Re: OOC VI: Perfection
I agree with you on the matter of the principal, assuming that's the whole story. If, for instance, they had spread word that they were going to be wearing their shirts as a sign for "illegals to get out" or "it's our country, not yours" sentiment, then I can understand them being suspended, possibly worse if there was a pattern of behaviour. If they just wanted to show their pride in their country, then yeah, that's fine. I might have had a talk with the school about why cinqo de mayo and respecting other cultures is important, but they shouldn't have been punished over it.
Now, to the situation in general, yes, that's a problem. Since the bill was passed, I've been reading a lot of pro and con articles. Learned statistics like how the crime rate at border towns are the same as the crime rate of the rest of the state. There hadn't been a murder by an undocumented worker in the state in 10 years prior to the bill. There are some serious issues with vandalism and people moving through other people's land. The vast majority of violence associated with drugs stays south of the border (much easier to attack the source of the drugs than to try to stop every smuggler once they're over the border and acting independently).
The big problem I have with the law is that it doesn't do anything to prevent the situations it was supposedly created to fix. Drug smugglers caught are already jailed or deported if they're caught. There's no funding whatsoever for police training. Plus, it allows immediate jailing if they don't have the proper papers. The concern is, if you're darker skinned, even if you're fifth generation American, you could be stopped, asked for papers (Do you carry a birth certificate or passport everywhere you go? Do you always carry your driver's license when you go for a jog or bike ride?), and put in jail if you don't have any with you.
There is a provision in the law that says that if a citizen doesn't think the police are enforcing the law adequately, they can sue the community. Think about it. If you think someone's an illegal immigrant (or undocumented worker), and the police don't do anything about it, you can sue them. And if the police don't do the job they're not trained for correctly, they can get sued too. Sounds like a free pay day for a lot of people, at the expense of the forces who should be focusing on taking on the more disruptive crimes.
Anytime people express concerns about racial profiling, it's shrugged off by the people who passed the law. But when someone suggests a way to keep it constitutional and not based on race, they immediately say it's not necessary. I watched an interview where the state senator who designed the law was on with the hispanic vice-mayor of Phoenix. The vice-mayor suggested that getting police to ask every single person they stopped for proof of citizenship was a good way to keep things constitutional and the police from being sued, the senator immediately suggested it was ridiculous and unnecessary, since the law doesn't allow racial profiling. And just the way he treated the vice-mayor made my skin crawl.
Phew, long rant. Thank you for listening.
EDIT: And, wow, the conversation moved quickly. Ruse, I'm not trying to attack you on this. More expressing my view (and frustration) in regards to the specific laws, and maybe help people learn a little more about the situation. I know I'm learning more about it even now.
This message was last edited by the player at 17:58, Tue 11 May 2010.