The Guardian:
Was he getting friendly?
During the "party" scene, IIRC. Maybe the Doctor was drunk?
The Guardian:
(In amidst all the callbacks, I sort of expected a reference to picking up the Master's "remains" from Skaro in the TVM. Although perhaps they're hoping we've all forgotten it entirely.)
It's not even the first time the Master's been exterminated by Daleks. :) I like that the Daleks have just gone with the "Why don't you just shoot him?" criticism, and run with it so hard.
quote:
Overall I felt like this story is really indulgent fanwankery that I'm not eager to see pursued... executed really well. It'd be a cool premise if it didn't have to be Davros and the Daleks again.
Yeah. I'd have hated it under RTD or early Moffat, but it's fortunate I like the style, tone, and characters enough now to forgive it. Apparently it was meant to be a 10-year anniversary of the new series, so it might be understandable, though I don't see it.
The Traveller:
I kind of have to split my brain in two when i watch Who regular Whovian brain, and Travcanon, because what happens in the show directly impacts how I play Trav.
I liked seeing Smoke Alarm's graffiti on Karn, that was a nice reference to ATTT. ;)
The Traveller:
Gonzales is cute, but she takes too much after the silliness of the Simms Master. I'm thinking that the home office might have found a more aggressive and darker female Master perhaps a bit too much for the family audience to take, as well as there being an effort to move away from sexualizing the Doctor and "catering to the female famdom" (which I have heard the show accused of in some corners.)
And thats too bad. Missy lacks a magnificence that the Master requires.
It's been said that the Master is a dark reflection of the current Doctor and their era, with Delgado's being an elegant establishment-like figure opposite the Pertwee Doctor; the gothic, eccentric, funereal Tom Baker Doctor (intended at the time to be the final Doctor) opposed by a crazed, corpse-like Master; and the classically good-man Davison Doctor opposed by the classic mustache-twirling villainy of the Ainley Master. Ainley stuck around too long to show us a good match for the Colin Baker Doctor (that would have been terrifying), but he became cruelly manipulative of young companions opposite the McCoy Doctor in "Survival". The Simms Master was young, flamboyant, over-the-top to counter the Tennant Doctor. And consider Jacobi's old man opposite the elder Hurt Doctor. So, with an older, elegantly dressed, eccentric Capaldi who putters about not being a big figure, the Gomez Master is older, elegantly dressed, and utterly demented and lurks around the edges.
Of course, I don't know why Capaldi is basically just dressing like a bum now. The Master now has to become a mad cat lady.
As for Davros and the Master always surviving without explanation, I think it's based on how often it happened back in the classic series. It seems to be a running joke now. They probably figure fans or the expanded universe will fill in the blanks, though I agree it's lazy writing.
Someone pointed out to me the other day that we get absolutely no information that Clara is or is going to be a teacher in Series 7b, only that she looks after some kids. She just suddenly becomes one in "The Day of the Doctor" as a reference to "The Unearthly Child". It makes sense in retrospect and suits her character, but it's invented wholly out of whole cloth. That's been the writing style since the beginning of the new series: if viewers can figure it out themselves or trust that it makes sense, then don't bother explaining it. Lazy writing, but the current TV style. Apparently RTD borrowed it from
The West Wing.
I realised: with no back story, a predestined status as a companion, appearing in the run-up to a Gallifrey epic with a dark missing Doctor and a new Doctor, Clara Oswald is basically the Melanie Bush of the new series.