Tomorrow, I'm driving from Illinois to Florida, making stops at friends' houses in a couple states. I will stay for more than a week. I won't forsake the beach to spend much time at the computer. However, my posting rate
when not traveling should be normal. I can post when I wake up and before I go to bed, in other words. Friday through Sunday, I may not post, then again those same days the week after next when I return to Illinois.
Martin Grey:
Concerning my post, I hinted that thievery might result in losing a hand or getting the rope. Is this actually right? I can't remember if the subject of criminal punishments have come up. Except that Iridia and Frank got off light, when they just ended up in the stocks for their shoplifting.
It's come up before, but the original time I mentioned it was way, way back in Oct. 2008, according to a quoted post in my GM screen. I noted that the empire did away with the practice of amputating hands. However, when I read your post, I took it as an idiom, because the punishments they use are almost as bad.
You can be hung for violent robberies (highway stick-ups, home invasions, etc.) or stealing a horse or other livestock. Death is almost certain for commoners who commit high crimes against nobility.
The unofficial punishment for thievery is a
severe ass-kicking, like broken fingers and missing teeth. Public flagellation is common. Branding a dot on the forehead is common for multiple offenses. Jail is common. The stocks and pillory are common. Public humiliation is common. Pretty standard stuff.
Treason against the empire and black magic, on the other hand, gets all that horrible medieval torture and stuff we've all read about.
The empire brought some order and consistency while doing away with many barbaric and/or superstitious practices. For example, no longer are people bound and thrown in a lake to see if they float guilty or drown innocent. None of that stuff any more now that the empire is around.
There are trials with judges, though commoners don't have the right to a free attorney and may languish in jail and nearly starve to death while awaiting one. There are established, written laws. The standing army also acts as police.
However, often, for poor commoners who have been caught red-handed, the sergeant on duty will simply doll out their punishment, such as throwing them in the stocks, flogging or beating them. That's socially acceptable and actually a legally protected practice (similar to "preponderance of evidence" laws in the US).
For every 100 soldiers there is a centurion. For every so many centurions, there is a prime centurion. A decanus or "sergeant" is often put in command of about 8-12 men, but are otherwise regular soldiers. There are all sorts of ranks other than that, but those are the main ones you'll hear me use.
One of the ways the empire keeps uprisings down and helps thwart internal corruption is by displacing fighting men. When the empire takes a place over, they take all their fighting men, swear them into service, and then spread them out to the distant lands. This also means the police are almost never "good old boys" and that they are more likely to take on nobility and organized crime with less fear of corruption or retribution.
Leon Kallis:
What exactly is the penalty for 'refusing' durgin? Is there a precedent ?
After thinking about it, I'm not going to answer that question other than to say there is no
direct precedent here. You'll have to use your imagination about how well you think Durgin will take no for an answer or Talk it out with Zuul.