 662, 136 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 2 Oct 2017
at 14:40
  • msg #574

Re: OOC Discussion 7

What's that, 7 hero points spent in total so far? :D 1 me, 2 Latro, 4 Boadicea? :D Exciting battle!
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1244 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Tue 3 Oct 2017
at 13:38
  • msg #575

Re: OOC Discussion 7

real talk, i've seen Arkrim remark about questions involving specificity in the arena and that he's already answered specific questions before a lot but i must be out of the loop cause i see nothing in the rules threads about asking questions like that, nor anything suggesting that such questions are not to be asked in the first place or even what the actual ANSWER to questions involving specificity is so, like, can someone fill me in?
did something happen in the time between july 2016 and july 2017 that resulted in this or what cause i was just not around during that time period. At the very least elaborate on exactly why the GM doesn't answer these kinds of questions, please?
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 741 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 3 Oct 2017
at 13:52
  • msg #576

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I am lost, what is the question?
I know his general rule is if something specifies it's the rule versus a suggested answer.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1246 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Tue 3 Oct 2017
at 15:02
  • msg #577

Re: OOC Discussion 7

The question i asked in the arena was a highly specific one and I don't think Arkrim has actually answered that specific question before. I'm not going to elaborate on it here because it's still a plan i have in my back pocket regardless. After the battle though id be happy to spill the beans.

The issue at hand is why won't arkrim answer questions that ask "what will happen when *specific thing* happens" regardless of if they could be answered with a simple yes or no, or require a more lengthy explanation.
I truly don't know and have no idea what Arkrim expects me to know his answer to such questions should be.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 742 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 3 Oct 2017
at 15:13
  • msg #578

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I response to your OOC in match, I had the  feather fall in last match and potion of walk so for ease I did the walk after it was over so it would be less conspicuous.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6240 posts
Game Master
Wed 4 Oct 2017
at 01:50
  • msg #579

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Latro Dectus:
real talk, i've seen Arkrim remark about questions involving specificity in the arena and that he's already answered specific questions before a lot but i must be out of the loop cause i see nothing in the rules threads about asking questions like that, nor anything suggesting that such questions are not to be asked in the first place or even what the actual ANSWER to questions involving specificity is so, like, can someone fill me in?
did something happen in the time between july 2016 and july 2017 that resulted in this or what cause i was just not around during that time period. At the very least elaborate on exactly why the GM doesn't answer these kinds of questions, please?

You answered your own damn question but didn't bother to read what those remarks said.

*GM glare*
Groppo
Fighter 662, 137 posts
Advanced Gnome
Wed 4 Oct 2017
at 11:12
  • msg #580

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Alright well, I'll check in here in another couple of weeks - probably in time for the next retreat-and-heal-maneuver! ;)
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1249 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Sat 7 Oct 2017
at 14:34
  • msg #581

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Chop chop, boadicea! I know you have like 36 hours to reply but i'm itching to get this match over with so i can play with my massive stack of BP winnings. ;P
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 745 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 7 Oct 2017
at 17:11
  • msg #582

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Lol I will try but it's canal days weekend no promises
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 747 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Mon 9 Oct 2017
at 13:44
  • msg #583

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Watch who you calling BO Latro we ain't even had dinner yet, LOL
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1251 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Tue 10 Oct 2017
at 09:40
  • msg #584

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Fret not. I'll treat you to a feast with all the BP I'll get from killing your ass. ;P
Groppo
Fighter 662, 138 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 16 Oct 2017
at 13:23
  • msg #585

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Having only played one battle before, it's funny to see how you guys have such reserves! :D I count 6 hero points used by Boadicea so far! But of course, there are a lot of BP to be won... Kind of regret standing up for a straight all in-battle, now that "a couple of rounds" have passed since Groppo died...
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1263 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Mon 16 Oct 2017
at 14:40
  • msg #586

Re: OOC Discussion 7

7 by my count actually. But i think i just found Boadicea's fatal weak point: The rules *thunder clap*

Edit: *Not Relevant to above* i found it. I found the thing. sorry i was a thorn in your side, GM.
quote:
No making extra work for the GM: Don't give me extra work that isn't necessary to play the game and don't give me a hard time. Just be nice and be fair

This message was last edited by the player at 15:25, Mon 16 Oct 2017.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 761 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Mon 16 Oct 2017
at 15:23
  • msg #587

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I do not count that many(even at that count I still have more), and we all have our issues with the rules.  I will throw the kitchen sink if available to win I do not go down without a fight.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1264 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Mon 16 Oct 2017
at 15:32
  • msg #588

Re: OOC Discussion 7

By my count, a hero point was used by you, after all immediate actions and the like were considered, in the following post numbers
#63
#102
#108
#127
#152
#177
#192

#192 is the most recent, being #7 and the one i'm officially calling shenanigans on in the battle thread.
(this is why we list our used hero points as well ;) )
This message was last edited by the player at 15:33, Mon 16 Oct 2017.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6245 posts
Game Master
Mon 16 Oct 2017
at 20:14
  • msg #589

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hero point reserves are both a perk AND a drawback.

You can always put a lower or higher cap on hero points when you agree to a match but players have to make those agreements.

The good news is the it's a ridiculous amount of BP because it's both a monster match AND a battle royal. Hopefully worth your wait. ;)
This message was last edited by the GM at 20:27, Mon 16 Oct 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 139 posts
Advanced Gnome
Tue 17 Oct 2017
at 11:30
  • msg #590

Re: OOC Discussion 7

For sure worth the wait, the BP winnings will be equal to that I'd gain from several fights according to my preliminary calculations. Also happy to have threatened the legendary antipaladin :)
Hoping to ref or do more battles once this one is over, especially if there are more people joining.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 140 posts
Advanced Gnome
Wed 18 Oct 2017
at 15:01
  • msg #591

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Not sure when the 48 hours would be counted from, but B and Ls posts are more than 48 hours ago, GM post soon there too. #watchingyouguys #iwanttobreakfree
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1267 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Wed 18 Oct 2017
at 15:57
  • msg #592

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I was counting from when i called shenanigans on Boadicea's hero point usage as that was the last thing combat related besides the GM confirming. So i guess technically it could have been called from the GM's ruling? idk, thats a tricky one.
But if we have 48 hours since the last combat post, then Boadicea had 48 hours since her now defunct combat post.

Alternatively, if you really wanted to spite us, you could technically call 48 hours on us if you wanted to, Groppo. You are, after all, still a participant in the match. ;P

Hooray for retribution from beyond the grave.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 141 posts
Advanced Gnome
Wed 18 Oct 2017
at 16:21
  • msg #593

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Wouldn’t do it to spite you, would do it with the fresh memory of the two games that were canceled due to players and refs going afk, and because the game is prolonged enough with everything that is not attacking the other player/monster. You’re well within your right to do everything you guys do within the rules, but then you have to do that - stay within the rules. And one can make the most tricky, advanced and may-not-work-choices, but one can also make the choices that makes the game move along. If the game does not move along, I will help it do so if I am able, after you’ve had your 48h to make whatever choices seem the most appropriate to you guys.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 771 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 21 Oct 2017
at 13:12
  • msg #594

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Looks like casters get a boost (like they need any), you no longer have to declare you carry around a component pouch it's just a given that you have it and it doesn't have to be visible to use so it's not even a target for that throws the whole sunder spell casters pouch of oddities so he can't hurt me strategy, can't sunder what you can't see...
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1271 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Sat 21 Oct 2017
at 13:37
  • msg #595

Re: OOC Discussion 7

This is the one spell i was talking about that stated i needed a material component but didn't actually list what exactly the material component is. I'm pretty certain that this spell needing a material component is in fact a typo on the dev's part as the spell it counters and is countered by does not require a material component.
I Mean, neither spell even lists in their description a material component required to cast said spell. If you look at any other spell requiring a material component it lists what is needed in parentheses. Unadulterated loathing does no such thing. The material component, if any at all, is inconsequential because the spell fails to list what the material component should be. Heck even the Paizo reference document fails to list an actual material component and it's more official than the SRD. Basically, if i have material component pouch or not is completely irrelevant if the spell doesn't actually list what material component is required to cast the spell and as such i can only assume that the material component is nothing at all.
Now, If we really want to designate a material component for the spell though, we can say some kind of hair/blood/whatever that is the subject of the loathing. So all i'd need to do is pluck some of my own hair for this, which, i think we can all agree, is readily available on my own head/in my own open wounds.
But i contest that Unadulterated Loathing requiring a material component is a mistake and the material component should be disregarded.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 772 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 21 Oct 2017
at 13:51
  • msg #596

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Point is wether a typo or not the item needed is given to you all you had to do was put the listed free items in your gear a simple copy and paste and boom no issue and in not doing it you do not meet the spell requirements simple as that
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 773 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 21 Oct 2017
at 14:03
  • msg #597

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Blood or hair from you may be readily available if it was said to be the component but your logic does not work when the spell is used on let's say druid and animal companion or summoner and eidolon/summons or whatever mix of Ally's you want to put out there.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6253 posts
Game Master
Sun 22 Oct 2017
at 01:45
  • msg #598

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Boadicea:
Looks like casters get a boost (like they need any), you no longer have to declare you carry around a component pouch it's just a given that you have it and it doesn't have to be visible to use so it's not even a target for that throws the whole sunder spell casters pouch of oddities so he can't hurt me strategy, can't sunder what you can't see...

Nah uh ah. Nothing said it wasn't visible.

They're assumed to have.

Nothing said whether it was visible or not.

So if the caster is using it, it HAS to be in the only spot it can be used: visible (unless the caster is invisible or using eschew materials).

Sunder away.
This message was last edited by the GM at 01:46, Sun 22 Oct 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 142 posts
Advanced Gnome
Tue 24 Oct 2017
at 12:53
  • msg #599

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Would one prefer moving towards the one you're doing everything to get away from (by climbing up to get away) - or moving over the prohibited fluid? Tricky! If the Unadulterated Loathing spell did not specify obvious physical danger, I'd think that the problem (and the only straight escape route going against the other spell) called for another save against the Unadulterated Loathing...
This message was last edited by the player at 12:57, Tue 24 Oct 2017.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 778 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 24 Oct 2017
at 13:12
  • msg #600

Re: OOC Discussion 7

If moving above the fluid was forbidden then there may be a problem, if Latro had an issue with me moving above the acid something should have been said first round after spell there was a wall within reach without moving to pillar.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1276 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Tue 24 Oct 2017
at 15:25
  • msg #601

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In truth Boadicea, I underestimated your ability to rules lawyer. Never before have i encounter someone quite as stubborn as you. I take my hat off in respect.

But sooner or later, you will fall to me. It's only a matter of time.

Also, should you grow tiered of the endless bickering, You are always free to yeild the match at no penalty because you are below half health. I assure you I have no intention of doing so while i have such an outstanding upper hand over you.
This message was last edited by the player at 15:28, Tue 24 Oct 2017.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 780 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 24 Oct 2017
at 19:23
  • msg #602

Re: OOC Discussion 7

You may feel free to yield, I have no intention to...
Groppo
Fighter 662, 143 posts
Advanced Gnome
Fri 27 Oct 2017
at 11:37
  • msg #603

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Groppo is always ready! Except maybe the upcoming Wednesday-Saturday due to family vacay :p
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1279 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Fri 27 Oct 2017
at 12:21
  • msg #604

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well, in the event that you are unable to reply, i can always ask the gm
Groppo
Fighter 662, 145 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 29 Oct 2017
at 09:29
  • msg #605

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Where is the quoted rules line from? :O
This message had punctuation tweaked by the player at 09:29, Sun 29 Oct 2017.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 783 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 29 Oct 2017
at 09:44
  • msg #606

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Arena maps same as the line that Latro quoted a while back about the hanging bridge they both are specific to this map
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 784 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 29 Oct 2017
at 09:46
  • msg #607

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I was busy Fri and sat did not make time to sit down and look post over should have because if GM doesn't get on in a few I have to put my post up or risk 48 hrs rule :(
Groppo
Fighter 662, 146 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 29 Oct 2017
at 09:59
  • msg #608

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Boadicea (msg # 606):

Oh wow, there are rules there too! Cool :)
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1289 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Thu 2 Nov 2017
at 20:19
  • msg #609

Re: OOC Discussion 7

so in my combat post i eluded to a nasty combo in my OOC area and heres what it is cause i'm not going to have a chance to do this again more than likely.

if bo had become shadow trapped i would have in turn used my Drow noble SLA levitate to start levitating 1100 lbs of burning acid liquid from underneath boadicea and up into the air.
the idea being that after I pull this 1,100 lbs (or roughly 18 gallons) of liquid up past bo to about +5, her water walking would automatically lift her up until +4 when her trapped shadow would prevent her from moving forward any more. from then, with the acid surface resting at +5, her water walking will by trying to pull her to the surface of +5 but her body will be stuck in +4, thus resulting in acid and fire damage each round because her water walking is pulling her up faster than she can move away while nauseated. ()upwards at 60 feet per round vs a move speed of 30 feet per round.)
GM Arkrim
GM, 6258 posts
Game Master
Thu 2 Nov 2017
at 21:16
  • msg #610

Re: OOC Discussion 7

That would not have worked for a multitude of reasons due to the way the spells are worded and formatted, but it is an interesting idea.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1290 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Thu 2 Nov 2017
at 21:24
  • msg #611

Re: OOC Discussion 7

*shakes fist at the heavens* curse you rules gods for foiling my devious plans!!
Brakt
Fighter 1,045, 424 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Fri 3 Nov 2017
at 12:49
  • msg #612

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Wow, this is still here? >_>

Hi!
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 790 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 3 Nov 2017
at 12:57
  • msg #613

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Howdy Brakt
GM Arkrim
GM, 6259 posts
Game Master
Sat 4 Nov 2017
at 03:24
  • msg #614

Re: OOC Discussion 7

The ogre lives! Welcome back.
Brakt
Fighter 1,045, 425 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Mon 6 Nov 2017
at 05:17
  • msg #615

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hey folks!

Sorry I disappeared suddenly. MtG stole my soul for a while.

I'm back now though, and ready to rumble!

Speak of rumbling. Anyone up for a match with a very very rusty fighter?
This message was last edited by the player at 05:41, Mon 06 Nov 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 151 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 6 Nov 2017
at 06:14
  • msg #616

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I am! Will be, once the battle royal is over :)
GM Arkrim
GM, 6261 posts
Game Master
Mon 6 Nov 2017
at 10:40
  • msg #617

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Gnome vs. Ogre? That should be interesting.

Which map do you want and do you want any special rules?
Groppo
Fighter 662, 152 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 6 Nov 2017
at 12:31
  • msg #618

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 617):

:D And ogre fighter vs gnome fighter? :D

I'd want no flying just in case you've got secret tricks up your sleeve, Brakt - I prefer limiting the different sneaky tactics I have to adapt to, playing a non-caster class :)
Map suggestions: Boxed in (small), Urban terrain, standard light.

I guess, if you would allow GM Arkrim, we could start even before the battle royal is over - me playing at my 662BP and you Brakt at 662 or full as you prefer.
Brakt
Fighter 1,045, 426 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Mon 6 Nov 2017
at 12:39
  • msg #619

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Clash of the fighters!

I'm happy with anything? Just pure mano a mano

Do we have any volunteers for a referee?

I would like to keep full BP though, just so I don't have to try and rebuild again? :D
Groppo
Fighter 662, 153 posts
Advanced Gnome
Mon 6 Nov 2017
at 13:07
  • msg #620

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Brakt (msg # 619):

Full BP is fine by me!
Madam Opal
Witch 509 BP, 594 posts
Ratfolk Witch
Shadow's Caress
Mon 6 Nov 2017
at 22:00
  • msg #621

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Madam Opal will put her witch's hat in the ring to ref.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1294 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Mon 6 Nov 2017
at 22:45
  • msg #622

Re: OOC Discussion 7

You might get to be in a match sooner than you think, groppo! I'm pretty sure i finally dealt a finishing blow to boadicea.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 154 posts
Advanced Gnome
Tue 7 Nov 2017
at 07:33
  • msg #623

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Latro Dectus (msg # 622):

And then with all them BPs! :D
Brakt
Fighter 1,045, 427 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Tue 7 Nov 2017
at 12:19
  • msg #624

Re: OOC Discussion 7

All right! I'll let you spend your new BP then, and post a challenge when you're ready!
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1296 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Tue 7 Nov 2017
at 19:00
  • msg #625

Re: OOC Discussion 7

5 months, guys. 5 months. It's finally over.
groppo and the creature died in september.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 156 posts
Advanced Gnome
Tue 7 Nov 2017
at 19:32
  • msg #626

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Five different months, but time taken only a little over three months - haha I couldn't believe it had really taken five full months... But yeah, that's a looong fight! :D
What does a guild do?
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,504, 1297 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Tue 7 Nov 2017
at 20:13
  • msg #627

Re: OOC Discussion 7

And in game time that fight lasted like 3 minutes or something ridiculous like that.


As far as guild go, A few choice things here and there. But the main perk is that we get free teamwork feats if we enter a match together. Also if one of us is the champion and we enter a match together, we all get a free hero point to use in that match only.

You can read about it all at the bottom of this page:
link to a message in this game
This message was last edited by the player at 20:22, Tue 07 Nov 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 662, 157 posts
Advanced Gnome
Tue 7 Nov 2017
at 20:30
  • msg #628

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sure, I'll join! Haha, with all that flavor in every fight, Latro is my favorite fighter of the arena anyway! :D
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,134, 795 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 7 Nov 2017
at 22:41
  • msg #629

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Only issue with guilds with attendance so low is it restricts who can be part of your duel as ref
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,795, 1298 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 01:10
  • msg #630

Re: OOC Discussion 7

That... is actually a valid point. Well brakt is back and according to the cast list, Grunyar and Josep are floating around as well so its not like no one is around. :P
They just haven't been posting.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6263 posts
Game Master
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 01:18
  • msg #631

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Boadicea, Groppo, Latro: You are finally free of the Monstrous Battle Royal. Make sure to update your sheets with all your shiny new battle points. I'm sure you've already got a plan for them.




Feel free to invite more people. Attendance used to be so busy here I had to create the REFEREE rules because GMs couldn't keep up.

And Latro may well outlast everyone. He's been here the second longest and I've seen him improve more than any other gladiator.




Guilds make MONSTER HUNTS extremely easy BP. A guild that's powerful enough can take on SUICIDE missions and still win without a single loss and the BP reward would be ridiculous.

This is kind of intentional so that people don't stagnate and can continue to grow in level if they're willing to work with others.
This message was last edited by the GM at 01:20, Wed 08 Nov 2017.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,795, 1299 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 06:25
  • msg #632

Re: OOC Discussion 7

OK gang, so here's a question for you all. And if arkrim wants to weigh in, that's cool too.
 Suppose there's a disagreement in the very word of a book where the text itself says something different than what the tables says. Which is correct? Do i use the written word over what the table says, or does the table trump the text?

Thing in question: Agent of the Grave - http://www.d20pfsrd.com/classe.../agent-of-the-grave/
the table says i gain a boost to CL at every level but 1st while the text says i gain a boost to CL at every level period.
So which is correct?
Brakt
Fighter 1,045, 429 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 06:49
  • msg #633

Re: OOC Discussion 7

As a general rule, the table will trump the Text, as the text may be ambiguous, while the table is "This is applied here"

As for your example:

Spells per Day/Spells Known:
When a new Agent of the Grave level is gained, the character gains new spells as if he had also gained a level in a spellcasting class he belonged to before adding the prestige class. He does not, however, gain other benefits a character of that class would have gained, except for additional spells per day, spells known (if he is a spontaneous spellcaster), and an increased effective level of spellcasting. If the character has more than one spellcasting class before becoming an Agent of the Grave he must decide which class he adds the new level to for the purpose of determining spells per day.


As taking the prestige class at level 1 doesn't count as "Gaining a new level", you'll only get extra spells at Levels 2+

I've gone ahead and posted your question at RPG.StackExchange.  Which I also advise you join if you haven't already.  Great for answering any and every question you may have :)

https://rpg.stackexchange.com/...el-of-this-class-cou
This message was last edited by the player at 07:00, Wed 08 Nov 2017.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,392, 796 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 07:00
  • msg #634

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Off topic, on break trying to look up wording but can not find it on ref not being of the same guild?

If we all joined Latro would that be a work around the rule?
Brakt
Fighter 1,045, 430 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 07:31
  • msg #635

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I could be wrong, but I don't recall there being an ability change guilds, so it looks like I'll be the nly representative of the Voiceless Dragon for the time being!

But you'd think that if guild-members were fighting, then another member could ref.  With the exception of Latro/Ugrim or similar >_>
Groppo
Fighter 883, 158 posts
Advanced Gnome
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 07:42
  • msg #636

Re: OOC Discussion 7

GM Arkrim:
Rewards are separate for monster and battle royal so it is a feast of rewards win or lose.

Oh dangit I had thought we'd get rewards for winning against the monster together (calculated as a Monster Hunt or so) separately from the battle royal - I thought there were more beeps coming :P

Also: will accept that challenge later today!
This message was last edited by the player at 07:44, Wed 08 Nov 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 883, 159 posts
Advanced Gnome
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 10:06
  • msg #637

Re: OOC Discussion 7

GM Arkrim:
3-4 heroes fight a monster, then fight each other to the death.

Now this might very well be me misinterpreting, but I really understood it as us winning collectively against the monster before fighting each other (rather than the monster being a combatant like the rest of us). Even though the option to attack others earlier was of course there...
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 666 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 10:49
  • msg #638

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Brakt you can leave guilds and join others but if I remember right after you leave the second you are blocked from joining a guild for a bit.

I used to be part of TA but people got scarce and I wanted to ref so I left
This message was last edited by the player at 10:50, Wed 08 Nov 2017.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,795, 1300 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 12:13
  • msg #639

Re: OOC Discussion 7

As far as refs. It does say you need a 3rd party to ref a match so members of the same guild reffing for one another might be a little not ok. Unless they were in the same guild in which case there really cant be any favoritism so that might be ok?

as far as rules, huh, really? cause i always thought is was text trumps table. at least thats what official errata in 3.5 says. Granted 3.5 is not pathfinder but i haven't personally been able to find anything pathfinder related that says anything one way or another. And thats the reason i was asking.

as far as our BP winnings from that match. I understood it the same way groppo. i'm still very happy with near 300 BP as now I can finally level up without sacrificing any of my gear. But it sure would be nice to get an extra helping more. ;P
Maybe that extra bp that would have gone to the reff can magically find its way into our pockets some how. #TrickleDownBP
This message was last edited by the player at 12:16, Wed 08 Nov 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 883, 162 posts
Advanced Gnome
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 15:57
  • msg #640

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Still sort of hoping Arkrim will tell us he forgot what his original plan for separate BP winnings would be, and change it - but I'm now built with close to 883BP for the next duel! :D

(Regardless, it was a good BP boost, got me most of what I wanted! Now I just need the BP from a good win to enact some further changes to fit in Latro's evil group ';.;')
This message was last edited by the player at 15:59, Wed 08 Nov 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 883, 163 posts
Advanced Gnome
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 16:03
  • msg #641

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Really excited for the duel btw! I thought I'd be the only one going for the 'boring' full fighter build, but nope! Now I get to fight one! At the same level!
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,795, 1301 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 16:16
  • msg #642

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I mean, if you feel like sparing with a boring fighter, i have a Barbarian in my arsenal i can throw at you. ;P
same goes to you boadicea. Ugrim hasn't seen the light of day for quite some time now.
Groppo
Fighter 883, 164 posts
Advanced Gnome
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 17:51
  • msg #643

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I could do that map, but it’s Sniper Valley, not Boxed In. Don’t know if Brekt is prepped to handle the pits? :)
GM Arkrim
GM, 6266 posts
Game Master
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 18:02
  • msg #644

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Groppo, you're right. I forgot. I recalculated the rewards. You're up by 105, Bo is up by 29...and Latro's down by 1 due to how rounding works here. LOL.

Also, Latro, your BP is huge and you've been a veteran for a while. Any chance you want to have a go at that championship belt again?
This message was last edited by the GM at 18:25, Wed 08 Nov 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 988, 165 posts
Advanced Gnome
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 18:29
  • msg #645

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 644):

Oh wow, great for me! :D

Brekt, challenge has been accepted and all... But no sheet posted yet in the duel, and no BP specified in the challenge thread. Would you be okay with me adding my full BP to the sheet? It still wouldn't take me up to level 11.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1304 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Wed 8 Nov 2017
at 23:18
  • msg #646

Re: OOC Discussion 7

GM Arkrim:
Also, Latro, your BP is huge and you've been a veteran for a while. Any chance you want to have a go at that championship belt again?

That was kinda my plan actually. :P

also, ow, that 1 BP loss. I doubt it'l make a difference though. Ive had a couple BP floating doing nothing at all in my current build anyways so. :P
This message was last edited by the player at 23:38, Wed 08 Nov 2017.
Brakt
Fighter 1,045, 431 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Thu 9 Nov 2017
at 00:54
  • msg #647

Re: OOC Discussion 7

@Groppo Doesn't bother me, I'm happy with anything :)

@Latro You've been a veteran since before I even started, and from what I hear, you're getting pretty awesome, so good luck!
Groppo
Fighter 988, 168 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sat 11 Nov 2017
at 11:24
  • msg #648

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Brakt, are you happy with the map as well? It was not the one we set out to battle on.
I’ll be able to post in at most a couple of hours :)
Brakt
Fighter 1,045, 435 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sat 11 Nov 2017
at 11:41
  • msg #649

Re: OOC Discussion 7

It's not what I expected, and I have 0 ranks in Acrobatics, but hey, I'm up for anything!

Maybe we'll have to have a rematch in an open Colosseum next time :)

I'll be online for another hour 20 or so, then back again same time tomorrow.  Just a heads up, I'll prolly be offline Monday/Tuesday, so if you need to call 48 hours, I get it.

Fingers crossed we wrap this up tomorrow.

Edit:

Also, this amused me

My BP: 989/1,045 BP used
Groppo's BP:  988

I beat you by 1bp! :P
This message was last edited by the player at 11:48, Sat 11 Nov 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 988, 171 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sat 11 Nov 2017
at 12:25
  • msg #650

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Now I won’t be able to answer again before you’re gone, probably. But then you’ll die! :D
Brakt
Fighter 1,045, 438 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sat 11 Nov 2017
at 12:43
  • msg #651

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Natural 1... Why '/cry

So, I don't get AoO behind cover, so free draw if you need to, but... That's all you get for free :P

I'll finish you off tomorrow :O
Brakt
Fighter 1,045, 441 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sun 12 Nov 2017
at 10:30
  • msg #652

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well...
Only took 2 years, but I finally did it!
Groppo
Fighter 988, 174 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 12 Nov 2017
at 10:45
  • msg #653

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Nice with them sunder tactics, can’t do s*** without gear. ;) Dead, posting later.
Groppo
Fighter 988, 176 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 12 Nov 2017
at 12:42
  • msg #654

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I was hoping you were LN, considering you're part of SotVD! :)
Edit: I'm up for another fight, if anyone wants to!
This message was last edited by the player at 12:42, Sun 12 Nov 2017.
Brakt
Fighter 1,045, 443 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sun 12 Nov 2017
at 12:44
  • msg #655

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Lawful Neutral who munches out on his opponents skull... Sounds legit :P
Groppo
Fighter 988, 177 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 12 Nov 2017
at 15:03
  • msg #656

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Could do a follow-up fight against you Brakt, not sure it would turn out the same way on another map :) (Also the fight was quick and intense, which is fun!)
Madam Opal
Witch 509 BP, 597 posts
Ratfolk Witch
Shadow's Caress
Sun 12 Nov 2017
at 15:06
  • msg #657

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Thanks for a short non-complicated fight! I'll get to doing some maths and set you guys free
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1305 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Sun 12 Nov 2017
at 17:44
  • msg #658

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Ok, i think i'm ready. I'm gonna go for it.
I hereby challenge the current Champion to a duel for the right to become champion of the arena. Josep, i hope you're around to accept the fight.

you have 1 week to accept.
This message was last edited by the player at 19:03, Sun 12 Nov 2017.
Groppo
Fighter 988, 178 posts
Advanced Gnome
Sun 12 Nov 2017
at 17:51
  • msg #659

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Latro Dectus (msg # 658):

Wow!
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1064 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA - 1,494 BP
Mon 13 Nov 2017
at 01:44
  • msg #660

Re: OOC Discussion 7

*cracks neck*

At long last... I was wondering when you would come.
Of course I accept the challenge...


All right now as a player, I just landed in Bangkok for two weeks of well deserved holiday. I’ll spend that time between jungle and beach, so it might be tricky for me to give this the attention it deserves.
To put in short, would you be ok with postponing the start of our fight to November 29th?

We can still work out the details before then, I will have some WiFi here and there.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1306 posts
Drow Noble Antipal/Oracle
Shadow's Caress
Mon 13 Nov 2017
at 12:11
  • msg #661

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I can accept that. Work is about to get hella crazy for me for black friday and cyber monday as well so i'm fine waiting for after at least that. Granted, christmas time isn't going to be a walk in the park either but I think I can manage.
Calantir Onagreen
Fighter 200, 1 post
Half-Elf Fighter
Wed 15 Nov 2017
at 23:02
  • msg #662

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hello all. New player and obviously new character to the arena. Had a question I was hoping someone would be willing to answer.

Is it possible to save BP from char gen, and if so, what, if anything, is the benefit of doing so?
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 667 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Thu 16 Nov 2017
at 00:03
  • msg #663

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Only upside would be a simpler charracter sheet (lower lvl/less items)

The BP is fluid once spent it is not gone you can later transfer the same BP into something else.  Example is your first fight maybe you want a higher lvl to unlock class features but maybe you second you feel said features where not worth say the perks of an Uber weapon you can lower your lvl and spent the BP the was used on the lvl to purchase the weapon.
Calantir Onagreen
Fighter 200, 2 posts
Half-Elf Fighter
Thu 16 Nov 2017
at 03:27
  • msg #664

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Grunyar Fangblood (msg # 663):

Okay, thank you!
Brakt
Fighter 1,328, 444 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Thu 16 Nov 2017
at 03:31
  • msg #665

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Speaking of Barbarians...

Does Ugrin feel like a dual by any chance? :D
Ugrim
Barbarian 1,249, 516 posts
Advanced Orc Barbarian
Shadow's Caress
Thu 16 Nov 2017
at 18:31
  • msg #666

Re: OOC Discussion 7

a thunderous roar can be heard across the arena at the mention of Ugrim;s name. The pounding of fists and legs against gravel makes its way closer. Through the wall comes Ugrim, the orc barbarian of Shadow's Caress and by far the strongest of it's legion.

"UGRIM ALWAYS READY TO FIGHT!" he shouts "UGRIM CRUSH TINY OGRE!"

So yes, Ugrim would be up for a duel. :P
It's been a hot minute since ugrim's done anything though so let me check his stuff out and make sure i have everything in order.
Brakt
Fighter 1,328, 445 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Fri 17 Nov 2017
at 01:28
  • msg #667

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm still trying to figure out how to spend my BP from Groppo anyway, but let me know when you're ready :)
Calantir Onagreen
Fighter 200, 3 posts
Half-Elf Fighter
Fri 17 Nov 2017
at 14:49
  • msg #668

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Okay, new question. I keep seeing the reference to BP's spent on races. However, do Core races have a BP cost? Also, in regards to the multiclass, and class skills, I'm planning on playing (at least to start) a Half-Elf. Traditionally half elves get to pick 2 favored classes. Since we're already getting the favored class to both HP and Skills, would a Half-Elf get 2 to each to reflect the fact they'd have gotten to pick 2 classes rather than just 1, or would they get to have the +1 to HP and Skills for 2 classes even thought they are multiclassing?
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 668 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Fri 17 Nov 2017
at 15:10
  • msg #669

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Answer your first part there is a formula in character creation:
quote:
BP Cost
The cost calculation for races is as follows: RP * RP / 10 = BP cost to be that race (round down). For example, Centaurs are 28 RP. 28*28 = 784/10 = 78.4 rounded down = 78 BP to play a centaur.


RP stands for race points

The second part I believe the you only get the one favored class period but that's just my take
Calantir Onagreen
Fighter 200, 4 posts
Half-Elf Fighter
Fri 17 Nov 2017
at 15:15
  • msg #670

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Grunyar Fangblood (msg # 669):

okay where do I find the cost? I was looking up stuff on the srd, but it doesn't show any RP costs for the base race.
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 669 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Fri 17 Nov 2017
at 15:31
  • msg #671

Re: OOC Discussion 7

It has been so long since I started below link may help I think those numbers are right

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/gamema...C-Core-Race-Examples
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 797 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 17 Nov 2017
at 17:24
  • msg #672

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Losing the shield buid way to specalized going to a two hander sucks Earth Breaker is not in fighter weapon training.  It really should be with the hammers, anyone know any rulings or errata that adds it.  Guess I could pay the BP and ask GM to add it rather not.
Calantir Onagreen
Fighter 200, 5 posts
Half-Elf Fighter
Fri 17 Nov 2017
at 21:50
  • msg #673

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Grunyar Fangblood (msg # 671):

Thank you so much!
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1307 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Fri 17 Nov 2017
at 21:57
  • msg #674

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Boadicea:
Losing the shield buid way to specalized going to a two hander sucks Earth Breaker is not in fighter weapon training.  It really should be with the hammers, anyone know any rulings or errata that adds it.  Guess I could pay the BP and ask GM to add it rather not.

here you go
http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2o...Breaker-weapon-group
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 798 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 17 Nov 2017
at 22:08
  • msg #675

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Thanks latro, wonder why niether of the web pages are updated
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1308 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Fri 17 Nov 2017
at 22:14
  • msg #676

Re: OOC Discussion 7

who knows? But in the event the gM overrules that, you can always spend the extra BP to give it the Versatile Design weapon modification.
http://www.d20pfsrd.com/equipm...ns/versatile-design/
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 799 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 17 Nov 2017
at 22:21
  • msg #677

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Thats awsome thank you, will probably do that hate to sink time into build and flop right out the gate
Brakt
Fighter 1,328, 446 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sat 18 Nov 2017
at 01:34
  • msg #678

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Whenever Ugrim's ready, can we get a volunteer to ref?
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 670 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Sat 18 Nov 2017
at 01:49
  • msg #679

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I am free just doing tweeks and waiting for josep and latro to finish so I can try for the belt
GM Arkrim
GM, 6270 posts
Game Master
Sat 18 Nov 2017
at 02:03
  • msg #680

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Grunyar Fangblood (msg # 679):

Why wait? If you have a hero point, Championships can go Battle Royal style.
Groppo
Fighter 1,093, 180 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sat 18 Nov 2017
at 02:06
  • msg #681

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 680):

That sounds AWESOME! Gonna have to try and get some betting going for a game like that :D
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 671 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Sat 18 Nov 2017
at 02:11
  • msg #682

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 680):

Don't want to impose on thier fight they have setup already, up to them however they want to do it
Ugrim
Barbarian 1,249, 517 posts
Adv. Orc Barbar/Fighter
Shadow's Caress
Sat 18 Nov 2017
at 04:09
  • msg #683

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Ugrim's ready when you are Brakt

Can we agree to no invisibility and no flying. I dont think you have anything like that and ugrim isn't carrying anything like that either but just as a precautionary measure. for both our sanities. ;P
Brakt
Fighter 1,328, 448 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sat 18 Nov 2017
at 04:49
  • msg #684

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Challenge is up, ready when you guys are!
Brakt
Fighter 1,328, 450 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sat 18 Nov 2017
at 08:51
  • msg #685

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Okay, init rolled.  I'm off tomorrow, but I'll be back monday arvo to post :)

Good Luck!
Groppo
Fighter 1,093, 181 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sun 19 Nov 2017
at 00:10
  • msg #686

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Appreciate that rules clarification, sheez I've got a lot to look over :P
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 800 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 19 Nov 2017
at 00:16
  • msg #687

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yeah, thats interesting, feat doesn't say you can take it more than once so I assume its a one time thing?
Groppo
Fighter 1,093, 182 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sun 19 Nov 2017
at 00:25
  • msg #688

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yeah I do too! Weapons and armor would be three feats if it could be taken several times, that's still a lot (if no specific craft skill was needed, one could have wondrous items too for the same amount of feats). Unlike many other feats, it really doesn't say one can take it several times, so I guess that's clear.

On a different topic:
Character Creation thread:
you CAN use any base class (...) from any official Paizo-published Pathfinder RPG source

What does "base class" mean here?
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 801 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 19 Nov 2017
at 00:39
  • msg #689

Re: OOC Discussion 7

No idea
GM Arkrim
GM, 6273 posts
Game Master
Sun 19 Nov 2017
at 02:33
  • msg #690

Re: OOC Discussion 7

If you read through Paizo books and materials, the term "base class" essentially means "any class that is not a Prestige class".

Even the SRD uses it to describe these classes, though their categories also include "core", "hybrid", "alternate", and "occult" due to these other classes coming out in specific supplements.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1065 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA - 1,494 BP
Sun 19 Nov 2017
at 07:16
  • msg #691

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So, Lord Dectus ! What kind of arena are we looking at?
Any specific requests ?
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 802 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 19 Nov 2017
at 07:45
  • msg #692

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I think I finally have my new build hammered out, anyone want to duel?
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1309 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Mon 20 Nov 2017
at 14:48
  • msg #693

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep Gavinho:
So, Lord Dectus ! What kind of arena are we looking at?
Any specific requests ?

Well seeing as you're allowed refuse anything beyond a standard duel, I guess i'm going to have to go with standard rules and regulations.
But I choose my map as the Small Coliseum. I'm not about to give you a very large area to run/fly around in, that's for sure.
Brakt
Fighter 1,328, 454 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Tue 21 Nov 2017
at 04:32
  • msg #694

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So, was just going through my history, and by my records, I've had 11 Matches (although this includes 3 Battle Royals, and 1 Team Match), along with 3 wins.  Would this qualify me for veteran status now?
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 185 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Tue 21 Nov 2017
at 14:29
  • msg #695

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Boadicea (msg # 692):

Got my sheet done now! A bit busy right now though, can probably duel you this weekend or next week. Or ref a fight if someone else comes along.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6275 posts
Game Master
Wed 22 Nov 2017
at 02:03
  • msg #696

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Brakt (msg # 694):

Your record only shows 7 battles. If some of them were skipped, I'll need you to show me (the GM) to get it fixed. You'll need a link to each battle. Just PM it to me in a reply to your original PM.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 803 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Wed 22 Nov 2017
at 02:44
  • msg #697

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Vry (msg # 695):

Sounds like fun, any requests?
GM Arkrim
GM, 6276 posts
Game Master
Wed 22 Nov 2017
at 05:24
  • msg #698

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I know that some people have had some trouble navigating these threads.

I'm developing a google site that's a bit easier to navigate.

https://sites.google.com/site/thepathfinderarena/home

It's not completely done, but it's getting there.
Brakt
Fighter 1,328, 458 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Wed 22 Nov 2017
at 07:11
  • msg #699

Re: OOC Discussion 7

New site looks amazing Arkrim!

In the meantime, it's back to the drawing board for me.  That Barbarian charge HURTS! :\
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 186 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Wed 22 Nov 2017
at 07:35
  • msg #700

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 698):

You're such a champ, Arkrim!
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 187 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Wed 22 Nov 2017
at 07:45
  • msg #701

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Boadicea (msg # 697):

Looked around at the maps, I like the Large Forest :) Otherwise, no specific ideas! You?

Edit: Oh, and perhaps a couple of prep rounds?
This message was last edited by the player at 08:22, Wed 22 Nov 2017.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1311 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Wed 22 Nov 2017
at 15:59
  • msg #702

Re: OOC Discussion 7

GM Arkrim:
I know that some people have had some trouble navigating these threads.

I'm developing a google site that's a bit easier to navigate.

https://sites.google.com/site/thepathfinderarena/home

It's not completely done, but it's getting there.

So, just as a side note, should we be following this as far as arena rules go or should we stick to whats on rpol cause i'm noticing some pretty substantial differences on the google site vs here on Rpol.
Calantir Onagreen
Fighter 200, 6 posts
Half-Elf Fighter
Thu 23 Nov 2017
at 01:07
  • msg #703

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hate to keep having to ask for help, but I didn't get an answer on a previous question. I noted in the Char Gen thread that multiclassing looses the Favored Class bonus, but also that the core rules would be followed. I'm playing a Half-Elf, who by core rules gets to have 2 favored classes. Would the Half elf get 2 classes that got the +1's for favored class, get +2 to each HP and SKills, nothing extra, or something else entirely?
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 804 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Thu 23 Nov 2017
at 01:24
  • msg #704

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Vry (msg # 701):

Give you map and 2 prep but no invisible and no flying
GM Arkrim
GM, 6279 posts
Game Master
Thu 23 Nov 2017
at 03:02
  • msg #705

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Latro Dectus:
GM Arkrim:
I know that some people have had some trouble navigating these threads.

I'm developing a google site that's a bit easier to navigate.

https://sites.google.com/site/thepathfinderarena/home

It's not completely done, but it's getting there.

So, just as a side note, should we be following this as far as arena rules go or should we stick to whats on rpol cause i'm noticing some pretty substantial differences on the google site vs here on Rpol.

Don't make me smack you Latro.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 188 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Thu 23 Nov 2017
at 07:53
  • msg #706

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Calantir Onagreen (msg # 703):

I've never seen this situation before, but without a specific answer from Arkrim, I'll have to say the same Grunyar said - probably only the one favored class.
Arena Competition Rules thread:
RULES HIERARCHY
For rules conflicts, keep in mind that some rules trump other rules in the following order from highest authority to lowest:
  • GM (highest)
  • Arena Errata/Rules (any listed in this game's threads)
  • Official Paizo Errata
  • Core Rulebook
  • Referee
  • Every other Pathfinder RPG book officially published by Paizo
  • Unofficial errata & 3rd-party ideas/solutions to issues not addressed by Paizo

For now, it is clearly stated in arena rules that if one would multiclass, then favored class bonuses are lost.
Perhaps Arkrim hasn't thought about the half-elf racial trait and will at some point change the wording to 'if you take levels outside of your favored class' or so. Or perhaps he has thought it through and decided to go with what he wants.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 189 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Thu 23 Nov 2017
at 08:09
  • msg #707

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Boadicea (msg # 704):

Ooh, no flying and no invisibility? That's tough! But having played a fighter up until now, I understand ;) It's a deal!
Let me post the challenge, before this wednesday, okay?

Also, anyone want to ref?
GM Arkrim
GM, 6281 posts
Game Master
Thu 23 Nov 2017
at 09:32
  • msg #708

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Calantir Onagreen (msg # 703):

Get a character portrait. You are fading into the background.


In reply to Vry (msg # 706):

I'd say the only things I hate more than multiclassing are poorly written rules and half-elves, but that would be redundant.

The arena rules and errata are written with the explicit intention of nerfing those no-good abominations of senseless and jumbled racial traits into the dirt where they belong.

Play a half-elf in this arena only if you truly and deeply hate yourself....like all people who play half-elves.

/UnwarrantedNerdRage (because strong opinions about the game are just funnier this way)
This message was last edited by the GM at 09:36, Thu 23 Nov 2017.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 190 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Thu 23 Nov 2017
at 09:42
  • msg #709

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 708):

Haha! Half-elves, those damn pointy-ears/those filthy humans soiling the pure blood in their veins! ;)
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 805 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Thu 23 Nov 2017
at 11:37
  • msg #710

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Vry (msg # 707):

Sounds good
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1312 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Thu 23 Nov 2017
at 11:43
  • msg #711

Re: OOC Discussion 7

GM Arkrim:
Latro Dectus:
GM Arkrim:
I know that some people have had some trouble navigating these threads.

I'm developing a google site that's a bit easier to navigate.

https://sites.google.com/site/thepathfinderarena/home

It's not completely done, but it's getting there.

So, just as a side note, should we be following this as far as arena rules go or should we stick to whats on rpol cause i'm noticing some pretty substantial differences on the google site vs here on Rpol.

Don't make me smack you Latro.

how did i miss that?
Calantir Onagreen
Fighter 200, 7 posts
Half-Elf Fighter
Thu 23 Nov 2017
at 13:23
  • msg #712

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Vry (msg # 706):

Thank you! I must have missed that comment earlier.

Apologies all!
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1066 posts
Human Sorcerer
TA - 1,494 BP
Thu 23 Nov 2017
at 14:28
  • msg #713

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I’ll give you either no flight or no invisibility for a prep round though.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1313 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Thu 23 Nov 2017
at 15:07
  • msg #714

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep Gavinho:
I’ll give you either no flight or no invisibility for a prep round though.

Hmm. An interesting bargain. One I will accept. I'll take no invisibility for a prep round then.

Anything else you'd like to tempt we with?
Ugrim
Barbarian 1,249, 528 posts
Adv. Orc Barbar/Fighter
Shadow's Caress
Fri 24 Nov 2017
at 08:18
  • msg #715

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Again, that was a weird match. So much learned and so much discovered, all in the first round of combat. :P

So, uh, if anyone wants to get crushed on round 1, just let ol Ugrim know. :P
Brakt
Fighter 1,328, 461 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Fri 24 Nov 2017
at 10:34
  • msg #716

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I feel like I could of done that better, but... It was a weird match, that's for sure.

I might look at a rebuild myself actually.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 806 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 24 Nov 2017
at 10:40
  • msg #717

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Vry and I need a ref if either of you are willing.
Brakt
Fighter 1,328, 462 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Fri 24 Nov 2017
at 10:50
  • msg #718

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm down :)
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 191 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Fri 24 Nov 2017
at 10:50
  • msg #719

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Cool! Posting challenge this weekend.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 807 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 24 Nov 2017
at 10:53
  • msg #720

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Awsome thank you


Vry will put up the challenge in next couple days, he said before Wednesday.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6285 posts
Game Master
Sat 25 Nov 2017
at 08:31
  • msg #721

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Click the professor's face for news:


Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1315 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Sat 25 Nov 2017
at 09:23
  • msg #722

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I am lead to believe that Arkim has a certain disdain for those who multiclass judging from the relentless penalties he imposess on those who do. :P
Is it more than his disdain for helf-elves? Does it stem form the same source? Did a half-elf multiclass one day and something in his brain snapped? Perhaps we will never know.
This message was last edited by the player at 09:24, Sat 25 Nov 2017.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1067 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Sat 25 Nov 2017
at 11:31
  • msg #723

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I think he had a half-elf PE/math teacher in high school.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6286 posts
Game Master
Sat 25 Nov 2017
at 17:17
  • msg #724

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I don't mind dual-classing, but I hate every other version of multiclassing.

Taking "1 or 2 levels of X" for that ONE ability is obnoxious and inconsistent. Remember 3.5 sorcerers taking 2 levels of paladin for the saves or the barbarians taking 2 levels of fighter for the feats? OBNOXIOUS. I'd much rather just have the character get some special feat, item, or spell to emulate an effect they like from another class (like the Monk's belt/robe). And don't get me started on the SAVE stacking. UGH.

And my hatred for half-elves is 2 fold:

1) The Multitalented feature being on Half-elves but not Humans or Half-Orcs is outrageous.

2) The Multitalented feature itself is outrageous.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 808 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 06:04
  • msg #725

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I am one of those 1 or 2 lvls for X ppl.  As long as it is just two classes and they are at least close to the same function like me Barbarian\Fighter I do not see an issue but I agree when I see the posts on line about 2 of this\3 of that\ 1 of another and so on those are a bit obnoxious especially when they are jumping between different types of magic (arcane\Divine) and martial classes.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1316 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 06:09
  • msg #726

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep, if we can get this match up and going before december 1st before the new rules take effect, that would be super cool. If we cant, i'm gonna have to do some serious reworking to accommodate Latro's multiclassing ass as well as rebuild his cohort.
Brakt
Fighter 1,422, 463 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 06:15
  • msg #727

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I was reading a post the other day that had 13 different classes, and ended up rolling over 2k d6 on a full attack with sneak attack.

I want to try it, but I feel like I would be obliterated from existence if I tried.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1317 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 06:20
  • msg #728

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Brakt:
I was reading a post the other day that had 13 different classes, and ended up rolling over 2k d6 on a full attack with sneak attack.

I want to try it, but I feel like I would be obliterated from existence if I tried.

wtf that sounds absolutely stupid
Brakt
Fighter 1,422, 464 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 06:24
  • msg #729

Re: OOC Discussion 7

https://rpg.stackexchange.com/a/110093/23186

All legal in RAW as well...  One day lol
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 193 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 07:11
  • msg #730

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Brakt (msg # 729):

Interesting read but there are some inconsistencies, such as a) all prestige class feat requirements are solved through paragon surge and b) the character is a Kobold. c) Mantis blades and d) sap master.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6290 posts
Game Master
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 08:03
  • msg #731

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Vry (msg # 730):

Yeah, they definitely did not do the math right.

They're not reading "sneaky" correctly, as it only allows you to sneak attack a target that isn't flanked or flat-footed, it does not allow you to double your sneak attack. The problem with this is the builder is intentionally misreading every instance of "you can sneak attack in a situation you normally couldn't" as "you can add your sneak attack AGAIN".

They are also not even following the CORE RULEBOOK'S rules on multipliers. Multipliers don't stack, they are added before being multiplied. So a x4 damage, x2 damage, and a x3 damage don't become X * 4 * 2 * 3 (X*24), they become X*7 (4+2+3-2=7). So not only are they adding multipliers that aren't there, they're multiplying them incorrectly.

This build would certainly give you a nice 30-40d6 sneak attack damage at best (if a GM even allowed the same types of bonuses/sources to stack, which you're not supposed to), but not 2268d6.

To put all that effort into reading class descriptions without ever bothering to read the CORE RULEBOOK seems like an "epic fail" level of oversight. :/
Brakt
Fighter 1,422, 465 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 08:08
  • msg #732

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Right, well... Scratch that then.

This is why I read things like this for inspiration, but I do the actual builds and adding up myself.  Just can't trust people lol
GM Arkrim
GM, 6291 posts
Game Master
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 08:27
  • msg #733

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Brakt (msg # 732):

I mean, it's still impressive.

A 20th level character dishing out 30-40d6 sneak per hit with 6 attacks is pretty terrifying. You might be able to push darn near 2268 damage with a full attack given some lucky rolls and the right gear, but not 2268d6.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 809 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 13:16
  • msg #734

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Latro Dectus:
Josep, if we can get this match up and going before december 1st before the new rules take effect, that would be super cool. If we cant, i'm gonna have to do some serious reworking to accommodate Latro's multiclassing ass as well as rebuild his cohort.


I must have overlooked a post this is when the new rules take effect?

I like the lower lvl BP cost it offsets the race tax.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1318 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 14:41
  • msg #735

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Boadicea:
Latro Dectus:
Josep, if we can get this match up and going before december 1st before the new rules take effect, that would be super cool. If we cant, i'm gonna have to do some serious reworking to accommodate Latro's multiclassing ass as well as rebuild his cohort.


I must have overlooked a post this is when the new rules take effect?

I like the lower lvl BP cost it offsets the race tax.

yeah, click the professor's face and it at the bottom of the page.
I didn't notice how much cheeper levels were until you pointed it out though so i might be ok. :P
I does look like if i stay my same Race and Level i'll actually come out ahead with how many BP i'll have left over though so that's nice.

Actually, you know what, josep, would you rather wait until the first of december to start this match? We can reign in the new rules with a championship match and it'll give us some extra time to make sure our sheets are in line and all that jazz.
This message was last edited by the player at 15:20, Sun 26 Nov 2017.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 194 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 15:52
  • msg #736

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Can't post in the challenges thread; it doesn't say so in the list but when I enter the thread it says it's closed for posting.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 810 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 16:00
  • msg #737

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Thanks Latro, I admit I did not click on the professor.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6293 posts
Game Master
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 17:13
  • msg #738

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Vry (msg # 736):

Try it again.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6294 posts
Game Master
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 17:13
  • msg #739

Re: OOC Discussion 7

For those of you who missed it...

Arkrim:
Click the professor's face for news:


Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 196 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 19:04
  • msg #740

Re: OOC Discussion 7

the Professor:
Starting December 1st 2017, please disregard all the older arena threads (except the RTJ and future posts) and utilize this as your primary source for the arena


As I can't find the rules thread in the forum anymore, I'm guessing we'll have to use the new site (except character building?) for the last battle starting before december?
GM Arkrim
GM, 6295 posts
Game Master
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 19:54
  • msg #741

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Unless you can somehow finish your match by Dec 1st, it will make no difference for the rewards.

The new site has all the old data. Just don't implement any of the new OPTIONS available and you're good to go.
This message was last edited by the GM at 19:55, Sun 26 Nov 2017.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 197 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 20:00
  • msg #742

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 741):

Roger! Didn't see the new reward system before now, cool!
GM Arkrim
GM, 6296 posts
Game Master
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 20:39
  • msg #743

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yes, the new rewards are are lot more generous and grow with you.

The math is easier while also encouraging you to fight tougher foes.

http://sites.google.com/site/t...es/finishing-a-match
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1068 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Mon 27 Nov 2017
at 08:26
  • msg #744

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Latro! I’ll be ready to accept your challenge when you issue it. Josep has gone back to wizard by the way. Wizard 11.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1319 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Mon 27 Nov 2017
at 15:07
  • msg #745

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep Gavinho:
Latro! I’ll be ready to accept your challenge when you issue it. Josep has gone back to wizard by the way. Wizard 11.

Cool beans. You being a wizard actually changes something so let me get that fixed up and i'll post the challenge before dec 1st. :P
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1070 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Mon 27 Nov 2017
at 16:26
  • msg #746

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Fine tuning your anti-spell casting strategies aren’t you ;)

Who wants to take bets on who wins initiative??
I seem to remember Latro and Josep regularly rolling in the 30+ area
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 632 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Mon 27 Nov 2017
at 16:39
  • msg #747

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yo GUESS WHO'S BACK (you get three tries, first two don't count)

First of all, I'd like to apologize to Latro for just abandoning our match like I did. I'd like to say there was stuff going on in my life preventing me from replying, but the truth was I just sort of lost interest, and it eventually reached a point where I felt coming back would just make things more awkward.

But now I am back! Anyone wanna help me get back in the groove of things?
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 198 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Mon 27 Nov 2017
at 19:15
  • msg #748

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Not sure if there is one and I didn't find it, but except for the professor in this thread I don't see any easy ways to the arena rules. The link in the RTJ thread doesn't work properly (I just see the a href code where I can copypaste the link) and it's not under Game Links. Anyone else found a two-click-path to the rules site? :)

Also, as far as I can tell, the challenge and combat post formats are pictures and not text - so I can't copy them.
This message was last edited by the player at 19:19, Mon 27 Nov 2017.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 814 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Mon 27 Nov 2017
at 19:16
  • msg #749

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Copy and paste like from post to browser, best way I found then marked as a favorite.
Brakt
Fighter 1,422, 468 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Mon 27 Nov 2017
at 23:19
  • msg #750

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Tina!

I don't blame you for that... That's the exact reaction I had after our last fight lol.

At least I'm not alone in the Voiceless Dragon now :)
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 633 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Tue 28 Nov 2017
at 00:55
  • msg #751

Re: OOC Discussion 7

for now...
GM Arkrim
GM, 6300 posts
Game Master
Tue 28 Nov 2017
at 02:49
  • msg #752

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Vry (msg # 748):

Yeah, RPOL coding doesn't work very well in IE or Firefox. Best to use Google Chrome.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 634 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Tue 28 Nov 2017
at 02:56
  • msg #753

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm on Chrome and I'm seeing the same thing that Vry sees.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6301 posts
Game Master
Tue 28 Nov 2017
at 03:05
  • msg #754

Re: OOC Discussion 7

It works fine in the newest version of Chrome.

That's usually the most common issue.

If it's something else, I can't help you. You're going to have to ask your local IT person for help.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 635 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Tue 28 Nov 2017
at 03:42
  • msg #755

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I am my local IT person :I
GM Arkrim
GM, 6302 posts
Game Master
Tue 28 Nov 2017
at 03:46
  • msg #756

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Then you need to go up a level. :P
Brakt
Fighter 1,422, 469 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Tue 28 Nov 2017
at 04:18
  • msg #757

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Okay, can confirm.  Using Chrome, it's displayed as a PNG image, and as such, we can't copy the format out.
Brakt
Fighter 1,422, 470 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Tue 28 Nov 2017
at 05:31
  • msg #758

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I did it. I finally managed to use every single BP available.

I know I'll get more before I can fight again anyway, but I did it!
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1320 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Tue 28 Nov 2017
at 13:59
  • msg #759

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So uh, heres a thing. Josep and I need a ref for our Championship Match.
I'd ask arkrim if he'd like to do it, but this is about that will surly hand out copious amounts of BP for the ref of it. So, first come first served, who wants to ref this match?
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 687 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Tue 28 Nov 2017
at 19:34
  • msg #760

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I am available, but definately think some one of lower BP should jump on this opportunity.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 201 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Tue 28 Nov 2017
at 19:58
  • msg #761

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Grunyar Fangblood (msg # 760):

Gonna be a tough match to ref though, Latro is always tricky :P
Lyn
Magus 200, 1 post
Elf Magus
Tue 28 Nov 2017
at 22:59
  • msg #762

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm available :D

>_>

Ignore the fact you've never heard of me before :O
This message was last edited by the player at 03:42, Wed 29 Nov 2017.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6303 posts
Game Master
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 05:37
  • msg #763

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm going to say whoever refs the championship needs to be an arena veteran themselves.

Latro is pretty tricky...but then again, so is Josep. Double trouble.
Lyn
Magus 200, 2 posts
Elf Magus
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 05:39
  • msg #764

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I've got one now, I just didn't want to post again to show it off :)

Well... Reffing aside, maybe someone will decide they want to fight after the weekend?

... Wow, way to make me look insane.  I mean. I am anyway, but still :P
This message was last edited by the player at 05:40, Wed 29 Nov 2017.
Brakt
Fighter 1,422, 472 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 05:59
  • msg #765

Re: OOC Discussion 7

@Vry @Boad

I'm going to be off over the weekend, so if you've got any other questions, or things you might run into, let me know tomorrow so you're not waiting around :)
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 688 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 07:01
  • msg #766

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 763):

Lol that knocks me out, still a few matches away from veteran.
Brakt
Fighter 1,422, 473 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 07:06
  • msg #767

Re: OOC Discussion 7

If Vry and Boad hurry up, I'll be available.  Otherwise... No idea sorry :(
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 636 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 07:15
  • msg #768

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Grunyar Fangblood (msg # 766):

Yeah same, I'm 3 fights from vet because of my character reset from way back.

Speaking of fights, howzabout you and me have a go, Lyn? (with a BP limit ofc, I'd prob. squash you like a bug if I went in at full power) I'd suggest you round up a couple other low-BP fighters and go for a Juggernaut but 1) they seem to be in rather short supply recently and a) Juggernauts don't seem to count for the leaderboard so I don't think they count for veteran status (I could be wrong on this tho, if juggernauts and battles royal count for veteran despite not counting for the leaderboard then I'm only one fight away)
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1071 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 13:27
  • msg #769

Re: OOC Discussion 7


GM Arkrim, may I ask, is the new BP table enforced already?
I had my build almost ready for Latro, but it looks like the new table is very different from the old one, should we use that then?
GM Arkrim
GM, 6305 posts
Game Master
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 13:31
  • msg #770

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Josep Gavinho (msg # 769):

Might as well. Only a day and a half left and the rewards are better on the new system anyway.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 203 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 13:33
  • msg #771

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I appreciate the roleplay thread bump! Will join once I'm done fighting :)
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1072 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 13:37
  • msg #772

Re: OOC Discussion 7

All right then, back to the drawing table!
Latro, I suppose you'll have some redesign to do as well...
Shall we aim to have a challenge issued by Friday 00:00 UTC?
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 204 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 13:49
  • msg #773

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Question for Arkrim, and to a lesser extent to everyone in the forum:

Betting. Have you considered it? Tried it? Here, I mean.
I tried to get someone going for a bet with the reward being a duel skewed in the favor of the winner... But noone accepted - lack of interest or lack of people or whatever the reason could have been. I'd like a simpler betting system, with something somewhat meaningful to bet. Small amounts of BP (20? 50?) or perhaps a hero point. Just something to make the bet meaningful, but not large enough to be an actual route of progress through the arena.

Pros: Fun thing to do with especially exciting matches, such as one for the champion belt. Something to add to the experience of being in the arena outside of a duel one is actually participating in.

Cons: Locking up BP/HP in games one does not participate in and that may take a long time? Complications if one enters a duel while a game they bet on is ongoing, and can/cannot use the betted points but is still in possession of them. Extra work for Arkrim.

Either way, it's something I'd think is fun. What do you think? Or is an official betting system out of the question?
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1321 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 14:27
  • msg #774

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep Gavinho:
All right then, back to the drawing table!
Latro, I suppose you'll have some redesign to do as well...
Shall we aim to have a challenge issued by Friday 00:00 UTC?

Yep, back to the drawing board for sure.
I'll actually be at work at midnight on friday (Slave to amazon and all) But i'll do my best to get the challenge issued at some point or another that weekend. (unless of corse i haven't finished revising Latro by then cause, you know, i work 12 hours every night)
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1073 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 14:57
  • msg #775

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Latro Dectus (msg # 774):

I don’t mind going right now with the old rules if you prefer though.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6306 posts
Game Master
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 15:03
  • msg #776

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Vry (msg # 773):

We don't do it for the very reasons you just listed. You just answered your own question.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 206 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 15:13
  • msg #777

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 776):

No, you did :) Priorities might be different while the consequences remain the same!

On another note: geez, playing a spellcaster is so much more complicated than a fighter... Plans changing every time I look up interactions between different effects in the game >_>
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1322 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 15:31
  • msg #778

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep Gavinho:
In reply to Latro Dectus (msg # 774):

I don’t mind going right now with the old rules if you prefer though.

Let's wait till after friday comes. Besides, we'll still need a ref who is a veteran for us. At the very least, we'll always have Arkrim. (Besides, better rewards)
Brakt
Fighter 1,422, 474 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Thu 30 Nov 2017
at 01:22
  • msg #779

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well... Fingers crossed Vry and Boad beat each other up quickly so I can jump across, unless one of the other vets shows up.

Haran, Jayce, Vile Ann or Bruhli...

Not as many as I thought lol
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 637 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Thu 30 Nov 2017
at 01:28
  • msg #780

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Pretty sure we lost a bunch of them in the Great BP Conversion Purge of 2015
Lyn
Magus 200, 4 posts
Elf Magus
Thu 30 Nov 2017
at 01:48
  • msg #781

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I know it's a bit out of the ordinary, but I can swap in with Brakt to ref Boadacia and Vry, so Brakt is free for the championship if everyone's all right with that?

Also - Has anyone ever thought of grabbing a discord server or something to chat about things?
GM Arkrim
GM, 6307 posts
Game Master
Thu 30 Nov 2017
at 04:11
  • msg #782

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 780):

Most are still lurking. I'm guessing they just don't want to post until they're absolutely certain they have enough time to actually commune with fellow arena residents.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1074 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Thu 30 Nov 2017
at 09:29
  • msg #783

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I was dormant for almost a year, but I felt a disturbance in the Force and had to come out.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1323 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Thu 30 Nov 2017
at 14:50
  • msg #784

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep Gavinho:
I was dormant for almost a year, but I felt a disturbance in the Force and had to come out.

You mean i dragged your butt out of hiding. ;P
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1075 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Thu 30 Nov 2017
at 15:57
  • msg #785

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Exactly, you big evil disturbance ;)
Lyn
Magus 200, 5 posts
Elf Magus
Fri 1 Dec 2017
at 05:49
  • msg #786

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well, it's the 1st!

I'd be up for that match if you were still interested Tina?

Don't worry about a BP limit. I feel like it would be better rewards for me to fight you at full power, regardless of winning or loosing.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6308 posts
Game Master
Fri 1 Dec 2017
at 13:43
  • msg #787

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yeah, the new rewards intentionally favor fighting stronger foes, win or lose.

However, it hurts your Leaderboard stats to lose (if you're the competitive type) and you don't get hero points for losing.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1076 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Fri 1 Dec 2017
at 18:18
  • msg #788

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Latro, if you want to issue the challenge later today, I'm Wizard 14.

We agreed to no flying and one prep round, Small Coliseum.

No mythic evidently, and I'd like to add no Hero Point Interruption, because that's just cheating in my view. I actually think that option was erratad out, but maybe I'm inventing this.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 638 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Fri 1 Dec 2017
at 18:51
  • msg #789

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Alright Lyn, how about this?

   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / {No Limit} or {Number} Hero Points
      Referee: {None} or {Name}
Participant 1: Tinny Tina, Wyrwood, Alchemist 14
Participant 2: Lyn, Elf, Magus ?
          Map: Small Colosseum
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Plains
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: None

Also, anyone want to ref?


Josep, Act Out Of Turn is still a valid use for Hero Point expenditure (see https://sites.google.com/site/...haracter-advancement)
This message was last edited by the player at 18:52, Fri 01 Dec 2017.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 223 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Fri 1 Dec 2017
at 20:07
  • msg #790

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Ref volunteer here! Just need the formalities of my duel done I suppose.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1324 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Fri 1 Dec 2017
at 20:10
  • msg #791

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep Gavinho:
and I'd like to add no Hero Point Interruption, because that's just cheating in my view. I actually think that option was erratad out, but maybe I'm inventing this.

I'll agree to that for an additional prep round or for no flying. Your choice this time.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 827 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 1 Dec 2017
at 20:26
  • msg #792

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 789):

Thank you Tina I could not find that section earlier
Brakt
Fighter 1,422, 477 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Fri 1 Dec 2017
at 21:32
  • msg #793

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Looks like I'm available for the championship after all :)
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 224 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Fri 1 Dec 2017
at 22:23
  • msg #794

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Brakt (msg # 793):

It’s december 1st now, at least in Sweden it is! New reward calculation system!
Brakt
Fighter 1,422, 478 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sat 2 Dec 2017
at 04:04
  • msg #795

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I thought since matched was.played using the old BP system, old rewards applied?

Happy to recalculate if need be though
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 639 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Sat 2 Dec 2017
at 04:36
  • msg #796

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Uh Lyn, you realize that the challenge isn't actually complete, right? We never set a Hero Point limit.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 225 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sat 2 Dec 2017
at 10:57
  • msg #797

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 796):

Luckily:
Akrim's FAQ:
If one person deviated from the challenge format and the match is cancelled, can someone ELSE be the challenger instead of having to wait 48 hours?
Yes. If your team hit a snag because someone wasn't following protocol, you are welcome to try again immediately so long as a NEW person serves as the challenger. If you hit a snag AGAIN, you might want to reconsider who you're teaming up with.

Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1077 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Sat 2 Dec 2017
at 12:20
  • msg #798

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Thanks for clarifying that Tina, and welcome back :)


Latro, how's that:

   Match Type: 1v1 Championship
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / No Limit Hero Points
      Referee: Grunyar (?)
Participant 1: Latro Dectus, Drow, Antipaladin/Oracle XX
Participant 2: Josep Gavinho, Human, Wizard 14
          Map: Small Colosseum
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Plains
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: No Flying, No HP interruption

I thought we had already agreed to  No Flying ; do you want to add anything to the above? Extra Prep Round? No Auras ;) ?
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1325 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Sat 2 Dec 2017
at 12:41
  • msg #799

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep Gavinho:
Thanks for clarifying that Tina, and welcome back :)


Latro, how's that:

   Match Type: 1v1 Championship
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / No Limit Hero Points
      Referee: Grunyar (?)
Participant 1: Latro Dectus, Drow, Antipaladin10/AgentOfTheGrave1/Oracle1
Participant 2: Josep Gavinho, Human, Wizard 14
          Map: Small Colosseum
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Plains
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round - 2 rounds(?)
       Extras: No Invisibility, No HP interruption, No flying (?)

I thought we had already agreed to  No Flying ; do you want to add anything to the above? Extra Prep Round? No Auras ;) ?


Latro Dectus:
Josep Gavinho:
I’ll give you either no flight or no invisibility for a prep round though.

Hmm. An interesting bargain. One I will accept. I'll take no invisibility for a prep round then.

Anything else you'd like to tempt we with?

pretty certain i called for no invisibility on your last offer. ;P
The ball is still in your court for no Hero Point interruptions though. I'm personally fine with using my hero points to interrupt, but clearly your not so i'll take either a 2nd prepr round or no flying for it.
also, i went ahead and added in my class levels and all that jazz to the post

right now, i'm still trying to make sure all my BP spending is in order with the new format. Cant have something happen like last time where all my gear suddenly vanished due to me assuming i was A-OK.
This message was last edited by the player at 13:11, Sat 02 Dec 2017.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1078 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Sat 2 Dec 2017
at 13:53
  • msg #800

Re: OOC Discussion 7

My bad, for some reason I thought we had settled on no Flight; clearly not.

I'm happy to take No Flight/No Invisibility (it will save us and the ref a lot of headaches actually)

 

   Match Type: 1v1 Championship
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / No Limit Hero Points
      Referee: Grunyar (?)
Participant 1: Latro Dectus, Drow, Antipaladin10/AgentOfTheGrave1/Oracle1
Participant 2: Josep Gavinho, Human, Wizard 14
          Map: Small Colosseum
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Plains
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: No Invisibility, No HP interruption, No flying


 And I triple-agree on the importance of double-checking ; my last fight was similarly skewed by my rushing through the update... and Kecil was more formidable than I had anticipated. Serves me right for underestimating the competition...
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1327 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Sat 2 Dec 2017
at 14:05
  • msg #801

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep Gavinho:
My bad, for some reason I thought we had settled on no Flight; clearly not.

I'm happy to take No Flight/No Invisibility (it will save us and the ref a lot of headaches actually)

 

   Match Type: 1v1 Championship
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / standard 3 hero point limit
      Referee: Brakt (?)
Participant 1: Latro Dectus, Drow, Antipaladin10/AgentOfTheGrave1/Oracle1
Participant 2: Josep Gavinho, Human, Wizard 14
          Map: Small Colosseum
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Plains
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: No Invisibility, No HP interruption, No flying


 And I triple-agree on the importance of double-checking ; my last fight was similarly skewed by my rushing through the update... and Kecil was more formidable than I had anticipated. Serves me right for underestimating the competition...


Excellent. Also, reading over the rules, it looks like standard protocol is still only a max of 3 hero points per match. I personally don't know if that extends to the hero point the belt offers or if that is a freebie hero point so we'll have to check with the GM on it. but other than that, I'm basically ready now.
Now, as for Brakt, seeing as Josep and i are pretty set on taking each other on 1v1, would you be interested in reffing this match for us? I'm pretty certain you're our only other Veteran in the arena right now who is both active and not part of one of our guilds. (and you'd gain some insight as to how our character sheets worked for if you wanted to challenge us yourself.)
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 227 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sat 2 Dec 2017
at 15:15
  • msg #802

Re: OOC Discussion 7

@Brakt

Vry:
As I can't find the rules thread in the forum anymore, I'm guessing we'll have to use the new site (except character building?) for the last battle starting before december?


GM Arkrim:
Unless you can somehow finish your match by Dec 1st, it will make no difference for the rewards.

The new site has all the old data. Just don't implement any of the new OPTIONS available and you're good to go.


I interpreted this as the new reward systems taking effect in our fight unless we finish before december 1st. I'm not a native english speaker however, so I'm not sure if I'm reading it right :)
Brakt
Fighter 1,422, 479 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sun 3 Dec 2017
at 06:53
  • msg #803

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Oops, my bad!

Fixed that up with new methods now :)
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,421, 828 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 3 Dec 2017
at 06:57
  • msg #804

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Thank You
Vry
Sorcerer 1,038, 230 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sun 3 Dec 2017
at 21:04
  • msg #805

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Vry vs Boadicea duel:
1421 / 3 = 474bp for Vry

1083 / 4 = 271bp for Boadicea

1421 + 1083 / 6 = 417BP for Ref


Duel Rewards:
Loser: Gains an amount of BP equal to 1/6th the winner's BP.

Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 829 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sun 3 Dec 2017
at 21:46
  • msg #806

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I like Brakt's math better :)
Vry
Sorcerer 1,512, 231 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sun 3 Dec 2017
at 21:50
  • msg #807

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Haha yeah, I’ve got nothing against it, but I think that’s why Arkrim doesn’t approve :)

@Tinny Tina, what happened with HP and ref? :p
GM Arkrim
GM, 6311 posts
Game Master
Sun 3 Dec 2017
at 21:56
  • msg #808

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I fixed it.

But just FYI, if you're not using the new site for all your rules needs from now on, you're doing it wrong.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,512, 232 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sun 3 Dec 2017
at 22:00
  • msg #809

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 808):

Thanks!
Vry
Sorcerer 1,512, 233 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sun 3 Dec 2017
at 22:05
  • msg #810

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well, if ref is left up to GM choice, then the GM should feel free to choose me, should the GM wish to do so.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 642 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Sun 3 Dec 2017
at 22:09
  • msg #811

Re: OOC Discussion 7

well shit
GM Arkrim
GM, 6313 posts
Game Master
Sun 3 Dec 2017
at 22:14
  • msg #813

Re: OOC Discussion 7

It's okay Tina, Vry will be your ref.

*waves magic GM wand*
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 480 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Mon 4 Dec 2017
at 04:59
  • msg #814

Re: OOC Discussion 7

And... This is why posting online from your phone while multitasking is a bad idea...

Sorry folks, thanks for fixing that up Arkrim, and I'll make sure I do it right from now now.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 644 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Mon 4 Dec 2017
at 05:25
  • msg #815

Re: OOC Discussion 7

There's one more thing you need to fix up, "Lyn"
Lyn
Magus 200, 8 posts
Elf Magus
Mon 4 Dec 2017
at 05:32
  • msg #816

Re: OOC Discussion 7

**Headdesk

Like I said. I have no idea what I'm doing obviously :P
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 482 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Mon 4 Dec 2017
at 08:11
  • msg #817

Re: OOC Discussion 7

@Latro Yeah, I'm happy to jump in and ref if you guys want :)  And no more calculation errors, I promise :D
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1079 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Mon 4 Dec 2017
at 13:15
  • msg #818

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Brakt (msg # 817):
 Well good then ! I‘m ready to rumble.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6316 posts
Game Master
Mon 4 Dec 2017
at 14:12
  • msg #819

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Josep Gavinho (msg # 818):

To the challenge thread!
Vry
Sorcerer 1,512, 236 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Mon 4 Dec 2017
at 16:06
  • msg #820

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Championship HYPE!
Madam Opal
Witch 614, 600 posts
Ratfolk Witch
Shadow's Caress
Tue 5 Dec 2017
at 14:34
  • msg #821

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Question for the DM.
I know you said no more than one archetype per character class, but would you consider up to three archetypes for one class if players took the progressive penalties for multiclassing for each archetype beyond the first?

for example, I am a witch with one archetype. I take no penalties for multiclassing and can take up to two other classes that are not witch.
If i took a second archetype, i would loose my bonus HP and Skill point per level and only be able to take one other class that is not Witch.
if i took a third archetype still, (assuming there are three archetype that don't conflict with one another), i would lose my bonus HP and Skill point per level and more over would be forced to double my Race's base BP to factor it's cost in my total BP cost. Additionally i could not take any other class other than Witch.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1332 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Tue 5 Dec 2017
at 15:15
  • msg #822

Re: OOC Discussion 7

+22 to initiative for a wizard? I call hax. :P
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1082 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Tue 5 Dec 2017
at 15:58
  • msg #823

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Initiative is the very reason I went wizard!
Vry
Sorcerer 1,512, 238 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Tue 5 Dec 2017
at 17:10
  • msg #824

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Those initiative modifiers are SICK and UNNATURAL!!!
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 486 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Wed 6 Dec 2017
at 01:45
  • msg #825

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Those initiative modifiers are incredible... And I don't quite know how I'm going to steal them :P
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1334 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Wed 6 Dec 2017
at 10:58
  • msg #826

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Aaaaand i suddenly have this feeling that i'm going to loose. :P
well, time to start revamping Latro with some brand new build ideas for when i get my butt handed to me. :D
Vry
Sorcerer 1,512, 240 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Wed 6 Dec 2017
at 12:10
  • msg #827

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Latro Dectus (msg # 826):

Champion sets foot in the arena and you get cold feet? :p Cmon Latro, I’m cheering for you!
Vry
Sorcerer 1,512, 241 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Wed 6 Dec 2017
at 12:12
  • msg #828

Re: OOC Discussion 7

We can challenge the Thaumaturgical Alliance later, show them what’s up!
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1336 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Wed 6 Dec 2017
at 17:29
  • msg #829

Re: OOC Discussion 7

It's more i'm suddenly finding much better builds that the current one i have that are substantially cheeper than what i'm using.
honestly, I may just rechallenge Josep to the championship after this match if i loose and implement this new idea i'm working off of.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1093 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Wed 6 Dec 2017
at 19:01
  • msg #830

Re: OOC Discussion 7

My turn is done. Have fun with my babies!
GM Arkrim
GM, 6319 posts
Game Master
Thu 7 Dec 2017
at 04:38
  • msg #831

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep in the arena right now:


Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1344 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Thu 7 Dec 2017
at 17:11
  • msg #832

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I am doing everything in my power to make Josep's time stop turns as worthless as possible. :P
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 491 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Fri 8 Dec 2017
at 01:14
  • msg #833

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Arkrim wasn't kidding about this match being complicated lol
GM Arkrim
GM, 6320 posts
Game Master
Fri 8 Dec 2017
at 04:48
  • msg #834

Re: OOC Discussion 7

No joke. And I see you're not pulling any punches Brakt.

Latro and Josep better watch out. LOL.
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 493 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Fri 8 Dec 2017
at 05:03
  • msg #835

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I live for rules and combat maths <3

I may still make a lot of stupid mistakes, cause I'm always multitasking at work when I post, but... As long as they play within the rules, they've got nothing to worry about :)
Vry
Sorcerer 1,512, 245 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Fri 8 Dec 2017
at 10:25
  • msg #836

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Haha, who thought there would be this much action i the championship before round one?! Well, alright, having only seen a few matches with Latro and only one by Josep, I did expect it :p
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1098 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Fri 8 Dec 2017
at 10:36
  • msg #837

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Indeed! Latro hasn't taken his first prep round action yet, we're already at msg#26 !
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 830 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 8 Dec 2017
at 13:33
  • msg #838

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Champ match is brutal
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1100 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Fri 8 Dec 2017
at 14:23
  • msg #839

Re: OOC Discussion 7

And we’re still only halfway through the prep rounds!

Arkrim, how would you feel about someone writing a set of standard match conditions that clarify terms like « no flying », « no invisibility », etc ? We could have those in the rules as « standard options », which wouldn’t keep gladiators from having their own conditions if they prefer that.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1348 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Fri 8 Dec 2017
at 14:31
  • msg #840

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sorry to be a rules lawyer Josep. But even though i out BP you, your still a powerful spellcaster and i'm going to take every opportunity I can to put myself ahead. I may even have a chance to win that belt after all in this match. :P
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1102 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Fri 8 Dec 2017
at 16:53
  • msg #841

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I like how playful Tina is with her invisible earth elemental!
Guiving hope to the puny magus: “hey you even get to roll yourself for how long you’ll be smashed to a pulp by the invisible Hulk!”
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 649 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Fri 8 Dec 2017
at 16:58
  • msg #842

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Unfortunately, Lyn doesn't even get that small comfort. Vry (the ref) gets to roll for how long Lyn gets slammed for.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1103 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Fri 8 Dec 2017
at 17:09
  • msg #843

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Aw I missed that part. Well tough luck...
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 495 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 07:55
  • msg #844

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well... Lyn managed to get a shield off at least?

And Josep...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MsvER1dpjM
 '/runs and hides

Maybe summoning isn't your best skill lol
This message was last edited by the player at 08:16, Sat 09 Dec 2017.
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 496 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 12:46
  • msg #845

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yo Vry

Once these matches are done, want to have one of our own? :)

Or anyone else want to face up against a brawler?
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1105 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 13:23
  • msg #846

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well now that I’m back in the game, i wouldn’t mind a simple one on one with a warrior.
No fly, no invisibility, no summon, no nonsense.
Just a classic you charge I shoot and let the awesomest blow win ;)
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 689 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 13:28
  • msg #847

Re: OOC Discussion 7

With Josep fighting Brakt next, Latro want to fight flying invisibility, summoning all the cool stuff allowed?
Vry
Sorcerer 1,512, 247 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 13:32
  • msg #848

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I’ll fight anyone! We’ll see how things look when these two fights are done...
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 831 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 14:27
  • msg #849

Re: OOC Discussion 7

looking over the rules pages and must be over looking it, are we still able to move classes around for free its just name change we have to pay for right?
Vry
Sorcerer 1,512, 248 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 14:29
  • msg #850

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Boadicea (msg # 849):

Yeah, I've never seen any rules for what can be changed and what can't, but always thought class was locked in. It doesn't seem that way though, the champ just changed class etc. The reset is probably only useful for resetting scoreboard, but the name can change too.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1107 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 14:38
  • msg #851

Re: OOC Discussion 7

The rule was, as well as I can remember, that you could change EITHER class OR race OR name, without affecting your ranking.
I once forgot about it and changed BOTH class AND race at once for my second character, and lost a beautiful 4-0-0 ranking.

I’m not sure whether that rule is still applicable, but just to be on the safe side I changed only my class this time. I might keep the class and change the race sometime...
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1352 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 14:40
  • msg #852

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Grunyar Fangblood (msg # 847):

haha, yeah i could go for that. you'll have to let me spend all the BP i end up getting of course but id be down. I mean, even if i loose, under the new BP rewards i think i'm getting like 160 bp+ which is honestly quite a bit.
This message was last edited by the player at 14:41, Sat 09 Dec 2017.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,512, 249 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 14:47
  • msg #853

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Josep Gavinho (msg # 851):

Oh, never heard about that! Perhaps GM Arkrim can set up a list of what cannot be changed (Alignment? Name? Race? Class?) - that would make it easy to understand what can be changed! Being a new player in the arena, I had no idea if I would be penalized for getting rid of an item I had last game before the next, or if I could change a feat, when I went into my first fights...
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1108 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 15:06
  • msg #854

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Again, that’s only AFAIK. It may well be obsolete knowledge ;)

What I do know for sure is that you can change inventory, feats, skills, spells, etc. willy nilly and without penalty.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 832 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 17:33
  • msg #855

Re: OOC Discussion 7

dumb barbarian speak corrected by Josep, going back to corner and sharpen my new sword
This message was last edited by the player at 17:50, Sat 09 Dec 2017.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1111 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 17:45
  • msg #856

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Boadicea (msg # 855):
 Thanks Boa, always a pleasure ;)

 It’s not an automatic hit in that it needs to make a grapple check vs the target’s CMD.
 If it automatically made the target grappled with no save, it would indeed be banned.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1112 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 18:42
  • msg #857

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Boadicea (msg # 855):
 No worries ;)
 I welcome a bit of rules lawyering, despite my recent failures !!
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,654, 653 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 19:39
  • msg #858

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep Gavinho:
Black Tentacles only roll for grapple check, not the attack roll that usually precedes a grapple check. Grapple checks are not subject to concealment as far as I know. And the tentacles don’t have eyes to begin with, they don’t know whether it’s dark or not.

Josep, this isn't 3.5. There is no attack roll preceding a grapple check in Pathfinder, the grapple check is the attack roll.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1113 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Sat 9 Dec 2017
at 20:08
  • msg #859

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 858):
 Good point.
 I was thinking of the Grab ability on monster attacks that both the Hezrou and the Crocodile were supposed to unleash on Latro...
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 498 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sun 10 Dec 2017
at 06:00
  • msg #860

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Couldn't find anything concrete on Wall of Force, a lot of forums say you can see it, or can't. I felt bad for Josep though, so I gave him a chance to have the wall not seen.

Also - I'm totally down for a match vs Josep once this match is done! I know I'll lose, but it will be worth it
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1114 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Sun 10 Dec 2017
at 09:52
  • msg #861

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Brakt (msg # 860):
 Please don’t feel bad for me !!

 I tend to agree with the perception check, because even if you cannot see it, you’d still hear your voice bounce off it, assuming you know what you’re looking for.

 And at our level, DC20 is a piece of cake anyway ;)
Vry
Sorcerer 1,512, 251 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sun 10 Dec 2017
at 11:03
  • msg #862

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Oh wow, that wall! :D
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1354 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Sun 10 Dec 2017
at 14:20
  • msg #863

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Brakt:
Couldn't find anything concrete on Wall of Force, a lot of forums say you can see it, or can't. I felt bad for Josep though, so I gave him a chance to have the wall not seen.

Also - I'm totally down for a match vs Josep once this match is done! I know I'll lose, but it will be worth it

Personally, i would argue that force effects are usually visible. Magic missile, Shield of Faith, entropic shield. Things of that nature. Wall conjures an invisible force effect and true seeing sees through all invisibility.

But I suppose its a mute point because Josep went ahead and let me know where the wall was anyways so i'm ok with it. :P
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 499 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Mon 11 Dec 2017
at 08:55
  • msg #864

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hey Josep.

Proposition for our match. How about... invis/flying is fine, but.
No Prep rounds  and Brakt automatically goes first in initiative.

I'll even take a large colloseum so you know I can't reach you
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1119 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Mon 11 Dec 2017
at 10:36
  • msg #865

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Brakt automatically goes first?? Are you crazy? Josep prises himself on being the fastest trigger of the plains...
Large colosseum is no guarantee, I’ve seen Hiro run diagonally across a large arena and land a high kick on arrival!
Invisibility and Flight are not very useful if I have an ogre on m’y neck before I can start casting ;)
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1359 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Mon 11 Dec 2017
at 14:04
  • msg #866

Re: OOC Discussion 7

hot dang! Critical hits with spells are the best!
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1120 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Mon 11 Dec 2017
at 14:17
  • msg #867

Re: OOC Discussion 7

 Hey that's my spell !!
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1361 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Mon 11 Dec 2017
at 14:31
  • msg #868

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I mean, what do you expect? I'm chaotic evil. I steel things. ;P
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,721, 656 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Mon 11 Dec 2017
at 15:08
  • msg #869

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yeah, and you steal things, too!
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1122 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Mon 11 Dec 2017
at 15:21
  • msg #870

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I notice no one stole your idea of bringing a freaking catapult into the arena ;)
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,721, 657 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Mon 11 Dec 2017
at 15:28
  • msg #871

Re: OOC Discussion 7

That's because it didn't work!!!
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 252 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Mon 11 Dec 2017
at 15:29
  • msg #872

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 871):

Was awesome though! :D
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 253 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Mon 11 Dec 2017
at 15:31
  • msg #873

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm not quite ready for a fight myself, but could ref one if anyone else is going to fight.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1123 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Mon 11 Dec 2017
at 15:33
  • msg #874

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Quick question, when one fires multiple rays, does one need to declare all targets before rolling, or can one shoot a first ray, see how it does, then a second, etc. The same way you would with multiple iterative attacks from a high BAB ?
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 690 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Mon 11 Dec 2017
at 15:39
  • msg #875

Re: OOC Discussion 7

spell says fired simultaneously so I would say declare before rolls
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 254 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Mon 11 Dec 2017
at 15:48
  • msg #876

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Josep Gavinho (msg # 874):

Haha this is just one big learning experience! Oh, to watch the champion and the major contender of the arena do what they do best! :D
This message was last edited by the player at 15:48, Mon 11 Dec 2017.
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 500 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 05:58
  • msg #877

Re: OOC Discussion 7

@Josep: I had to try.

Just for the hell of it, if you're still the champion at the end of this match, let's make it interesting?  No flying, no time stop. Everything else is fair game?

Latro, since you'll be done at the same time as us, want to ref?
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 501 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 06:30
  • msg #878

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hey OOC.

I need a vote for a ruling, because I can't do my job right :D

Tiaca just cast Reach Scorching Rays using a level 2 spell slot. According to the rules though:

Metamagic:
Pathfinder errata already clarifies this, but just to summarize: any effects that reduce the metamagic cost of an effect do not stack with each other nor can they reduce the spell slot level below its original spell level + 1. This applies regardless of any combination of class features, racial traits, background traits, feats or spells in effect. Any ability that specifically says that it does otherwise is banned from the arena.


So, Tiaca can't do this.  Now, do we:

  • A: Cast the same spell using a level 3 spell slot(Effectively no difference)
  • B: Cast a different spell using the same readied action?
  • C: Tiaca loses the readied action completely?


Thanks guys
GM Arkrim
GM, 6321 posts
Game Master
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 07:07
  • msg #879

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Personally, I'm of the opinion that if it's possible to do what you're trying to do, then you do it.

If it winds up having a different cost than you were expecting (higher spell slot for a spontaneous caster) then so be it.

However, if it's impossible (such as the same situation happening to a prepared caster) then what you declared happening fizzles and you may or may not get a foul depending on whether the ref feels that it's something the player should have obviously been prepared for.

Usually a conflict with the core rules is insta foul while a conflict with arena rules is a bit more forgiving but not for repeat mistakes during the same match (even if they're different rules for each mistake).

Or at least that's how I look at it.

A) if spontaneous caster
C) if not spontaneous caster and doesn't have exact same spell prepared as 3rd level
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 691 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 07:47
  • msg #880

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Brakt (msg # 877):

Latro and I are going to duel after he is finished
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 692 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 07:51
  • msg #881

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Brakt (msg # 878):
+1 what GM said

quote:
A) if spontaneous caster
C) if not spontaneous caster and doesn't have exact same spell prepared as 3rd level

Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 503 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 12:12
  • msg #882

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hmm... Well...

Anyone else want to ref Josep and myself?
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1126 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 12:21
  • msg #883

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Brakt (msg # 882):
 Vry? Or Tina ?

Brakt, are you saying you want the belt?
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1127 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 12:22
  • msg #884

Re: OOC Discussion 7

MY BELT ??!
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 504 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 12:37
  • msg #885

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Only if Latro doesn't take it first!

But yeah. I think I'm finally in a place where I'll have a chance :)

I do think we'll need someone experienced to ref, if it's anything like your current match... Maybe Latro when he's done eatingwith Grunyar, or Boadicea or Tina maybe?
Lyn
Magus 476, 18 posts
Elf Magus
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 12:38
  • msg #886

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I can't ref that, for... Reasons.

But, anyone up for a limit BP500 match?
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 255 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 13:00
  • msg #887

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm up for reffing anything. I'll probably be ready to duel in a week, too.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 833 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 13:11
  • msg #888

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Lyn, if you want to do the Grunyar Latro duel I can do Josep Brakt duel
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1362 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 13:59
  • msg #889

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Brakt:
Hey OOC.

I need a vote for a ruling, because I can't do my job right :D

Tiaca just cast Reach Scorching Rays using a level 2 spell slot. According to the rules though:

Metamagic:
Pathfinder errata already clarifies this, but just to summarize: any effects that reduce the metamagic cost of an effect do not stack with each other nor can they reduce the spell slot level below its original spell level + 1. This applies regardless of any combination of class features, racial traits, background traits, feats or spells in effect. Any ability that specifically says that it does otherwise is banned from the arena.


So, Tiaca can't do this.  Now, do we:

  • A: Cast the same spell using a level 3 spell slot(Effectively no difference)
  • B: Cast a different spell using the same readied action?
  • C: Tiaca loses the readied action completely?


Thanks guys


Oh my. I was very unaware of this.
Well, obviously, i would vote A but i don't suppose my vote actually counts does it. :P
Alternatively, i vote
D: Treat the spell as if no meta magic was applied to it whatsoever when cast.
This message was last edited by the player at 14:01, Tue 12 Dec 2017.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1128 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 14:34
  • msg #890

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Latro Dectus (msg # 889):
 I think that was added after the likes of Haran and Josep heavily abused metamagic enhancing drugs cocktail of traits/feats/rods/bloodline...

 I’d like to rearrange some metamagic memorised spells as well if that’s an option ;)
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1363 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 14:40
  • msg #891

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Josep Gavinho (msg # 890):

I mean if the ultimate result is that us prepared casters can't cast metamagic-ed spells like that and it turns out Josep has a few of those such prepared metamagic-ed spells, I'm all for simply erasing those spells from the face of this match, never to be seen again. Less spells i have to deal with after all. :P

But i still would like to see that critical spell fly right into your face. :P
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1129 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 14:51
  • msg #892

Re: OOC Discussion 7

What, you mean that warm breeze on my cheek? I thought that was you shadow’s caress ;)
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1364 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 14:58
  • msg #893

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Josep Gavinho (msg # 892):

Oh don't you worry. I still have loads of tricks up my sleeve. 40 damage will help for certain. But i can still take you down myself. you just have to not hit me is all. ;P
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1365 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 15:45
  • msg #894

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Brakt:
Only if Latro doesn't take it first!

But yeah. I think I'm finally in a place where I'll have a chance :)

I do think we'll need someone experienced to ref, if it's anything like your current match... Maybe Latro when he's done eatingwith Grunyar, or Boadicea or Tina maybe?

I'd be up to ref the next championship match assuming i'm not the one holding the belt by then. Hopefully i am, but circumstances being what they are, it honestly could go either way. I'll need to build my hero point reserve if i challenge the champion again so untill then

Hey all you puny worthless new scumbags! Yeah that's right i'm talking to you! Are you new to the arena? Wanna earn a butt ton of BP super fast? Challenge the reigning perpetual runner up to the championship to a fight. All you have to do is loose and you can rake in the spoils of your victory defeat!
Now it's time for some BONUS POINTS!!!
If you're good or lawful aligned you can even earn a hero point for your loss! There truly is no downside to this at all! (Other than your rankings on the leader board. Please don't think about your rankings on the leaderboard) >:D
Challengers killed on a first come first beheaded basis. Latro reserves the right to deny any challenges. Latro not responsible for loss of soul, becoming undead, screaming but no sound coming out, untimely death, moral corruption, hellfire burns, wet pantaloons, and sudden onset of bubonic plague.
Apply now!
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,721, 658 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 15:56
  • msg #895

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Someone! Fight me!!
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 256 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 16:02
  • msg #896

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Haha this championship really calls into question how these voluntary challenge rules can be specified better in the future :P

I could try to set up my sheet for a duel, Tinster! I need them numbers on the scoreboard...
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1367 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 16:34
  • msg #897

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Vry:
Haha this championship really calls into question how these voluntary challenge rules can be specified better in the future :P

I'm reminded of a battle Josep, hiro and i had a long time ago. It was a free for all monster match where we each controlled a CR11 monster or something along those lines.
We all agreed that Ethereal/Incorporeal/Invisible/Swarm/Flying were all suppressed. I took advantage of their oversight and chose a monster with a climb speed.
link to a message in this game
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 257 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 20:52
  • msg #898

Re: OOC Discussion 7


   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / No Limit Hero Points
      Referee: ?
Participant 1: Tinny Tina, Wyrwood, Alchemist ?
Participant 2: Vry, Advanced Gnome, Sorcerer 13/Oracle 1
          Map: Small The Ring
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Forest
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: None


You up for it?
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 258 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Tue 12 Dec 2017
at 22:21
  • msg #899

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep:
with Afrezza in Battle Royale #5

What a battle that was! Go Kazan!!! O_O
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 506 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Wed 13 Dec 2017
at 01:16
  • msg #900

Re: OOC Discussion 7

And this is why resource management is important...

I do believe there was a rule somewhere that the championship can't be won by disqualification, and instead the belt is given to an NPC created by the GM. Is that right, or am I making things up on the fly?
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,721, 659 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Wed 13 Dec 2017
at 01:24
  • msg #901

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Y'know, the site that Arkrim set up for us has a search bar so you can find those sorts of things for yourself. Here, I went and searched for the champion rules for you.

quote:
Becoming a champion requires you to defeat the current champion. Winners gain the championship belt as a reward until someone defeats them in a championship duel and takes the belt (though they retain ex-champion status). The Championship Belt (CL20 Artifact) grants a +2 enhancement to all ability scores and 1/day the wearer can gain a temporary hero point as a swift action (lasts 20 rounds). The belt does not function for anyone but the current champion and functions as a +6 adamantine buckler for hardness and HP.
Only veterans can challenge a champion or serve as a referee to a championship. Champions cannot refuse a standard championship challenge and has only 1 week to answer the call when challenged (doing so is an automatic forfeit). The challenger chooses the map if the champion wears the belt, but otherwise the champion chooses the map. Additional terms must be agreed upon as a normal PvP battle and if the two can't come to an agreement the GM will make a decision for them. If either doesn't want to compete after the GM's decision, it's an automatic forfeit. You cannot win a championship by forfeit but you can still lose by one.
If the current champion forfeits, they lose the belt and an NPC will be crowned the new champion and immediately challenge everyone to a first-come-first-serve battle royal championship. The GM will pick the NPC from the bestiary or design one themselves. The NPC has the same BP as the champion that forfeited.

Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 507 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Wed 13 Dec 2017
at 03:09
  • msg #902

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I didn't realise there was a search bar... I just go through the site looking for what I need lol

Forfeit, not DQ.  Guess Latro get's the belt after all, unless I screwed up somewhere.
Which to be honest, wouldn't surprise me :)
GM Arkrim
GM, 6322 posts
Game Master
Wed 13 Dec 2017
at 04:39
  • msg #903

Re: OOC Discussion 7

No, as written the only options are WIN or FORFEIT with no mention of DRAW or DISQUALIFICATION so there's no reason to assume either way and making such an assumption would be neither judging by intent nor by RAW. It would just be a really bad referee call.

So, I'll clarify that.
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 508 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Wed 13 Dec 2017
at 04:47
  • msg #904

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sorry, I'll clarify. I get that if Josep is DQ'd, he loses the belt. I just mean if I screwed up reffing the match is all :)
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 259 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Wed 13 Dec 2017
at 09:11
  • msg #905

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Took me a while to find the search too, but it's awesome!
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1369 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Wed 13 Dec 2017
at 09:55
  • msg #906

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Oh. well, this wasn't what i was expecting to come back to after work. I honestly had no intention of winning by DQ as i was pretty certain that winning by DQ would give that belt to some random schmuck monster and I'd have to issue the challenge all over again. I was just trying to keep Josep on his toes but i guess that sorta backfired, huh?

Well, uh, guess i'll post my end of match post then and hope i can have a shot at getting in on the battle royal championship against some random NPC monster. :/
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1132 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Wed 13 Dec 2017
at 11:01
  • msg #907

Re: OOC Discussion 7

That is a disappointing end indeed.
If you didn’t want to win by disqualification, maybe you shouldn’t have asked the ref to give me a foul every chance you got. Sorry if that sounds sour. I still strongly disagree with the second foul I received. The only reason I didn’t challenge it was fear of a third one...
I’ll wait for Arkrim to tell us what happens with the belt before I make my final post.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6323 posts
Game Master
Wed 13 Dec 2017
at 14:11
  • msg #908

Re: OOC Discussion 7

1) Josep, if you don't dispute it IN THE MATCH, then I don't ever enter the match at all.

2) And if you simply don't respond in 48 hours to Brakt's call, he can just close the match.

3) I don't make a determination about the belt until the match ends.




Circular logic is bad form for a wizard.

You've been out of the arena too long.

Gotten rusty there ol'wizard.
This message was last edited by the GM at 14:19, Wed 13 Dec 2017.
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1133 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Wed 13 Dec 2017
at 14:31
  • msg #909

Re: OOC Discussion 7

 I’m not disputing anything, I have too much respect for the ungrateful job that it is to referee.
You’ve also made it very clear that dispute are only for when you’re absolutely 100% certain that you’re in the right, and I don’t think that was the case.
 I still think that fouls have been handed out like it’s the most normal thing, which i think is a terrible way of dealing with mistakes, but again I’m yielding to the higher authority.
In the past, I seem to recall that calling an illegal action with no ill intent just caused you to lose the action for the round, which seems like it’s punishment enough in fights that last 3 rounds on average.

 I didn’t realise Brakt was waiting for my input, I thought you said you were going to clarify something. Apologies.

  I’ll be grumpy and sour for a week or a month and maybe I’ll come back to get the belt. I guess I didn’t want it enough.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 260 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Wed 13 Dec 2017
at 14:55
  • msg #910

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I admire your respect for the ref, Josep, I don't think it's an easy job either!

Josep Gavinho:
I still think that fouls have been handed out like it’s the most normal thing


There is a big difference in how the rules have been written, and in how they're applied, in my opinion. In my last game, I did some rolls that my opponent called out as strictly against the rules (in fact the rules say a foul is awarded for the confusing rolls), but no foul was awarded... And I don't think it would have made a difference had I been fouled either - the rules are harsh enough that once caught I think most people will do their best to not break them or argue about it again (as you did).

But, the rules are rather clear on fouls in some places:
Three Strikes:
Multiple violations during a single match eventually lead a player to disqualification as follows:

48-hour rule:
Failing to post in a timely manner is treated as a foul (see three strikes).

etc.

Do things wrong - get a foul; do things wrong several times - get disqualified, is how I read the rules. Having seen a couple of games, I wouldn't apply them as I read them, but I'm not surprised that they are applied in that way.

It's sad that the championship ended like this. How would you, Arkrim, prefer we go about things if we want to avoid games ending by disqualification (seeing how it here happened by a couple of accidents on Josep's part)? Call more for player correcting stuff, less for ref intervention? Dispute rulings?
This message was last edited by the player at 15:00, Wed 13 Dec 2017.
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 509 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 00:57
  • msg #911

Re: OOC Discussion 7

It's absolutely not how I anticipated the match ending. I'm actually quite disappointed myself, and I reffed it.

I was honestly kinda hoping Arkrim would step in and say I was being too strict, but being a championship match, and being strict from the start, I didn't feel like I could ease off.

Reading back through it, I can see it does almost feel like I was favoring Latro, with not giving a foul for Tiaca casting the quickened rays.  I didn't feel it at the time, since I should of picked up on the fact she had them prepared while prepping sheets.

As for preventing something in the future, maybe we could set a default match rule going forward that any illegal action is simply a lost action, and won't result in a foul?  If we'd had something like that here, I could of quite happily let everything that happened go.
Brakt
Fighter 1,729, 511 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 03:16
  • msg #912

Re: OOC Discussion 7

So, I couldn't find anything saying whether losing by DC means you gain 0 rewards, or only 50% rewards.  As such, I've posted declarations with 50% rewards for Josep.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 1,794, 1373 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 11:27
  • msg #913

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Here's my thinking on this.

It's the championship match. Those participating should know the rules inside and out. There is no room for error and as such the penalties come quick.
Outside the championship I can understand letting a few things slide or skirting the rules some. But by RAW of the arena we really shouldn't be. But the championship is the pinnacle of the competitive side of this particular game and as such should also be the pinnacle of how harshly the rules should be enforced.
If one isn't ready for that, then a championship[ match shouldn't be attempted.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 834 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 12:24
  • msg #914

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I can see that train of thought
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,537, 1136 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 13:10
  • msg #915

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Here’s my train of thoughts:
Pulling the ref’s sleeve and asking them to give out fouls is the pinnacle of poor sportsmanship.
Rules lawyering is part of the game and I’ve engaged thoroughly in this, and I understand the will to be unforgiving in a championship more so than in an other fight, but requesting that your opponent be given a foul is a weak man’s strategy to « win ».

But then we have a ref who makes a call whilst hoping it will be overturned... I suppose I have been naive for thinking players should surrender to the ref’s decisions. Apparently arguing with the ref is also part of the game now.

I keep thinking I should stop mulling over this and move on, but I’m somehow compelled to rant...
Latro, Brakt, I should stress that I’m not one to hold a grudge, so even if I’m sour and may sound mean now, I’m still looking forward to playing with you all.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6324 posts
Game Master
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 14:19
  • msg #916

Re: OOC Discussion 7

For future reference, I am not supposed to step in unless someone summons me. I've done so in the past because I'm nosy but I'm not supposed to.

As a ref, you need to make good calls. As a player, when the ref doesn't make good calls (and you're certain of it), you need to call the GM.

I'll be honest, if the ref is disqualifying you, that's a good reason to call me. If I rule against the player, what else am I going to do? Disqualify you again? As long as you're not being belligerent or causing a flame war, you've got nothing to lose at that point. Call me in next time.

I do not like the outcome of this match and even though Josep is disqualified, I'm not going to hold that against him as far as player ban. I'm striking this from the record for those purposes.

But the match is what it is.

A new NPC championship has taken the belt.

A new Battle Royal Championship will be underway soon.




And I want Latro to ref the next Championship and Josep to run the NPC.

Because I'm funny like that.

The rest of you get ready.

It will be first come first serve and you don't know when I'm going to post it in the next couple of days.

BE PREPARED.
This message was last edited by the GM at 14:21, Thu 14 Dec 2017.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,306, 1374 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 18:08
  • msg #917

Re: OOC Discussion 7

GM Arkrim:
And I want Latro to ref the next Championship and Josep to run the NPC.

huh. interesting.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,721, 661 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 18:52
  • msg #918

Re: OOC Discussion 7


   Match Type: 1v1
BP/Hero Limit: No Limit BP / No Limit Hero Points
      Referee: ?
Participant 1: Tinny Tina, Wyrwood, Alchemist 14
Participant 2: Vry, Advanced Gnome, Sorcerer 13/Oracle 1
          Map: Small The Ring
     Lighting: Standard Light
      Terrain: Forest
        Walls: Standard Masonry
         Prep: 1 round
       Extras: No invisibility


Changes have been underlined.

Anyone want to ref?
This message was last edited by the player at 19:07, Thu 14 Dec 2017.
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 693 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 19:09
  • msg #919

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Tinny Tina (msg # 918):

looks like my match with Latro may be on hold a sec I will ref for you
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 262 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 19:32
  • msg #920

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hm, you guys aren’t gonna try for the belt then? :p Well, I did set my sheet up for this fight and not a royale, but unless we’re really fast we’d miss our shot at the belt... But maybe Arkrim starts the match in like 7 days? Hard to know...
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 694 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 19:40
  • msg #921

Re: OOC Discussion 7

As a non veteran I an unable to compete for the belt
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,721, 662 posts
Wyrwood Alchemist
SotVD
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 19:42
  • msg #922

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Vry:
Hm, you guys aren’t gonna try for the belt then? :p Well, I did set my sheet up for this fight and not a royale, but unless we’re really fast we’d miss our shot at the belt... But maybe Arkrim starts the match in like 7 days? Hard to know...

Just die really quickly!

Also unless I'm missing something you're not a Veteran so you're not allowed a shot at the belt.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,306, 1375 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 20:13
  • msg #923

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Currently the only active veterans are Tinny Tina, Brakt, Ugrim, and Madam Opal. (And also Josep and my self who are ineligible due to the rules of the arena)

Oh.
...
Wait.
...
...
Ugrim is a veteran.
...
...
...
...
the belt may end up in the halls of Shadow's Caress after all. Just not worn by the character i ultimately intended to wear it. :P
now granted, IF i decide i want Latro to ref the championship, i could not also have Ugrim participate and IF i decide to have Ugrim participate, i would not be able to have Latro ref.

Arkrim, is your request for Latro to ref more of a demand or just a funny jest towards Josep and I and not exactly something i have to abide by?
This message was last edited by the player at 21:28, Thu 14 Dec 2017.
Tinny Tina
Alchemist 1,721, 663 posts
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 20:22
  • [deleted]
  • msg #924

Re: OOC Discussion 7

This message was deleted by the player at 20:24, Thu 14 Dec 2017.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 263 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 21:11
  • msg #925

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Ah, before the update that happened like today, there was nothing in the rules about only veterans becoming champions as far as I could tell - only about challenging the champion. But now it says the npc will challenge all veterans, so that’s settled... allow me a moment to adjust my character for the added extra, Tina, and I’ll be ready to go!
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 264 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Thu 14 Dec 2017
at 21:15
  • msg #926

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Also, Arkrim should probably clarify his intentions - as it seems right now to be decided on a Brakt vs NPC or Brakt vs Tina vs NPC for the belt, if Latro’s count is correct :p
Brakt
Fighter 2,145, 512 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 00:29
  • msg #927

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I have bad memories of my last fight against Tina...

Correction, I have bad memories of /every/ fight with Tina.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 835 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 00:32
  • msg #928

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Agree with Brakt tiny creature lobbing big bombs scary memories
GM Arkrim
GM, 6325 posts
Game Master
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 05:27
  • msg #929

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Any of you that are not yet arena veterans should go ahead and get in another duel.

Those of you who are already veterans, please do some refereeing.


@Latro & Josep: I'm not allowed to demand it, but I can take as long as I want making this NPC and if I don't get what I want it might be FOREVER. How bad you want that belt? Somebody else has to win it if you're going to take it from them. *dangles carrot*
Lyn
Magus 476, 19 posts
Elf Magus
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 05:42
  • msg #930

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I don't think I'm going to be a vet anytime soon, so I'm available to ref if anyone needs?
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 836 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 06:18
  • msg #931

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I am still converting to new lvl/race rules will be ready to fight soon any takers
Lyn
Magus 476, 19 posts
Elf Magus
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 08:03
  • msg #932

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Well, if I'm helping someone else get to Vet, want to go Boad?

I'm happy with whatever rules you are, and full BP as well is fine by me.
This message was last updated by the player at 08:03, Fri 15 Dec 2017.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 837 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 07:57
  • msg #933

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sounds good, How about Large Tier Ring with the special : Random square adjacent to the Pillars (##) when moved into or occupied by a Gladiator summons a non magical beast (lion, Tiger, Bear, T-rex, ...)of 3/4 average CR of the Gladiators controlled by GM/ref and is immune to all control spells or abilities and is "chained" to said pillar only able to move 2 squares from it's Pillar. All beasts act at the end of a round but on first summons rolls initiative if it beats the play who summoned it it may take a standard action.

Be like the Roman Colosseum floor opens up out pops a Tiger if you get to close it mauls you.
Lyn
Magus 476, 20 posts
Elf Magus
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 08:04
  • msg #934

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I mean... Might take a bit longer, but if that's what you want :)
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 838 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 08:16
  • msg #935

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Lol, that was for someone else, how's small Colosseum and prep as many as you want
Lyn
Magus 476, 21 posts
Elf Magus
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 08:47
  • msg #936

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Small Colosseum, 1 prep round? We just need a ref. Any volunteers?
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 839 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 09:08
  • msg #937

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sounds good should be ready be this evening if we can get a ref
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,306, 1376 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 09:40
  • msg #938

Re: OOC Discussion 7

@bo and Lyn. I'll ref for you guys. I gotta polish my reffing skills anyways.

@Gryunyar. I'll still fight you if you want after we're both done reffing matches. Arkrim did just basically say he was holding the champion's belt ransom until i was ready to ref and josep was ready to NPC. :P

also it seems that when someone get's DQed, no rewards are distributed whatsoever if it's a duel. Moreover, it seems like the match is treated like it never happened as I am not short any more hero points than when i challenged the champion.
This message was last edited by the player at 09:42, Fri 15 Dec 2017.
Grunyar Fangblood
Summoner 1,822, 695 posts
Skinwalker Summoner
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 10:08
  • msg #939

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sounds good, still ironing some stuff out.  I went to the dark side and picked up a cohort so Tiaca had someone to play with :)
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,306, 1377 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 10:10
  • msg #940

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Grunyar Fangblood:
Sounds good, still ironing some stuff out.  I went to the dark side and picked up a cohort so Tiaca had someone to play with :)

Aww how sweet of you!
GM Arkrim
GM, 6326 posts
Game Master
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 14:24
  • msg #941

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Latro Dectus (msg # 938):

I granted rewards and I took hero points from the bottom of your sheet. You apparently weren't checking there. That's where I notate those.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,306, 1378 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Fri 15 Dec 2017
at 16:31
  • msg #942

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to GM Arkrim (msg # 941):

I'm going to take this to the PMs so i don't reveal super confidential info about my sheet.
Lyn
Magus 476, 22 posts
Elf Magus
Sat 16 Dec 2017
at 03:07
  • msg #943

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Post a challenge when your ready Bo, and I'll accept
GM Arkrim
GM, 6329 posts
Game Master
Sat 16 Dec 2017
at 09:20
  • msg #944

Re: OOC Discussion 7

A new challenger has arrived!

Everyone please welcome Somatra to the arena!
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 841 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 16 Dec 2017
at 10:13
  • msg #945

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Welcome Somatra, good to have some fresh blood join ;)
Brakt
Fighter 2,145, 514 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sat 16 Dec 2017
at 12:04
  • msg #946

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Welcome to the fray Sometra!
Josep Gavinho
Sorcerer 1,687, 1137 posts
Human Wizard
TA - 1,537 BP
Sat 16 Dec 2017
at 13:30
  • msg #947

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Welcome on board, fresh blood!

Oh my, Vry! This initiative roll... it moves me.
Can I interest you in a membership with the Thaumaturgical Alliance ?
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,306, 1381 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Sat 16 Dec 2017
at 13:45
  • msg #948

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Josep Gavinho:
Oh my, Vry! This initiative roll... it moves me.
Can I interest you in a membership with the Thaumaturgical Alliance ?

*Smacks had aways* keep yer mitts off my minion, wizard! this one's already accepted the darkness.
This message was last edited by the player at 13:46, Sat 16 Dec 2017.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,306, 1382 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Sat 16 Dec 2017
at 16:39
  • msg #949

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Vry:
OOC: I'm not sure how to interpret the map even though I chose it. Standard map is only 50ft high, so the corners are completely blocked, right? And are there four pillars blocking vision in the middle? Do we still start as close to the corners as we can get?

Back in the olden days, the map's max hight was 50 feet above the tallest structure for small maps and 100 feet above the tallest for big maps.
This might still be the case, however there's nothing about it on the rules site so *insert shrug emoji*
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 842 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Sat 16 Dec 2017
at 16:48
  • msg #950

Re: OOC Discussion 7

The intention when the map was suggested is that you are unable to go in the corners it is a Ring as the name implies.  It is supposed to be similar to the Roman Colosseum with the special like I suggested to Brakt
GM Arkrim
GM, 6330 posts
Game Master
Sat 16 Dec 2017
at 22:26
  • msg #951

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Latro Dectus:
Josep Gavinho:
Oh my, Vry! This initiative roll... it moves me.
Can I interest you in a membership with the Thaumaturgical Alliance ?

*Smacks had aways* keep yer mitts off my minion, wizard! this one's already accepted the darkness.

The guildmasters are bickering and bidding for new blood.

Excellent.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 268 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sat 16 Dec 2017
at 22:30
  • msg #952

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Thank you for the offer Josep, but I have already chosen a master to serve!

Boadicea: ah, that’s what I thought :)
Brakt
Fighter 2,145, 516 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Sun 17 Dec 2017
at 08:33
  • msg #953

Re: OOC Discussion 7

On behalf of absent Hiro, we would like to remind everyone that the Voiceless Dragon is also recruiting.

Also, that I'm available if anyone needs a ref, or a very quick match.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 270 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Sun 17 Dec 2017
at 08:49
  • msg #954

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Brakt (msg # 953):

Lyn’s post didn’t work out well in the duel :p
Lyn
Magus 476, 24 posts
Elf Magus
Mon 18 Dec 2017
at 05:08
  • msg #955

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I refuse to make any comments at this time
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,306, 1387 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Mon 18 Dec 2017
at 08:15
  • msg #956

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Lyn, your schizophrenia is showing again.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 848 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Mon 18 Dec 2017
at 08:18
  • msg #957

Re: OOC Discussion 7

LOL
Lyn
Magus 476, 28 posts
Elf Magus
Mon 18 Dec 2017
at 08:40
  • msg #958

Re: OOC Discussion 7

:\ One of these days...
Lyn
Magus 476, 30 posts
Elf Magus
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 05:39
  • msg #959

Re: OOC Discussion 7

This is what I get for not triple checking my sheet. Just realized my attack modifier should be at least 3 higher then I've rolled. Oh well lol :)
Lyn
Magus 476, 32 posts
Elf Magus
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 08:20
  • msg #960

Re: OOC Discussion 7

That's me done.

Who's next! :)
Brakt
Fighter 2,145, 519 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 08:24
  • msg #961

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Psh. I bet I can take out Boad faster then she took out Lyn :P

'/flex
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 851 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 08:29
  • msg #962

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Lol come try it
Brakt
Fighter 2,145, 520 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 09:08
  • msg #963

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Anyone want to ref a match quickly? Lots of BP in it for you!  Should only take a couple of turns.

Let's keep this simple, small Colosseum, no prep?

We'll both start by enlarging anyway, so make it so we're both already enlarged +1 size, make this even faster?
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 853 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 09:13
  • msg #964

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Sounds good
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,306, 1388 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 09:27
  • msg #965

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I mean, I'm down for enlarging my BP pool via reffing. :P
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 293 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 09:32
  • msg #966

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Where has Kecil gone to? He was such a rising star at one point, aiming to take both records and belts!

also:
quote:
This thread is nearing the 1,000 post limit.  Please request your GM creates a new thread.

Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 854 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 09:43
  • msg #967

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Can not accept that until GM closes current one
Brakt
Fighter 2,145, 522 posts
Ogre Fighter
SotVD
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 09:46
  • msg #968

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Yeah, that's fair.  This way it's ready when you're free. :)
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,306, 1389 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 10:05
  • msg #969

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I'm at work for another 4 hours so it'll be a bit until i can hand out rewards.
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 855 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 10:15
  • msg #970

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Brakt do you have the time to post it in OOC or a private message so all he has to do is copy paste
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 295 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 10:18
  • msg #971

Re: OOC Discussion 7

DUEL 1v1
Winner BP 1594 Loser BP 476
Winner Reward 159 Loser Reward 266
Draw Reward 119 Draw Reward 399
Boadicea
Barbarian 1,594, 856 posts
Advanced Human Barbarian
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 10:20
  • msg #972

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Thanks Vry

Latro gets 259 for reffing


Wait a sec, I get the least and I won LOL
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 296 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 10:23
  • msg #973

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Boadicea (msg # 972):

Haha! Well, you get a win on the score board! :D
Lyn
Magus 476, 33 posts
Elf Magus
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 10:47
  • msg #974

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hey, you knew what you were getting into when you picked a fight with me :P

Also, on a side note. All hail Amazon, and a moment of silence for Latro, slaving away for us.

Amazon finally opened in Australia, and... I don't get it. :\
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 297 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 10:59
  • msg #975

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I heard Amazon is (finally) expanding into Sweden, and I'm excited! In thirty years when we'll have a dystopian anarcho-capitalist cyberpunk world, Amazon will be the company I sell my life and family to.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,306, 1391 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 13:51
  • msg #976

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Ok, rewards posted. I rounded down on my calculations cause thats been arena standard for as long as i can remember.
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 298 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 14:04
  • msg #977

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Where can one find the arena rules on opposing alignments now? Can't find it on the website...
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,306, 1393 posts
Drow N. Antipal/Agn/Oracl
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 14:18
  • msg #978

Re: OOC Discussion 7

hmm. interesting.
It's not there anymore.
The rules do say that those in a duel must list their alignment though so that leads me to believe that alignment is still a relevant thing in those circumstances.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6332 posts
Game Master
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 14:51
  • msg #979

Re: OOC Discussion 7

It is not relevant anymore.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,564, 1395 posts
Drow N. Antipaladin
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 15:24
  • msg #980

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Cool beans. I guess i'll adjust that in the rewards then.
Or not. cause its locked now
This message was last edited by the player at 15:24, Tue 19 Dec 2017.
GM Arkrim
GM, 6334 posts
Game Master
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 15:29
  • msg #981

Re: OOC Discussion 7

No worries. I lock this thread too once we hit 1,000 posts.
Hiro
Monk 2,038, 1178 posts
Dwarf Monk
SotVD
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 16:03
  • msg #982

Re: OOC Discussion 7

WHO DARES AWAKEN THE SLEEPING DRAGON???
Vry
Sorcerer 1,743, 300 posts
Advanced Gnome
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 16:05
  • msg #983

Re: OOC Discussion 7

In reply to Hiro (msg # 982):

Wohoo!
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,564, 1397 posts
Drow N. Antipaladin
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 16:37
  • msg #984

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Hiro:
WHO DARES AWAKEN THE SLEEPING DRAGON???

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKKKKKKKK!!!!!!!!!! MY NEMESIS ARRIVES!!!!!!!! I AM DRAW TO FIGHT AGAINST HIM ONCE MORE!!!!!!!

EDIT: Sleeping dragon? I thought you were a voiceless dragon. ;P
This message was last edited by the player at 16:37, Tue 19 Dec 2017.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,564, 1398 posts
Drow N. Antipaladin
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 16:38
  • msg #985

Re: OOC Discussion 7

I've got dibs on the first 1v1 against hiro. I don't care if he's the champion by then or not and i have to rip that belt off his cold dead body. That fight is mine and none shall deny me it.
Hiro
Monk 2,038, 1180 posts
Dwarf Monk
SotVD
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 16:53
  • msg #986

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Give me a bit of time to remember how to play - I wouldn't want you to win just because I haven't even looked at my character sheet in a year...

Maybe we should do a monster hunt to help me limber up.
Latro Dectus
Antipaladin 2,564, 1400 posts
Drow N. Antipaladin
Shadow's Caress
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 17:00
  • msg #987

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Man, so much has changed since you've been gone. You've got a heck of a lot of updating to do. more over, the belt is up for grabs by any and everyone (except Josep and I). Better get that sheet ready if you want to reclaim it. ;P
GM Arkrim
GM, 6335 posts
Game Master
Tue 19 Dec 2017
at 17:24
  • msg #988

Re: OOC Discussion 7

Oh snap...he's back...
Sign In