Re: OOC5
Again, I'll point out, the odds of ALL of that being true... that's pretty far-fetched. That's the point, one or two things, and I'm inclined to agree with you. Heck, we outed and killed two succubus with less preamble earlier in the game. But... ALL of that... that's just screaming "exception to the rule".
Thinking that DM is playing all of the character by the book - that's meta-gaming.
Having skill ranks is not the same as having knowledge... did you roll those skill ranks to come up with this information, or are you just skimming information from books that might have NOTHING to do with this setting? This is, while sharing many things that are familiar, a unique game world. The Kruthik and the dispelling creatures for example - those will not be found as is in any book.
Also... I didn't threaten anyone. YOU said, " "I should warn both of you that should you try casting a spell or activating an item until the creature is returned to its natural place of repose then I will be forced to assume that you are under its control. Please do not move away until we have dealt with it"
That is a threat.
"Do what I say, or else."
I'm guessing your held action wasn't to bake me a cake or offer me a funny caricature of the Angel and I in princess and prince outfits.
Now, seeing as he took 4 points of Wisdom damage from the Illusionist, and being threatened with bodily harm by people that keep ignoring perfectly good advice makes him cranky, pointing out that he is fully equipped to DEFEND himself seems a perfectly reasonable response.
Without the Wisdom damage, he still would have defended himself, but he would have probably just pointed out that the succubus might not be a succubus rather than warning you that he was prepared to defend himself with prejudice against attacks by threatening individuals like yourself. Again, I did not lift a finger to stop you from attacking the sucubus - I just pointed out that it seemed like a bad idea, and provided reasons as to why. Good reasons. Solid reasons. Reasons that were verified by a Celestial creature and an Epic Level Legendary Hero with Sense Motive as a class skill and a high wisdom score.
You on the other hand, threatened both me and the ange in "so many words" if we so much as breathed the wrong way because we might be charmed because you don't trust anyone or anything that isn't you even if the evidence literally has teeth and could bite you.
Pointing out that if I were being mind controlled that I'd likely be attacking everyone just makes sense. That's not a threat, and I hope that's not what you are referring to, because I just don't get it.
That's like saying, "If I was really scuba diving behind your back, I'd be wearing scuba gear." I'm guessing the "threat" was "harming me is suicide." That seems... reasonable. If someone wants to put their hands on me without my permission, my general rule of thumb becomes whatever part of them touches me becomes mine. Yes, its not what he would normally say, because of how aggressive it is, but its not exactly out of proportion with Jade's "warning".
As for my "irrational" behavior... I'm not sure what those were exactly?
We went to the encounter - I cautioned examining it. Balli shot an arrow, and some other actions took place, and I pointed out that the Kobolds seem bad, the orcs seemed like dwarves in disguise, and that the Kruthik seemed like Kruthik. Then, I pointed to the area where the dwarves were chained up and said the pendant was there.
I then buffed the party, turned myself invisible, and did some stuff... such as outing the illusionists hiding place, and then doing a pompous little monologue to the illusionist after killing a bunch of his minions and dispelling and disenchanting some dwarves.
Then, when you and Relwyk decided to attack the creature that got rid of the remaining kruthik tearing into our fighters with their armor rending attacks, I decided to search the body while pointing out why I believed the succubus was a threat, citing LOADS of evidence.
That's when you decide I'm charmed, citing as evidence the fact that I disagree with you. That, and the inherent nature of most succubi is your example.
Forget the magic circle, and spells, or the fact that literally EVERYTHING confirms what I'm saying. Evidence be damned, your "hunch" is more important.
That doesn't strike me as lawful, let alone rational. Which is fine, but its a bit weird, given that your strongest argument is that succubi are inherently evil... in spite of the fact that you have multiple, independent lines of evidence saying that THIS one, isn't.
Yes, it can be circumvented. Anything is possible - including the fact that it might not even be a succubus.
Did you consider that? Maybe Relwyk is wrong, and you are attacking an angel that's been polymorphed and geased, or some such thing? No verification - just instant death. I mean, it makes just as much sense as what you are suggesting.
And I'll just refer you not only to where I was the one that suggested you request such a thing, I then DID it. MSg 156 and Msg 176 (my very next post). Remove Enchantment should read "Break Enchantment, but they would do essentially the same thing, which is remove any enchantments upon my mind. So I did exactly as you asked after I suggested it.
So at this point, I don't know how you can say I'm charmed by the succubus, and I'm not sure what I've done that's more irrational than attacking a creature that appears to be a succubus that aided the party in the defeat of an evil illusionist that has multiple Good aligned people vouching for it - and an Epically Good Hero of Legend that just called for a ceasefire.
As for your very fair point about your character being who she is, and doing your due diligence to make sure your character would fit, to add on to what Faran said...
I get it. You are LG, and LG good says that jay walking is still a crime, and so is existing as a succubus. That part I get.
But... if a LG character murders a non-evil character without provocation... are they really LG? Because I think that's the part that's important in this instance. Because whether or not such divinations can be circumvented, the fact is that ACTUAL alignment matters, and with your +15 in Knowledge Planes, you should be aware of that.
That by itself, should give you pause, unless SOMEHOW, your character is just a racist who doesn't actually care about the difference between ACTUAL good and evil. A succubus that only sucks the souls of evil creatures for example, or something of that sort. The Vegans of the Succubus world - that they exist is a fact. So atypical alignments are a fact, and in the face of evidence that a typically evil creature might actually NOT be evil should be important to a LG character. Maybe it's new information, but its new information that you now have, and have to cope with. I suppose murdering a non-evil character who hasn't lifted a finger to defend themselves IS one way with coping with this life-changing information... but it sounds like an EVIL coping action, not a Good one.
Also... I've been summoning demons since before the maze... That's what I've been doing this entire time. Eyeballs - evil outsiders.
Voors - evil outsiders
Hell Hounds, Evil outsiders
Fiendish Huge Crocodile, Evil outsider
Koryalut - Evil Outsiders
Fiendish Wolves - Evil Outsiders (my first summons ever in the game actually)
Spikey Demon Thing - Evil Outsider
So... yeah. Been Evil Outsiders chilling with the LG characters for at least as long as I'VE been in the game. :p
And Belroar has literally ran into a room that was filling completely with sand to attack stone golems. He compulsively touches buttons and switches that are likely trapped.
Of course he would blindly attack the Succubus.