I think I may be confused then, I thought Articles of Faith by James Talmage was considered important literature, and I have seen it described "the next best thing to LDS creed" . As well, when I did some searching to be more sure, I looked up some more about Jame Talmage. He also wrote a seven volume set "the History of the Church".In one of the volumes, it speaks of the Book of Mormons being more correct than the bible.
(As a side note, I thought you said mormon is a slang word, but I did a double take as I started reading further. It is called book of the mormon. This is confusing me further, as I'm writing this and digging up more from LDS sites that use mormon clearly.
http://www.mormon.org/learn/0,8672,1090-1,00.html )
Now back to original question Since James Talmage was a pretty important guy, president of LDS College in Salt Lake City, and was one of the "Quorum of the Twelve Apostles" (Honestly, I don't know what that is yet, but it sounds pretty big. So if he has said that the true Gospel is lost, and that the Book Of Mormon is more correct than bible, plus the addition that the Book of Mormon does have some things different than bible, could you be a bit more clear on the KJV thing and how they believe it's the Word of God? I mean what is the true Gospel, that's lost, when we only had the Bible in the first place?
Edited to add, got that use of mormon part now.
This message was last edited by the GM at 05:09, Wed 23 June 2004.