Re: Kingmaker Chapter 2: Rivers Run Red
"It will most likely be the Surtova family that will make such a claim on your lands," Addleworth agrees with Scott, "When they do, they will do doubt claim that because the land grant you received did no bear the royal seal that it is not valid and will therefor claim that your hold upon the land is unlawful.
"But to remove you from office now will mean that they will have to also take upon themselves the responsibility of defending these people - something they are not willing to expend their already strained time and resources on - for failure to do so will be a public relations disaster that could very well spell the end of their tenuous claim to the throne of Brevoy. Not to mention that your benefactors - The Swordlords of Restov - wisely arranged that yours is an independent nation. As Eli pointed out, any overt actions against you by the Surtovas will open them up to allegations of expansionism, giving the Swordlords more diplomatic capitol to make alliances with other nations against the Surtovas.
"The balance will likely be maintained so long as you do not officially declare a military alliance with Restov - something they hope you will do after Noleski makes his move. Before then, the Surtovas may attempt to diplomatically persuade you to join them, hire secret agents to frame the Swordlords for some disaster that may befall your people, or, and in my opinion what they'll consider the least risky choice, wait until the wilderness claims your lives, destroys your nation, and makes the Swordlords look foolish for trying to civilize an un-tamable tract of land that thousands of years of history have been unable to conquer for very long."
"Cheery," Joey grumbles.
"I was speaking from Noleski's perspective. I myself expect you all to succeed in taming this land for at least a generation or two. Long enough to decide the future of Brevoy."
"Well thanks for the vote of confidence. But is it true that we're here illegally?"
"That's a gray area of law that is debatable. Considering that the Surtovas have essentially usurped a vacant throne against the wishes of the nation, it could be argued anything they put the royal seal on is null and void anyway. On the other hand, when a king and his family vanish, is it really illegal for someone to step up and assume control in their absence? So if it is illegal for you to be here, then it is equally illegal for the Surtovas to be doing what they are doing. Historically, many new settlements have no choice but to establish themselves in the absence of a legal authority to do so, so the true legality of your claim is not really that much of a concern if it could be established at all. Enemies will find an excuse to oppose you, legitimate or not. But as Scott pointed out, the more legitimate you all appear, the more illegitimate your enemies will appear when they oppose you."
This message was last edited by the player at 00:59, Thu 02 Oct 2014.