RolePlay onLine RPoL Logo

, welcome to 2300 Great Game Command Center

14:05, 29th March 2024 (GMT+0)

International Forums.

Posted by RefereeFor group 0
UK
player, 94 posts
Rule Britannia!
To the stars!
Sat 16 Oct 2021
at 21:02
  • msg #513

International announcement.

In reply to Canada (msg # 512):

China you were informed of ongoing military exercises, As of this moment you are threatening several members of N.A.T.O and are making hilariously demands.

You may test the protocol of Article 5 at your leisure.
China
player, 113 posts
Sun 17 Oct 2021
at 07:18
  • msg #514

International announcement.

In reply to Japan (msg # 511):

China has no need for invitation from someone to present their fleet in any point of international waters or space sector. Its a free space for everyone, not belonging to any nation.
China
player, 114 posts
Sun 17 Oct 2021
at 07:21
  • msg #515

International announcement.

In reply to Canada (msg # 512):

You can stand wherever you want.
Australia push the red button first. That's all.
Or not. You stand for war starter. Hope you understand this. And all consequences which are will be followed.
China
player, 115 posts
Sun 17 Oct 2021
at 07:32
  • msg #516

International announcement.

In reply to UK (msg # 513):

Your "military exercises" just excuse for limiting other nations freedom. But not this time. This time you pushing not a small country. Its something new for you. And you don't understand what will happen after.

Stop rotating this mantra and look what you doing in reality.

You article 5 is stated, that alliance will react if any member will be attacked. But it's not appliable, if alliance member start war by himself. Actually he has no right to do it.
So, Australia hit China force with approval from NATO?. So this mean that hole "defensive" alliance is just a empty words? And in reality it's an aggressor?
Or Australia do this without approval, and all this conflict happening between China and Australia?
Or any members of NATO can start wars with anyone, but if attacked side response and start to defending, all NATO will strike? Interesting position...
Canada
player, 33 posts
Sun 17 Oct 2021
at 11:44
  • msg #517

International announcement.

In reply to China (msg # 516):

Australia is not a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
China
player, 116 posts
Sun 17 Oct 2021
at 13:06
  • msg #518

International announcement.

In reply to Canada (msg # 517):

So NATO have a chance to avoid this conflict.
Canada
player, 34 posts
Sun 17 Oct 2021
at 13:52
  • msg #519

International announcement.

In reply to China (msg # 518):

Yes, I see absolutley no reason for a conflict if you leave 3N33.
China
player, 117 posts
Sun 17 Oct 2021
at 18:30
  • msg #520

International announcement.

In reply to Canada (msg # 519):

We don't. It's an international free waters.
Japan
player, 71 posts
Banzai! Banzai! Banzai!
Mon 18 Oct 2021
at 10:06
  • msg #521

International announcement.

[In Character]

TRANSCRIPT TOKYO MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS 3:54 AM MDT - STATEMENT OF THE PRIME MINSTER

Thank you for coming at this inconvenient hour.

The current regime in mainland China is a pirate state, lawless and disordered. It's continued dominance of the majority of the territory of that great country, which should be the valued friend and elder teacher of all the world, is an international crime. In response to Chinese provocations, building for many years and not limited to their current hostility in the Pacific, the nation of Japan hereby withdraws its recognition of the legitimacy of the government of China.

In accordance with the appropriate international norms of diplomatic law, the government of the island province of Taiwan is recognized by Japan, pro tempore, as the legitimate, if partially exiled, government of the country of China. Japan pledges its support to that government in its defense of its lawful prerogatives in Chinese affairs, up to and including the removal of criminal bandits who have for too long been a stain on the Chinese nation's reputation.

I will be speaking personally to an emergency session of the Diet this evening to make a set of proposals, all of which I have been informed reliably by members of both coalition and opposition parties will be strongly approved of.

1. Japan cuts off all trade and economic commerce with mainland China. No flights will continue from Japanese territory to Chinese territory. Favorable tax and regulatory treatment for Japanese firms which transfer their Chinese business to Taiwanese companies will be expedited through the Diet.

2. Japan transfers all aid, economic support, subsidy, tariff and other legal treatment, in any way favorable to China, to the government of Taiwan, effective immediately. Any legal penalties, fees, costs, tariffs, or other structures negative or harmful to China are NOT transferred to Taiwan, and remain in effect against mainland China so long as the current regime holds power.

3. Regretfully, because of the entrenched nature of the Chinese pirate state and its willingness to use weapons of horrible power against its fellow human beings, the nation of Japan with a heavy heart announces that it will seek to develop weapons of mass destruction to be integrated into our military force. We request the aid of our allies in this.

4. Effective one hour from the receipt of this message, and under my personal military authority as head of state pending authorized (and expected) legislative oversight, the military forces of the nation of China under the current regime are banned from the entirety of the Pacific Ocean, including and especially any portion of that body adjoining the island of Taiwan. Japanese forces in the Pacific are authorized and instructed to destroy any and all Chinese military forces they encounter. A temporary abeyance on enforcement of this order is offered to any Chinese-flagged military vessel heading plainly, peaceably, and at maximum operating speed directly back towards its base of its operation, for the next however many hours are required for such voyages to be speedily completed.

(*A reporter violates protocol most shockingly and insists on being heard. They demand to know whether this is a declaration of war against China.*)

An excellent question. No, release him, officer, he is doing his job as a member of a democracy, a place where questions are allowed - even if they are rude and come seconds before I was about to ask for them. I commend your spirit, young man, even as I chide your manners. No, we are not declaring war on China. The government of China, in Taiwan, is our friend and we hope eternal ally, as a fellow democracy and a state which looks to the well-being of all of Asia. There are pirates calling themselves China out there starting wars; we cannot have that. It is not Japan's place to tell the Chinese people what to do in China, but in the Pacific Ocean, where Japan is in alliance with the free nations of the world, Japan will not allow pirates to operate under any flag.

They will be sunk. They will be shot down. They will be brought to the bottom of the sea and their blood will enrich the land that our colony sought to build in peace for all people - China included.

One hour. No further questions at this time. Thank you.

[OOC]

There, that's my order for the last war round. China, we see a flag that looks anything like yours on anything made out of metal that has a gun on it, and its underneath, on or over the Pacific Ocean, it's scrap metal. We stand with Australia, as they have stood with us. Back off and get your antiquated tin cans out of my ocean or find out how many countries it takes to blow your widdle kingdom into the middle of next week.
China
player, 118 posts
Mon 18 Oct 2021
at 14:23
  • msg #522

International announcement.

In reply to Japan (msg # 521):

Order to attack military vessels of other state is an act of war. Or terrorism. You can call it as you want - not war, limited war, peace and war... It's no matter. You starting a war.

Let's see who fire first.

China end all diplomatic relations with Japan.

OOC. If you can not keep calm, and receive fun from playing - you not on your place in this game. I want to remind you, your emotions should be directed to avatar, in this case China state, but not to player behind it.
So I expect behaviour of serious player from you. And maybe some excuses. I operate units, but not tin cans, and you totally have no idea what's going on, and what the plans, and what would be next move.
Have a nice day.
Russian Federation
player, 135 posts
Tue 19 Oct 2021
at 09:45
  • msg #523

International announcement.

Gentlemen, let's make a deep breath and make a pause.

No harm had been done yet.

I urge everyone to take no action until the end of the turn. I'm sure a peaceful solution is possible. Russia invites every nation to the UNCLOS-2080 summit. Let's sit down and work out the rules.
Canada
player, 35 posts
Tue 19 Oct 2021
at 10:50
  • msg #524

Re: International announcement.

In reply to Russian Federation (msg # 523):

We have tried and tried to reason with China, to no avail. I will happily join you in UNCLOS-2080. Meanwhile, Chinese destroyers are harassing the civilian population in 3N33. If they do not vacate 3N33 we will have to defend the colony.

China, leave 3N33 now, and we can discuss the rules at UNCLOS-2080. If the rules dictate that the Japanese colony in 3N33 is illegal I am sure we can find a legal spot and move the colony there.

In reply to China (msg # 521):

China:
OOC. If you can not keep calm, and receive fun from playing - you not on your place in this game. I want to remind you, your emotions should be directed to avatar, in this case China state, but not to player behind it.


I agree with you. I expect us all to have a friendly tone in our OOC comments. We are doing this for fun.

While Canada and China aren't friendly at the moment in the game, I am very much enjoying playing this game against you. I have picked up the Persian Empire as my second nation, which is much more friendlier towards China. I'm looking forward to have some constructive gameplay with you as well.
China
player, 119 posts
Tue 19 Oct 2021
at 11:48
  • msg #525

Re: International announcement.

In reply to Canada (msg # 524):

OOC.
Yep. Same here. I was totally busy with my boats whole summer, now I am in vacation on amazing Crete island, and I plan to be back home in two weeks, and finally will have time for more deep play, long diplomatic letters and all this stuff )))
Or long and interesting war. ))))))
Australia
player, 43 posts
Tue 19 Oct 2021
at 12:27
  • msg #526

Re: International announcement.

In reply to Canada (msg # 524):

Simply redefining UNCLOS seems like a short sighted stop-gap measure. It would fail to provide rulings for territorial expansion off-world, outside of maybe off-world bodies of water.

We are in an age of exploration outside of our own world, with several nations looking to Luna. Australia would rather this not cause more issues than necessary.

This entire conflict was sparked by a complete lack of faith in older treaties by a few nations, Australia included, and China's offense to that fact. Australia has from that point on worked with Japan and Canada, primarily, to provide treaties that look forward upon our reality. (OOC: And are game relevant.) This was to ensure that nations stay accountable for many years into the future and set forth, in our opinion, fair rules for not only the exploration of space, but the continued use of our home planet, Earth. Naturally, Australia is biased towards these treaties, we helped create them after all.

This does not mean Australia is not willing to join the UNCLOS-2080 summit, we simply wish to point out that there are a lot more steps that need to be taken, so that we don't have similar incidents a few years into the future.
China
player, 120 posts
Wed 20 Oct 2021
at 10:54
  • msg #527

Re: International announcement.

In reply to Canada (msg # 524):

What rules you're talking about? This ones, which was forgotten by almost all nations? From which many nations officially exit? And who will decide, what is right and what is wrong? Voting? For example - Australia have 60 times less population, than China. We have same votes? Or you just want to meet in your club of friends and pretend, that your decisions are legitable?
Its totally clear, that your country not looking for dialog. You sent ultimatums, and promise just to talk after that.

China will never accept any ultimatums. Remember it.
Canada
player, 36 posts
Wed 20 Oct 2021
at 11:19
  • msg #528

Re: International announcement.

In reply to China (msg # 527):

This is exactly what we are going to sit down and discuss. You represent a far larger part of the world population than either of us do. Do you think votes should be weighted by the size of the population they represent? Come and sit down and discuss with us. We will listen. We left the old treaties because they where old and stagnant and we desperatley need something new that suits the world (and worlds) we live in now. We drafted new proposals, but if the countries that remain with the old treaties agree to rework them we will gladly present our work and sit down togeather and work out something that everyone is mostly happy about.
Australia
player, 44 posts
Wed 20 Oct 2021
at 12:06
  • msg #529

International announcement.

In reply to China (msg # 527):

Judging by that response, China is willing to acknowledge Australia responses, so we will proceed under that assumption.

What club of friends does China refer to? Russia or the nations that felt the need to leave old treaties causing more harm than good?

If its the former, Russia can likely confirm that as of late the relationship between Russia and Australia has been strained. This might change in the near future, it might not.

Regardless, Australia is here for the betterment of ALL nations with these treaties and will keep this stance during the UNCLOS-2080 summit. This likely means Australia is going to be at odds with the historically diplomatically powerful nations. Australia wishes for modernized treaties that work for all nations' benefit. Not simply the ones with the most economic power or political power for that matter. But that's a matter we will hopefully discuss in 2080.

We invited ALL nations to take a look at (And join if they so wished) those treaties when they were drafts, and come with input, Canada and Japan were as far as I can recall the only two nations who did so. Australia will once again invite all nations to come with their input on them, provided its relevant after the summit in 2080... or for that matter, provided we make it to the 2080 summit Russia is proposing without a full scale war. We would be happy to send China a copy of the Chinese translation of the treaties, if China cares for it.

Australia has been willing to talk this entire time. Australia has also not wanted a war, we would very much like to get back to our colonization projects. But we have not been willing to  sit back and let our allies be bullied.
Russian Federation
player, 136 posts
Thu 21 Oct 2021
at 07:19
  • msg #530

International announcement.

Whoever gives the order to attack in the hex 3N33 will be considered by Russia as the instigator of the war.
China
player, 121 posts
Fri 22 Oct 2021
at 12:20
  • msg #531

International announcement.

In reply to Russian Federation (msg # 530):

This is already happened.
China
player, 122 posts
Wed 17 Nov 2021
at 23:35
  • msg #532

International announcement.

Because the United States of America, Great Britain, Japan, Australia and Canada attack our military unit with their military forces we close any diplomatic relations with these countries. All these countries citizens and diplomats are received "person non grata" status and should leave China territory in 24 hours. No more than one case of luggage per person is allowed. All luggage is subject to control. All accounts and assets of companies with USA, Britain, Canada, Australia, Japan shares or control are under arrest or going to China control. All media companies of enemy states are banned from the translation on China territory.

All China citizens located in enemy countries should return to China.

China asks NATO about its position. Some NATO members are initiating military actions. Was that action been approved by NATO?
Should we consider other NATO countries as hostile?
Canada
player, 38 posts
Thu 18 Nov 2021
at 20:19
  • msg #533

International announcement.

If China had been less agressive and provoking and instead open for negotiations we would never have ended up where we are. China has engineered this conflict despite our best efforts to find a peacful solution.

In response to the hostile actions by the Chinese regime against Canadian citizens in China, Canada will offer recidense permit to Chinese citizens in Canada who wishes to stay.
This message was last edited by the player at 20:19, Thu 18 Nov 2021.
Canada
player, 39 posts
Sat 19 Feb 2022
at 13:47
  • msg #534

International announcement.

Canada will withdraw from Iraq by the end of 2080. I will put 1PA into a handover of security to the local government.
Canada
player, 41 posts
Mon 21 Feb 2022
at 22:37
  • msg #535

International announcement.

My condolences to the people of Japan for the loss of the Ōshan'u-erusu colony. I condemn China for their actions causing such loss of life and property!

The Pacific Response Joint Naval exercise has concluded. The Canadian units will perform a naval visit in Australia before returning home.
USA
player, 146 posts
Sun 6 Mar 2022
at 19:58
  • msg #536

International announcement.

In reply to Canada (msg # 535):

US units will be returning to friendly ports at the conclusion of this exercise.
China
player, 125 posts
Mon 12 Sep 2022
at 10:33
  • msg #537

International announcement.

TOTALY OOC!

This game looks pretty dead for now.

I am developing a cosmic strategy and simulation game. Maybe will be some working modules in the wintertime. Unreal Engine as a base.
If someone is interested in joining a new project, don't hesitate to contact me.
Sign In