Ok, I can see message #13, but the wording of your message confuses me a bit.

Is the ocnvoy intact?  Or did they get tore up while we were attempting to procure a MBT?

In reply to 2Lt Jack Winters (msg # 911):

OOC: Well technically the convoy was torn up because Cpt Miller ignored his scout that the enemy were coming and decided to thirst for fuel instead of paying attention to the tactical situation, kinda like that whole Cpt Gamble cluster: he made a choice and paid for it.

I had Winters charge across the river alone to get the tank before you came back, but I think that was decidedly non-Winters-like, so when you came back I realized that with the rigid adherence to Army doctrine he would not have had time to take advantage of the situation so the tank opportunity dried up. So, I as GM try to NPC characters but sometimes, most of the time, I don't get them right. Still, I was wrong, and I admit it.

As far as the wording of Msg 13 the Crooklyn is intact, the rest are not. Cpt Miller is taking the NPCs except for Ramirez and riding off in the sunset. We can NPC the exchange if you like, but you would have to shoot them because they aren't coming with you and in the end that does not allow for Miller's player to come back later.
This message was last edited by the GM at 06:25, Sun 06 Oct 2013.

So desu ka. No problemo, I understand now.  We can skip the NPC interaction, although he probably wouldn't shoot them, it's unnecessary at this point.  Although be rest assured Miller will be greeted with a fist in the face the next time.

In reply to 2Lt Jack Winters (msg # 913):

That shit made me laugh Jackie Brown, although still not sure if you meant the player or the PC. Just kidding. It's obviously the player. :)

In reply to Niewiele Dupek (msg # 914):

OOC: That doesn't make it even by V1 standards. Roll for Barr please.

I can usually figure out when to post - it's just time to post that's the issue.

In reply to 1LT Gavin Barr (msg # 916):

Trust me man it was more a personal look at my side than yours. My opinion you guys quite post a bit, actually.

In reply to Niewiele Dupek (msg # 917):

OOC: Two ticks XPs for Winters RCN please

In reply to Niewiele Dupek (msg # 918):

OOC: You guys ever see a movie where the good guys lose big in the beginning only to get sweet revenge in the end? Well right now RBS is that shitty movie. It's easy to forget that anything called 'Escape from ______, Death of a ______' might be fun to watch, but to actually be in the MIDDLE of it would probably be demotivating.

Once the 57s are loaded the Hind will have the ammo to kick back. The Hind and the Crooklyn will meet up, and the game will go from there.

Hang on. Help is coming.

ND

In reply to Niewiele Dupek (msg # 919):

OOC: For the record Gavin Barr, like all of us, is a sexually-transmitted self-replicating virus. While other men fight for land and title trying to make sense of it all, Gavin has a...different approach to dealing with life's stresses. I can't tell if I pity him, or us for not being more like him.

In reply to Niewiele Dupek (msg # 920):

OOC: Really? With that haircut I thought the skipper's 'little buddy' there would be more comfortable with that 'they come to snuff the rooster' track Alice did :)

Ok, Edwards is looking to do a one man Army version of this scene from Blackhawk Down:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoTwp19x5Pc  (start 3 minute 30 seconds).

Basically, approach the back of the 12.7mm by steath, get my knify stab on, then man the weapon and open up on enemy forces.

Snake Eater Lite(tm) is gonna try to de oppresso liber those POWs.

In reply to SSG Alan Edwards (msg # 922):

Jesus Maria is there a National Endowment for Democracy award for 'most languages used in a Pbem game'? If so, and we don't win, we should at least be in the running. Ok Mr. Chao ab ordo you are cleared hot for knife attack, over. Gimmie 2x ESY RCN and 'hold your thumbs' so you don't go 'under the mushrooms' as the locals say.

In reply to Niewiele Dupek (msg # 923):

JB the Crooklyn is in that open patch just south of AW street on the map. Henderson is talking about bridge 6, which is not a huge bridge but a one lane sort of deal.

As a player can't remember all the details.  I'm guessing it's one of the ones we didn't blow?

In reply to 2Lt Jack Winters (msg # 925):

Yeah I used to drive myself crazy trying to update the map when no one checked it. Now it's not really changing that much, and players are actually looking at it. Taki life. Bridge 6 is active; looks like an eight tonner, but wtf do I know? Could be 12.

In reply to Niewiele Dupek (msg # 926):

Vita is one of the POWs and sees The Haircut smoke the guys on the 469. JB as soon as you can post an action for her, and then her Character Sheet in the Character Subs thread.

Barr's trim detection skills are second to none.

19:24, Today: 1LT Gavin Barr rolled 22 using 1d100. RCN.

In reply to 1LT Gavin Barr (msg # 928):

OOC:

Barr from the helicopter sees the tactical situation for what it is: the Dodge gun might be rozpierdoli, or Roostered, as the case may be, but the threat has been taken away. Well it is the Rooster....ok the threat of the helicopter being engaged by the 12.7mm has been reduced, shall we say. :)

19:41, Today: SSG Alan Edwards rolled 61 using 1d100. INT Check.  NOPE

I thought INT/Attribute checks were done with a d20?

EDIT:  Oh, I was thinking about that too...perhaps I should actually read the rules...oops...
This message was last edited by the player at 16:37, Tue 22 Oct 2013.

If I recall, the rules as written says multiply them by five and do d100.  Not sure the original box set had a d20 in it.  Of course I've been guilty of doing d20 in the past since the probabilities are the same.
This message was last edited by the GM at 14:42, Tue 22 Oct 2013.

In reply to SSG Alan Edwards (msg # 932):

Shit JB has a point. I thought it was a D100 roll too. Oh well. I'll accept both D20 rolls and D100 rolls for atts, although I think JB might be officially right. Or wrong. But definetly right or wrong. One of the two. Either way.

In reply to Niewiele Dupek (msg # 933):

In reply to Niewiele Dupek (msg # 934):

Just showing you're still alive?  Am I holding us back in any way?  Just want to make sure.