RolePlay onLine RPoL Logo

, welcome to Always Time To Travel!

16:59, 2nd May 2024 (GMT+0)

OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Posted by The GuardianFor group 0
The Guardian
GM, 94 posts
Thu 26 Dec 2013
at 19:06
  • msg #1

OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

As requested by the Traveller.  I figure we can leave this floating for future use too.
The Guardian
GM, 95 posts
Thu 26 Dec 2013
at 19:09
  • msg #2

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Without getting overly specific about Time of the Doctor, I'll just note that with every one of these mythology-heavy episodes I end up holding my breath to see what outright contradictions Moffat is going to throw at me. :)
The Traveller
player, 91 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Thu 26 Dec 2013
at 20:15
  • msg #3

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

A few things -

Trav went to the Prydonian academy with Theta Sigma. She's known his name since they both started adventuring.

Of course, we can hand wave this by simply saying that by the time Trav finds out (ie, gets the signal from the opening of Time of the Doctor), it's all over with.

Now, I understand the difficulties of trying to slavishly follow the show (and if Gary needs to go off canon, I understand. But I'm wondering how things will play out when Trav meets 12.

Also, the Time Lords gave 11 a whole new set of Regenerations. So, new rules!

Never tell me the rules!

I like to imagine that a future Marshall and her Robotech allies helped the Papal Mainframe defend Tranzalore from the fleets of Cybermen and Daleks that besieged it. But that's my headcanon.
Sereth
player, 55 posts
Fri 27 Dec 2013
at 01:17
  • msg #4

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Only thing is if that was the case; wouldn't she have died when the Daleks infiltrated? Or did she buzz off before then?
The Traveller
player, 93 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Fri 27 Dec 2013
at 17:23
  • msg #5

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
Only thing is if that was the case; wouldn't she have died when the Daleks infiltrated? Or did she buzz off before then?


Are we talking Trav?
Smoke Alarm
player, 108 posts
Build High For Happiness!
Sat 28 Dec 2013
at 01:37
  • msg #6

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'd ignore it until you want to do something with it. It's silly that the message is everywhere and everywhen. Maybe we're far enough in the future to miss it or missed the translation. Or maybe "Time" is always just a few episodes or a season ahead of where we are.

This is our Who-niverse, so we don't have to follow the show (especially since continuity is shot).
This message was last edited by the player at 01:38, Sat 28 Dec 2013.
The Traveller
player, 97 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sat 28 Dec 2013
at 02:53
  • msg #7

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Actually, Moffat taking a blow torch to Continuity benefits us - Gary can change things on just as easy a whim. What may even be interesting is that Trav is the last remnant of the Doctor actually using the Moment - she's evidence for that timeline, that it was a fixed point in time and that it's not so easy to go backies. "Booby, you idiot, I was THERE when you did it - you can't just wave your hands and say magic time lord bullshit! Time Lord triumphant, my ass!"
Sereth
player, 57 posts
Sat 28 Dec 2013
at 04:31
  • msg #8

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Eh. I like Moffatt more than I like RTD; but my biggest issue with him is 'timey-wimey wibbly-wobbly'. As in his argument is that the Doctor not using the Moment -always- happened; it's just that he only remembers it now. See The Wedding of River Song for another example of that.

Smoke Alarm's right. If you're setting a game of DW in a particular time period; it's best you just ignore anything that came after it; unless it suits your purposes. Much as I admire a lot of Moffatt's work; he's a lot harder to just work into a game than RTD is. Moffatt loves using time travel as a plot device more than just a 'getting from point A to point B'. Which means trying to work within his evolving universe is very hard.
The Guardian
GM, 99 posts
Sat 28 Dec 2013
at 04:45
  • msg #9

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Well, have no fear: figure that the baseline assumptions for the game (Time Lords: gone; Daleks: gone; Doctor: missing and presumed dead or unavailable) will persist at least until I'm good and ready for things to be otherwise.

This follows on from a certain state of affairs which has ramifications for what I see as your big challenge to deal with, but as Smoke Alarm said, this is your story, not a tiny piece carved out of Moffat's.
The Traveller
player, 99 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sat 28 Dec 2013
at 05:42
  • msg #10

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

*Our* story, but yes.
The Traveller
player, 101 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sat 28 Dec 2013
at 10:30
  • msg #11

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Speaking just for myself, I do hope that the Daleks do come back at some point, perhaps in a much reduced state, similar to how they were in Eccleston and most of Tennant's run. The Daleks figure hugely in Trav's back story, but she has yet to see one since the Time War. I want her encounter with them, no matter what form it takes, to be as dramatic as when the 9th Doctor encountered the last Dalek in the episode Dalek in Season one of New Who.
Sereth
player, 58 posts
Sat 28 Dec 2013
at 10:34
  • msg #12

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

.... I'm burned out on Daleks. I have issues with seeing that Daleks could escape a Time Lock when Timelords couldn't. I wouldn't mind if we didn't see Daleks again for a very long time. I'd like to see Draconians before we saw Daleks; though I admit that's unlikely.

Admittedly; Day of the Doctor does provide a slight rationale for some Daleks escaping. And let's be honest; since Victory of the Daleks there is absolutely no reason to think the Daleks won't be back en masse again.
Stanley Newton
player, 28 posts
Sat 28 Dec 2013
at 10:39
  • msg #13

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Busy couple of days, but I've now seen "Time of the Doctor" and it wasn't as good as I had hoped. There were some elements I liked, but the pacing felt a bit off in my opinion.
This message was last edited by the player at 10:41, Sat 28 Dec 2013.
The Traveller
player, 102 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sat 28 Dec 2013
at 11:16
  • msg #14

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Well, that beggars a very important question - if the Parliament of the Daleks are all New Paradigm Daleks, then why haven't they swept forth and conquered the galaxy overtly?

1) They're wiser Daleks. While still every bit as hateful and monstrous as their forebearers, they understand that weapons of mass destruction and use of time as a weapon will only result in destroying the universe they wish to rule. These Daleks, as shown in Season 7, seem more intent in subverting and transforming others into Daleks or Dalek slaves.  It seems that being a Dalek is not so much now as a genetic ideal as a philosophical one, and that the aim of the Daleks is to conquer by way of transformation - the ultimate subjugation.

2) The New Paradigm Daleks, while being wiser, don't have the technological prowess of the Time War era Daleks. We don't see any of the new generation of Daleks time travel, for example. Another possibility is that these Daleks deliberately limit their temporal excursions because they understand that gross manipulation of the time stream will draw the attention of other time aware groups - which we have established in our setting are folks like the Time Agency (which has been mentioned in rpg.net threads), the Great and Bountiful Human Empires (which might have their own brands of temporal defenders), the Chamber of Unwrought Time and the Justice Department (the folks behind the Teselecta, the man shaped robot that impersonated the Doctor in The Impossible Astronaut/Let's Kill Hitler/other season 6 eps), Torchwood's future incarnations, Faction Paradox (some of whom may have survived the Time War), and, if Trav is successful, the Parliament of Time. Let's not forget Phillipe/Fortuna/Evers.

3) The new Daleks are terrified of the Traveller.  With the Doctor gone (or at least perceived to be - I like to assume in my headcanon that what Clara The Dalek did has hidden the Doctor not only from the Daleks, but from casual discovery by the Traveller) They remember the Marshall, and remember that the Marshall would have committed genocide on them if she could have. I'd like to think that these Daleks would rather hide, wait and see, and try to work for subtler method than their forebearers.

4) Our current story could be taking place relatively before the New Paradigm Daleks arise. Wibbley wobbly timey wimey. The events of the 2005 Dr Who revival don't have to take place in sequence with regards to our campaign. For example, from Kate Stewarts POV, Day of the Doctor and the UNIT Vault incident could have taken place a month ago, but the Torchwood outfit is up and running over on Canary Wharf and the finale of Dr Who Season 2 hasn't taken place yet. From UNIT's POV, Doctors and Travellers of various makes roll in all the time. Sgt Patel made the comment, "Oh, a new one." for all we know, she could have spent 5 years travelling with the 8th Traveller who looks like Whoopie Goldberg but she's smart enough not to spoil the Traveller's younger 5th self.

5) Other Time Lords. We have Mister Saxon (Trav: "Yeah. Your prime minister is an ex boyfriend of mine. Don't ask.") who may or may not be part of Gary's Whoverse, the Corsair (who I refuse to believe is dead - a transgender Time Lord is too cool, and Time Lords can grow back arms!) and other unaccounted Time Lords. I as a player thought that the Rhani was behind the Splintered Sisterhood, for example.)

All speculation on my part, of course.
This message was last edited by the player at 11:21, Sat 28 Dec 2013.
Sereth
player, 59 posts
Sat 28 Dec 2013
at 11:25
  • msg #15

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Oh wanting not to see Daleks is purely for the TV series. What happens here as is established is our own version of the Whoniverse; so I'm not fussed.

In regards to Daleks in the TV series though -

Since the new Paradigm Daleks have come up; they turned up to lock the Doctor in the Pandorica at the close of Season 5; forced the Doctor into doing their job in The Dalek Asylum; at which point their memory of him was wiped, and then again they waged war at Trenzalore.

I don't think they're worried about the majority of those groups. Most of them don't have tremendous time travel capabilities - nothing beyond a Vortex Manipulator for example.

I -do- think the Doctor still scares them though. And I think the possibility of the Time Lords returning scares the crap out of them.
The Traveller
player, 103 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sat 28 Dec 2013
at 11:34
  • msg #16

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
Eh. I like Moffatt more than I like RTD; but my biggest issue with him is 'timey-wimey wibbly-wobbly'. As in his argument is that the Doctor not using the Moment -always- happened; it's just that he only remembers it now. See The Wedding of River Song for another example of that.


I am also really pissed at that particular piece of backsies. The idea that the Doctor unwillingly commited genocide added real dark heft to Dr Who and really made me take the series seriously. I model Trav a lot of off Eccleston's 9th Doctor.

Sereth:
Smoke Alarm's right. If you're setting a game of DW in a particular time period; it's best you just ignore anything that came after it; unless it suits your purposes. Much as I admire a lot of Moffatt's work; he's a lot harder to just work into a game than RTD is. Moffatt loves using time travel as a plot device more than just a 'getting from point A to point B'. Which means trying to work within his evolving universe is very hard.


This is true as well. If we're actually working in a setting where Gary draws a line at Last of The Time Lords and says nothing else counts, then I'm fine with that. An alternate whoverse where the last Doctor was The War Doctor who died activating The Moment (which is what Trav thinks happened) is fine too. But part of me irrationally wants for Smith or Capaldi's Doctor to be around the corner, from the Shadows, letting Trav do her thing, seeking out Gallifrey while his protege and onetime romantic interest (way back in his 5th incarnation, her 2nd) is forging her own legend with her own companions.

I'm sure that Gary will keep it all suitably vague in the interests of game play ;)
Sereth
player, 61 posts
Sat 28 Dec 2013
at 11:39
  • msg #17

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Traveller:
I am also really pissed at that particular piece of backsies. The idea that the Doctor unwillingly commited genocide added real dark heft to Dr Who and really made me take the series seriously. I model Trav a lot of off Eccleston's 9th Doctor.


I can get that. My bigger beef is end of The End of Time; where it's implied the Doctor quite deliberately commited genocide on both because he didn't trust the Time Lords anymore. Way beyond any issues he'd had with them before. I'm not really a huge fan of the Time War in general honestly; but I get it had to move on from where it had been when it was last on TV.
The Traveller
player, 104 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sat 28 Dec 2013
at 11:42
  • msg #18

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
Oh wanting not to see Daleks is purely for the TV series. What happens here as is established is our own version of the Whoniverse; so I'm not fussed.

In regards to Daleks in the TV series though -

Since the new Paradigm Daleks have come up; they turned up to lock the Doctor in the Pandorica at the close of Season 5; forced the Doctor into doing their job in The Dalek Asylum; at which point their memory of him was wiped, and then again they waged war at Trenzalore.

I don't think they're worried about the majority of those groups. Most of them don't have tremendous time travel capabilities - nothing beyond a Vortex Manipulator for example.

I -do- think the Doctor still scares them though. And I think the possibility of the Time Lords returning scares the crap out of them.


So this implies that the Doctor is somehow a key or means for the Time Lords and the Time War returning. What's ironic here is that the New Paradigm Daleks are as scared of the Time War as anyone else, and that includes being scared of their progenitors (the Time War Daleks under the Dalek Emperor and Davros) as everyone else. The War Was Hell, to quote the 10th Doctor, so they don't want it back. A story idea is "The Nightmare of the Daleks", where the Daleks beg the Traveller to save them - from the Time War.

If Capaldi's Doctor were to make an appearance here, that would be a big point, depending on how they write him. The Marshall learned to hate and despise Rassilon and what she was forced to do in the Time War (remember all those weapons in the Vault of Omega? Someone was forced to pull the trigger!)  They fought back when she was the Marshall. I'm toying with the idea of a future Traveller being a reformed Marshall, they might clash again. But that's more grist for Trav-Doctor fan fic in my headcanon. "Gallifrey must stay dead!"
Smoke Alarm
player, 110 posts
Build High For Happiness!
Sat 28 Dec 2013
at 12:05
  • msg #19

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm's right? Well, of course Smoke Alarm's right! :D

We had a similar problem running the Forgotten Realms D&D setting. The community started ten years ago, and a few years ahead of the then setting date. Since that time, about a year has passed in-game, while the setting advanced ten years, underwent massive changes, destruction and warfare, then went made and destroyed itself and advanced a century and two editions. We were much better off not trying to keep up. Sitting in the past is safe, especially with the slow rate of PbP.

It's why I prefer setting Who games pre–Time War: continuity and the time-lines are stable, Daleks are available, and you don't have to jump through hoops explaining the existence of the Time Lord PC.

But it really only affects Traveller, and doesn't really concern Smoke Alarm. I have my own, old-fashioned conception of Time Lords. I should play one one day.

I'm amused that the new series Time War has now completely retrod all the ideas and arcs of the EDA's War in Heaven arc, even down to weaponised regenerations (Time Lord suicide bombers, sigh). They both have their good and bad points, mostly bad. Did Davies and Moffat learn nothing?

Ugh, can't stand New Paradigm Daleks. They just look awful. I'm glad I haven't seen them since that stupid "Victory of the Daleks" (I ragequit at "Day of the Moon" and only got back for Season 7B and the Capaldi Doctor).

I wouldn't mind our own encounter with Daleks ('Cleaners!') or Cyberman, but frankly I'd prefer classic series, historical Daleks and Cybermen. (In my personal time-line, one of the two was likely responsible for people being evacuated to Paradise Towers.) They're not as powerful and easier to explain. Which raises the issue of, e.g., such-and-such Daleks being a part of history and a fixed point in time or whatever.
The Traveller
player, 105 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sat 28 Dec 2013
at 12:09
  • msg #20

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

One encouraging sign is that most of the Daleks that we see in Time of the Doctor are bronze RTD era Daleks. I presume that they only made the 5 new paradigm Dalek props and any other Dalek props that they use have to be the RTD ones - that can be hand waved by saying that Ipod Daleks are all leader types and that standard soldiers are the RTD era bronze design (my favorite Dalek design EVAR)
Sereth
player, 62 posts
Sun 29 Dec 2013
at 21:30
  • msg #21

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I kinda agree with Smoke Alarm (Again! This is getting to be a habit.) I'm not sure I agree that the Cyberman are any nastier than they've ever ever been; but it could just be they weren't as upgraded as the Daleks were. Doomsday is the best example I have of that with 'This isn't war, this is pest control'. Yes, hilarious line, but it amps up the threat value of Daleks, or downgrades Cybermen quite a lot.
Smoke Alarm
player, 111 posts
Build High For Happiness!
Mon 30 Dec 2013
at 00:20
  • msg #22

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I've been hoping they'd given up on the awful Apple Daleks and gone back to the bronzies — whatever else, they were a great design. (Guess whose family brought them a framed full-size poster of a Paradigm Dalek for their birthday? :( )

The Cybermen were certainly superpowered in "Nightmare in Silver": super-speed, nanites, almost indestructible. Basically, they became the Borg.
This message was last edited by the player at 10:49, Mon 30 Dec 2013.
Sereth
player, 64 posts
Mon 30 Dec 2013
at 00:22
  • msg #23

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

... I'd blocked out Nightmare in Silver.

It does support my headcanon that Cybus-Cybermen are nothing compared to the real ones though.
The Guardian
GM, 105 posts
Mon 30 Dec 2013
at 06:30
  • msg #24

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

There's a very good possibility of the Cybermen turning up.  In Trav & Stanley's last big adventure, they opened up negotiations for a non-aggression pact with a future Cyber-empire.  (They'd found some Cyber scouts who'd been stranded on Earth and got their clocks cleaned by an Osiran; subsequently some of their information and tech helped Trav to defeat it.)

So at some point you may get back to a conference that involves figuring out how to coexist peacefully with Cybermen, which is possibly much more challenging than just beating them.
Sereth
player, 65 posts
Mon 30 Dec 2013
at 08:37
  • msg #25

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

-possibly- more challenging? I think it's definitely more challenging. I mean, Ace showed us that all you need to beat cybermen is a handful of gold coins.
Smoke Alarm
player, 115 posts
Build High For Happiness!
Mon 30 Dec 2013
at 10:57
  • msg #26

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Ace also destroyed a Dalek with a baseball bat. The key element here is "Ace". ;) Or maybe the coins were superpowered like the baseball bat.

Yeah, let's just discount all Cyberman stories with "Silver" in the title. :D
The Traveller
player, 111 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Mon 30 Dec 2013
at 19:16
  • msg #27

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I kinda tried to nudge things a little bit by Trav directly mentioning the Cyberiad, as if it was something she had encountered in her pre-RIFTS days (back when she ran around with Jon Pertwee in technicolor). I also tried to work with Gary in highlighting how the Time War changed things.
The Traveller
player, 163 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Thu 16 Jan 2014
at 14:44
  • msg #28

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Of interest to Who fans -

So turns out that Bernard Cribbins (Wilfred) was in the two Dr Who Peter Cushing movies! I had no idea!

http://www.doctorwhohub.tv/?p=1593
Smoke Alarm
player, 167 posts
Build High For Happiness!
Thu 16 Jan 2014
at 14:59
  • msg #29

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

That was the first thing I knew about him.

But he was only in the second movie, as the policeman who replaced Ian.
Sereth
player, 101 posts
Thu 16 Jan 2014
at 21:50
  • msg #30

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

More interesting, is that Bernard Cribbins auditioned for the role of the 4th Doctor. And when asked what he could do, he said he could fight a bit.

"Sorry, the Doctor doesn't fight."

First thing he sees on TV, is Tom Baker knocking someone out.
The Traveller
player, 216 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Fri 28 Feb 2014
at 22:27
  • msg #31

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

A nice selection of Murray Gold music I found on Youtube -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFKwWbe-UxA

Because it gets me in a Trav/Who mood.
Smoke Alarm
player, 249 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang should be.
Sat 1 Mar 2014
at 03:02
  • msg #32

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Ugh, Murray Gold. D:
The Traveller
player, 217 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sat 1 Mar 2014
at 06:03
  • msg #33

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Hey, I love Murray Gold!
Sereth
player, 129 posts
Sat 1 Mar 2014
at 06:21
  • msg #34

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Murray Gold is fine; but if you liked the classic music, it's somewhat at odds.
Smoke Alarm
player, 251 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang should be.
Sat 1 Mar 2014
at 06:41
  • msg #35

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I find the music too orchestral, not weird enough for Who, and so in-your-ear with forced emotion.

And if I hear ooh-wa-wa-wa one more time...

But what do I know, I used the Unique II dance cover of "Break My Stride"... ;)
The Traveller
player, 221 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Mon 10 Mar 2014
at 16:46
  • msg #36

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I had to share this -


This message was last edited by the player at 16:47, Mon 10 Mar 2014.
The Traveller
player, 248 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Tue 15 Apr 2014
at 20:26
  • msg #37

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Dear River -

I'd like my gun back. If I don't get it, I shall shoot you with the other one.

kthx, The Traveller ;)

BTW - a pair of turbopistols and a vortex manipulator only makes you look like you're trying too hard, baby. Leave being bad ass to the professionals!

(Heaven forbid should Trav actually meet River. ;) )


This message was last edited by the player at 20:28, Tue 15 Apr 2014.
Smoke Alarm
player, 282 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang should be.
Wed 16 Apr 2014
at 04:01
  • msg #38

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Ugh, River Song. I think Smoke will kick her in the shins.
Sereth
player, 146 posts
Wed 16 Apr 2014
at 04:11
  • msg #39

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

.... alas, I cannot hold her down, because then it wouldn't be a fair fight.
The Traveller
player, 249 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Thu 17 Apr 2014
at 09:55
  • msg #40

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Now I'm imaging all our PCs mugging poor River.

"SWEETY, HELP!" Whump whump whump thwack KICK KICK KICK

I love Alex Kingston, but River as a character? Yeesh.
Stanley Newton
player, 88 posts
Wed 14 May 2014
at 22:03
  • msg #41

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

This might be interesting:

Over on the Humble Bundle site there is a Doctor Who Comics Bundle. Pay-what-you-want for 60 issues from IDW publishing and the Doctor Who: Legacy android game.

Link: https://www.humblebundle.com/books
This message was last edited by the player at 22:04, Wed 14 May 2014.
The Traveller
player, 275 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Thu 15 May 2014
at 13:02
  • msg #42

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yay! More Trav... hey wait. These are all boobie comics.

Ah well. In my headcanon Big West and Harmony Gold are joint-producing the new Traveller/Robotech anime. The Trav franchise convinced all the parties to resolve their differences and we're getting awesome Trav adventures with giant robots!
The Guardian
GM, 328 posts
Thu 15 May 2014
at 23:04
  • msg #43

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Traveller:
Yay! More Trav... hey wait. These are all boobie comics.

Not only that, but as far as Trav knows, they're completely apocryphal.
Smoke Alarm
player, 326 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang should be.
Fri 16 May 2014
at 02:33
  • msg #44

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

A pity they don't have Assimilation². Then you can pay the $0 it's worth. :(

I already have all the ones I'd want.

I can't wait for the Smoke Alarm spin-off! :D
The Traveller
player, 280 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sat 17 May 2014
at 03:51
  • msg #45

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Guardian:
The Traveller:
Yay! More Trav... hey wait. These are all boobie comics.

Not only that, but as far as Trav knows, they're completely apocryphal.


As opposed to the entirety of Robotech, which is absolutely Travcanon! ;)

That's OK. Trav loves her Bobobie, although she would mock him pretty mercilessly.

If she meets 9 -

"You look like you should be in a Ska band, baby! Look at that buzz cut hair!"

10 -

"OOH LOOK AT THAT HE MOUSES HIS HAIR HOW PRECIOUS."

11 -

"Boobie, bowties are so mid 20th century. Suspenders? Baby, barber shop quartets rock suspenders."

(later 11)

"Hm, that victorian look is much sexier."

12 -

"Yeah, new kidneys. Also, throwback to the Venusian Karate days much?"
The Traveller
player, 301 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Fri 23 May 2014
at 03:02
  • msg #46

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
A pity they don't have Assimilation². Then you can pay the $0 it's worth. :(

I already have all the ones I'd want.

I can't wait for the Smoke Alarm spin-off! :D


I'd pay real world dollars to see Smoke Alarm guest star in Torchwood and Sarah Jane as well as in her own Smoke Alarm show. That's when her actress isn't appearing with other members of the cast along with Matt Smith and David Tennant on Graham Norton.

And at the the Doctor Who Proms, of course Sereth and Amanda appear in full make up and talk to the crowd along with Strax and Lady Vashtra.
This message was last edited by the player at 03:10, Fri 23 May 2014.
Sereth
player, 183 posts
Fri 23 May 2014
at 03:06
  • msg #47

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Well guest starring on Sarah Jane would be pretty hard now. I'm pretty sure the Smoke Alarm spin-off would be brought in to replace the forcibly defunct Sarah Jane adventures. Would appeal to a similar audience I suspect.

Sereth would clearly be ushered in as part of the proposed Patternoster Gang spin-off. He and Strax would clearly -not- get along though.

"What's the greatest weapon?"

"A grenade!"

-facepalms- "No, Strax. Words are the greatest weapon of all."
The Guardian
GM, 357 posts
Fri 23 May 2014
at 03:10
  • msg #48

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
Well guest starring on Sarah Jane would be pretty hard now. I'm pretty sure the Smoke Alarm spin-off would be brought in to replace the forcibly defunct Sarah Jane adventures. Would appeal to a similar audience I suspect.

Although possibly not their parents.  A teen hero who vandalizes buildings and flings herself off them at high speed!  What could possibly go wrong?

By the way, I don't know if any of you listen to the Verity! podcast, but they're going to do a commentary on Paradise Towers at some point.  Should be epic ice hot.
This message was last edited by the GM at 03:12, Fri 23 May 2014.
Smoke Alarm
player, 342 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang should be.
Fri 23 May 2014
at 04:01
  • msg #49

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Oh, Sarah Jane Adventures. :( It's my favourite form of modern televised Who. It really could have kept going: the adventures of Clyde, Rani, Luke, and K-9 would have been perfect, like the K9 series done well. It's a pity SJA tied itself so heavily to Sarah: a show can rejig and survive by changing the main character (as Doctor Who did), but not if they're in the title.

A Smoke Alarm show would be the most anarchic thing around: vandalism; parkour; actively defying police, teachers, politicians; encouraging open rebellion against the ills of society; all in favour of community, grass-roots action, girl-power, and just being icehot to each other. :D So I suspect outside guest appearances, Smoke would find her home in a comic book. Where writers can really let rip on the madness. ;)

Okay, I'll play the game:

Fan lore has it that Smoke Alarm can first be glimpsed as an extra in the background of a crowd of Kangs in "Paradise Towers" (usually when the Blue Kangs invade the Red Kang brainquarters). Of course, they disagree on the exact character, with some fans insisting on a Red Kang, with a fan theory that Smoke Alarm switched colours at some point as a part of a Kang swap. In any case, the actresses in question are too old to fit Smoke Alarm's continuity, but this is in keeping with the general miscasting of the serial.

More to come!
This message was last edited by the player at 11:36, Fri 23 May 2014.
Smoke Alarm
player, 344 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang should be.
Fri 23 May 2014
at 08:34
  • msg #50

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm's first appearance was in Doctor Who itself, in a Season 7C Matt Smith adventure with the Cybermen (not "Nightmare in Silver", the other one). The character was designed for a guest appearance of an actress from US sci-fi/fantasy television: Alison Scagliotti (fresh from the end of Warehouse 13, where she played Claudia) was considered, as was Maisie Williams (Arya from Game of Thrones), though ultimately Ksenia Solo (Kenzi from Lost Girl, following her character's death) proved available and willing and best suited to the part. Giving her a strange Kang character, from a now-obscure late-80s serial of the classic series, was a controversial decision with fans prior to the episode airing.

Fortunately, she nailed the role: her acting range demonstrated by the street-kid thief character of Kenzi fitted Smoke Alarm perfectly, and her ballet dancing skills translated well to the action scenes in Lost Girl (such as in the Ruler of Forest Nymphs and Wood Sprites story) and thence to Smoke Alarm's "Kang fu". However, Ksenia's back injury and general safety concerns necessitated stunt-women and CGI for the parkour scenes, with wire-work for close-ups.

Smoke Alarm proved instantly and surprisingly popular with fans, who adored her madcap antics and unique voice and style. Kangs were also an easy and cheap option for cosplayers, with Smoke Alarms, Blue Kangs, and Red Kangs soon turning up at conventions, in all kind of styles, from traditional to punk to steampunk, all with dyed hair. (Ksenia actually opted to wear a wig for the part, having been used to them in Lost Girl.)

Naturally, Smoke Alarm and Ksenia were considered for a role in the Always Time To Travel spin-off.
This message was last edited by the player at 11:39, Fri 23 May 2014.
The Traveller
player, 317 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sun 25 May 2014
at 18:19
  • msg #51

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Blake Lively has often been criticized, after Gossip Girl, for running around doing mad cap antics in what was called by a competitor as a "stupid kid's show." She and Ksenia vocally defend the show on Twitter, as well as the larger Doctor Who franchise over all. "Oh, get over yourself. The show is all about heart and emotion and adventure and love and fun and what's best in people. When I first started on the Rifts I and Ryan marathoned the entire Doctor Who revival along with as much classic Traveller we could find. Now I'm a fan of japanese robot shows! All these other shows on TV are either about all this darkness, which is OK, while Rifts and now Always Time To Travel has none of that BS. There's lots of darkness in Doctor Who, but it never wins. I really owe all the prior Travellers and Doctors, I'm standing on giants shoulders. I can do this role for 10 years - I think I will." Indeed, Lively has been a rock of stability in the franchise, while Doctors leave their roles in an approximately 3 year cycle.

When questioned about who might succeed while interviewed on Graham Norton, lively joked with Ksenia and Kate Mulgrew that "it can be either one of these ladies, or maybe even my husband!" She then shouted to the crowd, "WHO WANTS TO SEE THE MARSHALL COME BACK AND KICK ASS, HUH?" The crowed roared, while Mulgrew covered her face in embarassment. Mulgrew: "I have to get busted out of lockdown first." (This was Mulgrew referring to her role as Red on Orange is the new black.)  Ksenia commented "we'll just say that she's an Orange Kang, no mousetrap can hold a Kang!" Ryan Reynolds replied, "Oh, Icehot."
This message had punctuation tweaked by the player at 18:20, Sun 25 May 2014.
The Traveller
player, 318 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sun 25 May 2014
at 18:45
  • msg #52

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Trav's former companions seem to have done well for themselves -

http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs7...rpwriter-d33u2nl.png

http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs7...rpwriter-d5ftze6.jpg

http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs7...rpwriter-d3a72w4.jpg
This message was last edited by the player at 05:00, Thu 29 May 2014.
Smoke Alarm
player, 353 posts
Build high for happiness!
Mon 26 May 2014
at 07:29
  • msg #53

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I have to say, I'm amazed by all Traveller's backstory, in-universe and in a telly universe outside it. It's very impressive. I hope what I add to it all fits. :) Partly, I'm trying to finish up an aborted game for Smoke Alarm.

*

Smoke Alarm had had a number of scenes in her Doctor Who episode that cemented her reputation with fans. Her impressive run through the factory away from the partially Cyber-converted cultists, and defeating them with various bits of machinery, was the first time that parkour had been showcased in Doctor Who, surprising for a show that made such a big thing of running away from villains. The parkour scenes were devised by experts brought over from France. The adorable tea party scene in which Smoke Alarm and Puddy dined with the elderly characters aged backwards to childhood by the osmic projector was also much loved. These showed a great sense of adventure, fun, and innocence that appealed to many viewers tired of modern dark or angsty heroes (especially in the parent program of Doctor Who), and made her a perfect fit for Always Time to Travel, as a foil for the other characters and to get them in or out of trouble as the plot demanded.

Following her character Kenzi's apparent death in Lost Girl Season 4, Ksenia Solo chose to leave on a high note and accept the role in Always Time to Travel. This was a wise decision, as the once-novel and promising Lost Girl continued to meander aimlessly to a confusing and unsatisfying end. (Alas, poor Lost Girl.) They were later reunited when Anna Silk (Kenzi's friend Bo and star of Lost Girl) made a guest appearance as Doctor Sam, discoverer of the Kangs and a friend of Smoke Alarm, in several flashback scenes.

The character of Smoke Alarm was revised slightly for the series, with "Kang Fu" introduced to reduce her reliance on the crossbow, or "arrowgun", as well to showcase Ksenia's dance skills and gracefulness. A Kang dictionary was devised for a consistent Kang-speak, to which Ksenia added some Russian slang. Smoke Alarm was also written with, if anything, greater enthusiasm and liveliness, an expanded background and additional character traits.

Ksenia continued to wear a blue wig through her first season, but elected to dye her hair for the second. One odd request by costuming was that she grow underarm hair and dye it blue for the "nude" scene by the pool, notorious for its fan disservice in displaying the malnourished, scarred Smoke Alarm. Some commentators hoped it would reduce the fashion for shaving among young women; it did, at least, among cosplayers.

The switch introduced some continuity issues, however, with "Paradise Towers" apparently dated to the 22nd century, the Cyberman story set in the 26th, and Smoke Alarm's introductory episode in Always... set in the 195th. Some throwaway lines about the osmic projector and background info about Paradise Towers handled this. These also neatly explained away Smoke Alarm's apparent death in her first episode, with her escaping, naturally, through the osmic projector time machine. Not that it mattered, as Smoke Alarm fans continued to come up with all kinds of crazy theories, as crazy as Smoke Alarm's own ramblings and skewed view of the world.

At the time, Smoke Alarm was the only character to meet both the current Doctor and the current Traveller, though she remained unaware of the Doctor's true identity and was thus unable to tell the Traveller the Doctor was still alive. Though this plot point was sensibly ignored in Always..., fans continued to anticipate the revelation.
This message was last edited by the player at 02:39, Fri 06 June 2014.
The Traveller
player, 319 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Mon 26 May 2014
at 08:10
  • msg #54

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Thank you! That's awfully sweet of you to say. To be honest, sometimes I worry that this goes into ego serving fan wank, but I love it when I see other players do it as well.
The Traveller
player, 332 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Wed 28 May 2014
at 17:30
  • msg #55

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

So, Gary, what are #travfans on Twitter saying? Who is the big couple being shipped? Tell us about the fandom!

For some reason, Imagine that the bulk of Ru Zheng fans in Trav Fandom don't like a TravRu ship because they want a non-romantic relationship between the two.

I bet the anime fans are all mad that Smoke Alarm cosplayers are flooding the anime cons with gangs of Kangs, overwhelming the Attack on Titan and Naruto cosplayers.

The only people who like the swelling Trav army seems to be other Doctor Who fans (who love that ATTT is airing during the regular Who hiatus) and Bronies (who have always had strong love and connections with Who fandom, and flood Deviantart with ATTT pony art. Sereth of course is a dragon, and Amanda is a cat creature, with the rest of the crew are Ponies.)
Sereth
player, 194 posts
Wed 28 May 2014
at 23:00
  • msg #56

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

... err I'd doubt the majority of Ru Zheng fans dislike a TravRu ship. I say this as someone who has very few actual fandoms, but has watched ships attached to other shows a fair bit.
The Guardian
GM, 370 posts
Thu 29 May 2014
at 03:48
  • msg #57

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
... err I'd doubt the majority of Ru Zheng fans dislike a TravRu ship.

The group that is upset by the idea that this would compromise the ideals of a Buddhist monk are surely the loudest faction, regardless of its size.
The Guardian
GM, 371 posts
Thu 29 May 2014
at 03:54
  • msg #58

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Say -- is there any chance of you editing those big graphics out or half-sizing them?  The reason I ask is that they're fouling up the word wrap.
Sereth
player, 195 posts
Thu 29 May 2014
at 03:55
  • msg #59

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

.. possibly true. Much like fandom in regards to the Doctor/anyone shipping eh?

(For what it's worth, I despise the Doctor pairing off with anyone; but I try not to impose my views too much.)
Smoke Alarm
player, 358 posts
Build high for happiness!
Thu 29 May 2014
at 04:07
  • msg #60

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Or maybe just links to the pictures. Then we can see the source website.

I find the Doctor is just too weird, too unnatural to be considered a romantic figure. But more, he's always been a parental or family figure: a grandfather, a mad uncle, a father figure, a professor, an older brother, to the companions, to the audience, to the people he meets. So it never feels right or appropriate.


The canonical animal for Smoke Alarm is actually a rat, mouse, or possum, never, ever a pony. This was established in a famous arc in the Smoke Alarm Chronicles comic series, in which the crew were played by talking animals with no reason given. Smoke Alarm was a heroic possum in a blue bandanna, and the crew faced an army of actual goannas. The storyline incorporated Aboriginal Dreamtime themes and presented several major revelations and plot developments for the ongoing Army of Gehenna arc in AWTT, though some AWTT fans declared it non-canon as it was (a) about talking animals and (b) a licensed comic.
This message was last edited by the player at 04:12, Thu 29 May 2014.
The Traveller
player, 333 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Thu 29 May 2014
at 05:01
  • msg #61

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Guardian:
Say -- is there any chance of you editing those big graphics out or half-sizing them?  The reason I ask is that they're fouling up the word wrap.


I turned them into regular links. Check now.
The Traveller
player, 340 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Fri 30 May 2014
at 17:08
  • msg #62

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm considering having Trav rock a Debbie Harry look, since 5th Trav has a punk attitude. While she's played by Blake Lively, the costume and makeup staff work with Blake to make unique looks for the TVs most popular female Time Lord -


Smoke Alarm
player, 380 posts
Build high for happiness!
Fri 6 Jun 2014
at 03:23
  • msg #63

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

With the continuing popularity of Smoke Alarm in Always Time to Travel!, thoughts quickly turned to a spin-off to replace the lost Torchwood or Sarah Jane Adventures, one that would star Ksenia Solo as Smoke Alarm. However, like the proposed Rose Tyler: Earth Defence early in the Davies years, it was decided to be a "spin-off too far". As popular a character as she was, Smoke Alarm did not seem suitable for a lead role, unable to carry heavier themes and plots. Besides, Ksenia Solo was still doing full series of AWTT and there were no plans to change that.

Concerns were also raised when proposed stories, in which Smoke Alarm was marooned on modern Earth and led a band of kids against alien threats and human villains, proved to be utterly anarchic, featuring vandalism, anti-authoritarian views, and encouraging open rebellion against the government. This had been controversial enough on AWTT, but a series based around it terrified executives and lawyers. The BBC wouldn't touch it with a ten-foot pole. In later years, leaked synopses circulated around the Internet, and the idea was beloved by left-leaning fans, who thought it a missed opportunity for real social change. Much of these ideas eventually resurfaced in the Smoke Alarm Chronicles comics.

A cartoon was also considered with a voice actress replacing Ksenia as Smoke Alarm. The animated medium would have allowed greater freedom in story telling and action sequences, and those executives and lawyers would pay less attention to it. However, British animators like Cosgrove Hall proved simply unable to provide the full level of motion necessary for Smoke Alarm's parkour scenes. Lucasfilm Animation, responsible for Star Wars: The Clone Wars, was interested, but negotiations became mired in cross-Atlantic licensing deals, between the BBC, Lucasfilm, and Disney.

Ksenia and Smoke Alarm did, however, have a cameo appearance in the SJA reunion special, along with the rest of the AWTT cast.

Surprisingly, when the K9 series finally came back for a second season, a suspiciously similar character named Fire Alarm, played by a little-known Australian actress, arrived to help the regulars battle the Department, with basic parkour, graffiti, and rebelliousness. Dressed in red and described as coming from a world ruled by girl gangs, Fire Alarm was immediately pegged by fans as being a Kang. Fans have devised various theories that this was actually Smoke Alarm in disguise or working with the Red Kangs, or her sister.
This message was last edited by the player at 03:26, Fri 06 June 2014.
The Traveller
player, 371 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Fri 6 Jun 2014
at 16:57
  • msg #64

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Strangely, talk of Smoke Alarm spin offs also occurs in various Robotech fora, since the new 2nd Traveller-Macross Frontier OVAs have proven so successful, especially with the Robotech localization release. A petition resides at Change.org demanding that Smoke Alarm get her own series of Big West-Macross crossover OVAs. Of course, more traditional TravFans have objected that seeing Smoke Alarm fight Invid with 2nd Trav and Scott Bernard's team would blow TravCon (a TravFan term for "Traveller Continuity") all to hell, but other fans rightly point out that this is ultimately Doctor Who, which laughs at hard canon. None of these ideas have gained any traction. However, Mari Ijima (who voices Lynn Minmay in the original Macross show and the 8 2nd Traveller OVA episodes, as well as in the current Traveller Macross OVAs) has tweeted about her love of Smoke Alarm, posing in a recent Smoke Alarm cosplay. Another strong supporter is Tara Strong, who voices the Second Traveller in the new OVA series when she is off season from My Little Pony:Friendship is Magic
Smoke Alarm
player, 383 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sat 7 Jun 2014
at 02:40
  • msg #65

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I know zip about a Robotech and Macross and all that. All this time, I was thinking you were talking about Battletech. :\ But that turned out to be a different mecha series.

Smoke Alarm in a mecha. Gods help us. :o
Sereth
player, 210 posts
Sat 7 Jun 2014
at 02:43
  • msg #66

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm in a mecha? The gods are obviously angry, and trying to make us crazy.
The Guardian
GM, 390 posts
Sat 7 Jun 2014
at 02:49
  • msg #67

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I dunno, the image that pops into my head is Smoke running up the side of a mech to spraypaint over the whole windscreen.
Smoke Alarm
player, 384 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sat 7 Jun 2014
at 02:53
  • msg #68

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Now that would be cool. :D

But going in a parkour run in a mech would likely flatten a city.
Sereth
player, 211 posts
Sat 7 Jun 2014
at 03:11
  • msg #69

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

What springs to my mind is

"I wonder what this button does."
The Traveller
player, 373 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sat 7 Jun 2014
at 03:13
  • msg #70

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

All of Robotech is available (in pretty scratchy form) on Youtube. Imagine the animation styles of mid 80s anime combined with this.

Imagine this girl, but with guns and twice as hyper, fighting Daleks and Zentraedi giants -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlLN2yk24P8

I imagine that the new 2nd Traveller OVAs have fantastic battles between her and Delgado's Master, as 2nd Trav and UNIT Dallas struggle to protect the Earth from the Master and his Krayloss allies!
This message was last edited by the player at 03:19, Sat 07 June 2014.
The Traveller
player, 376 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sat 7 Jun 2014
at 05:16
  • msg #71

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

OK, Twitter is now officially Flipping The Fuck Out, with the Smoke's revelation.

And now for a treat -

An artist at Dreamation (a gaming con in NJ that happened this part march) was offering free drawings of folk's favorite RPG character, for free. Well, guess who I asked him to draw.

GENTLEMEN, BEHOLD.


This message was last edited by the player at 05:19, Sat 07 June 2014.
The Traveller
player, 377 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sat 7 Jun 2014
at 05:18
  • msg #72

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

What's really funny is that I didn't specify Trav wearing a Superman T, but that is something she'd totally wear. And I told him Uggs, but I can see Trav rocking furry raver boots, because "fuck it I'm a Time Lord and I get to wear eccentric fashion."
Smoke Alarm
player, 387 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sat 7 Jun 2014
at 06:31
  • msg #73

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I can see the meme now. Smoke knows the Doctor is alive. Smoke knows Gallifrey stands. Smoke knows all the mysteries of the Whoniverse. Smoke knows how to solve UNIT dating.

Nice.
Sereth
player, 213 posts
Sat 7 Jun 2014
at 06:39
  • msg #74

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

.... so basically, the answer to life, the universe and everything isn't '42' it's 'Smoke Alarm'.

Seriously, if she can answer UNIT dating, I have a new hero.
Smoke Alarm
player, 388 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sat 7 Jun 2014
at 06:57
  • msg #75

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I solved UNIT dating once. Then some new things came out to stuff it up again. :(

Anyway, the first UNIT date comes from "The Web of Fear", where it's said that "The Abominable Snowmen", set in 1935, was "over forty years ago". But that can be very a rough estimate in normal speech. Ask someone when something happened, roughly, without time to think about it, and they can be up to ten years out. I know I've often added an extra ten years to things.

For example, answer this question immediately, straight off the top of your head:

Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
How long ago was World War II?


And given doddery old Professor Travers, in shock at seeing the Doctor and co. again? Revise that to thirty or so years, date "Web" to 1969 and not 1975, and things start making more sense. At least at this point. Fans often take date references as exact, but people are rarely so precise on the spur of the moment.

My theory went on with a few more roughed dates and I think I some changing of history.
This message was last edited by the player at 06:59, Sat 07 June 2014.
Sereth
player, 214 posts
Sat 7 Jun 2014
at 07:11
  • msg #76

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sarah-Jane is the biggest problem I had with UNIT dating. The rest of it seemed, pretty much, to be as though it was the same year. But then all of a sudden Sarah-Jane came from '1980'.

Of course part of it is that UNIT first popped up when he was still running around everywhen, and so they could just add a few years here or there and no-one would care. But then they moved it to the point where he couldn't, and so they had to be more consistent.
Smoke Alarm
player, 389 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sat 7 Jun 2014
at 07:30
  • msg #77

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

That is the trickiest bit, given how solid and frequent the reference is. There's an EU story that has young Sarah living for a while in 1980, a few years past her own time, and suggests she referred back to that. I don't know the story though.

Here's a thought: the 1977 Brigadier recovered his memories shortly after the events of "Mawdryn Undead" and returned to UNIT for six years, during which Sarah arrived in 1980. Then UNIT wiped his memories and returned him to the school in 1983 to preserve the time-line. :D


Well, UNIT dating is better than Phantom comics dating. Seventy-eight years of comic book time, no reboots, with twenty-one Phantoms stretching back to 1536 and covering known historical events. Eventually, it seems the current Phantom was active when his own grandfather should still have been the Phantom.
This message was last edited by the player at 07:34, Sat 07 June 2014.
Sereth
player, 215 posts
Sat 7 Jun 2014
at 07:49
  • msg #78

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Oh gods. I'd forgotten about Mawdryn Undead.

How's that fit with the Five Doctors and his retirement party I wonder?

Eh. I'm usually willing to write it off. Even ignoring the relaunch, it had been going on for a long time, some continuity errors in general will happen.
Smoke Alarm
player, 390 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sat 7 Jun 2014
at 07:56
  • msg #79

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

"Five Doctors" happened after "Mawdryn", no problem there. A second retirement, maybe.

I heard a fan theory, possibly an EU suggestion, that the Brigadier never really retired in 1976, that he actually went to teach at the school undercover while investigating alien activity, namely Turlough and the monument. When he lost his memory, he only remembered the cover-story.

Eh, continuity issues are always a fun thing to discuss, at least for a certain type of fan. :) "Timey-wimy" or "Time War" are unsatisfying excuses when you can actually go back over the stories and read in retcons or new interpretations, or find specific changes to history.
The Traveller
player, 381 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sun 8 Jun 2014
at 06:58
  • msg #80

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

For a show like classic Doctor Who, it's amazing that it had as few continuity errors as it did, considering it's long run.
The Traveller
player, 382 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sun 8 Jun 2014
at 07:01
  • msg #81

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

From around the time period of the Traveller Macross special OVAs. A 3rd Doctor spinoff got an unaired pilot!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kt3qZYUPi2Y
Smoke Alarm
player, 391 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sun 8 Jun 2014
at 07:19
  • msg #82

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Oh wow, that's amazing. The Pertwee era looks amazingly suited to anime: UNIT, the martial arts, the capes, the hair. :)
The Traveller
player, 383 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sun 8 Jun 2014
at 07:53
  • msg #83

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

There's really no cohesive storyline except that a bunch of Doctor Who monsters fight over Tokyo. Also, the Master and the Doctor sword duel at Tokyo Tower! I Imagine the Traveller Robotech OVAs look like that, except with Veritech Fighters and Trav and Minmei being chased by Cybermen and steampunk Kryaloss soldiers.
Smoke Alarm
player, 394 posts
Build high for happiness!
Mon 9 Jun 2014
at 02:06
  • msg #84

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

For that matter, Kangs are also well suited to anime, especially with big, colourful, spiky hair. :)
Smoke Alarm
player, 397 posts
Build high for happiness!
Mon 9 Jun 2014
at 06:41
  • msg #85

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Traveller:
"Speaking of legacy, this place looks awesome. You guys seem satisfied with caves when Boobie and I dropped by - that was in his celery days."


Oh no, I hope you're not referring to Warmonger by Terrance Dicks. D:


The Puddy prop, far from being a second-hand stuffed animal, was specially made in several versions for its appearances on Always Time To Travel, new, worn, burnt, leaking fluff, and so on. Fans clamoured for their own Puddies — for their children, of course — but manufacturing new pre-worn and re-stitched stuffed animals was difficult to justify. Instead, they were encouraged to use their own well-loved stuffed toys. In the end, patterns for sewn and knitted Puddies were designed and circulated among cosplayers who wanted authentic Puddy props. Non–Smoke Alarm Kang cosplayers preferred their childhood toys.

One popular fan theory is that Puddy is in fact a Cyber spy, as the surveillance unit in the original Doctor Who episode also took the form of a stuffed cat toy. Indeed, the props had been made off the same pattern.
The Traveller
player, 393 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Mon 9 Jun 2014
at 13:12
  • msg #86

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

This is similar to how fans have made custom scutters ever since they first appeared in the RIFTS TV series. Over the years many Trav cosplayers have made custom radio controlled scutter props, and fans have been demanding a crossover ATTT/Red Dwarf episode to show when 2nd Traveller got the scutters (who first appeared of, ironically, when Zu Rheng also first appeared in their aborted 1 season TV pilot. The scutters appeared chronologically in the RIFTS TV series first, but in-continuity it's the 2nd Traveller who constructs them, some time after her Robotech adventures.)

Red Dwarf and Traveller fan art and fiction abounds, usually of The 2nd Traveller getting lost and stuck on the Red Dwarf for a time, and getting involved in various hijinks with Rimmer, Lister and the bunch. A running gag in fan fic is how 2nd Trav tries to get Rimmer a new body and it always ends up being a disaster. Also, 2nd Traveller can never seem to be able to get Red Dwarf home in the fan fic.
This message was last edited by the player at 04:15, Tue 10 June 2014.
The Traveller
player, 396 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Tue 10 Jun 2014
at 23:56
  • msg #87

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

If this comes near where you live, this may be of interest -
http://www.doctorwho.tv/worldtour
This message was last edited by the player at 00:28, Wed 11 June 2014.
Sereth
player, 218 posts
Tue 10 Jun 2014
at 23:59
  • msg #88

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Gee...

Depends on -where- in Sydney I guess.
The Traveller
player, 403 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Thu 12 Jun 2014
at 17:34
  • msg #89

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Not exactly Who Lore, but definitely Trav lore. Trav was present for all 4 Robotech wars.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMX4UIrzW0E
The Traveller
player, 404 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Thu 12 Jun 2014
at 21:14
  • msg #90

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

This is now available at Drivethru RPG. I purchased my copy.

http://rpg.drivethrustuff.com/...on-Hardcover-Edition
Smoke Alarm
player, 405 posts
Build high for happiness!
Fri 13 Jun 2014
at 02:31
  • msg #91

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I just got my real-world copy of the 11th Doctor edition boxset yesterday, on special from Book Depository. It's nice, though a pity it's done up for my least favourite era, but at least there's some new stuff in it. I hope to run table-top games some day.

A single book like that would have been nice though. I'm the kind of person who'd rather photocopy the sheets and cards than scribble on the originals, would rather not mess with a hundred itty-bitty tokens, and I have my own d6s already.
This message was last edited by the player at 02:34, Fri 13 June 2014.
Sereth
player, 220 posts
Fri 13 Jun 2014
at 02:33
  • msg #92

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

That's what's always deterred me about this particular ruleset. Boxed sets for the core rules. Which not only means more things to lose, it ramps up the price.
The Guardian
GM, 406 posts
Fri 13 Jun 2014
at 02:47
  • msg #93

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm still on my PDFs of the original edition box.  From what I've gathered about the new all-in-one, it's probably got little that I don't have or will not have, eventually -- I got in on the preorder deal for the set of Doctor sourcebooks, so I presume that most of the fancy new up-to-date writeups will be recapitulated in the Eleventh Doctor volume.

Though at C7's development speed, we'll probably have two Capaldi series done by that time.
Sereth
player, 221 posts
Fri 13 Jun 2014
at 02:50
  • msg #94

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

C7 still beats Eden Studios by a country mile. I don't know when they started releasing Doctor sourcebooks, but given we're already up to the fourth, that's not too bad.
The Guardian
GM, 407 posts
Fri 13 Jun 2014
at 02:58
  • msg #95

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Fifth, actually.  That's in about fifteen or sixteen months.  I think their printer supply issues have had the line on hold for a few months now.
The Traveller
player, 407 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Fri 13 Jun 2014
at 12:40
  • msg #96

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The reason that we're not seeing a hardbound Traveller edition of DWAITAS is because Kevin Siembieda is tying up the rights in court, due to his ownership of the Robotech rights. He's demanding from C7 an exorbinant cash payment instead of just simply a rights swap (where he can use Trav in RIFTS products). This has enraged Trav fans in both the RIFTS and DWAITAS communities. Siembieda has even gone as far as to issue DCMA takedown notices against RIFTS fansites that include Traveller material. In response, Steven Moffat was quoted as saying that "he absolutely blew" any chances of BBC America authorizing a Traveller RIFTS supplement from Blake Lively's first HBO appearances. The fan community has responded with several multi-system Trav supplements, mostly for RIFTS, DWAITAS and Marvel Heroic Roleplaying. Blake Lively, who has done Trav panels at Origins and Gencon, was shown on Twitter holding up a printout of a Traveller RIFTS fan produced PDF. She's also been featured along with other actors from ATTT playing D&D Next on Wil Wheaton's Youtube show, with Felicia Day acting as DM. This has added to the rumours that Day will be chosen to be the 6th Traveller.
Smoke Alarm
player, 407 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sat 14 Jun 2014
at 06:08
  • msg #97

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
That's what's always deterred me about this particular ruleset. Boxed sets for the core rules. Which not only means more things to lose, it ramps up the price.


As well as duplicating all the rules from the Player's Guide in the Gamemaster's Guide. :( Well, at least that's two copies to share around the table.

I do like the story at the beginning, with the gelatinous cube and Rory saving the world with his knowledge of D&D. :)

The Guardian:
Though at C7's development speed, we'll probably have two Capaldi series done by that time.


I spent ages waiting for new books, stopping paying attention for a while, then suddenly they had half a dozen of them out.
Smoke Alarm
player, 448 posts
Build high for happiness!
Fri 27 Jun 2014
at 08:45
  • msg #98

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Still reading. I like that a lot of things are explained more clearly, though still surprised that Screamer was changed so completely.

Ahem.

One popular item in the Always Time To Travel! toy-line was Smoke Alarm's Arrowgun, a small crossbow that could fire plastic suction-darts and nerf pellets like many other toy guns on the market. The Arrowgun was unique, however, in being marketed primarily at girls, with blue-wigged girls shooting them in advertising and on the box; and, like the TV prop, being decorated in flowers, animals, sparkles, and rainbows in manner similar to a plethora of girl's toys.

Naturally, this triggered a small controversy among conservative sections of society, who complained about violence among girls, but largely wished to maintain the traditional sexist dichotomy of boys' and girls' toys. More alarmingly to them, boys also enjoyed playing with them. Their concerns were thankfully dismissed as ridiculous and the Arrowgun allowed girls to annoy their brothers for a change.

A blank design was also released, which children and cosplayers could personalise by decorating with stickers, doodles, and sparkles as they liked.

Authentic arrowguns proved tricky for cosplayers, due to the difficulty of obtaining or building actual crossbows and weapons licenses.
The Guardian
GM, 464 posts
Sun 29 Jun 2014
at 03:13
  • msg #99

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

C7's Sixth Doctor book got sent out to subscribers a couple of days ago.  Because they only have 11 serials to fill up the book without hugely changing the format, there are a couple of sections that go into a plot and adventure seeds looking at the Sixth Doctor's TV adventures through the lens of a Time War prelude.  It's very strange.
Smoke Alarm
player, 451 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sun 29 Jun 2014
at 03:23
  • msg #100

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Time War prelude? The Sixth's era is the least applicable, I would have thought. "Genesis" and "Resurrection of the Daleks" are made for it, but "Revelation" hardly matters.

And a Sixth Doctor sourcebook already? Eee, I really want the Seventh, I need to see what they do with Kangs. And everything else from that era.
The Guardian
GM, 465 posts
Sun 29 Jun 2014
at 03:35
  • msg #101

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Less to do with straight-up tussles between Time Lords and Daleks, and more to do with the Time Lords suddenly beginning to stick their oar in to a lot of situations -- up to the Trial stuff, which has them flat out working strategic mischief across the timeline.
The Traveller
player, 436 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sun 29 Jun 2014
at 08:58
  • msg #102

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The only way I can see a "time war prelude" with the 6th Doctor is somehow connecting the Valeyard with John Hurt's War Doctor?
Sereth
player, 248 posts
Sun 29 Jun 2014
at 10:31
  • msg #103

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

As stated; I think it has more to do with the Timelords, for example, moving earth across the universe and renaming it; than with the Timelord-Dalek stuff.

I think the Valeyard is more likely to be connected with the Dreamlord than with the War Doctor. The War Doctor; despite his beliefs, was still a good man. He still deserved the title 'Doctor' - and would have even if you want to ignore the anniversary special's retcons. He did what needed to be done.

The Valeyard though, was dark, dark, dark. Darker than McCoy, darker than Eccleston. Certainly darker than the War Doctor.
Smoke Alarm
player, 456 posts
Build high for happiness!
Thu 3 Jul 2014
at 02:23
  • msg #104

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Well, I've gone and bought myself PDFs of the Fourth Doctor Sourcebook, the Time Traveller's Guide, and the adventure Medicine Man. Online shopping is getting worryingly easy.
The Traveller
player, 453 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Thu 3 Jul 2014
at 14:31
  • msg #105

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Do you mean the Time Traveller's Companion? I want to make sure I haven't missed a book.
Smoke Alarm
player, 462 posts
Build high for happiness!
Thu 3 Jul 2014
at 14:35
  • msg #106

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

That's the one. I just got the name wrong.
The Traveller
player, 454 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Thu 3 Jul 2014
at 14:51
  • msg #107

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I imagine in the imaginary Trav franchiseverse that after all the rights got cleared There's the Always Time Travel Guide, the Traveller omnibus that details her from the original 1st and 2nd Traveller animated Robotech adventures all the way through Always Time To Travel. It's one of the biggest books in the C7 line because all of the Traveller material is in one book. An online web supplement written by Bill Coffin of Palladium as an "unofficial fan supplement" covers the Traveller's war against the Shedraya Time Demons and has full RIFTS stats for the entire Traveller canon, including support for people who want to do Trav gaming in RIFTS and ROBOTECH.

Various fan groups have created free products to do Robotech and Rifts under DW:AITAS rules, including an abbreviated magic rules set and a Mekton conversion!
The Traveller
player, 472 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Wed 9 Jul 2014
at 16:57
  • msg #108

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Trav takes no responsibility for this recent discovery amidst her old pile of VHS tapes. This was another one of those hidden regenerations.

http://www.nerdist.com/2014/07...dest-and-best-thing/
The Guardian
GM, 507 posts
Wed 9 Jul 2014
at 23:10
  • msg #109

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I thought you were going to link to this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...ersist_safety_mode=1

You can tell that is Trav, because she has a goose for a companion.
This message was last edited by the GM at 23:11, Wed 09 July 2014.
The Traveller
player, 473 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Wed 9 Jul 2014
at 23:29
  • msg #110

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Wow, she must have regenerated into an idol singer - Minmei's infectious influence on the TARDIS and Trav is still there after centuries.

The Doctor had Frobisher (or whoever that Penguin companion was), so Trav has Gooseberry!
Smoke Alarm
player, 481 posts
Build high for happiness!
Thu 10 Jul 2014
at 03:24
  • msg #111

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Something for me to watch tonight.

Frobisher!
The Traveller
player, 474 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Thu 10 Jul 2014
at 05:04
  • msg #112

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Damn you all -

GOOSEBERRY THE GOOSE MUST NOW BE A THING IN TRAVLORE
Sereth
player, 281 posts
Thu 10 Jul 2014
at 05:05
  • msg #113

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

... maybe it's holed up with the Us?
The Guardian
GM, 511 posts
Thu 10 Jul 2014
at 05:09
  • msg #114

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
Frobisher!

"All hail the big talking bird!"
The Traveller
player, 478 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Thu 10 Jul 2014
at 14:17
  • msg #115

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I have decided on a few things -

Gooseberry drinks gin. And whatever other booze he can get his beak on.
Gooseberry has a foul mouth.
Gooseberry travelled with the 1st Traveller.
Gooseberry has a past he doesn't like to talk about, and is being chased.
Gooseberry left with Al Capone. This was the very first time Trav was left completely alone. This was shortly before the trip to Macross Island and her regeneration into 2nd Traveller.
The Traveller
player, 479 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Thu 10 Jul 2014
at 14:18
  • msg #116

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
... maybe it's holed up with the Us?


...Oh no.

Gooseberry has a TARDIS key. Gooseberry loves booze and casinos.

Be careful when you go into the sauna.

Watch your valuables.
The Traveller
player, 480 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Thu 10 Jul 2014
at 14:19
  • msg #117

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

One last thing about Gooseberry. He's a sociologist by trade, and has written several scholarly  papers on social structures and economics of one-celled civilizations.
The Traveller
player, 485 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Fri 11 Jul 2014
at 15:35
  • msg #118

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm considering starting an ATTT Pinterest board. We can pin up pics of people and things for the game. It's working really well for my vampire game and, besides, we all know you can't get enough pics of blondes wearing fedoras.
The Traveller
player, 506 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Thu 24 Jul 2014
at 14:31
  • msg #119

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Always Time To Travel now has a presence on Pinterest! Pin up your favorite pieces of fan art and pics, Trav fans!

http://www.pinterest.com/kaiuk...ways-time-to-travel/

If anyone needs an invite, let me know and I will get you signed up. It's an open board so anyone should be able to access it.
Smoke Alarm
player, 518 posts
Build high for happiness!
Fri 25 Jul 2014
at 01:58
  • msg #120

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Now I've got to work out what Pinterest is...

Watching Arrow season 2, I think I've found a new Smoke Alarm: Bex Taylor-Klaus, playing Sin. Scrawny young punk girl, and they even had a free-running chase scene. :)
The Traveller
player, 509 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sat 26 Jul 2014
at 20:37
  • msg #121

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

You can sign up to Pinterest with your Facebook login. I urge members to log in and pin ATTT relevant media.
The Guardian
GM, 591 posts
Sun 27 Jul 2014
at 00:55
  • msg #122

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I think you need to invite people.  I'm following the ATTT board, but it won't let me choose it to pin something at the moment.
Smoke Alarm
player, 520 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sun 27 Jul 2014
at 02:14
  • msg #123

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I see the Doctor has picked up Smoke's habit of sitting on top of the TARDIS:
http://www.doctorwhonews.net/2...ctor-who-listen.html

And I'm on Pinterest and following the board.

No, I can't pin anything to the board either.
This message was last edited by the player at 02:32, Sun 27 July 2014.
The Traveller
player, 510 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sun 27 Jul 2014
at 18:57
  • msg #124

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I will need folks to message me here the emails that they are using over at Pinterest so that I can "invite" you to the board. Stupid system.
Stanley Newton
player, 151 posts
Sun 27 Jul 2014
at 21:05
  • msg #125

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Traveller:
You can sign up to Pinterest with your Facebook login. I urge members to log in and pin ATTT relevant media.


Sorry, I don't do Facebook.
The Traveller
player, 511 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sun 27 Jul 2014
at 22:08
  • msg #126

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

You can give Pintertest a regular e-mail.
Smoke Alarm
player, 522 posts
Build high for happiness!
Mon 28 Jul 2014
at 00:42
  • msg #127

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Okay, here's my email, PLed since this is a public thread (not that it affects much if someone really wants to stalk me):

I've got two things about Kangs ready to pin. :)
The Traveller
player, 513 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Mon 28 Jul 2014
at 06:07
  • msg #128

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

In reply to Smoke Alarm (msg # 127):

OK, I see your icon. Let me know if it worked.
Smoke Alarm
player, 525 posts
Build high for happiness!
Mon 28 Jul 2014
at 06:15
  • msg #129

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yep, it looks like it worked, thanks. I'll pin a few things.
The Traveller
player, 516 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Mon 28 Jul 2014
at 16:26
  • msg #130

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I am developing a potential DW:AITAS PBP of my own, where the majority of PCs are Time Lords =

link to a message in another game

Doctor Who:Adventures In Time And Space:The Survivors

Let me know what you think. Specifically, I'm wondering how all three of you would do as young Time Lords who are refugees from The War.
This message was last edited by the player at 16:27, Mon 28 July 2014.
Smoke Alarm
player, 529 posts
Build high for happiness!
Tue 29 Jul 2014
at 02:28
  • msg #131

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm interested. Well, I'm always interested in Who games. :) I've got a few ideas and things I'd like to play kicking around my head. I'd love to try a Time Lord, but I've never quite found a Time Lord character concept I've wanted to play.
Sereth
player, 324 posts
Tue 29 Jul 2014
at 02:33
  • msg #132

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm not sure I'd want to play a timelord; honestly.
The Guardian
GM, 598 posts
Tue 29 Jul 2014
at 02:35
  • msg #133

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Hmm.  I'm kind of worried that getting involved would divide the headspace I'm using to dream up post-Time War shenanigans right now to run this game.
The Traveller
player, 523 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Tue 29 Jul 2014
at 04:52
  • msg #134

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I hope that how Time Lords deal with post Time War PTSD isn't too off putting. Trav had a very I Want To Be Evil On These Fuckers moment, and being one of the best and most moral Travellers (actually, they all were) is how she is dealing with it. Also, I like having her talk all 19th century like.
Smoke Alarm
player, 531 posts
Build high for happiness!
Tue 29 Jul 2014
at 05:21
  • msg #135

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

It seemed a bit out of the blue. But I like Hartnell Traveller. :D


I'm wondering if it's possible to play a TARDIS, like the humanoid Type 103 from the other great time war:
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Type_103
Getting inside might be a bit weird...
The Traveller
player, 525 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Tue 29 Jul 2014
at 14:04
  • msg #136

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Let's talk about it, but direct all conversation about The Survivors to the relevant thread, since I don't want to clutter up ATTT with talk about that game.
Smoke Alarm
player, 534 posts
Build high for happiness!
Wed 30 Jul 2014
at 04:04
  • msg #137

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Ah, I was just tossing ideas around to see what sticks. We're not allowed to discuss character concepts in the proposals board. I've got a few bubbling around, and would pick something to fit the rest of the group.
The Traveller
player, 528 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Wed 30 Jul 2014
at 04:25
  • msg #138

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Let me get the game set up then. I wasn't sure I should start it unless I had specfic interest. Also, I want to give Gary a chance to *play*.
Smoke Alarm
player, 543 posts
Build high for happiness!
Fri 1 Aug 2014
at 09:08
  • msg #139

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Ahem.


Although the proposed televised spin-off had fallen through, the character of Smoke Alarm remained popular and the idea of giving her own series remained a hot issue. Finally, her creator and BBC Worldwide decided to try licensing the character to a comic book. IDW had lost the rights to Doctor Who comics, and was generally too bland anyway, and so was passed over. Titan Comics was running Doctor Who series at the time, but Smoke Alarm was now wholly a part of the Always Time to Travel franchise, and so a separate licensing deal needed to be struck. Fortunately, Marvel (a much more fun comics company) acquired the license to run Smoke Alarm stories, with The Smoke Alarm Chronicles soon released.

The Smoke Alarm Chronicles had a different writer, artist, and style each story, keeping the stories highly varied and unique. Notably, it went out with Skottie Young's Baby and Animal variant covers as standard covers. The series thus took a very gonzo turn, taking the form of a series of disconnected stories told by Smoke Alarm, with no clue given to continuity, canon, or common sense, as suited the rotating stable of writers. They were notorious head-scratchers for fans, provoking the traditional arguments of canon.

Many stories were very much in the universe of Doctor Who and Always Time to Travel, with Smoke Alarm having crazy side-adventures while the Traveller and friends dealt with more traditional threats, or served as back-ups to current TV stories. Although many elements of Doctor Who (bar "Paradise Towers") and AWTT remained out of the license and thus off-limits to The Smoke Alarm Chronicles, writers and editors had a ready-made solution in Smoke Alarm's wild imaginings and skewed POV, simply substituting creatures as Smoke Alarm might see them (Daleks for Pepper-pots, Gehenna for Goannas, etc.), thus handling the DW/AWTT elements via metaphor, or by having the Who and AWTT elements just off page. However, on a few occasions, they told AWTT tales directly, such as in the famous Army of Goannas arc, with all characters played by talking animals with no reason given. Smoke Alarm was a heroic possum in a blue bandanna, and the crew faced an army of actual goannas. The storyline incorporated Aboriginal Dreamtime themes and presented several major revelations and plot developments for the ongoing Army of Gehenna arc in AWTT. These were promptly ignored by fans who worried about canon and talking animals, only for the AWTT series to follow up on them.

Other stories went entirely off-the-wall. One week, Smoke might be retelling an old fairy tale like "Hansel and Gretel", with two Kangs lured to an apartment made of candy and home to an old Rezzie who attempted to eat them before they pushed her in the over and robbed her; it was very much a cautionary tale. The next story might be sharp political satire, such as when Smoke Alarm let a herd of pigs into Australia's Parliament House then pushed PM Tony Abbot in a mound of dung. Then Smoke might rip-off and parody a popular movie or tv series, like "Game of Kangs" (depicting a feud between Red and Blue Kangs and depicting the downfall of the Green Kangs) and "Rat-Woman" (with Smoke Alarm as a superhero protecting the people of a city). There were also a few popular crossovers, such as the notoriously loony "Smoke Alarm Kills Deadpool".

A number of stories were more serious in tone, even quite dark, telling flashbacks to Paradise Towers and Smoke Alarm's origin story. These detailed the disasters and urban decay that beset Paradise Towers and the rise of the Kangs, and presented Smoke Alarm's tragic backstory. Others depicted Doctor Sam's discovery of Paradise Towers and filled the gaps between the original serial and Smoke Alarm's appearance in Who and AWTT. They also detailed Kang society and philosophy, and explained some of the more puzzling phrases of Kang speech, such as the traumatising truth behind being "taken to the cleaners".

By the end of the series, it was revealed that Smoke Alarm — now a wise old Kang — was telling these stories to a group of young Kangs (some implied to be her children) to prepare them for the future. Every story had contained a bit of wisdom, practical knowledge, or advice for forming a good, fair, and equal society. In the last, the young Kangs had an idea to journey into the bowels of Paradise Towers and repair and activate the ancient engines of the artificial world of Paradise Towers and fly it around space, exploring in the Kang way. Smoke Alarm had advised against it, warning it would be very dangerous and of the fierce peoples they might encounter (as many of her stories had reflected), and she didn't want to change the Kangs' peaceful existence. But the young Kangs considered her words, then ignored them, and went off to do it anyway. Smoke Alarm found them, but surprisingly congratulated them on ignoring her advice. Thus, the series imparted its last message, that the future belonged to the young and that the old should give their advice and stand aside for their children to make their own decisions. Smoke Alarm went off with the young Kangs to help them, on one last adventure.
The Traveller
player, 533 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Fri 1 Aug 2014
at 10:51
  • msg #140

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Ah, the Traveller and comics! Let's not talk about how...

...the 2nd Traveller was licensed by Go Nagai and appeared in a semi-official Mazinger Zed story arch where The Traveller and the Photonic Studies Institute join forces against Doctor Hell and the Splugorth from RIFTS. Lots of Trav panty shots and horrible ecchi, this is part of what convinced the BBC to never license out the Traveller again.

...The Marshall and Absalom Daak teaming up in 2000 AD - first in competition (as to who could kill the most Daleks) and clashing with the infamous Judge Dredd. This is the only time the Marshall of Daak ever appeared in 2000 AD, and exists outside of the continuity of the Marshall/Traveller and Daak stories.

...The Marvel UK EXCALIBUR vs THE MARSHALL SPECIAL, where the Grand Universal Omniversal Majestrix tasks Exclaibur with returning the key of chronos, that has fallen into the hands of the Marshall, who intends to use it to unlock the Skasis Paradigm (1992, now considered out of continuity)

...The 1st and 2nd Traveller make various silent cameos throughout Robotech and Marvel comics over 20 years.  With the RIFTS tv series and now ATTT, blondes in trillbies are often seen running into or poking their heads out of blue phone boxes.

...In Avengers vs Justice League, the writers wrote backstory notes of how Krona's Great Sin was originally that Oan scientist's great misuse of Time Lord technology to see into Event One, a realm of technology expressly forbidden by the Laws of Time. This same leaked document also talks about how, in the Dark Times, Rassilon leads a coalition that assembles and creates the Infinity Gauntlet, using this artifact to restrain and bind the Phoenix Force with the only power greater than the Phoenix's cosmic reborth - the inevitable march of time, The Bad Wolf. In the planned story, Rassillon scatters the infinity gems and keeps the gauntlet for himself, now a powerless token. The coalition to restrain the Phoenix includes the Oans (who become the Guardians of the Universe and form the Green Lantern Corps, and contribute their Power Battery for the project), the Elders of the Universe (who contributes each an Infinity Gem), and the Time Lords (who possess the vast knowledge of temporal science to restrain the Phoenix in the White Hot Room, it's natural home, which Krona later breaches.) Other attendees are representatives of Asgard (including a young Odin, who curses Rassilon for being an arrogant fool), the Eternal Vishanti (mystic entities from the Dr Strange stories), and others. 3 assistants of Rassilon and Omega are named - one Koschei, one Theta Sigma, and one Travellerandenturiata, all three young scholars of the Prydon college. This ties in to Krona's great sin and why the Phoenix is such a threat, and has ripples into the later Avengers vs X-Men.

...How there is a fedora pony who has appeared on MLP:FIM who is often accused of being Trav Pony -



...How supposedly Marvel/Disney and the BBC are in negotiations RIGHT NOW for a full line of Dr Who comics, including a monthly ATTT series which will supposedly be in continuity with Marvel''s Earth 616. Being that it's been canonically established that Earth 616 is also the Earth of Doctor Who by way of Death's Head.



There's talk of Capaldi's Doctor and the 5th Traveller appearing in Marvel's line of cosmic space adventure books.
This message was last edited by the player at 10:52, Fri 01 Aug 2014.
Smoke Alarm
player, 545 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sat 2 Aug 2014
at 02:21
  • msg #141

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I wish I knew more of what you reference, Trav. :)

Really, a blue-haired pony, and people say Traveller and not Smoke Alarm? I dunno...
The Traveller
player, 534 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sat 2 Aug 2014
at 19:23
  • msg #142

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
I wish I knew more of what you reference, Trav. :)

Really, a blue-haired pony, and people say Traveller and not Smoke Alarm? I dunno...


Awesome new stuff for you to check out! Go Nagai created Mazinger Zed and was an amazing influence on modern anime, he's one my heroes.

Nah, has a fedora. Definitely a Traveller.

Maybe Trav becomes a Blue Kang after all. Or maybe Smoke inherits the legacy of being a Time Lord!

Hmmmm!
The Traveller
player, 538 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Sun 3 Aug 2014
at 18:39
  • msg #143

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I saw Guardians of the Galaxy last night. It was SO GOOD. I'm almost to the point of demanding that Gary merge the Marvel Movieverse and the Whoverse!

I take no responsibility if Trav starts dancing around to this one while exploring ancient ruins with you guys or in the control room.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...V4aFgCjw&index=8
This message was last edited by the player at 18:43, Sun 03 Aug 2014.
Smoke Alarm
player, 547 posts
Build high for happiness!
Mon 4 Aug 2014
at 02:42
  • msg #144

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yes, in the final issue old Smoke Alarm was wearing an old fedora like one of Trav's. ;)

I think you mean "Time Kang". :D

Also, one popular story was "My Fair Kang". :)
The Traveller
player, 549 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Tue 5 Aug 2014
at 18:49
  • msg #145

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I am starting a new Dr Who:AITAS game which will be related to Gary's Travcanon but will also diverge at certain points (because I am certain that Gary doesn't want his game beholden to mine in any way).

All of you are invited and get first crack. Unlike the ruck and run, I will permit folks from here to app a somewhat experienced Time Lord, or bring diverged versions of ATTT PCs - you can't have too many Smoke Alarms, right? And cat people are certainly allowed!

Because I trust y'all, I will entertain AU versions of the Doctor himself, The Master, the Rani or the Corsair, with certain allowances and restrictions so as to not overshadow the other PCs. I for one would love to see a PC Corsair, for instance.

Link is here - link to another game
Sereth
player, 338 posts
Tue 5 Aug 2014
at 21:31
  • msg #146

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'll give it a look when I get home; I don't tend to apply for games from work. Except DnD because I can do characters for that in my sleep.
Smoke Alarm
player, 561 posts
Build high for happiness!
Wed 6 Aug 2014
at 01:24
  • msg #147

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Great! I'll work on my RTJ today. I have a few PC options for you.

I'm afraid I get more than my recommended daily dose of Smoke Alarm here. So much sugar. :) On favourite characters, I like to apply them to multiple games, since the die-off rate is so high. But ATTT is running so well I don't have to worry. :)

What about fish people? ;)

What about AU/advanced companions? Sereth will know I'm talking about Destrii from the comics. Anyway, I'll put her in my RTJ.

Work from home, Sereth!
Sereth
player, 340 posts
Wed 6 Aug 2014
at 01:36
  • msg #148

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Deal with too much confidential information to work from home!
Smoke Alarm
player, 563 posts
Build high for happiness!
Wed 6 Aug 2014
at 01:40
  • msg #149

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Technically, I do too, I just have to delete my work after 5 days. Or whenever I get around to it, ahem.
The Traveller
player, 554 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Wed 6 Aug 2014
at 04:20
  • msg #150

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

A warning for The Survivors - I'm not really that up on off screen lore. I plan on studying up on the Faction Paradox, and I may be using some cross over stuff (because Marvel Comics are technically Who Canon ;) ), but my knowledge of Doctor Who comics and novels is very thin. However, I am also easy going. I'm sure we can work it out.
Smoke Alarm
player, 565 posts
Build high for happiness!
Wed 6 Aug 2014
at 04:23
  • msg #151

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I just posted my lengthy RTJ. Sorry. I've written up all Destrii's background so it doesn't need research, and I can explain whatever else you need. The Time War can be something of a soft reboot for the character.

I'm in favour of retconning elements of the War in Heaven time war of the EDAs into the later Time War.
Sereth
player, 341 posts
Wed 6 Aug 2014
at 04:25
  • msg #152

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I never really got extensively into the novels; and didn't do the comics at all. My onscreen lore is pretty good though; starting from Hartnell all the way through.

I'm now tempted to join just to see Destrii in a game that seems likely to go somewhere. -sigh-.
The Traveller
player, 555 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Wed 6 Aug 2014
at 04:32
  • msg #153

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

If folks can point me towards sources with both Destrii and Izzy, I'd really appreciate it. I fell in love with McGann when I saw him in The Night Of The Doctor.
Sereth
player, 342 posts
Wed 6 Aug 2014
at 04:33
  • msg #154

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Well Smoke Alarm will have definitives, but I know Destrii was a comics character. Not sure about Izzy; I suspect the same; but the name is tugging on my memory banks.
The Traveller
player, 556 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Wed 6 Aug 2014
at 04:40
  • msg #155

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'd also like a reading guide to the Whoniverse version of the Faction Paradox. I've always been fascinated by them, but I know terribly little about them.
Sereth
player, 343 posts
Wed 6 Aug 2014
at 04:44
  • msg #156

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Well this is a start; it does provide links to stories as well. It's my go to for whenever Smoke Alarm starts talking novels/comics:

http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Faction_Paradox
Smoke Alarm
player, 566 posts
Build high for happiness!
Wed 6 Aug 2014
at 05:08
  • msg #157

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I highly recommend the Eighth Doctor comics from Doctor Who Magazine, 1996 to 2005. They're collected in Endgame, The Glorious Dead, Oblivion, and The Flood, though may be hard to get now. They had long-running story arcs; mad, fun, and experimental stories; interesting companions; and did a lot of what the new series would do, first and best. "The Flood" is a very New Who alien invasion: big, public, on the news. The Doctor and Destrii both solved problems by gaining flashy godlike powers in the finales. The first gay companions too, Izzy and Fey, meaning the Doctor only travelled with lesbians for seven years (except for Kroton the Cyberman briefly, and Destrii seems straight, but she was locked in Izzy's closet for a while...)

They're my era of Who. :)

The articles aren't complete, but give a good overview:
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Izzy
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Destrii

Oh, and Fey/Feyde really should be the top secret agent of the Time War:
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Fey_Truscott-Sade

I never followed the Faction Paradox spin-offs, but I'm familiar with their presence in the Who novels. It's been many years now though. Feel free to ask me any questions.
Stanley Newton
player, 160 posts
Wed 6 Aug 2014
at 23:33
  • msg #158

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

In reply to The Traveller (msg # 145):

Thanks for the offer, but I don't think I have the time to play in another game.
The Traveller
player, 590 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 01:58
  • msg #159

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Does Sweet Boy have an adventure setting?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_TfU8bTpqo
The Guardian
GM, 670 posts
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 02:13
  • msg #160

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Didn't you once allude to there being a (presently disconnected) Wheel-Of-Fortune component that plugged into the console?  Sort of like the classic Randomiser, except that it had a big wheel to spin?
The Traveller
player, 591 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 02:55
  • msg #161

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Oh, the WHEEL OF WONDER. I actually invented the Wonder Wheel as a background thing during the Rifts game!

The WHEEL OF WONDER was a 2nd Trav thing. It was essentially a prop hooked up to a randomizer, but instead of just a few buttons like the Doctor used, Trav had hers as a carnie wheel with all sorts of different wacky locations!

"WHEEL OF WONDER turn and turn, spin round and round so we may learn! Today we're going to... THE MESOZOIC ERA, EARTH!LETS MEET THE SILURIANS!"

I don't think this group is ready for the WHEEL OF WONDER yet.
This message was last edited by the player at 02:55, Fri 22 Aug 2014.
Sereth
player, 364 posts
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 02:57
  • msg #162

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Silurians are a myth! There's no such thing as Silurians. Or there are; but the name was all wrong.
The Guardian
GM, 671 posts
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 03:05
  • msg #163

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I remembered it was some sort of wheel.  I was pretty sure it wasn't a Wheel of Morality....
The Traveller
player, 592 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 03:17
  • msg #164

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yeah, just like Draconians and Time Lords are myths ;)
Smoke Alarm
player, 598 posts
Build high for happiness!
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 03:19
  • msg #165

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Traveller:
I don't think this group is ready for the WHEEL OF WONDER yet.


Smoke Alarm so is.
Sereth
player, 365 posts
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 03:25
  • msg #166

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

... noo. Silurians was a misnomer. They weren't Silurians. The Doctor commented as much in the follow-up story.
The Guardian
GM, 672 posts
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 03:36
  • msg #167

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Wait, wait, I've got this one!

The Doctor tried to fix it to "Eocenes" in The Sea Devils, because that was a somewhat less wrong geological era, and people also tossed around the term homo reptilia, which was also scientifically ridiculous.  Then the Virgin NAs decided that was racist (?) and started using the term "Earth Reptiles" which was broadly accurate but dull.

However, this point of nomenclature actually turned up IC in the previous season of Always Time To Travel, and the following was located on a database when Trav & Stanley first visited Arden, Amanda's homeworld:

quote:
The following turns up for "Silurian":

Silurian: Obsolete and socially derogatory term for members of Terran sophont species Sphenodon sapiens. Scattered populations of Sphenodons survived from the Eocene period in protected hibernation bunkers until re-emerging into Earth society in the 30th Century; the subsequent period of integration is known as the Awakening. Sphenodon technology and knowledge shifted the balance of influence in the Earth Government toward the regions where they negotiated successful agreements with preexisting Terran governments: Central and South America, Southeast Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and Australia.

The term "Silurian", as with the taxonomically spurious designation homo reptilia, is believed to derive from suppressed pre-Awakening contacts with human military and intelligence organizations on the basis of limited and non-accredited scientific advice. (Citation needed.)


I got Sphenodon from the genus of the tuatara, the three-eyed lizard species.
Sereth
player, 366 posts
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 03:43
  • msg #168

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

... well except for the bit from previous incanrations of ALways Time to Travel which I obviously didn't know...

Ding Ding Ding.

I don't know what you win though!
The Traveller
player, 593 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 03:59
  • msg #169

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

In reply to Sereth (msg # 166):

Ah yes. Earth Reptiles or Eocenes. It's good you mentioned that -  I remember Gary correcting me, my IC justification for Trav entering that in as a search term on Arden is because she was so used to UNIT dudes calling Earth Reptiles (which she prefers) "Silurians" that she figured that they might be using that term in this time zone. Also, unique keyword. Trav was super pleased that they had reached the starts and had integrated, which meant that all the work that she and the Doctor did had worked!

I invented a bunch of new Travcanon, but that Gary pointed out that Silurians *had* appeared. But, what the hell, here it is -


The Traveller never appeared with the Silurians properly on screen in live action, since her live action presence is of course rather short in her classic run, and her animated appearances in the 80s era take place on an alternate Earth. 2nd Trav makes a brief reference to Silurians when she, Scott Bernard and Lancer are trapped in an Invid Genesis Pit - "Silly, those aren't real dinosaurs, those are just genetic constructs - the Invid Regess has the eras all wrong! Besides, if they were real Dinosaurs, there would be Eocene people here! Earth Reptiles!" Scott: "'Eocone' people? Traveler, you're not making sense again.'" Trav: "Eocene people! Earth Reptiles! Don't make me use the word Silurian, it's a bad word, a slur!" Trav later goes on to tell the Invid Regess that the Rani was better at making Dinosaurs, "And she's a half rate hack!"

In the revival era, fans of the 2007 RIFTS series lobbied hard for the appearance of various Doctor Who aliens as Dee Bees, but the BBC was very stringent with rights release, with archival Dalek footage being used for the Mulgrew-Eccleston sequences. However, a few Doctor Who aliens were spotted in both the town shots of New Kentshire and the crowd scenes in Center when Trav and her team and the TARDIS visited Phase World. These included two Cybus Cybermen and a classic Silurian. None of these have been acknowledged as canonical appearances.

In the recent IDW Paternoster crew comics, there have been reverse appearances - A blonde in a fedora and a blue haired girl with a raggedy cat doll have been spotted in crowds during Jenny and Vastra dialog scenes, as well as Strax showing up late to a meeting - "I found the wrong police box, Madam. I am sorry for my tardiness. Also, the Doctor's TARDIS would never have an american flag decal on it. I am certain my cannon fire destroyed it."

Fans have been lobbying hard for Silurian appearances. At SDCC, writer Chris Bell was heard to remark at the Trav panel - "Listen, we already have a Kang and a Draconian on board. You were lucky Gary and I were able to get that out of the Moff. You were lucky we got the Arden Wiki lookup through. We would LOVE to have the Paternoster gang on ATTT!"
This message was last edited by the player at 04:00, Fri 22 Aug 2014.
The Guardian
GM, 673 posts
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 04:26
  • msg #170

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Well, I'm glad we cleared that up.

For my next trick, I'll prove that there are no such things as Macra.
Smoke Alarm
player, 599 posts
Build high for happiness!
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 04:37
  • msg #171

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Another scientific name, from the NAs, is, deep breath, psionosauropodomorpha, meaning "psychic lizard-foot shaped":
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Silurian

I once read a theory that Macra were the origins of a surprising number of old monsters.

Actually, it shouldn't be too hard to get Silurians and so on into ATTT: for the most part, licenses for various characters and creatures are held by the original authors or their estates. That's why the BBC has to get permission from the Nation estate to use Daleks, and why fan-vids exist that use Sontarans and so on. I imagine there's only a restriction if the TV series plans on doing something with them at the time.


BTW, the Mailman sounds like an awesome renegade Time Lord. :)
This message was last edited by the player at 04:38, Fri 22 Aug 2014.
Sereth
player, 367 posts
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 04:40
  • msg #172

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

... of course, I'm stuffed if I can remember who came up with Silurians. I know Holmes came up with Sontarans; and Pedler was Cybermen...

But yeah; that was why there was almost no Daleks in Season 1 of the new series. The Nation estate was holding out. And the latest run of Doctor Who classic series here; had to skip every single Dalek episode; because the Nation estate refused to give the rights for the old series. And you have to negotiate separately for stuff from the new series or classic; if they're in both.
The Guardian
GM, 674 posts
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 04:55
  • msg #173

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
... of course, I'm stuffed if I can remember who came up with Silurians. I know Holmes came up with Sontarans; and Pedler was Cybermen...

Malcolm Hulke, same as the Draconians and of course the Sea Devils.

Your litmus test to detect Hulke stories: is there an empire behaving badly?
Sereth
player, 368 posts
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 05:02
  • msg #174

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Oh yelp. Thinking on some other Hulke stories now and that's scarily accurate.
The Traveller
player, 594 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Fri 22 Aug 2014
at 06:36
  • msg #175

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
Another scientific name, from the NAs, is, deep breath, psionosauropodomorpha, meaning "psychic lizard-foot shaped":
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Silurian

I once read a theory that Macra were the origins of a surprising number of old monsters.

Actually, it shouldn't be too hard to get Silurians and so on into ATTT: for the most part, licenses for various characters and creatures are held by the original authors or their estates. That's why the BBC has to get permission from the Nation estate to use Daleks, and why fan-vids exist that use Sontarans and so on. I imagine there's only a restriction if the TV series plans on doing something with them at the time.


BTW, the Mailman sounds like an awesome renegade Time Lord. :)



That is smarter than it sounds. There was someone interfering with stuff going all the way back to ATTT Season One (March 2013 at RPGNet)

The Traveller:
She striders over. "Watcha got, babe?"

She looks non plussed. "No, no, good catch. The guy who taught me this gig only passed with a 51%, you're doing great." Someone messing with work I'm involved in while I'm trying to help people? Notably annoyed, the Traveller analyzes the wave pattern, getting ready to stabilize it, with the sonic.


OOC: To analyze -

2d6+Ingenuity 8+Science 7+sonic 2


She frowns, because she wanted to use a smaller firehose for this. She doesn't want to hook this up to her own TARDIS, as that would be hooking up a 747 jet turbine to the stream instead of a car engine.


Context - Trav meets with three versions of who you guys know as Warlock (Phillipe, Evers and Fortuna) who is being chased by the Chamber of Unwrought Time. This creates a temporal backwash which creates a bunch of medical problems in people, which gets Stanley involved. Trav, Stan and Phillipe talk everyone down, negotiate, and backwind the backwash. Stanley joins the TARDIS crew.

RPGNet thread (need membership to read) - http://forum.rpg.net/showthrea...ays-Time-To-Travel!/
Smoke Alarm
player, 603 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sun 24 Aug 2014
at 08:45
  • msg #176

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I have to say, I enjoyed "Deep Breath" and like the new Doctor. I'm actually liking the new series now. :)
Sereth
player, 371 posts
Mon 25 Aug 2014
at 14:21
  • msg #177

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

A break from the manicness of Smith and Tennant was welcome. Capaldi has a feel of Hartnell about him, and not just due to the age.
The Traveller
player, 606 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Mon 25 Aug 2014
at 17:02
  • msg #178

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I got more of a Pertwee vibe, but yeah.

If Trav meets this one - "Boobie, you look *so* Vegas!"
Sereth
player, 372 posts
Mon 25 Aug 2014
at 21:47
  • msg #179

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

His fashion sense is Pertwee. His personality was a lot closer to Hartnell; Pertwee was very happy-go-lucky.
Smoke Alarm
player, 609 posts
Build high for happiness!
Tue 26 Aug 2014
at 13:08
  • msg #180

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I couldn't see any particular other Doctors in him, which I think is a good sign. Some people are saying Tom Baker, which is a good fit. Some moments seemed borrowed from other Doctors (especially Tennant's "Ohhhh!" thing), but you get that in a post-regeneration story.

But he hasn't made any obvious catch-phrases yet, which is simply glorious. The forced wackiness also seems to have gone, post-regenerative trauma notwithstanding. He's also the least costumed (i.e., no novelty clothes) since Eccleston, and before that, Troughton, which is surprisingly refreshing. I hate the red slashes though.
The Traveller
player, 609 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Tue 26 Aug 2014
at 14:48
  • msg #181

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I think that Capaldi is going to be a very grim, brooding, scary doctor. That might not appeal to Tennant or Smith fans, but it appeals to Eccleston fans, like me.

Anyone catch the chips and 'no money' reference at the end of the episode? Do you think Capaldi might take some inspiration from 9?
Sereth
player, 374 posts
Tue 26 Aug 2014
at 21:46
  • msg #182

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The 'scary' Doctor aspect is how he reminds me of Hartnell.

I think Capaldi; as a lifelong fan, will likely take some -inspiration- from all the previous Doctors.
Smoke Alarm
player, 612 posts
Build high for happiness!
Wed 27 Aug 2014
at 02:26
  • msg #183

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I think the Doctor is best when he has an air of danger and unpredictability. He began as the the antagonist, after all. Hartnell, McCoy, and others had it just right, Colin Baker much too much. The new Doctors have generally been rather safe, bar contrived moments and unsupported claims. Capaldi carried it off very naturally though.
Sereth
player, 377 posts
Wed 27 Aug 2014
at 02:31
  • msg #184

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I have to say actually, Eccleston never scared me. Capaldi did have it right; and no catchphrases was my dream come true.
The Traveller
player, 614 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Wed 27 Aug 2014
at 13:49
  • msg #185

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Don't jinx it, Capaldi may end up getting a catchphrase ;)
Sereth
player, 378 posts
Wed 27 Aug 2014
at 14:26
  • msg #186

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Actually in honesty most have - but they weren't forced. 3 and 4 certainly did; and along with 2, they've been my favorites.
The Traveller
player, 615 posts
Renegade Time Lord
Time's Defender
Wed 27 Aug 2014
at 17:56
  • msg #187

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Dig it, some real science! And I want Trav to talk about Stellar Haloes at some point.

https://medium.com/starts-with...-beyond-42feb99f6d66
The Traveller
player, 788 posts
The Last Time Lord
I can't go,I owe too much
Tue 2 Dec 2014
at 16:41
  • msg #188

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

From the Always Time To Travel Season 3 OST - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmVxiEXWJWQ

High energy music involving Smoke, Sereth and Trav dealing with bad guys!
The Traveller
player, 792 posts
The Last Time Lord
I can't go,I owe too much
Thu 4 Dec 2014
at 20:08
  • msg #189

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Some science!

Very appropriate for Time Travel, Block Transfer equations, and so on - http://gizmodo.com/5-reasons-o...tual-real-1665353513
The Traveller
player, 793 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Thu 4 Dec 2014
at 20:39
  • msg #190

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

New bio slot - last one was too depressing!
Smoke Alarm
player, 778 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sun 7 Dec 2014
at 02:23
  • msg #191

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Ahem.


Following the appearances on Doctor Who, Smoke Alarm's regular role on Always Time to Travel, and the niche popularity of the Smoke Alarm Chronicles Marvel comic series, a Kang fandom soon grew up around these properties, forming a subsection of the fandoms of all three and some attracted from outside. Kangs, as they were known, were a small but dedicated subculture of geeks, cosplayers, sports enthusiasts, and girl power activists, mostly women. They adopted Kang-inspired dress and philosophies, such "brave and bold as a Kang could be".

One unique expression of Kang fandom was in the women-dominated sport of roller derby. For roller girls, who already adopted punk, gothic, lolita, and grunge fashions for their games, and played under novel nicknames, the attraction of Kangs was obvious. Kang-themed roller girls appeared in games, followed by a whole Red Kang roller derby team. "Catch me if you can" adorned a few backs and backsides.

In homage to the sport and the Kang roller girls, Smoke Alarm appeared on roller skates in a high-speed chase/fight scene in AWTT.
The Traveller
player, 799 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Mon 8 Dec 2014
at 19:30
  • msg #192

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Let's not forget when Blake Lively organized her Blue Kang Paradise Rollers for breast cancer research, coming to roller derby matches as her Blue Kang cosplay character Speed Bump. Her performing the Kang how-do-you-do trended on Vine and Instagram for *months*.
Smoke Alarm
player, 786 posts
Build high for happiness!
Fri 12 Dec 2014
at 08:49
  • msg #193

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Coming soon from Marvel Comics, the hotly anticipated crossover event — Squirrel Girl & Smoke Alarm! The mutant with squirrel powers and the Blue Kang team up in an epic adventure to save the entire multiverse itself, aided by Tippy-Toe and Puddy, with cameos from the Avengers and Always Time to Travel!. Can the roof-running, wall-climbing, rodent-rapping duo defeat Galactus and the entire Dalek Empire? Of course they will!

http://www.ign.com/articles/20...-squirrel-girl-comic
The Traveller
player, 804 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Sun 14 Dec 2014
at 23:28
  • msg #194

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Silly reporters, getting Doctor and Trav cosplays mixed up - http://io9.com/steven-moffat-f...and-shoul-1668433760
The Traveller
player, 805 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Mon 15 Dec 2014
at 04:12
  • msg #195

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

So, caught up with Who. Missy's arc was rather... anticlimactic.

In ATTT canon, I presume that Missy was distinctly avoiding Trav because Trav ironically had already been through the entire been a general thing and would have cut entirely cut through Missy's shit. I also feel that Missy basically committed Suicide By Doctor, if indeed that's what happened. The visual was a blue effect, not a red one.

I kind of have the feeling that Trav is a lot further a long in recovering in her post war emotional arc than Capaldi's Doctor is. "Yeah, boobie, you are an idiot, and so is Jackaninny (what she would call a female Master.)"

"Sweety, what is up with the whole Mary Poppins thing?"

I was very disappointed that Asthma Girl did not become the next companion. But I am now very psyched we now have Cyber Brig!

What's really ironic is that if Trav and Clara knew each other, Trav would not hesitate to use the Corsair sample to download Danny Pink's mental pattern and bring him back with a new body.
Sereth
player, 507 posts
Mon 15 Dec 2014
at 04:15
  • msg #196

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Well, other than the fact that it's been confirmed that Cyber-Brig joined Danny in committing suicide; yeah.

Also, Gomez has already confirmed she's in talks to reprise her role. The Master never dies. It's becoming a bit... old. IF they insist they Master doesn't die, stop setting up things to make it look like he has.
Stanley Newton
player, 253 posts
Fri 19 Dec 2014
at 23:08
  • msg #197

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
Well, other than the fact that it's been confirmed that Cyber-Brig joined Danny in committing suicide; yeah.


I can't remember anything from the episode that indicates that the Cyber-Brig committed suicide.

He was still around to shoot the Master and that was after Danny and the other Cybermen had already exploded. I thought the last we saw of the Cyber-Brig was him flying away. Also his page at the Tardis wikia doesn't say anything about him dying a second time. http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/A...n_Lethbridge-Stewart
Smoke Alarm
player, 790 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sat 20 Dec 2014
at 01:00
  • msg #198

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

It was a bit of a disappointing end to a great season, but this time around I'm more "meh" than actively offended. I wish Who could do away with epics, season finales, and non-character arcs altogether, but I think they're sadly endemic to modern television.

Yeah, it was Cyber-Brig who shot Missy, then he flew off into space. Maybe he becomes Kroton?
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/K...oul_of_a_Cyberman%29
I don't like it. It's a tacky, tacky end for the character. Literally, the corpse of the Brigadier dug up and paraded around for an obligatory non-appearance. It's especially a waste since the Mistress/Master isn't even going to stay dead.

I think the writers see his constant coming back from the dead as part of the gimmick of the character, just something he always does. At least they didn't go to any great effort trying to explain his resurrection like last time. But, yeah, escaping to provide a looming threat would give the character a bit more menace.

Osgood would have made a great companion, but was probably too much of a joke fan-girl character (and non-standard leading female role) to keep around without changing. It's annoying that she's so smart and genre-savvy the whole time, but falls for such an obvious trick by Missy. She should have raised the alarm immediately.
The Traveller
player, 812 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Tue 23 Dec 2014
at 19:49
  • msg #199

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

You do have a good point. In order to be a full fledged companion and not a fan in joke, Osgood would have had to have been changed I feel.

I would have loved to have seen Danny Pink as a full blown companion, and was dearly hoping for the Doctor and a single male companion.

In Travcanon, I can see some in the imaginary fandom making claims that ATTT was created to allow Dr Who to stay more traditional and to take risks that Dr Who couldn't. For example, two male companions and a female Time Lord in season 1 of ATTT. Also, the PC mix in ATTT you'd never see on traditional Dr Who. Also, while attractive herself, Trav hasn't felt romantic feelings towards any of the companions, but not due to any censorship from me as a player - Trav loves and adores Stan, but has a relationship of profound respect with him similar to the Donna/10 dynamic, except not with the same kind of humour. Of course, there's no doubt a thin but deep Stan/Trav shipping fandom - about as big as the Trav/Smoke shipper and Trav/Amanda shippers (cue tons of Trav Tumblrs and such ;) )) I can see the fandom making paralells between Stan and Danny, and them saying Moff killed off Danny because he was becoming too much like Stan from ATTT. I can see ATTT fans saying that Danny (and Clara) need to be moved from Dr Who to ATTT because the 5th Traveller as a character is more at ease with lots of companions than the 12th Doctor is.

What's weird about Trav is that character I as the player think she'd be interested in she turns out feeling maternal towards instead. Trav's backstory on RIFTS Earth massively informs her, as does the 3 years I played her in that game. Unlike the Doctor, who is a mountain range that takes on the mask of a cute guy, Trav is a hurricane who takes on the mask of a quirky hot mom.
This message was last edited by the player at 20:03, Tue 23 Dec 2014.
Sereth
player, 515 posts
Tue 23 Dec 2014
at 21:38
  • msg #200

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Nothing from the episode; but Moffatt has said he went off to join Danny in suicide. Personally, I'd hate the idea of a Cyber-brig staying around. Hasn't he done enough?
The Traveller
player, 813 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Wed 24 Dec 2014
at 00:05
  • msg #201

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm OK with that. In fact, I'm of a changed mind. Yeah, it was kind of ghoulish for them to trot out The Brig.
Sereth
player, 523 posts
Sun 28 Dec 2014
at 22:41
  • msg #202

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Watched the Christmas episode. New monsters is a bonus. I don't mind the occasional returns; but lately we've had too many returning monsters; not enough new ones.

And yes; MOffatt considers the Master will always live. But the Delgado Master; and the Ainley-Master to a certain extent; never had a 'assumed to be dead' moment. THey escaped; you saw them escape. Heck, much of the arc on earth had to do with UNIT finding the Master.

Generally, I'm a MOffatt-fan. I think he's done more good than bad; though some of what he's done is horrendous for me. But I really wish he'd stop doing this stuff setting up for a 'future showrunner' - when he currently has no plans to hang up the boots.

I don't mind the Time War being resolved as it was. I've had enough of angsty-Doctor. But I do mind the "Oh I can find Gallifrey!" aspect; when MOffatt has himself stated he hates the timelords; so you know they're not going to find Gallifrey under his watch.
The Traveller
player, 821 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Mon 29 Dec 2014
at 00:08
  • msg #203

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm going to share this to the Pinterest board, but I see that the BBC has released the official ATTT T shirt!

http://www.lookhuman.com/desig...going-time-traveling
Smoke Alarm
player, 802 posts
Build high for happiness!
Tue 30 Dec 2014
at 02:48
  • msg #204

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Ainley Master was often seen dying with no apparent possibility of escape. In Castrovalva, he's beaten by a mob in a collapsing pocket universe. In Planet of Fire, he's incinerated. In Mark of the Rani, he's trapped in a runaway TARDIS surrounded by tyrannosaurs. Then he comes back without a word as to how he got out of it.

According to the TARDIS Eruditorium blog, Moffat seems to be a writer who often seeds plot hooks for later use. Some he comes back to and makes it looks like he planned it all along, some he doesn't. Like whoever put the Doctor and Clara together in "The Bells of St John", which he probably didn't have any plans for in Season 7. Even way back with River Song. Equally, he can seed stuff for later showrunners.

"Get in loser"? Seems harsh. :(
This message was last edited by the player at 05:16, Tue 30 Dec 2014.
Sereth
player, 524 posts
Tue 30 Dec 2014
at 02:52
  • msg #205

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yeah; but equally the Ainley-Master was also seen sometimes to flat-out escape. But yes, it is that habit he sometimes had that Moffatt is drawing off; and has stated that the Master/Missy will return without any explanation as to how they survived.
The Guardian
GM, 949 posts
Tue 30 Dec 2014
at 04:28
  • msg #206

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
"Get in loser"? Seems harsh. :(

Dunno, is it a Twelfth Doctor quote?

(I suppose a GO AWAY HUMANS T-shirt would really not sell.)
Smoke Alarm
player, 804 posts
Build high for happiness!
Tue 30 Dec 2014
at 05:15
  • msg #207

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'd wear it. :)

All the shirts at the link say it. It's too harsh even for the 12th Doctor. It might be from Supernatural, it would fit.


It's probably due to the limited number of appearances the Master gets in the new series. In the Pertwee and Davison eras, he appeared so often he had to unambiguously escape sometimes. With only three appearances in the new series, each time goes for the "destroyed forever!" gimmick. You get similar situations with the Daleks and Cybermen, each apparently completed destroyed at their first appearance, and many times after.
The Traveller
player, 822 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Tue 30 Dec 2014
at 20:39
  • msg #208

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yeah, it kind of is harsh for Trav to say. It instead would be "GET IN BABY". Not "sweety," that catchphrase has been swiped by another certain rip off character played by the awesome Alex Kingston. ;)

Travcanon fakenews - Community fans love the dishevelled, happy, clumsy bespectacled J pop loving weeaboo girlfriend of the Inspector, The Tourist!


The Traveller
player, 823 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Tue 30 Dec 2014
at 20:50
  • msg #209

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Travcanon Marshallore - On Villains escaping - Back in the Marshall days, Kate Mulgrew just as often always just slipped out of the clutches of Davison, Colin Baker, McCoy and McGann (in the Big Finish audiobooks). She often mocks the Doctor by using such things as bobby pins, gum, and other "Traveller-ish" methods of clever escape - "I remember all the tricks you taught me, Doctor!" Her famous declaration of "I shall return!" was as famous as her "discipline and order" line. Mulgrew, at Travcon panels, often relates that Directors would let her simply make up stuff on the spot. "I did the role initially for extra money, but I found that it was great fun. The 1996 Fox movie was supposed to be about the Marshall's capture, but it was determined by Fox that my exposure through the Star Trek franchise was a little too great. Ah well, what could have been!" The Internet is rife with animated GIFS of Mulgrew using her time ring to teleport away with a manic grin and text I SHALL RETURN or BE THE MARSHALL.

And, of course, there are a lot of stories where a captured Marshall returns with apparently no explanation.
The Traveller
player, 825 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Thu 1 Jan 2015
at 22:17
  • msg #210

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

"Oh crap! Stan, we missed one! Damned Osirians!"

http://io9.com/do-these-nasa-p...tm_medium=socialflow
The Traveller
player, 826 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Fri 2 Jan 2015
at 10:39
  • msg #211

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Stanley Newton
player, 260 posts
Fri 2 Jan 2015
at 22:52
  • msg #212

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Traveller:
"Oh crap! Stan, we missed one! Damned Osirians!"

http://io9.com/do-these-nasa-p...tm_medium=socialflow


:), I like how the "UFO enthusiasts" want NASA to turn the rover around for this rock.
The Traveller
player, 830 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Mon 5 Jan 2015
at 15:43
  • msg #213

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Osirian cultists who wish to free their lord from Gallifreyan block transfer equations, obviously. They want to undo our good work, Stan! :)
Smoke Alarm
player, 826 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sun 11 Jan 2015
at 03:15
  • msg #214

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Eighth Doctor Sourcebook came out yesterday, and I quickly bought the PDF, but have only had time to skim.

It only covered The TV Movie and The Night of the Doctor, as expected. It suffers a little from the small reference pool, only able to talk about those two. I'm sad it can't say anything about the comics, novels, and audios, but Cubicle 7 just doesn't have the license for it. :( It does mention the Eighth Doctor's multiple contradictory timelines and multiple possible Ninth Doctors as a result of the Time War, which is a quiet way of acknowledging it all.

Oddly, the Master's jelly snake in the TVM (well, I've always thought of it as a jelly snake) is statted out and called a Deathworm Morphant — the Deathworm is from the novels, the Morphant is from the script and comics, and the two were merged unnecessarily into the Deathworm Morphant in the audios. So this one creature gets to represent all three ranges.
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Deathworm_Morphant
Maybe there are other sneaky references. I'd say rels, the Dalek unit of time, but they already appeared in the new series.

There don't seem to be any new traits or gadgets that aren't monster- or adventure-specific. :(

The main part of the book is "The Doom of the Daleks" adventure path, 13 complete adventures inspired by each of the Doctors' eras and forming a quest to bring back the Doctor after he's been wiped from history in the Time War. Most seem easily adaptable to regular campaigns. Oddly it suggests setting it before the Time War or after the Time War, but not during.
The Traveller
player, 839 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Mon 12 Jan 2015
at 15:54
  • msg #215

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

You do all understand that this is the very first canon 5th Traveller Dalek story, yes?

This is the first time Trav has had to had to deal with Dalek stuff outside of backstory.

I'm considering this story as having started from the beginning of the Mailman arch with Space Vegas.

Truly momentous for the current 2008 Traveller revival! The fanbase is ecstastic!
The Traveller
player, 842 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Mon 12 Jan 2015
at 20:10
  • msg #216

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Suggested episode title -

Kingdom of the Daleks (because we're dealing with a Silurian King)
The Traveller
player, 863 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Thu 29 Jan 2015
at 05:47
  • msg #217

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm playing Trav in Champions Online as an inventor, using ATTT as her backstory. Chronologically, it takes place in some amorphous time between ATTT adventures where Trav investigates a CVE that leads to the CO setting (which is really no different from the Rifts and Phase World settings which are part of Travcanon.) In dialog there she refers to her ATTT adventures. I presume this is when she drops the companions off to take care of business. It would be pretty hilarious if you guys decided to play CO as Smoke Alarm, Sereth, Stan and Ru. Champions Online is free to play!

She likes chilling in Millenium City because here she can be just a nobody as opposed to The Last Time Lord. She's making sure that none of the CO universe threats bleed over into ATTT and vice versa.

Here is Trav chilling in Club Caprice with some friends and her new inventions, the Chibi Bots -

Note that she is hatless because the hats in CO look awful -


This message was last edited by the player at 06:08, Thu 29 Jan 2015.
Smoke Alarm
player, 856 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sat 7 Feb 2015
at 03:14
  • msg #218

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Woohoo! Doctor Who Lego! Two of my favourite things come together!
http://www.doctorwhonews.net/2...go-040215170008.html
Though I'm not sure that Lego can handle dimensionally transcendental construction...

I want to make a Smoke Alarm minifigure, but Lego don't have any good blue hair pieces. :( Just one pale blue spiky anime style.
The Guardian
GM, 1024 posts
Sat 7 Feb 2015
at 05:26
  • msg #219

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
Though I'm not sure that Lego can handle dimensionally transcendental construction...

You read The Book of the War, right?  Remember ParaBloxTM?
Smoke Alarm
player, 860 posts
Build high for happiness!
Sat 7 Feb 2015
at 05:31
  • msg #220

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

No, actually, though I wish I could.

I don't want my blocks disappearing before I get a chance to use them...

There's an awesome Auton/Nestene & Lego story waiting to be told. :)
The Traveller
player, 875 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Mon 9 Feb 2015
at 22:16
  • msg #221

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Who has been messing with the transversal power system?


The Traveller
player, 886 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Mon 23 Feb 2015
at 20:09
  • msg #222

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Last Time Lord considers her options.


The Traveller
player, 993 posts
The Last Time Lord
Always time to travel!
Sun 12 Apr 2015
at 05:24
  • msg #223

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Shiori Experience is a manga is obviously inspired by 2nd Traveller's adventures with her first virtual assistant based on Jimi Hendrix -


The Traveller
player, 1030 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Wed 6 May 2015
at 16:33
  • msg #224

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

WHAT DO YOU MEAN THE CORSAIR HAS RETURNED?

http://io9.com/check-out-maisi...tm_medium=socialflow

If Trav sees this girl she's gonna flip her shit, even if it's not Corsi.
The Traveller
player, 1031 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Wed 6 May 2015
at 16:36
  • msg #225

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

If the Corsair *has* returned...

Oh goodness.

I don't think that Moffat would do that though.

He wouldn't.

Would he?

...
Sereth
player, 717 posts
Wed 6 May 2015
at 16:57
  • msg #226

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I see nothing to suggest she's the Corsair.

Honestly; there are enough renegade timelords mentioned throughout the series; if he really insisted on bringing back one rather than make a new one, he wouldn't have to resurrect one that we know absolutely is dead (not presumed dead like say, every single other one barring the Master and the Doctor). And stuck in a pocket universe.

I don't even think she's a timelord; though it'd be awesome if it was the Rani done right...

But the Rani will probably never return; because fans keep assuming every bad-ass female villain is the Rani.
The Traveller
player, 1032 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Wed 6 May 2015
at 17:23
  • msg #227

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm generally inclined to agree. Also, Gaiman has staked out the Corsair as his Time Lord, so if the Corsair were to return, it would probably be in a Gaiman story. Also, Maise Williams is slated to become the next Companion, so I doubt she's going to be the Corsair. But still, if Trav is stopping by UNIT HQ and catches an image of this girl, she'll probably twitch a few times.

However - now that we know that Gallifrey is absolutely not dead, the door is wide open for surviving Time Lords to come in and out of the show. What's ironic is that the time has never been better for a Traveller-like character to appear (more resembling the pre-Time War Traveller, obviously.)
This message was last edited by the player at 17:25, Wed 06 May 2015.
Sereth
player, 718 posts
Wed 6 May 2015
at 21:28
  • msg #228

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Maisie Williams is not going to be the next companion. She's basically still American-based. She's more likely to be the next Sally Sparrow.

I doubt we'll really get any other Time Lords; besides the Master/Missy, to return whilst MOffatt is showrunner. He doesn't like Time Lords. He did what he did to leave the door open for a future showrunner; not to bring them back himself. I think, if/when they return, they need to go back to what they were when they first appeared, pre-The Deadly Assassin - enigmatic, rarely seen. Like the Doctor himself, we found out too much about them.
The Guardian
GM, 1222 posts
Thu 7 May 2015
at 00:09
  • msg #229

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm up for suggestions on the next port of call for the TARDIS.  I've been doing weird hours for training at work, so my brain is a little sluggish this week.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1012 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Thu 7 May 2015
at 01:20
  • msg #230

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

She's pretty clearly dressed up as an old-fashion Dick Turpin–like highwayman character. Not a pirate. That's 17th/18th century, and so probably in the "The Magician's Apprentice"/"The Witch's Familiar" opening two-parter, which has Missy.

The Rani has less chance of coming back than the Monk. Only fans know of the Rani, and bringing her back runs the risk of bringing back Pip & Jane Baker (or now just Pip).

Maisie Williams won't be a companion. She'll be in movies next.


What are we doing right now? Are we still with the Collinswoods or in the town, or going off on a new adventure so soon? I'm happy to continue raising havoc on contemporary Earth.
This message was last edited by the player at 02:47, Thu 07 May 2015.
Sereth
player, 719 posts
Thu 7 May 2015
at 02:46
  • msg #231

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
The Rani has less chance of coming back the Monk. Only fans know of the Rani, and bringing her back runs the risk of bringing back Pip & Jane Baker (or now just Pip).


Well yes; but I think the same can be said of any classic-series timelord barring the Master. I find the idea that they bring back the Corsair ridiculous - unlike any others who would be "presumed dead", we know he died. House ate him. I think a brand new timelord is probably more likely than any being brought back.
The Traveller
player, 1034 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Thu 7 May 2015
at 05:25
  • msg #232

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I set up things so we can basically do anything. I figured people had their fill of the Phillipe subplot for now. An adventure on modern day Earth in Stanley's time zone might be cool, around the time period with Stan's mom, similar to some of the adventures 9 had with Rose and Jackie Tyler. Maybe we can run into some of those Torchwood Yobbos.
Sereth
player, 720 posts
Thu 7 May 2015
at 05:44
  • msg #233

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

... you just want an excuse to have Sereth in a human skin for longer....
The Traveller
player, 1035 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Thu 7 May 2015
at 11:45
  • msg #234

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

So you're trying to tell me that you don't to tell me you don't want to look like Sam Jackson any more?

Fine, fine, I'll turn it off... ;p
Stanley Newton
player, 327 posts
Thu 7 May 2015
at 19:20
  • msg #235

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Guardian:
I'm up for suggestions on the next port of call for the TARDIS.  I've been doing weird hours for training at work, so my brain is a little sluggish this week.


A random idea:
An undersea base...on a alien planet, something or someone trying to get in, section being flooded, etc.
The Traveller
player, 1036 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Fri 8 May 2015
at 14:10
  • msg #236

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Or maybe a pick up at UNIT Headquarters. I need to raid some talent for the team:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doc...9e-9c75-34e0cae1af56

I *adore* Osgood.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1013 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Sat 9 May 2015
at 06:38
  • msg #237

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Talent? Smoke Alarm would never fallen for the Master's trick like that. Nor fallen out of a plane. That was a rather dumb moment for a usually much cleverer character. And how's she coming back? Is it her Zygon double? Or was it the Zygon who died?


Sounds like a classic base-under-siege, Stanley!
Sereth
player, 721 posts
Sat 9 May 2015
at 13:32
  • msg #238

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I've heard comments also about how it's a show about time travel, so suggesting it's before she died.

I do tend to agree with Smoke actually. Her original appearance in the 50th anniversary was awesome. Not so fond of her subsequent appearance.

If I'm remembering my Who mythology right, Zygons keep those they're doubling for alive, because they can only use their shape if they're alive. I think that's even what happens in Terror of the Zygons; a prisoner dies and the Zygon who was impersonating him reverted to it's original form; thus letting the Doctor have an idea of what he was up against.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1015 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Sat 9 May 2015
at 13:51
  • msg #239

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I think that's right. And when a Zygon died, a prisoner awoke. However, the Zygons in Day of the Doctor didn't need to take prisoners. Zygon Osgood took Osgood's form just by looking at her.
Stanley Newton
player, 328 posts
Sun 10 May 2015
at 07:19
  • msg #240

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
Sounds like a classic base-under-siege, Stanley!


Yeah, we haven't had one of those yet. Most of the time we end up attacking the enemy's base instead of the other way around :).
The Guardian
GM, 1223 posts
Sun 10 May 2015
at 17:44
  • msg #241

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm pretty sure I can do something interesting with either one of the ideas currently kicking around, the TARDIS exploration being discussed or the sea base.

In the latter case I hope I can beat the high bar set by Warriors of the Deep
Sereth
player, 722 posts
Sun 10 May 2015
at 22:29
  • msg #242

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I dunno... Warriors of the Deep was a pretty high standard to beat.

You just can't beat the Myrka.
The Traveller
player, 1039 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Sun 10 May 2015
at 23:45
  • msg #243

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Oh, one other adventure possibility:

Don't we have a UNIT Colonel to rescue from a time paradox?
Smoke Alarm
player, 1018 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Mon 11 May 2015
at 02:09
  • msg #244

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

You can't karate kick a Myrka either.


I think Smoke's got the Unadventurous trait right now, after her encounter with the Qplotl. Anyway, I have no strong feelings for the choice of next adventure.
The Traveller
player, 1040 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Mon 11 May 2015
at 15:39
  • msg #245

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Hey Gary,

What we the name of the UNIT Colonel who is time trapped again? I keep forgetting that we have to rescue him.
Stanley Newton
player, 329 posts
Mon 11 May 2015
at 20:11
  • msg #246

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Traveller:
What we the name of the UNIT Colonel who is time trapped again? I keep forgetting that we have to rescue him.


Colonel Rayburn? link to a message in this game
This message was last edited by the player at 20:11, Mon 11 May 2015.
The Traveller
player, 1041 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Mon 11 May 2015
at 21:04
  • msg #247

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

That's it. Who wants to go rescue the good Colonel?
The Traveller
player, 1046 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Tue 12 May 2015
at 22:19
  • msg #248

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

WHEN IS TRAV GETTING HER OWN LEGO GAME DAMMIT

It's probably tied up with Palladium/Rifts rights. Damn that Siembieda.

http://blogtorwho.blogspot.co....ture-doctor-who.html
The Guardian
GM, 1225 posts
Tue 12 May 2015
at 23:22
  • msg #249

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Live by the crossover, die by the crossover.
The Traveller
player, 1047 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Wed 13 May 2015
at 00:18
  • msg #250

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I know right. Just like that THE TRAVELLER'S GUIDE TO THE THREE GALAXIES he promises like 15 years ago for Phase World, feh.
Sereth
player, 723 posts
Wed 13 May 2015
at 00:19
  • msg #251

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm still waiting for my Sereth figurine.

Complete with a removable helmet which reveals Samuel L Jackson's face underneath...
Smoke Alarm
player, 1021 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Wed 13 May 2015
at 01:21
  • msg #252

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The annoying thing is that the Dimensions instructions don't actually have instructions for the models, you have to run the game, for which you need to buy the game and the console. Bah. It won't be the first time I've worked out a build from an image and parts.

I really need to make a Smoke Alarm minifigure. A bunch of leftover blue and black parts, a crossbow. If only Lego made blue hair.
The Traveller
player, 1094 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Tue 2 Jun 2015
at 19:29
  • msg #253

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I hear that a PARADISE TOWERS supplement is planned as as spin off book for DW:AITAS as part of their ATTT game book line, with dual Savage Worlds stats, due to recent Pinnacle/Palladium partnership. Supposedly half the book is devoted to Smoke Alarm and the Us. Talk about meta!

And you know whose glasses and coat Osgood is wearing. She may have even knicked them from the UNIT vaults -



This message was last edited by the player at 19:43, Tue 02 June 2015.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1054 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Wed 3 Jun 2015
at 05:03
  • msg #254

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Including a much-wanted Kang to English dictionary and grammar guide.
Sereth
player, 743 posts
Wed 3 Jun 2015
at 05:08
  • msg #255

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

... there -is- a Kang to English dictionary? WANT.
The Traveller
player, 1096 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Wed 3 Jun 2015
at 11:39
  • msg #256

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I thought that was sold as a seperate product by the BBC.

I personally want a Kang-to-english subtitle track.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1056 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Wed 3 Jun 2015
at 12:15
  • msg #257

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Knowhow to Kang-Speek, a glossary of Kang terms and phrases, Kang-to-English and English-to-Kang dictionaries, a pronunciation guide, and an introductory course on how to speak like a Kang and how to integrate new slang words, children's phrases, and architectural terminology. All based on the ATTT writer's notes, and in turn used for future episodes. Including a Kang-ified version of a Shakespearean play, Kang Leer.
This message was last edited by the player at 12:16, Wed 03 June 2015.
The Guardian
GM, 1262 posts
Wed 3 Jun 2015
at 12:26
  • msg #258

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Knowhow to Kang-Speek holds the notorious distinction of being officially condemned by the professional teachers' associations of nearly every predominantly English-speaking country.

This drove the guide onto international bestseller lists.
The Traveller
player, 1097 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Wed 3 Jun 2015
at 14:47
  • msg #259

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Blake Lively has been known to threaten to Kang Speak in interviews with reporters she does not like.

There is also a Kang Language Studies and Kang Culture sub fandom in Dr Who and Trav Fandom, as well as a thriving Paradise Towers LARP scene at Gallifrey One. Kang and Whovian LARPERS have been known to invade Zombie larps such as Dystopia rising and undo their cynical post-apocalyptic plots, even forming Kang gangs (with secret Time Lords and companions), much to the chagrins to Larp judges of these venues seeing their games hijacked by positive Kang culture. The Kang "how do you do" is the secret pass sign. Male Kang cosplayers identify themselves as "Pex".
This message was last edited by the player at 14:52, Wed 03 June 2015.
The Traveller
player, 1145 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Mon 10 Aug 2015
at 20:45
  • msg #260

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)



You owe me a scene, Gary.
This message was last edited by the player at 20:59, Mon 10 Aug 2015.
The Traveller
player, 1146 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Thu 13 Aug 2015
at 16:28
  • msg #261

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Traveller
player, 1148 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Wed 19 Aug 2015
at 16:05
  • msg #262

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

In Travcanon, this threatens to split the larger Who fandom into respective camps as Trav and Doctor fans try to claim Hayley Atwell to be their respective favorite Time Lord -

http://io9.com/hayley-atwell-w...tm_medium=socialflow

Obviously, Atwell watches Always Time To Travel. ;)
The Traveller
player, 1150 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Tue 25 Aug 2015
at 11:52
  • msg #263

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The fandom wars over Atwell continue to rage!

If Atwell does not become Capaldi's successor, I'm going to probably claim her for Trav:


This message was last edited by the player at 11:57, Tue 25 Aug 2015.
Sereth
player, 781 posts
Tue 25 Aug 2015
at 13:56
  • msg #264

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Given Capaldi seems to be hinting at gunning for Baker's record, I don't think she'll succeed Capaldi.

ALso, despite their playing around with it, I do not believe they'll have the Doctor regenerate into a woman. Personally, I'd prefer they changed his skin-tone rather than gender.
The Traveller
player, 1151 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Tue 25 Aug 2015
at 14:40
  • msg #265

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth: I'm inclined to agree with you. And considering that Dr Who is a "family focussed" franchise, I think that the Doctor will for the forseeable future be a white male british guy, as much as I would adore the Doctor being Idris Elba.
Sereth
player, 782 posts
Tue 25 Aug 2015
at 14:55
  • msg #266

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

With few exceptions (Capaldi, Ecclestone and Davison that I can think of), the Doctor has also been relatively unknown. No-one as big as Idris Elba is now, that's for certain. I just think it makes a bit more sense for a regeneration to mess around with what determines skin color, then what determines gender. That's of course subjective though.

Pity the Master couldn't have regenerated into somoene who looked non-caucasian rather than a woman; but that might have been seen just as racist as having all the regulars be white.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1107 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Tue 25 Aug 2015
at 15:08
  • msg #267

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm not concerned about the Doctor's race or gender now, though I'd like to see it change somehow. I think it can, should, and will happen eventually, just for the sake of having done it. I just hope the character won't get written differently because of it.

The only proviso for me is that the actor be mature-aged, to have the experience and occupy the mentor/familial role for the companion.

I think everyone could pick their favourite for a female Doctor. I like Amanda Tapping after Sanctuary; she even said she wanted to be the Doctor at last year's Comic-Con.
Sereth
player, 783 posts
Tue 25 Aug 2015
at 15:14
  • msg #268

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Maturity is an interesting one. With the casting of both Tennant and Smith, the respective showrunners were quoted as saying something along the lines of "With all the running, you really can't have a 40-year-old Doctor anymore".

Then Smith's successor is Capaldi - following the youngest ever Doctor with one of the oldest. (I believe Hartnell -just- shades him - Capaldi is certainly in better health at the least).

I'm still uncertain about wanting the gender to change. If it did, I hope it's not written as just an ordinary regeneration. Should be special. Otherwise why has he never before changed into one?
The Traveller
player, 1154 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Tue 25 Aug 2015
at 15:48
  • msg #269

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I think a lot of it is the chemistry between the lead and the showrunners. That's one of the reasons that Eccleston didn't work out past one season. Plus 50 years of tradition. But we'll see. Part of the reason I created The Traveller for that Rifts game back in 2007 was to have a Doctor like character who wasn't the Doctor - female, American, different backstory and so on. You can do that in RPGs.

I've been playing with the idea of regenerating Trav soon - she's been around in active play longer than Tennant or Smith were in their TV tenures (Trav was generated under RIFTS rules back when Tennant was on the air)
The Traveller
player, 1155 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Tue 25 Aug 2015
at 15:50
  • msg #270

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

About "why has he never been a woman before" - the Doctor has always been portrayed as not having a lot of control over his regenerations. Just luck of the dice.

Trav has the random regenerator flaw herself. So watch out!
Sereth
player, 784 posts
Tue 25 Aug 2015
at 15:52
  • msg #271

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Ecclestone's a weird one. He and RTD have always got on great - he only joined the show because RTD was involved.

Umm, but if it really was just luck, does it make a lot of sense that he's regenerated what, 12 times into a male body?
The Traveller
player, 1156 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Tue 25 Aug 2015
at 16:33
  • msg #272

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Gambler's fallacy! Sometimes that's how the dice fall!

And a boy Traveller will be the height of hilarity.

"Oh wow. flat chested. And check this out! Hee! That's how that works!"
This message was last edited by the player at 16:34, Tue 25 Aug 2015.
The Guardian
GM, 1329 posts
Wed 26 Aug 2015
at 01:47
  • msg #273

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Myself, I'd be game to see the Doctor be female, but in the hands of a showrunner who would use it to open up different perspectives on the character and the sorts of mythological echoes that have been particularly explored in post-2005 Who.  And would not use it as a vehicle for crappy humor.  Which, much as I like a lot of his work, firmly excludes Steven Moffat.

(I don't buy the hypothetical you sometimes see in these discussions that a female Doctor should barely acknowledge the fact.  Decisions about what to do with the show should drive and spring from story.)
This message was last edited by the GM at 01:47, Wed 26 Aug 2015.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1108 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Wed 26 Aug 2015
at 03:18
  • msg #274

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yeah, doing it properly would be most important. Not like The Curse of Fatal Death.
Sereth
player, 785 posts
Wed 26 Aug 2015
at 03:22
  • msg #275

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

We do not mention that travesty...

They honestly probably need some -good- female writers, even if the showrunner is still male, before they can consider it, to be blunt. I do play female characters on occasion, and whilst I've gotten some praise for them, I'm sure I don't write for them as well as an actual woman could. And at least one has descended into a cliche.
The Traveller
player, 1157 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Wed 26 Aug 2015
at 18:23
  • msg #276

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yes, female writers and a female showrunner for a female Doctor.

I know that Trav sometimes comes off as less than convincing, and if she was played by a woman, she'd no doubt be way different.
The Traveller
player, 1159 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Wed 26 Aug 2015
at 19:41
  • msg #277

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Good news everybody!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...-time-Christmas.html

I'm -really- tempted to buy a set and retrofit a Sweet Boy and Trav figures, as well as Sereth, Smoke Alarm and Stanley Lego figs.
The Guardian
GM, 1332 posts
Wed 26 Aug 2015
at 23:46
  • msg #278

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I basically do not buy any Who merch that isn't media of one sort or another.  This will be the exception.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1112 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Fri 28 Aug 2015
at 01:12
  • msg #279

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

That's the old news from back in February. Frustratingly there's been no news on the set since. And I really really really want to know.

They have shown the Dimensions sets though: mini TARDIS, K9, Capaldi Doctor, Cyberman, and Dalek, plus a video with the Lego Doctor Who level:
http://lego.wikia.com/wiki/71204_Doctor_Who_Level_Pack
http://lego.wikia.com/wiki/712...ho_Cyberman_Fun_Pack

I want to make a Smoke Alarm out of my spare/second-hand/broken blue and black minifigure parts. Unfortunately, Lego still don't do any good blue hair pieces.
The Traveller
player, 1163 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Mon 31 Aug 2015
at 14:02
  • msg #280

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Of course, Trav fans are all asquee at how they're going to combine the Dimensions playsets with their Robotech legos.
The Traveller
player, 1167 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Fri 11 Sep 2015
at 16:07
  • msg #281

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Now, I know they're not talking at all about our continuity. But considering our recent visits to Karn:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0326qkd

Near the end of it, in my headcanon I like to think that 12 is directly talking about and referring to Trav. Of course, that's not the case, but still.

Why is it that when I say that I'm done with Moffat, I still get excited?
Smoke Alarm
player, 1125 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Sat 12 Sep 2015
at 02:07
  • msg #282

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Because, regardless of what you think of the current state or whatever, you still love Doctor Who enough to keep caring. :) I've been through that two or three times now.
Stanley Newton
player, 373 posts
Mon 14 Sep 2015
at 13:06
  • msg #283

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I am not really excited for the new series if I am honest. There was nothing in the trailer and the prologue that looked cool or made me want to find out more (IMHO). I will still watch it, though.
Sereth
player, 795 posts
Mon 14 Sep 2015
at 13:27
  • msg #284

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I have rarely gotten -really- excited about it except for the first year; purely because it was coming back. It's still a good show, and I would still watch it over most other stuff on TV at the moment. I guess at heart I'll always prefer the Classic Series; which is probably why Seasons 3-4 were so terrible for me, and why, despite it's many, many faults, I didn't mind seasons 5-6.
The Guardian
GM, 1346 posts
Tue 15 Sep 2015
at 01:28
  • msg #285

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I must be way easier to please than all of you. :)

At the moment, what I've heard hinted and rumored about the new series is nonspecific enough that I'm just interested to see what comes.  I'm pretty jazzed to find out what's up with Maisie Williams' character.  Mostly, I'm really hopeful that with most of the stories being two-part / linked episodes, they'll have the time to breathe like old school Who did.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1129 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Tue 15 Sep 2015
at 02:11
  • msg #286

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I don't think I really get excited about anything. Even when new Who was announced in 2003, I was curious and cautiously optimistic, but I'd seen too many failed attempts to get my hopes up.

But I am looking forward to Series 9, and I'm currently rewatching the Series 8 repeats.

I'm wary of all the two-parters though. Though it might allow for more extended, complex, relaxed tales, I like having more variety in a season like we got with Series 8, where the single-episode stories never felt rushed like in all the seasons prior. More two-parters means less stories overall. :(
The Traveller
player, 1170 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Sun 20 Sep 2015
at 21:31
  • msg #287

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I presume everyone saw it on BBC America last night -

Gonzales has The Master's cleverness and is channeling some of Delgado and some of Simms. I like it.

The whole thing being a big fake out so he can get the Doctor to admit that his whole life's work is wrong a little transparent and old, but hey, I found myself enjoying it anyway, and the entire shout out to Genesis of the Daleks was good.

Anyway, it wasn't horrible, and for now, I will keep on watching.
This message was last edited by the player at 21:32, Sun 20 Sept 2015.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1131 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Mon 21 Sep 2015
at 02:24
  • msg #288

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I think for once Traveller and I have come from opposite directions to have the same opinion on something. :P

It was a bit too much of a return to old new-series form for me, a messy sprawling epic driven by portent and artificial controversies and things only happening for the sake of spectacle (the planes are irrelevant, Colony Sarff could've just been a Dalek agent).

I pretty much worked out the whole thing from the opening scene. Of course the regressing war was Skaro's, so then the boy had to be Davros, and of course the issue is whether to abandon him or not, setting him on the path to the Daleks. Then he's called the lord of Skaro, so of course the space-station-like thing had to be on a planet. The quote from "Genesis" fortunately justified the whole thing.

The Doctor and Clara working with Missy just doesn't feel right, nor the Doctor getting all friendly with her after what she'd done, especially so soon after "Dark Water/Death in Heaven". I do like that they confirmed they really were/are old friends, not brothers or lovers, which would be so hackneyed.

And why are calling her Missy? If we called him Master, then we should call her Mistress.

Moral debates and not-so-different accusations between the Doctor and Davros or other villains are always ridiculous and artificial: Davros is a genocidal lunatic, his argument is invalid. The Doctor should always be able to out-argue him, maybe not changing Davros's mind, but never doubting himself.

But I didn't hate it, and will reserve judgement until the second half.

Prediction for next week, spoilered in case anyone cares:

Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
The Doctor will use the Dalek gun to exterminate the hand-mines and rescue young Davros. Because the 12th Doctor always says one thing to sound like a hard-arse, then does something different in a way that doesn't contradict.

The Guardian
GM, 1350 posts
Mon 21 Sep 2015
at 02:45
  • msg #289

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
The Doctor and Clara working with Missy just doesn't feel right, nor the Doctor getting all friendly with her after what she'd done, especially so soon after "Dark Water/Death in Heaven". I do like that they confirmed they really were/are old friends, not brothers or lovers, which would be so hackneyed.

Was he getting friendly?  I kind of got the impression this was sort of the flip side of, say, the various times the Third Doctor bailed the Master out of the consequences of schemes that backfired on him.

(In amidst all the callbacks, I sort of expected a reference to picking up the Master's "remains" from Skaro in the TVM.  Although perhaps they're hoping we've all forgotten it entirely.)

quote:
And why are calling her Missy? If we called him Master, then we should call her Mistress.

I dislike how everyone has taken the Missy name on board too.  Master, in modern parlance, should be a nongendered term.  Unless one is using that meaning of mistress.  Which is not happening.

Overall I felt like this story is really indulgent fanwankery that I'm not eager to see pursued... executed really well.  It'd be a cool premise if it didn't have to be Davros and the Daleks again.
The Traveller
player, 1171 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Mon 21 Sep 2015
at 12:48
  • msg #290

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I kind of have to split my brain in two when i watch Who regular Whovian brain, and Travcanon, because what happens in the show directly impacts how I play Trav. After reflection, yeah, a good deal of the ep does seem kind of contrived. Gonzales is cute, but she takes too much after the silliness of the Simms Master. I'm thinking that the home office might have found a more aggressive and darker female Master perhaps a bit too much for the family audience to take, as well as there being an effort to move away from sexualizing the Doctor and "catering to the female famdom" (which I have heard the show accused of in some corners.)

And thats too bad. Missy lacks a magnificence that the Master requires.
Stanley Newton
player, 374 posts
Mon 21 Sep 2015
at 21:35
  • msg #291

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I don't like how they didn't even try to explain how the Master survived. That's just lazy and bad writing. The same with Davros, didn't the Doctor leave him to die when the Crucible exploded?

The Guardian:
Was he getting friendly?  I kind of got the impression this was sort of the flip side of, say, the various times the Third Doctor bailed the Master out of the consequences of schemes that backfired on him.


Something doesn't feel right about how the Doctor interacted with the Master this episode. Like she is too easily forgiven for what she did in season 8.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1136 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Tue 22 Sep 2015
at 03:55
  • msg #292

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Guardian:
Was he getting friendly?


During the "party" scene, IIRC. Maybe the Doctor was drunk?

The Guardian:
(In amidst all the callbacks, I sort of expected a reference to picking up the Master's "remains" from Skaro in the TVM.  Although perhaps they're hoping we've all forgotten it entirely.)


It's not even the first time the Master's been exterminated by Daleks. :) I like that the Daleks have just gone with the "Why don't you just shoot him?" criticism, and run with it so hard.

quote:
Overall I felt like this story is really indulgent fanwankery that I'm not eager to see pursued... executed really well.  It'd be a cool premise if it didn't have to be Davros and the Daleks again.


Yeah. I'd have hated it under RTD or early Moffat, but it's fortunate I like the style, tone, and characters enough now to forgive it. Apparently it was meant to be a 10-year anniversary of the new series, so it might be understandable, though I don't see it.

The Traveller:
I kind of have to split my brain in two when i watch Who regular Whovian brain, and Travcanon, because what happens in the show directly impacts how I play Trav.


I liked seeing Smoke Alarm's graffiti on Karn, that was a nice reference to ATTT. ;)

The Traveller:
Gonzales is cute, but she takes too much after the silliness of the Simms Master. I'm thinking that the home office might have found a more aggressive and darker female Master perhaps a bit too much for the family audience to take, as well as there being an effort to move away from sexualizing the Doctor and "catering to the female famdom" (which I have heard the show accused of in some corners.)

And thats too bad. Missy lacks a magnificence that the Master requires.


It's been said that the Master is a dark reflection of the current Doctor and their era, with Delgado's being an elegant establishment-like figure opposite the Pertwee Doctor; the gothic, eccentric, funereal Tom Baker Doctor (intended at the time to be the final Doctor) opposed by a crazed, corpse-like Master; and the classically good-man Davison Doctor opposed by the classic mustache-twirling villainy of the Ainley Master. Ainley stuck around too long to show us a good match for the Colin Baker Doctor (that would have been terrifying), but he became cruelly manipulative of young companions opposite the McCoy Doctor in "Survival". The Simms Master was young, flamboyant, over-the-top to counter the Tennant Doctor. And consider Jacobi's old man opposite the elder Hurt Doctor. So, with an older, elegantly dressed, eccentric Capaldi who putters about not being a big figure, the Gomez Master is older, elegantly dressed, and utterly demented and lurks around the edges.

Of course, I don't know why Capaldi is basically just dressing like a bum now. The Master now has to become a mad cat lady.


As for Davros and the Master always surviving without explanation, I think it's based on how often it happened back in the classic series. It seems to be a running joke now. They probably figure fans or the expanded universe will fill in the blanks, though I agree it's lazy writing.

Someone pointed out to me the other day that we get absolutely no information that Clara is or is going to be a teacher in Series 7b, only that she looks after some kids. She just suddenly becomes one in "The Day of the Doctor" as a reference to "The Unearthly Child". It makes sense in retrospect and suits her character, but it's invented wholly out of whole cloth. That's been the writing style since the beginning of the new series: if viewers can figure it out themselves or trust that it makes sense, then don't bother explaining it. Lazy writing, but the current TV style. Apparently RTD borrowed it from The West Wing.

I realised: with no back story, a predestined status as a companion, appearing in the run-up to a Gallifrey epic with a dark missing Doctor and a new Doctor, Clara Oswald is basically the Melanie Bush of the new series.
Sereth
player, 802 posts
Wed 23 Sep 2015
at 13:30
  • msg #293

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Finally saw it.

Moffatt actually stated at the time that the Master would be back; with no explanation, because that's what s/he does. Planet of Fire springs to mind. RTD also stated that he deliberately didn't show Davros actually dying because he figured he probably used an emergency temporal shift to escape; and he wanted it left open for future showrunners to bring him back.

I actually like Clara though, as opposed to Mel. Mel, for me, is the opposite of Donna - have no issues with the actor (though to be fair, haven't seen Bonnie Langford in anything else); but can't stand the character.

It was... okay. The Daleks have become the equivalent though of Pertwee-era Master. Overused, are fast losing their fear/shock value. I've never been terribly fond of the Daleks; but I did like Dalek and the series 1 finale. Every Dalek story since then I've either hated, or thought "This would have been nice except for the Daleks."

Outside of Delgado, I haven't really been fond of the Master; so this story was a bit of a miss for me. It wasn't badly done (Though, I really wish every time they referenced a classic Doctor it wasn't T. Baker), but with the villains being ones I don't engage with, it didn't grab me.
Stanley Newton
player, 376 posts
Fri 25 Sep 2015
at 12:53
  • msg #294

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
That's been the writing style since the beginning of the new series: if viewers can figure it out themselves or trust that it makes sense, then don't bother explaining it. Lazy writing, but the current TV style. Apparently RTD borrowed it from The West Wing.


I could have forgotten things about the earlier series, but I think Moffat does it a lot more (or worse) than RTD. In series four there was the Master's ring to explain his resurrection, which might not be a very good explanation, but at least it is something.

Edit: I just remembered the nonsense with mind-wiped Donna having some sort of, never explained, protection. That was also pretty lazy.
This message was last edited by the player at 12:55, Fri 25 Sept 2015.
Sereth
player, 804 posts
Fri 25 Sep 2015
at 13:00
  • msg #295

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'd prefer no explanation than one than doesn't make sense...

The End of Time, IMO, was just about the worst piece of fanwankery that has ever existed in Doctor Who; that is supposedly canon. Sound of the Drums was bad; End of Time was far worse. I have never come closer to quitting the fandom than after seeing it. In fact, the only reason I did was that it was RTD's final episode. It was ludicrous, made no sense in various parts; made you wonder why the Doctor is really mourning the timelords when they weren't collateral damage; the whole reason he did what he did in part was actually to stop the timelords. Not to mention Rassilon becoming exactly what he had set up the Game of Rassilon to stop people becoming.
The Guardian
GM, 1358 posts
Sun 27 Sep 2015
at 00:34
  • msg #296

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Well, will ya look at that.  They imported Trav's glasses into the show with that other guy in it....
The Traveller
player, 1176 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Mon 28 Sep 2015
at 02:51
  • msg #297

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
I'd prefer no explanation than one than doesn't make sense...

The End of Time, IMO, was just about the worst piece of fanwankery that has ever existed in Doctor Who; that is supposedly canon. Sound of the Drums was bad; End of Time was far worse. I have never come closer to quitting the fandom than after seeing it. In fact, the only reason I did was that it was RTD's final episode. It was ludicrous, made no sense in various parts; made you wonder why the Doctor is really mourning the timelords when they weren't collateral damage; the whole reason he did what he did in part was actually to stop the timelords. Not to mention Rassilon becoming exactly what he had set up the Game of Rassilon to stop people becoming.


The Time Lords becoming monsters is a objection in some circles of Who fandom, but this has always been a running theme since the 4th Doctor. At least explaining it from Trav's POV - she saw her people become evil, and even succumbed to it herself. The actions of the leadership doesn't necessarily mean that the entire culture or people are lost.

Also, Doctor Who doesn't have a canon. Do a Google for "Paul Cornell Canonicity In Doctor Who" to find his article. Canon is a dirty word that fans use to try to claim a non-existent ownership over a media franchise and shame other fans for how they like to enjoy a media property. Doctor Who has a kind of continuity.

If Gary ever decides to pick up on it, the return of the Time Lords could be a big, big thing. Trav would regard a returned Rassilon as being the number A-1 threat to the cosmos. While she didn't partake in the vote, she saw it - she was there (as an officer of the Gallifreyan military, she wasn't part of the Parliament and didnt't vote). She'd be a true renegade Time Lord, in that she'd do everything in her power to organize a defense against Rassilon's high council and the Daleks to prevent their plan to annihilate the cosmos or another Time War. There's also the matter that nearly every evil thing she did during the Time War was at his direct order (using all the weapons in the vault of Omega, for instance.)

While it probably wouldn't stop me from being a fan of Who, whitewashing Rassilon would really, really fuck up my portrayal of current Trav.
The Traveller
player, 1177 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Mon 28 Sep 2015
at 02:51
  • msg #298

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Hey Gary, if Missy can stop all the planes of the world in mid flight, can I? ;)
Sereth
player, 807 posts
Mon 28 Sep 2015
at 02:58
  • msg #299

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Timelords being bad guys I don't object to. Rassilon being one I do. They should have left him dead, rather than actually flip his character like that.

And Doctor Who has a canon. It can vary from person to person; but if there's not a generally agreed upon things that definitely happened, then it is far, far too confusing. Generally, I think everyone should say the TV series happened. If some people want to add the books, or the comics, or whatever, that's fine; but you shouldn't ignore parts of the TV series because it doesn't fit.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1140 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Mon 28 Sep 2015
at 03:52
  • msg #300

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

So, it was... okay. It felt like it was assembled for the sake of revisiting Davros than for having a good story to tell. It relied on everyone doing something dumb: Clara just going along with whatever the Master told her to do (she should be wiser than that); Davros's plan being doomed to failure from conception; and the Doctor going along with it despite the cost and the risk. There's no indication that the Daleks were sick or dying, or needed to be renewed with regeneration energy, or that anything changed as a result, so it was pointless.

Please no sonic glasses, please no sonic glasses. Ugh. It's a horrible return to sad gimmicks like the bow-tie and fez.

I can accept the Time Lords as evil and monstrous in the late stages of the Time War. After all, I saw the War in Heaven arc in the novels it was based on, and, well... Things got so much worse. The new series Time War hasn't shown enough to fully justify it, but in light of prior EU continuity, I can well understand why the Doctor would feel the need to destroy Gallifrey, again, to stop it happening, again. Actually, I have plans for this in my own game. ;)

Rassilon was suggested to be villainous in The Five Doctors, his plot being as much to trap those who would challenge him. He wasn't even fully dead. EU lore goes further, his image being as much propaganda as truth, and the suggestion he was a vampire. Still, I didn't like him coming back, especially because the story was crap and Timothy Dalton was just such a generic villain.

For me, canon is everything that's licensed, all media and ranges. I may not have seen/read/heard all or any of it, I may not like it, but I accept it, even when it contradicts. That's limited by what I remember and what I choose to use.
This message was last edited by the player at 05:15, Mon 28 Sept 2015.
Sereth
player, 808 posts
Mon 28 Sep 2015
at 03:58
  • msg #301

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
For me, canon is everything that's licensed, all media and ranges. I may not have seen/read/heard all or any of it, I may not like it, but I accept it, even when it contradicts. That's limited by what I remember and what I choose to use.


... so that means Curse of Fatal Death is canon?

The Five Doctors, at least as originally done, not necessary what was stated afterwards, stated that

"Rassilon knew that any who sought immortality were dangerous, thus he created this trap."
Smoke Alarm
player, 1141 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Mon 28 Sep 2015
at 05:14
  • msg #302

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

No, I don't count parodies and satires. I don't know why some fans would. They're set in the same universe, maybe, but not even remotely in continuity.

Even in the episode, the Second Doctor said "So the official history says, but there are many rumours and legends to the contrary. Some say his fellow Time Lords rebelled against his cruelty and locked him in the Tower in eternal sleep." Afterward, the First Doctor actually said "It was all part of Rassilon's trap to find out who wanted immortality and put him out of the way. He knew very well that immortality was a curse, not a blessing.", which is slightly different in purpose.

There's a transcript here:
http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/20-7.htm
Sereth
player, 809 posts
Mon 28 Sep 2015
at 05:22
  • msg #303

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I think it's ambiguous enough to be either. The last bit sounds to me more like he thought immortality wasn't a good thing, but anyway.

However, the real issue I have with End of Time; is that I don't think it jives with the modern series up until now (where it's suggested the timelords being killed was an unavoidable side effect of taking out the Daleks); or, not to start Trav on another 50th anniversary rant, afterwards.

I'm going to shut up now. But I can't go along with an argument which says "it should have been more like the way they did it in the End of Time".
Smoke Alarm
player, 1142 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Mon 28 Sep 2015
at 05:42
  • msg #304

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

My issue with "The End of Time" is that it exists. And everything in it. :)

I realised last week that, with Gallifrey and the Time Lords now being around but hidden, and Skaro and the Daleks being around but hidden, the Time War hasn't actually ended. The Doctor just forced a cease-fire.

Ironically, the 1997 EDA War of the Daleks by John Peel, once a ridiculous piece of fanwank and retconning, is now clearly the greatest novel of the Time War.
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/War_of_the_Daleks


BTW, I loved seeing classic-model Daleks, and actually doing stuff, and without those hideous Paradigms stinking up the place. They even seem to fly on 60s comics hoverbouts, if you squint at the long-range shots of the city.
Stanley Newton
player, 378 posts
Mon 28 Sep 2015
at 22:01
  • msg #305

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Witch's Familiar was better than I thought it would be. We finally got an explanation for how the Master survived being shot :).
Smoke Alarm
player, 1145 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Tue 29 Sep 2015
at 03:08
  • msg #306

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

No one's dead until you see the body, I guess.

I pretty much expected it, for the deaths in "Death in Heaven" and "The Magician's Apprentice". It was the same get-out clause in "Time Heist". It was that or the Doctor would change time so it never happened.
Sereth
player, 810 posts
Tue 29 Sep 2015
at 03:18
  • msg #307

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Eh. The Master has frequently 'died'. Him dying permanently is about as likely as the Doctor running out of regenerations. And we've been having that get-out clause since the Bad Wolf arc - Rose was supposedly exterminated during the season 1 finale. But wait, she wasn't. It was a trick.
Sereth
player, 812 posts
Tue 29 Sep 2015
at 04:37
  • msg #308

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Also, I agree with Smoke re: sonic glasses.

The Doctor's fashion has always been out there; pre Eccleston anyway. But he never carried on about it. I'd actually like the Doctor to have to go sonicless again for a bit.
Stanley Newton
player, 380 posts
Thu 1 Oct 2015
at 22:36
  • msg #309

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

To my surprise, the BBC announced a new spin-off series. It is a YA series set at Coal Hill school apparently.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doc...b9-8184-f1b6567260f1

What do you think?
Sereth
player, 819 posts
Thu 1 Oct 2015
at 22:41
  • msg #310

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

quote:
With all the action, heart and adrenalin of the best YA fiction (Buffy the Vampire Slayer, The Hunger Games)


Just no. That's not Doctor Who.
The Traveller
player, 1184 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Fri 2 Oct 2015
at 01:12
  • msg #311

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I just saw the episode. It was OK. Davros turning cackling at the end and the whole "hybrid" nonsense and then "well, that was what I planned to do" was kind of cheap, but on the other hand Clara being trapped in the Dalek travel machine was actually frightening. Overall, a B-. Also, Gonzalez is starting to grate a little.

In Travcanon, we can see that 12 has dug out the plans to 2nd Traveller's old glasses, updated to be shades (back in the very 1st rpg.net DWAITAS PBP, 2nd Trav didn't use a sonic, but had a pair of glasses - she was sonic-less.)
The Traveller
player, 1185 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Fri 2 Oct 2015
at 01:15
  • msg #312

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

In reply to Stanley Newton (msg # 309):

I won't judge the show until I see it, but they my issue with spin off shows is that if they try to ride off of a character, then they need to have that character be in the show (for example, in Sarah Jane adventures, they actually had Sarah Jane have K-9 in the show, had Matt Smith guest star, had Dr Who monsters and had UNIT be an element.) If this is going to be a Whoniverse show, it better have Whoniverse elements. This is part of what Torchwood flop.
Sereth
player, 820 posts
Fri 2 Oct 2015
at 01:22
  • msg #313

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Traveller:
In reply to Stanley Newton (msg # 309):

If this is going to be a Whoniverse show, it better have Whoniverse elements. This is part of what Torchwood flop.


A -successful- spin-off has very little relation to the original material as time goes on.

As an example:
NCIS, was originally a spin-off of JAG. It's now it's own successful franchise.

Sarah-Jane adventures was not successful because of K-9, or Matt Smith; or even Jo Grant.

Torchwood was fine at first; it's failure was poor writing not lack of Doctor Who elements.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1151 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Fri 2 Oct 2015
at 02:46
  • msg #314

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Ugh. I wish they'd stop reaching for Buffy, it's much too old to use as a model. And please don't copy The Hunger Games, post-apocalyptic drama is not really relevant to this. YA fiction seems to be an awful of lazy clones of whatever the last popular thing was, usually missing what teens are interested in.

Spin-offs and multiple shows divide the production team's focus too much, and usually one or the other suffers because of it. Some seasons of Who and Torchwood failed that way. I want the showrunner paying maximum attention to Who, because it needs it, and it is the flagship.

A spin-off is a delicate balance, I feel. It needs to have some elements and flavour of the original to draw fans from one to the other, but also needs enough that is new and different to stand on its own and justify itself. If it has nothing of the original, then why be a spin-off, why not just be an original thing? If it's got almost nothing, then it's a lazy attempt to trade off the name of a more popular series.

Class has to be the laziest, most uninteresting name ever. It's set at Coal Hill School, which has Who significance, but isn't interesting on its own. I don't know if Clara is going to be in it, but I don't think she can really carry it.

I liked The Sarah Jane Adventures, but enough is enough.

Though I was thinking a good crossover between ATTT and Doctor Who circa Series 8/9 could see Smoke Alarm going undercover as a student at Coal Hill School. :D


There was really no reason for the Master to be in that, was there? There was no big thing of the Doctor and Master not being enemies, that was the Doctor and Davros. She was there to pad out the running time (pruning back the unnecessary bits, this could have been a single episode), do things Clara could have done herself, and come back for the sake of coming back.

BTW, it's Gomez, not Gonzalez.

Well, "Under the Lake" should be something relatively straight-forward and simple, so fingers crossed for something better.
The Traveller
player, 1186 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Fri 2 Oct 2015
at 16:25
  • msg #315

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yeah, sorry about that.

Gomez was actually kind of unnecessary in the whole thing, except maybe to establish her as being around for future episodes.

This seemed to me to be more or less a kind of Davros reset episode. Overall, it was kind of lazy. I dont know, must think more on this.
Sereth
player, 821 posts
Fri 2 Oct 2015
at 16:41
  • msg #316

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

That wasn't even necessary. Taking out Delgado; as he was IMO by far and away the best Master; the Master is always at his best when unsuspected. By bringing her back, we now suspect. Which is going to lessen any impact.

I'm just sick to death of Daleks. Davros; as one of the few non-Timelords who have ever rivalled the Doctor for intelligence; could be a worthy foe if used sparingly. At least they haven't pretended the Daleks have ever had any love or respect for Davros. Despite everything, he is not a Dalek, and so will be exterminated.

I would actually like a series with all fresh villains, or if you insist on bringing back old villains, at least make them niche villains; not the ones every man and his dog have heard of. No Daleks, Cybermen, Sontarans or even Ice Warriors. But if you want to bring back the Rutans or the Logopolitians, go for it. If there's a reason for it other than 'the classic fans will squee'.

And no Master, and for goodness sake, no bloody Rani. (Not that they have, or I expect them to, but the fans always clamor for it). Not the Meddling Monk either, unless you actually -do- get Patrick Stewart to agree. (Again, the possibility of this would be around the 0.000000001% chance).
Smoke Alarm
player, 1154 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Sat 3 Oct 2015
at 07:26
  • msg #317

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Davros should have stayed dead at the end of "Genesis...", when the first Daleks exterminated him. Keeping him around just diminishes the Daleks.

It's sad that the new series hasn't yet come up with any recurring villains of the level of the Daleks, Cybermen, and the Master. Slitheen and Judoon are gimmicky, but done better in SJA and hardly big season-ending threats. Maybe only the Weeping Angels come close, but they hardly work for big threat stories. Classic ideas seem to work the best.

I feel Series 1 should have not used the Daleks. Originally, rights issues were such that they were going to use what became the Toclafene (which are basically Daleks anyway). They suck, but the new series might not have felt compelled to use them as a crutch ever since.

Or they could take a rubbish monster of the past, then revise it and build it up into something terrifying. Like Quarks. :D
Sereth
player, 823 posts
Sat 3 Oct 2015
at 12:58
  • msg #318

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

What I find amusing is that, outside of the Daleks and Cybermen, very few of the 'iconic' monsters were really used -that- much. Ice Warriors had I think 4 stories in the classic series; Sontarans 3. Zygons had 1!

Weeping Angels might have been a very good iconic villain; except they keep recreating their mythology.

"Don't blink, don't look away, not even for a second... err but if you do that, then they get in your head, so forget everything I just said!"
The Traveller
player, 1188 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Sun 4 Oct 2015
at 00:29
  • msg #319

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

When they use the Daleks, I like it when the Daleks are actually *smart* and they're clever and ruthless and tactical. It's very easy to write lazily with the Daleks. I think that overall the bulk of Cyberman stories are better than Dalek stories.

Also, I hated the reset with Davros at the end. I hate it when stories don't have *consequences*.

They're turning Doctor Who into a *brand*, which is killing it for me.

I like that ATTT has it's own unique villains, monsters and factions (the Chamber of Time Unwrought, the Gehennans, the Fists) and that we haven't seen a single Dalek travel machine, but only parts of them.

I'm really down with using monsters and aliens who appear only a few times, like Sereth as actual Draconian, or the cat people who were important during the New Galveston episodes of ATTT or our Cyberman/Osirian episode (which is still one of my all time favorites when we were gaming at RPG.net.)
The Traveller
player, 1189 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Sun 4 Oct 2015
at 00:32
  • msg #320

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Guardian:
Well, will ya look at that.  They imported Trav's glasses into the show with that other guy in it....


IKR. That's because ATTT is a much better show with better writers and a much better show writer and ATTT has much better ratings. I hear that Moffat is begging for a crossover episode but that ATTT's showrunner isn't hearing it and won't take Moffat's calls!
Smoke Alarm
player, 1155 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Mon 5 Oct 2015
at 02:32
  • msg #321

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Well, I liked "Under the Lake". It had a very classic-series-style start, with the Doctor and companion landing in an unknown place, discovering the various mysteries, and working things out for themselves. I don't think the new series has really done that before.

Then it moved into a rather well-done base-under-siege story. There's mysteries and puzzles, but ones the viewers can solve as they watch, not like Moffat showing off his cleverness.

I'm not sure why the Doctor is so willing to believe in ghosts and life-after-death, having encountered so very many that are lost time travellers, aliens, creatures from parallel universes, etc. He seems to veer between enormously sceptical and quick-to-believer, but that seems to be his thing after "Robot of Sherwood" and "Listen".

Also, ghosts? Actual ghosts? I'm going to go with stolen psychic energy, that makes more sense. :)

The connection of the words to coordinates comes right out of left-field, and the understanding of constellations is very dubious (at least someone knows they depend on perspective, but Orion's Belt is more of a V-shape from any other angle). I think I can rationalise that as alien writing and descriptions being filtered through human minds and voiceboxes.

So, the wretched sonic glasses made an appearance. Just the once, fortunately. Hopefully they'll be abandoned as quickly as New Paradigm Daleks. :p I really, really, really, really hope we don't get a Doctor who lowers his cool shades and says or does something "cool".

All these two-parters are going to get frustrating.

I'm hoping "Before the Flood" isn't going to be a temporal paradox story.
The Traveller
player, 1190 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Mon 5 Oct 2015
at 16:01
  • msg #322

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Hey, don't diss the glasses, now ;)

For the record, 2nd Trav never back in the old days had "sonic" glasses - her old Yomiko Readman glasses were sensory devices and did some hacking. She couldn't make holes in walls or do screwdriver stuff with them. Gary, back me up here, back in the game with Henry Boyd. 5th Trav would think that specs that could do active stuff would be kinda gauche.

Trav absolutely believes in magic, in that there are some things that simply refuse to be explained. But this is because of IC play experienced - she walked with angels, went to hell and met real gods. There were things which Gallifreyan science simply could not explain, including small mysteries of faith. Trav has seen evidence of that even before she went to R-Space, so, she's cool with it, and considers her people's scientific arrogance one of their failings. One of the reasons why the Faction Paradox and Morbius Cults arose was because the Gallifreyan heart ached for religion and mystery, which it had excised from it's heart in it's quest for absolute knowledge. One of the tragedies of the Time War was the lost chance at reconciliation with the sisterhood of Karn. And Trav is a specific AU character and not strict Whoniverse at all, because she was created for a RIFTS game. That's why I do more Robotech call outs - Robotech, despite it being transforming fighter planes and motorcycles, is still ostensibly SF, as opposed to RIFTS which has ghosts and dragons.

It's funny when I compare Trav to the Doctor and how they're developing, and I imagine what they'll finally say to each other when they do meet.

I'll be watching the new episode this Thursday most likely.



The 2nd Traveller gets a call from the Brig. Her TARDIS Library is such a mess!
This message was last edited by the player at 16:10, Mon 05 Oct 2015.
The Traveller
player, 1192 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Mon 5 Oct 2015
at 16:08
  • msg #323

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
Well, I liked "Under the Lake". It had a very classic-series-style start, with the Doctor and companion landing in an unknown place, discovering the various mysteries, and working things out for themselves. I don't think the new series has really done that before.

Then it moved into a rather well-done base-under-siege story. There's mysteries and puzzles, but ones the viewers can solve as they watch, not like Moffat showing off his cleverness.

I'm not sure why the Doctor is so willing to believe in ghosts and life-after-death, having encountered so very many that are lost time travellers, aliens, creatures from parallel universes, etc. He seems to veer between enormously sceptical and quick-to-believer, but that seems to be his thing after "Robot of Sherwood" and "Listen".

Also, ghosts? Actual ghosts? I'm going to go with stolen psychic energy, that makes more sense. :)

The connection of the words to coordinates comes right out of left-field, and the understanding of constellations is very dubious (at least someone knows they depend on perspective, but Orion's Belt is more of a V-shape from any other angle). I think I can rationalise that as alien writing and descriptions being filtered through human minds and voiceboxes.

So, the wretched sonic glasses made an appearance. Just the once, fortunately. Hopefully they'll be abandoned as quickly as New Paradigm Daleks. :p I really, really, really, really hope we don't get a Doctor who lowers his cool shades and says or does something "cool".

All these two-parters are going to get frustrating.

I'm hoping "Before the Flood" isn't going to be a temporal paradox story.


Back when I made 5th Trav in Rifts, I had this idea she'd be playing guitar, but then I realized what a dumb gamer idea it was. So, I filed it in the back of my mind that Trav would play guitar *badly*, and now I occasionally have her DJ dubstep and the like. Capaldi strumming in a Guitar like Bill and Ted kinda made me cringe.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1159 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Tue 6 Oct 2015
at 03:21
  • msg #324

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I can forgive it, Capaldi used to be in a band and can really play.

At last, the Doctor Who Lego set:
https://ideas.lego.com/blogs/1-blog/post/44

A bit disappointing. "The Time of the Doctor" is two years old now, something based on the current setup would have been more relevant (plus I liked Series 8 more). I'm going to have to buy the expensive Dimensions set to get a proper 12th Doctor (well, I was going to buy that anyway, and I don't even plan to get the game).

Still, it's a lovely set. But I think I'm going to tinker with it endlessly to improve it. :)

Presumably this is set between "The Time of the Doctor" and "Deep Breath". And I have a big Lego T-Rex too... I'm definitely going to make a Doctor Who and the Pirates display. And maybe try for something with the Autons & Nestene Consciousness, because that would be just so fitting.

Now to find spare parts for a Kang.
Sereth
player, 824 posts
Tue 6 Oct 2015
at 03:25
  • msg #325

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
And I have a big Lego T-Rex too... I'm definitely going to make a Doctor Who and the Pirates display. And maybe try for something with the Autons & Nestene Consciousness, because that would be just so fitting.

Now to find spare parts for a Kang.


ANd when you do, you must post photos.
The Guardian
GM, 1371 posts
Tue 6 Oct 2015
at 04:08
  • msg #326

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

So, this was a thing today:

quote:
In December 2015, the Time War will rage and only one man can save us. John Hurt is The War Doctor!

John Hurt, the world-renowned star of film and television, is returning to the role of The War Doctor, in twelve full-cast Doctor Who audio plays.


But they buried the lead:

quote:
The cast of The War Doctor also includes Jacqueline Pearce, who plays Time Lord Cardinal Ollistra — an arch manipulator who is waging the Time War against the Daleks.


Now, I know that the Marshall is supposed to have been Kate Mulgrew: one can hardly have missed that.

However:

Cardinal Ollistra

Traveller


COINCIDENCE ?!?!?!?

8-o
Sereth
player, 825 posts
Tue 6 Oct 2015
at 04:17
  • msg #327

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

She also seems outstandingly good at playing those arch manipulators.

Chessene in the Two Doctors, Servalan...

Aaah Servalan. The one villain who might rival my admiration for the Delgado-Master.
The Traveller
player, 1193 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Tue 6 Oct 2015
at 04:59
  • msg #328

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Guardian:
So, this was a thing today:

quote:
In December 2015, the Time War will rage and only one man can save us. John Hurt is The War Doctor!

John Hurt, the world-renowned star of film and television, is returning to the role of The War Doctor, in twelve full-cast Doctor Who audio plays.


But they buried the lead:

quote:
The cast of The War Doctor also includes Jacqueline Pearce, who plays Time Lord Cardinal Ollistra — an arch manipulator who is waging the Time War against the Daleks.


Now, I know that the Marshall is supposed to have been Kate Mulgrew: one can hardly have missed that.

However:

Cardinal Ollistra

Traveller


COINCIDENCE ?!?!?!?

8-o


Kate was busy filming Orange is the New Black so they had to call in other Voice Talent. The Marshall, for her part, was pulling some Delgado style disguise shenanigans.

In actual Trav Canon, The Marshall is out in the field with Exigency, directly smashing the Daleks in secret Time War operations, directly leading Gallifreyan troops in mind bending Time War Manoevres (see, I spelled it british-like.)

OR MAYBE BOTH.

Good to see that your Marshall fandom loyalty is fierce. Discipline and Order!
This message was last edited by the player at 05:02, Tue 06 Oct 2015.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1161 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Tue 6 Oct 2015
at 08:10
  • msg #329

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm sad that Big Finish is the only classic-era expanded universe range still going. I just have no head for the audios. I bought two months ago and still haven't even thought to listen to them.

Oh, wait, there's Titan comics now doing Eighth Doctor comics and I think a bit of the War Doctor.


Wait, is her full name Ollistraveller?
The Traveller
player, 1195 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Tue 6 Oct 2015
at 14:12
  • msg #330

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
I'm sad that Big Finish is the only classic-era expanded universe range still going. I just have no head for the audios. I bought two months ago and still haven't even thought to listen to them.

Oh, wait, there's Titan comics now doing Eighth Doctor comics and I think a bit of the War Doctor.


Wait, is her full name Ollistraveller?


YOU ARE KIDDING ME.

I CALL SHENANIGANS.
The Traveller
player, 1196 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Tue 6 Oct 2015
at 14:27
  • msg #331

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

ICly, Trav's Gallifreyan name is Travellendatarura, btw. ;)
Sereth
player, 826 posts
Tue 6 Oct 2015
at 14:32
  • msg #332

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Or so she says. You can't believe anything a timelord says...
The Traveller
player, 1198 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Tue 6 Oct 2015
at 20:18
  • msg #333

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I HEARD THAT. *shakes fist*

Actually, Trav is an awful liar.

Her only really good lies are shenanigans. Like when she convinced that Fist that she was a put upon civilian when Smoke was causing trouble.

Trav is literally the anti-Doctor in many ways.
This message was last edited by the player at 20:20, Tue 06 Oct 2015.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1163 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Wed 7 Oct 2015
at 03:26
  • msg #334

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

BTW, I have to say, you have good Time Lord names. Outside the Doctor and Master, most fans and writers make up typical alien names or pick titles that just don't really work in speech. But Traveller and Marshall just seem to work fine.

Of course, I say this playing a character called Smoke Alarm... :) (which I'm really pleased with, myself).
Sereth
player, 827 posts
Wed 7 Oct 2015
at 03:33
  • msg #335

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

You mean like 'the Rani'?
Smoke Alarm
player, 1164 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Wed 7 Oct 2015
at 04:09
  • msg #336

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yes, or the Corsair or the Monk.

The DWAITAS set discussed choosing workable names for Time Lords, suggesting things like "Time Thief" would sound silly.

The titles like Castellan or Coordinator, etc., do work in the formal settings of Gallifrey stories, but would sound ridiculous outside. The Brigadier also works for his military background, but at least he has a real name as well. :)
Sereth
player, 828 posts
Wed 7 Oct 2015
at 04:13
  • msg #337

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I didn't mind the Monk or the Corsair. I always thought the Rani sounded silly. What's 'the Rani' even mean?

It's also possible this is my strong anti-Rani bias.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1165 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Wed 7 Oct 2015
at 04:22
  • msg #338

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

It's Hindu for "princess" or "queen". Which makes no sense whatsoever for the character, as she has no Indian theme, and is a scientist, not a conqueror, bar that planet she rules. But this is Pip & Jane Baker, who think a thesaurus is the secret to good writing.
The Traveller
player, 1202 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Wed 7 Oct 2015
at 04:43
  • msg #339

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
BTW, I have to say, you have good Time Lord names. Outside the Doctor and Master, most fans and writers make up typical alien names or pick titles that just don't really work in speech. But Traveller and Marshall just seem to work fine.

Of course, I say this playing a character called Smoke Alarm... :) (which I'm really pleased with, myself).


Why thank you. Coming from an old school Whovian, I consider that quite the high praise.
The Traveller
player, 1203 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Wed 7 Oct 2015
at 04:59
  • msg #340

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Two Time Lords the Traveller encountered in her Rifts campaign were the villainous Mathematician and her ally (yet someone she didn't like) Tangent of 90.

The Mathematician allied with a sect of magicians who combined Time Lord science with magic to use PPE to "buy off" temporal paradox, creating temporal impossibilities. Trav regarded him as utterly mad, because without the immense magic energy from nearby ley line conjunctions, the time lines would reassert themselves, causing temporal paradoxes and destruction the likes of which she saw during the Time War. The Mathematician tried to convince the Traveller to join him and his faction - "You could save the Time Lords, have everything you ever wanted, do away with the burdens and curse of a Time Lord." She replied to him, "You asshole. You're creating a fake and a cheat. Without that stolen life energy, the paradoxes will resolve themselves and all those worlds will *stop being*. You'll blow this planet up."

Tangent of 90, on the other hand, was the only survivor of his Gallifrey, and had the same role in his cosmos as Trav had in hers, and had cannabilized his TARDIS to hold the RIFTS Earth timeline together to stop the Mathematician and his faction, in a reverse of what the Simms Master did with his year of hell - his TARDIS was acting as a cap and filter, maintaining normal time. Trav rushed in and helped him stabilize his TARDIS construct and finish his equations (being one of three Gallifeyans on that RIFTS Earth.) She held his cannibalized TARDIS together and did spot repairs on the block-transfer equations and let him rest and get healing, food and rest while fixing it (Trav knew things about block transfer tech he didn't, having created/recovered Omega's Time Lock back in her version of N-Space). After recovering, Tangent of 90 became the PC group's ally against the Shedraya time demons, and Trav's scientific sounding board and real only colleague. His technology and history and Gallifrey were slightly different - he didn't have a Doctor, but had Daleks. They both knew they could never, ever go home, and that all Gallifreys were lost and dead. He chose his name because he prided himself as a thorough scientist, but that he always strove to look in unconventional directions of established scientific principles that others hadn't considered - "tangents". Trav suspected that he was his world's version of the Doctor. He was kind of rude but honorable. He chose not to time travel any more but to instead stay at 62 PA and keep the Mathematician and his cabal from any more paradox experiments - "I'll leave the time travel adventures to you."
Sereth
player, 829 posts
Wed 7 Oct 2015
at 21:44
  • msg #341

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

So saw the episode. Not particularly impressed. Toby Whithouse has usually been one of the new series writers that most impresses me; but not this time. And if they really are ghosts (something I'm not actually convinced of, for a couple of reasons) I'll be even more unimpressed.

Travellers rift-canon not withstanding; Doctor Who has always been a case of "the most advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." They've played with the power of faith (Curse of Fenric, the Daemons), powers of the mind (Planet of the Spiders, the Shakespeare Code) and even powers beyond even the Doctor's understanding (Greatest Show in the Galaxy, Satan's Pit). We've had vampires and werewolves. We've had all sorts of things that are usually supernatural; but in the world of Doctor Who are not.

If we really take that step to saying the supernatural is real, and out there? I dunno. I don't think I like it.
The Traveller
player, 1205 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Wed 7 Oct 2015
at 21:47
  • msg #342

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

As for this setting, that's all Trav's backstory. I'll never demand that Gary make the supernatural explicitly real. If he makes it so that's Dr Who standard, that's fine by me. I consider myself lucky that I get away with mentions of transforming fighter planes.
This message was last edited by the player at 21:47, Wed 07 Oct 2015.
Sereth
player, 830 posts
Wed 7 Oct 2015
at 21:52
  • msg #343

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm not fussed when it comes to -this- game. If the supernatural is actually real in this game? Okay.

But I don't want that to be true for standard Doctor Who.
The Traveller
player, 1206 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Wed 7 Oct 2015
at 22:00
  • msg #344

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I don't mind if that's kept in the eye of the beholder, but if Moffat came out and said that was the case, I'd be looking at him squint eyed.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1168 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Thu 8 Oct 2015
at 00:42
  • msg #345

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Classic Doctor Who always had that ethos of science over superstition, that there is a rational explanation behind strange and apparently magical events and monsters, even if it's just technobabble or way beyond our comprehension, it's still something comprehendable. The Doctor himself was a scientist and inventor. That's something the new series has sometimes forgotten.
The Traveller
player, 1215 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Sun 11 Oct 2015
at 23:18
  • msg #346

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I just saw the most recent two parter. Plugging his glasses into a panel? Holo projections?

"Really, Boobie? Really?"

Its so mid life crisis. Also, 2nd Traveller played guitar and badly (this is from the Rifts stuff. I did not make this up!) Palladium had these awful "instrumecha" sonic weapons for Invid Invasion that I joked Trav must have made for Scott Bernard and his crew when she was drunk or something. I swear I am not making this up.



The look you get when your fellow Time Lord is imitating you at your worst and is not being ironic.
This message was last edited by the player at 23:19, Sun 11 Oct 2015.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1173 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Mon 12 Oct 2015
at 01:22
  • msg #347

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

"Before the Flood" was so disappointing, just an utter shambles.

Spending the whole opening just to explain the bootstrap paradox, thus spoiling the resolution was idiotic. Is this what we do now, have the Doctor explain the plot and theme to the audience, treating them as idiots? New-series Who has done stacks of this kind of thing, and much better and more complicated, ("Blink", "The Big Bang"), and never felt the need to explain like this. It's not even clear how the ghost messages were supposed to give the Doctor the idea, or where the Doctor got the opportunity to implement them. Then the story completely missed the actual bootstrap paradox – the Doctor blatantly telling the Fisher King exactly what he was going to do.

Ironically, my Telstra T-Box recorder (and such a piece of shit that is) tried to spare me this, cutting out until the credits rolled. I should've kept watching, but hopped on ABC iView to see what I missed. Just wasted time and spoiled plot.

And the Fisher King: a name stolen from Arthurian legend applied to a generic, baseless baddie, with absolutely no connection or thought. The Russian village was also pointless, as was the Tivolian. And what was with that sea monster mural? It's all just random ideas tossed in without any thought.

Cass was pretty cool as a capable, deaf character, as was apparently written in the script as such. You'd expect her deafness to play an important role in the story like she can't pass on the message, but nope, they didn't think that through.

And men and women suddenly pairing up for no reason and no with apparent prior attraction. Whatever happened to friendship? And one was a blatant fridging.

Ugh. This season of two-parters is going to be a hard road.
Sereth
player, 838 posts
Mon 12 Oct 2015
at 11:48
  • msg #348

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Oh gods. Oh no. Just no. No, no and no.

Firstly - can we go sonicless? Or gadgetless entirely? Look, I love Pertwee and his gadgets as much as the next guy. But seriously, in the first 8 Doctors, that was unique. That was his thing. The new series makes having gadgets being a thing for all the Doctors - and it really wasn't. That, and not even Capaldi carries it off with such panache as Pertwee did. JNT got rid of the sonic - arguably the best thing he did in his reign as Executive Producer (showrunner for all intents and purposes). Ban it. Destroy it. Have the part of the TARDIS that just creates them automatically (and let's remember that the original was supposedly created by the Doctor himself), be broken. Whatever.

Also; I like Moffatt, I really do. But the overuse since he became Showrunner of 'Timey-Wimey Wibbly-Wobbly' is starting to grate. With Blink it was great, beautiful. Let's play with Time Travel as more than just a mode of transport. With Big Bang/Pandorica Opens it works. But since Capaldi especially, it's starting to feel a bit overused, a bit tired. It seems to be that the joke about RTD's era was 'the Doctor must always be alone'; we're in a real danger here of Moffatt's era becoming known as 'timey-wimey, wibbly-wobbly' or 'the bootstrap paradox' era.

I was all prepared for 'Timey Wimey' to become a Tennant phrase much like "reverse the polarity of the neutron flow" or "There should have been another way" were phrases of earlier Doctors - as in said once, repeated so often that people have begun to believe it was stated all the time. Now whilst the phrase itself has never been repeated, the meaning behind it is being used too often.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1175 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Mon 12 Oct 2015
at 12:23
  • msg #349

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I can understand Moffat's interest in time paradoxes. I've read that, coming from being a comedy writer, for him it's the same kind of elaborate set-up ending in a punchline. I haven't seen his comedy, but he is good at the time shenanigans.

Also, Moffat made his name in Who fandom with the "Continuity Errors" short story, which was very popular back in 1996, and he's been ripping it off ever since (a planet-sized library, what are monsters afraid of, etc.):
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Continuity_Errors
It's a fairly straightforward joke story of the Seventh Doctor revising someone's timeline to get his own way, like in that "A Christmas Carol" so the character changes as you read her. A short synopsis can be found here:
http://www.drwhoguide.com/who_dec3.htm

Time paradoxes are fun and clever when done well and occasionally. But Toby Whithouse showed the exact opposite.

"Timey-wimey" was bought back quite a few times:
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Timey_wimey
This message was last edited by the player at 12:26, Mon 12 Oct 2015.
Sereth
player, 840 posts
Mon 12 Oct 2015
at 13:07
  • msg #350

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I agree to a point that it was the utter lack of intelligence shown that was the big problem. But the other thing is that it was neat when it was occasional; it's just the last couple of seasons it's started to happen more and more, or so it feels. For all that was good about it, I also found that a bit frustrating with Listen - it seemed to be developing into a pattern. No-one can deny that RTD handles emotional control in his stories very well; but it doesn't change the fact that a lot of people, by the end of his run, were getting sick and tired of the 'emotional overdose'. Not -just- Classic fans; though they probably got tired of it a bit sooner. (I think I was tired of it by the end of Season 2).
The Traveller
player, 1219 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Mon 12 Oct 2015
at 20:29
  • msg #351

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm kinda glad that we don't engage heavily in temporal in-character continuity re-arranging bullshit, and that personality-wise, Trav is dead set against it. Part of it comes from her utter dedication to the sanctity of personal agency and her Time War experiences, part of it comes from me and my experiences with the Continuum RPG.

I notice that one of the things we usually don't do with our story points (and which I can't, since my SP are so slim) is use them for wholesale dramatic editing. I presume that we're generally of a more simulationist bent as a group, since all we seem to use SP for is to simply alter dice rolls or to use SP for small little things. I guess that if you wanted to do smart ass "well, Trav was smart enough to do THIS" and come up with a Moffat style BS explanation for a story win after doing a bunch of entertaining story antics (and building up a bunch of SP by invoking flaws). But I guess I do go for that, in that instead of story editing whole sale, I use my SP instead for skill rolls. Hm.

I think we're somewhere in the middle between FATE style big story gaming and hard core sim stuff.
This message was last edited by the player at 20:30, Mon 12 Oct 2015.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1176 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Tue 13 Oct 2015
at 02:01
  • msg #352

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I started in D&D 3.5, which I suppose is the ur-simulationist RPG, then other d20 systems. So I largely see Story Points as like the Action Points that some have, as a boost to rolls, though rather more useful and effective, and replenishing. Similarly, when negative outcomes do occur, I'm more inclined to just run with them for the sake of drama, rather than change things to suit. I also tend to save SPs for situations in which something special is suitable.

Then again, Smoke Alarm usually isn't in a position to change or become personally involved in a story, only to react to situations. We're not likely to see the villain suddenly fall in love her or something like in the old days. I haven't played any other DWAITAS games long enough to consider a different style.

Oddly, the most temporal shenanigans I've gotten up to in an RPG have been a d20 Modern game for the Supernatural series, where time travel is occasionally used. The game's set in 1890, so the GM worked in time travel to introduce a modern PC, and the big bad seems to tampering with my character's heritage to bring forward the circumstances of his escape. My character has travelled to the future and back, and temporally duplicated her luggage, and now she's travelled to the past and her own birthplace, and left things in a cave to save her life and set her on her path in the future, though neither of these change the story. I think it's appropriate in this case, for the character: she is now, quite literally, a self-made woman, born ahead of her time.
This message was last edited by the player at 05:40, Tue 13 Oct 2015.
Sereth
player, 842 posts
Tue 13 Oct 2015
at 02:18
  • msg #353

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

... I started in AD&D; the latter days of first and the earlier days of 2nd. Thus really, anything beyond modifying die rolls just doesn't occur to me.
The Traveller
player, 1223 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Tue 13 Oct 2015
at 04:51
  • msg #354

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

A time travel game I suggest to everyone is Aetherco's Continuum, it's the best Time Travel RPG ever written, to date - it's much more rigorous about time travel the Dr Who ever could be (it has very strict rules about information and it's effects on causality.) Dr Who and Moffat only flirt with this (the Bootstrap paradox), in Continuum, this is inalterable law. But sometimes, non-causal info does pop up, you just roll with it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...role-playing_game%29
The Traveller
player, 1243 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Wed 28 Oct 2015
at 14:26
  • msg #355

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

MOAR TIME TRAVEL:

If time-space is plastic, this still holds up:
http://phys.org/news/2011-04-s...etime-dimension.html
Smoke Alarm
player, 1201 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Tue 3 Nov 2015
at 02:34
  • msg #356

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

It's been a while since we discussed the current series.

"The Girl Who Died": Inconsequential, but a great, fun little episode.

Oh Doctor, you know that making immortal someone who wants to die with honour won't end well:
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Sato_Katsura

"The Woman Who Lived": Is not. Good stuff with the characters, but the actual story was a lazy shambles. I'm not sure Maisie Williams really worked here; she's too young to be so old. (It must suck to be stuck as a teenager for centuries.)

"The Zygon Invasion": I need to wait for the second part to really judge this, but it feels like the first story to really deserve being a two-parter and to be conceived as one. The British spy thriller is an interesting new style, but not one I enjoy. It's great to see Doctor Who really tackle and a satirise a real-world issue, which it hasn't done for years, but "The Zygon Inversion" will have to tread very carefully to avoid being offensive.
Sereth
player, 857 posts
Tue 3 Nov 2015
at 02:38
  • msg #357

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Isn't she like Jack? So you know, the TARDIS won't let her onboard? The TARDIS fled to the end of the universe to get away from Jack.

Apparently, she's got a cameo in a later episode as well. "Face the Raven" from what I hear.
Sereth
player, 858 posts
Tue 3 Nov 2015
at 02:52
  • msg #358

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Though I admit, I smirked about the Terileptils.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1202 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Tue 3 Nov 2015
at 02:53
  • msg #359

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I loved that bit. I should have watched "The Visitation" beforehand, for a perfect combo.

Could be. There's an interesting idea that the Time Lords don't like immortals and immortality. That was suggested in "Mindwarp" in "The Trial of the Time Lord", as they sent the Doctor to foil a viable brain-transplant version of immortality, specifically because it would upset the natural order (immortality that is, not brain-transplants, which they generally don't seem to care about). Rassilon set up his tomb as a trap for those who sought immortality. They probably had the choice themselves, but went for regeneration with many deaths and an ultimate limit.

Of course, when their three great gods are Time, Pain, and Death, and they're not villains, it suggests something about them:
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/D...ewyrm:_Revelation%29

I think death and lack of it is the theme of this season. Themes! So much better than story arcs! (Though I don't yet know how the Zygon story will fit into this.)
The Guardian
GM, 1397 posts
Tue 3 Nov 2015
at 03:00
  • msg #360

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
There's an interesting idea that the Time Lords don't like immortals and immortality.

See also: the Sisters of Karn, although the Doctor's reaction is limited to pointing out the long-term pitfalls to them.
Sereth
player, 859 posts
Tue 3 Nov 2015
at 03:00
  • msg #361

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

End of Time they sought immortality. But then, both at the time, and even more since; it's been stated they were just as bad as the Daleks at that point in their history.

I don't mind story arcs. (Key to Time!) What I don't like is 'arc words'.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1204 posts
Brave and bold
as a Kang could be.
Tue 3 Nov 2015
at 03:56
  • msg #362

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I don't know what they were doing in End of Time.

Like "hybrid"? They're really reaching now. I suspect they do these things now because fans expect it, but I'm hoping its a red herring.

I was thinking of story arcs in the general sense, that most shows insist on doing whether they need to or not. My preference is for a plot or situation that evolves naturally in the background, or character development across the season (which works independently on the time-zone and planet). Arc words that have little basis for being there, or portents that are little more than adverts or teasers for a finale are really just cheats in place of storytelling.

I've heard it said that when you watch an episode, you decide at the end whether it was good or not. Mystery shows like Lost and its imitators, shows with strong story arcs, and modern 10-episode miniseries that have an unfolding plot, defer that question until the next episode and onward to the finale, by which point its too late and you've watch the whole. Then it defers to the next season. So you have all these unsatisfying finales to unsatisfying series. It's a bad habit. I so want a return to true episodic television.
Stanley Newton
player, 394 posts
Wed 4 Nov 2015
at 23:36
  • msg #363

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
It's been a while since we discussed the current series.


Some interesting ideas, badly written stories. That is my impression of the series so far.

The Girl Who Died: Some good moments, but the combination of comedy and drama didn't really work for me.

The Girl Who Lived: I felt like this one could have been much better. Ashildr, as the Knightmare , forgot to use her male voice during the confrontation with Sam the Swift. Lion-man didn't really add much, so why did it have to be a fire-breathing lion? Ashildr's change of heart was way too sudden. Why the Doctor couldn't take her with him was never really explained. There is certainly room for three in the Tardis, so pick up Clara or some other mortal and problem solved...

The Zygon Invasion: The same writer as Kill the Moon :(...at least this one was slightly better. Still not very good, though. The message was anything but subtle and in my opinion about something a bit too current. The Zygons knew exactly who was operating the drone: that is some long-range telepathic connection or that specific UNIT output has been infiltrated (which isn't that unlikely, but still, they should do something about that). Those UNIT soldiers at the church...how? why? Seriously, who would fall for that? When you know you are dealing with shapeshifters...and those were UNIT troops (not borrowed troops). If they are the ones defending Earth, then we are doomed. I don't care for the Osgood character, but I like that she didn't want to tell if she was Zygon or human.

I would love to compare the 'first' version of an episode's script with the what we actually get.
This message was last edited by the player at 23:37, Wed 04 Nov 2015.
The Traveller
player, 1253 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Thu 5 Nov 2015
at 18:16
  • msg #364

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I feel that the whole several episodes were generally muddled messes. I'll come back with a more detailed analysis later, but in general I'm not impressed.
Sereth
player, 860 posts
Thu 5 Nov 2015
at 22:33
  • msg #365

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Stanley Newton:
Why the Doctor couldn't take her with him was never really explained.


It's been established in the modern series; the TARDIS doesn't like immortals. If you can't die from old age I think it's fine; but if you just cannot die; like Jack, like this girl here? She doesn't like you.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1210 posts
BLUE KANGS, BLUE KANGS,
BLUE KANGS ARE BEST!
Fri 6 Nov 2015
at 06:31
  • msg #366

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I think it's because immortals are, metaphorically, kind of timeless, unchanging and eternal. They don't quite fit with time machines or Time Lords as a concept.


Yes, this season has been, on the whole, rather problematic. The paired-episodes concept hasn't really worked thus far, generally being too rushed or needlessly expanded from one episode to two. I really hope the last five work out and salvage the season.


I have Doctor Who Lego! The level set for Lego Dimensions has just been released. The 12th Doctor and sonic screwdriver are nice (though he has a blue coat and pants rather than black), the mini-TARDIS is a rather good, and the K9 looks better in life.

Unfortunately, the instructions can only be accessed in game, which I don't have, nor even a platform to play it). I worked out the K9 models from pictures, and there's some videos online for the TARDISes.

Right now, the Polar Bear People (Chima Ice Bears) with their blue ice technology are invading Antarctica (some grey mats) and the Doctor, K9, and a plucky Arctic Explorer are escaping with a stolen crystal on a snowmobile.

I still haven't made my Smoke Alarm though.
Sereth
player, 861 posts
Fri 6 Nov 2015
at 12:53
  • msg #367

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

As Tennant stated to Jack "You're a paradox, Jack."

Of course, I have this uneasy feeling that this was plain forgotten about; and it's just obsessive fans who remember and make it make a kind of sense; that wasn't if you're not a fan.

There's been some speculation that Osgood is the next companion. She's been directly questioned on it and been rather coy on it; but I think she's more like Sally Sparrow than Clara Oswald - a companion that could have been. I'm not really sure how I feel about 'Doctor fangirls' actually existing in universe - I kind of felt the same about the science geek from the year of specials working for UNIT. Malcolm I think?
Stanley Newton
player, 396 posts
Fri 6 Nov 2015
at 21:45
  • msg #368

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
It's been established in the modern series; the TARDIS doesn't like immortals. If you can't die from old age I think it's fine; but if you just cannot die; like Jack, like this girl here? She doesn't like you.


But Jack and Ashildr have completely different types of immortality? Jack is an anomaly(a fixed point?), Ashildr has some sort of nanomachines or something keeping her alive. She can still die, but she is functionally immortal.  The TARDIS doesn't like anomalies, but I don't see why Ashildr is such a problem. There is not that much difference between her and The Doctor.
Sereth
player, 862 posts
Sat 7 Nov 2015
at 04:02
  • msg #369

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

She dies about as easily as Jack. Jack dies; he gets better. She dies; he gets better. They are from different sources; but they are both functionally immortal. The Doctor isn't even close to immortal. If he actually dies? That's it; he's dead. No coming back.
Stanley Newton
player, 397 posts
Sat 7 Nov 2015
at 11:07
  • msg #370

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
She dies about as easily as Jack. Jack dies; he gets better. She dies; he gets better. They are from different sources; but they are both functionally immortal. The Doctor isn't even close to immortal. If he actually dies? That's it; he's dead. No coming back.


Have we actually seen her die(apart from the first time)? She keeps on living, but she doesn't come back from the dead. The nanomachines repair damage and she doesn't die to diseases like the plague, but chop off her head and I think she'll die for good. Chop off Jack's head and he'll come back, because he is a fixed point in time and space. The Doctor can survive injury and disease by regenerating, but like you said, if you actually kill him, he is dead.

I think that her immortality is nothing like Jack's and more like the Doctor's longevity. I also thought that the TARDIS specifically disliked Jack's type of anomalous, space-time immortality and not immortality in general.
Sereth
player, 863 posts
Sat 7 Nov 2015
at 14:19
  • msg #371

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

She stated she'd been run through with a sword. She is far more resistant to being killed than the Doctor. As I said, I think it's a shame this wasn't stated; but when she was describing what happened to her, especially given she'd been brought back from the dead once; I immediately thought the TARDIS wouldn't get on with her. Maybe not to -quite- the extent of Jack; but certainly worse than Clara, even at the beginning of Season 7.

The Doctor has a long history of having issues with actual immortals - his own people in the End of Time, Space Vampires (err; actual Space Vampires, not those pieces of garbage wannabes from Vampires of Venice). I think there's a few instances in the expanded universe as well; but Smoke would be able to tell you about them better than I.
Stanley Newton
player, 398 posts
Sat 7 Nov 2015
at 16:42
  • msg #372

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
She stated she'd been run through with a sword. She is far more resistant to being killed than the Doctor. As I said, I think it's a shame this wasn't stated; but when she was describing what happened to her, especially given she'd been brought back from the dead once; I immediately thought the TARDIS wouldn't get on with her. Maybe not to -quite- the extent of Jack; but certainly worse than Clara, even at the beginning of Season 7.

The Doctor has a long history of having issues with actual immortals - his own people in the End of Time, Space Vampires (err; actual Space Vampires, not those pieces of garbage wannabes from Vampires of Venice). I think there's a few instances in the expanded universe as well; but Smoke would be able to tell you about them better than I.


The impression I got from the episode was that the Doctor didn't want her as companion because then they would lack the 'mortal' perspective. (but this has an easy fix) Maybe the Doctor just doesn't like immortals, but then that should have been made clearer in the episode. The TARDIS not liking her would also have been a better explanation, but I can't really accept it. I don't really remember the TARDIS not liking Clara, but she has that Impossible Girl timey-wimey stuff to explain it, just like Jack has being resurrected by the Bad Wolf. The TARDIS obviously doesn't like unnatural/paradoxical things, but I don't see why it wouldn't like 'immortals' like Ashildr.

A comparison between the 'immortals' in three situations:
1) The Doctor, Ashildr and Captain Jack receive a fatal wound (fatal for normal humans). The Doctor regenerates, Ashildr's nanomachines repair the damage and Jack resurrects.

2) Now they are all injected with a very strong (regeneration inhibiting) poison:
The Doctor dies, unable to regenerate, Ashildr's nanomachines neutralise/filter the poison and/or repair the damage it causes and Jack resurrects.

3) Now they are all beheaded:
The Doctor dies, Ashildr dies, the nanomachines can't repair that much damage and Jack resurrects.

Sure, Ashildr is probably harder to kill than the Doctor, but both can still be killed, unlike Jack. Would the TARDIS dislike biologically immortal animals like that little, immortal jellyfish (Turritopsis dohrnii)? In my opinion, there's not really a difference between Ashildr and the jellyfish (regarding the sort of immortality).

Maybe the TARDIS doesn't like her because she shouldn't be alive, because she should have died in the past, but then it is more because the Doctor changed things than because she is immortal.

I am afraid we already have spent more time thinking about this than the writers :(
Sereth
player, 864 posts
Sun 8 Nov 2015
at 07:09
  • msg #373

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

As I stated; I have this nasty suspicion that the writers didn't remember that. Of course; the Woman who Lived was written by Cath Tregenna; who I do -not- have a good opinion of in writing; having seen her writing for Torchwod.

One thing about the Moffatt era; is he's very good at bringing in references to the classic series; but he's not as good at remembering stuff that happened more recently; in the RTD-era.

My interpretation is that she actually does dies. She's already died once; without a doubt. If it was just being repaired before death all the time; the easy fix would be when she tired of life; was to throw herself in the water. And Jack mentions he ages; though slowly. There's no suggestion she ages at all, which is either better or worse than Jack.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1215 posts
BLUE KANGS, BLUE KANGS,
BLUE KANGS ARE BEST!
Sun 8 Nov 2015
at 08:05
  • msg #374

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

It's more a fan theory I heard somewhere that I elaborated on, mostly based off "Mindwarp".

The real-world reason for not being allowed into the TARDIS is that they're not sticking around as companions. :) More personally, I suspect the Doctor wouldn't take Ashildr because she was, at the moment, a cynical, murdering thief.

Tregenna apparently doesn't actually like Doctor Who, only Torchwood, hence the lazy effort here.
Stanley Newton
player, 399 posts
Sun 8 Nov 2015
at 11:39
  • msg #375

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
My interpretation is that she actually does dies. She's already died once; without a doubt. If it was just being repaired before death all the time; the easy fix would be when she tired of life; was to throw herself in the water. And Jack mentions he ages; though slowly. There's no suggestion she ages at all, which is either better or worse than Jack.


Maybe in some (rare) cases she actually dies and the nanomachines repair her in time and she comes back, but severe accidents and things like drowning would permanently kill her. At least that is the impression I get, looking at quotes from the episodes:

The Girl Who Died:
DOCTOR: It's repairing her. It will never stop repairing her, if it works. Come on, Ashildr. Come on. The story's not over yet.
...
DOCTOR: It won't stop, the repair kit I put inside Ashildr, not ever. It'll just keep fixing her.
CLARA: Well, good.
DOCTOR: I'm not sure, but it's entirely possible she has lost the ability to die.
CLARA: The ability?
DOCTOR: Oh, dying is an ability, believe me. Barring accidents, she may now be functionally immortal.


The Girl Who Lived:
DOCTOR: You're immortal, not indestructible. You can be hurt, killed even.
...
DOCTOR: He'll kill you.
ASHILDR: He'll have to be fast. And if he does, perhaps it's about time.


Smoke Alarm:
The real-world reason for not being allowed into the TARDIS is that they're not sticking around as companions. :) More personally, I suspect the Doctor wouldn't take Ashildr because she was, at the moment, a cynical, murdering thief.


She wasn't a cynical murderer when she set up that leper colony.
Sereth
player, 865 posts
Sun 8 Nov 2015
at 11:49
  • msg #376

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Losing the ability to die doesn't suggest to me she can be killed. The barring accidents line sounds more like something a bit more serious.

Oh but she was. She set up a leper colony; but she had no issues whatsoever with killing someone if it meant she got to go to the stars. Someone like Clara can't do for her what she does for the Doctor - because she, at this point anyway, has given up the fight to be 'good'.

This might be all immaterial. She's supposedly in a future episode; though probably only as a cameo. I also think we've kind of gotten to the point that we're not going to talk each other around - I'm not sure whether that's because it's good writing, leaving each fan with their own interpretation - or lazy writing; as they should have made things clearer as to which way it was. I lean towards the latter; but as I said, I'm not fond of Tregenna's work, even on Torchwood. She wrote one good episode on Torchwood; the others were garbage.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1216 posts
BLUE KANGS, BLUE KANGS,
BLUE KANGS ARE BEST!
Sun 8 Nov 2015
at 12:20
  • msg #377

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Stanley Newton:
She wasn't a cynical murderer when she set up that leper colony.


I gathered that had been some time before. She used to try to do good, but gave up and/or forgot and turned to crime.

I think it's a lazy story with enough to intrigue fans but not enough to confirm. What kind of immortal story doesn't show them returning from the dead? It's like the central concept.

I don't even know what we're talking now. :)

Just think of her as one of the Highlander immortals. :D
Sereth
player, 866 posts
Sun 8 Nov 2015
at 13:03
  • msg #378

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
Just think of her as one of the Highlander immortals. :D


Well that explains why she never made someone else immortal. There can be only one!
Stanley Newton
player, 400 posts
Sun 8 Nov 2015
at 13:51
  • msg #379

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
This might be all immaterial. She's supposedly in a future episode; though probably only as a cameo. I also think we've kind of gotten to the point that we're not going to talk each other around - I'm not sure whether that's because it's good writing, leaving each fan with their own interpretation - or lazy writing; as they should have made things clearer as to which way it was. I lean towards the latter; but as I said, I'm not fond of Tregenna's work, even on Torchwood. She wrote one good episode on Torchwood; the others were garbage.


It is lazy writing :) Maybe we'll learn more when Ashildr returns.
The Traveller
player, 1256 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Sun 8 Nov 2015
at 22:13
  • msg #380

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

In regards to our current episode (in ATTT), I like to imagine the Sylvester McCoy, without makeup, was the guest star for this episode. Of course, classic Who fandom went out of their minds. This may have been an ATTT webisode special.
Sereth
player, 867 posts
Sun 8 Nov 2015
at 22:27
  • msg #381

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

It was undeniably his voice.

Fandom's divided as to whether it was pure CGI; some footage borrowed from Paradise Towers; or a stunt double.
The Traveller
player, 1257 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Sun 8 Nov 2015
at 23:00
  • msg #382

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Blake Lively says that was Sylvester McCoy she was on set with. That's her story and she's sticking to it ;)

EDIT - I can imagine what they need to pay Smoke, Trav and Sereth's stunt doubles, especially during the Last Dalek episode. Some people say that Jet Li loves the show so much that he's Sam Jackson's body double for fight scenes.
This message was last edited by the player at 23:02, Sun 08 Nov 2015.
Sereth
player, 868 posts
Sun 8 Nov 2015
at 23:11
  • msg #383

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth is not usually played by Sam Jackson. He's usually played by some really tall; but cheaper actor. Who does his own stunts.

Regardless though, it being his voice doesn't change him being on set.
The Traveller
player, 1258 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Sun 8 Nov 2015
at 23:37
  • msg #384

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Nah, they just CG him to be a little taller. That's really Sam Jackson who is cutting down Dalek machines! All that Mace Windu fight training is paying off.
The Traveller
player, 1259 posts
Last Time Lord No More!
Always time to travel!
Sun 8 Nov 2015
at 23:42
  • msg #385

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

And look at Osgood - the only companion who fan girls both the Doctor and Trav -


Smoke Alarm
player, 1229 posts
BLUE KANGS, BLUE KANGS,
BLUE KANGS ARE BEST!
Mon 23 Nov 2015
at 06:42
  • msg #386

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Series 9 has picked up at last.

The Zygon story was brilliant. I like Doctor Who to tackle real politics now and then, and this walked a fine line to have a good judgement on the issues.

"Sleep no More" wasn't great, but had no major flaws. I wish it had done more with the concept though. Sleep or lack of it was irrelevant to the plot. You could replace the sleep-funk monsters with almost anything else and have the same story. It was passable filler anyway, which "Before the Flood" failed to be.

I liked "Face the Raven". This must be what Ashildr does, make stupid short-sighted deals that get people killed. Being stuck as a teenager forever really does suck. Anyway, Clara. This is the first genuine character death of the new series, and they handled it well.

I suppose Clara had to die to leave. The set-up of the Doctor visiting in the TARDIS to take the companion off an adventure is okay, but it means there's no point at which the relationship can end, which is necessary for an actor to move on.

Of course, Clara could have just faded away, and the Doctor finds someone else and we stop seeing her. Her further adventurers with the Doctor can shift to expanded-universe material like novels, comics, and audios, and future comebacks, but I guess a lot of fans, especially the TV-only crowd, wouldn't be satisfied with a formal break.

I do think she should have stayed gone at the end of Series 8, her story was done and that was a good parting. Jenna Coleman originally retired then, but was asked back for "Last Christmas", retired again, then was asked back for Series 9. But there wasn't really anything for Clara in Series 9, she was often sidelined or given little to do.

I'm looking forward to the next companion, the first fully Twelfth-Doctor-era companion. I hope they do something different at last.
The Traveller
player, 1277 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Mon 30 Nov 2015
at 02:43
  • msg #387

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

So, who here has seen "Heaven Sent?"

What's interesting is that Trav has human kids who have appeared in the RIFTS game that I played her in.

So, heh, Hyrbids.

Not to mention Phillipe-Warlock-Fortuna-Evers
Smoke Alarm
player, 1233 posts
BLUE KANGS, BLUE KANGS,
BLUE KANGS ARE BEST!
Mon 30 Nov 2015
at 03:00
  • msg #388

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

That was brilliant. Utterly intense, it felt so much longer than 45 minutes or so. Like an eternity, in fact. Sometimes, the very best episodes are just one great actor in a room with a good script and director.

If not the Doctor himself, another possibility for a hybrid is Jenny, whom Moffat asked Davies to keep, and has recently made comments about her coming back. She would fit the half-human, half-Gallifreyan thing. Then again, with enough wiggling, almost anything can be called a "hybrid": the Master, the Timewyrm (already the subject of a future prophecy).

Also, is Gallifrey now the future version of Earth? So, we finally have a Gallifrey story. Please be good, please be good.


Also, I watched "Paradise Towers" again, and only now noticed that all the Kangs have tattoos. Something like a flame on the back of the right hand. Now I'm desperately wondering what they mean. Does Smoke Alarm have one? I think they must have been tagged and barcoded when they were evacuated as children.
This message was last edited by the player at 06:06, Tue 01 Dec 2015.
Sereth
player, 888 posts
Mon 30 Nov 2015
at 03:11
  • msg #389

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
Also, is Gallifrey now the future version of Earth?


Didn't I mention that fanwank theory in the OOC last week?
Smoke Alarm
player, 1235 posts
BLUE KANGS, BLUE KANGS,
BLUE KANGS ARE BEST!
Tue 1 Dec 2015
at 06:06
  • msg #390

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I hope they don't do it. It's one of the more uninspired, unoriginal ideas that's been floating around.

Oh, the reason it felt longer than 45 minutes was because it was 55 minutes. That makes sense. :)

Did anyone else think the flowers were these:
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Flower_of_Remembrance
I remember Traveller laid these at the war memorial in London.
Sereth
player, 889 posts
Tue 1 Dec 2015
at 06:09
  • msg #391

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I agree. But it's also one of those that keep cropping up. But they avoided the Master is the Doctor's brother theory which was almost as widespread, so maybe not.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1236 posts
BLUE KANGS, BLUE KANGS,
BLUE KANGS ARE BEST!
Tue 1 Dec 2015
at 06:51
  • msg #392

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Fortunately Moffat's been rather good at avoiding the cliches. Which is just well, given how much of Who history he's put his stamp on.
The Traveller
player, 1279 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Tue 1 Dec 2015
at 07:31
  • msg #393

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I and my ex GF were talking about Heaven Sent. What's funny is that the route that the Doctor took to get back to Gallifrey is such a way that it's impossible for Trav in any way to follow (I've kept her up to date with ATTT).

If Trav ever finds out that the Time Lords have returned, she will flip.

Also, I feel that the space where the Doctor was reincarnated over billions of years was constructed by the Master/Missy, specifically to torture out of him the secret of the Hybrid, and it obviously failed.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1238 posts
BLUE KANGS, BLUE KANGS,
BLUE KANGS ARE BEST!
Wed 2 Dec 2015
at 06:01
  • msg #394

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke would have gotten through that maze in minutes and evaded the slowpoke monster easily.

The Christmas special is named "The Husbands of River Song". Kill me.
The Traveller
player, 1282 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Wed 2 Dec 2015
at 18:35
  • msg #395

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Maze was designed for the Doctor, not Smoke. To confound Smoke, it would have been a big literacy puzzle or something ;)

I kind of like the River Song character when she's not portrayed as Moffat's fantasy girlfriend (like in the original Library episode)
Stanley Newton
player, 407 posts
Wed 2 Dec 2015
at 23:50
  • msg #396

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

"Sleep no more" gets bonus points for trying something new. In my opinion it could have been great. It is pretty unusual that the villain wins.

"Face the Raven" Decent episode. I loved the retcon and perception filter callbacks. Shame we didn't get any more information about Ashildr's immortality :)

"Heaven Sent" ... I really like that one. The twist was a bit predictable, but at first I thought it would be too grim even for Doctor Who. Some things seem a bit unclear/inconsistent with what gets reset and from what point, but that could be a feature of the maze.
The Traveller
player, 1283 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Fri 4 Dec 2015
at 16:03
  • msg #397

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Even though this has been thoroughly disproven, this has Who stamped all over it -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phantom_time_hypothesis
The Guardian
GM, 1428 posts
Sat 5 Dec 2015
at 01:29
  • msg #398

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Faction Paradox!  Those wacky scamps!
Smoke Alarm
player, 1239 posts
BLUE KANGS, BLUE KANGS,
BLUE KANGS ARE BEST!
Sat 5 Dec 2015
at 07:37
  • msg #399

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

They have a history of this. The Faction's Eleven Day Empire lies in the eleven days lost from the calendar in 1752.
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Eleven-Day_Empire
http://factionparadox.wikia.com/wiki/Eleven_Day_Empire


I think the "Heaven Sent" maze was basically designed to be what the Doctor does at the core of his adventures: running through corridors, being chased by a monster, solving puzzles. That's basically what Smoke Alarm does too. :)

The trap was that there was no way out and no other solution, but to give up and confess (something, I don't know what), just die, or clone himself and try again (which I think was planned for), all in order to wear him down. The Doctor still found another way out, following the "never give up, never give in" line.

I think the Doctor would only do that to protect someone else, not himself, so he can't be the Hybrid-thingey.

You know, my DWAITAS game basically follows the same course, only stretched to a whole campaign and the whole universe. Each time around, you get to the end, fail, and Tarys in the past receives a vision/message to set you off again on a another chance. ;)

The story was truly epic, in an ancient Greek myth way, with the eternal punishments. Like Prometheus chained to a rock and having his liver eaten by a bird every way, only for it to regrow the next day. In fact, the Doctor's apparently met Prometheus, and he almost escaped the same way, twice:
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/P...8The_Life_Bringer%29
So the Doctor probably got the idea from him.

The record goes to Brimo the Time Witch, who was imprisoned (wrongfully) and kept immortal in an eternity chamber, watching civilisations rise and fall, all life die, her planet erode to dust, her sun go supernova and become a black hole, until she was finally swallowed up and wound up in the same place as Omega, with the same powers.
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/The_Time_Witch

Early 80s comics were amazing, epic, and weird.
The Traveller
player, 1284 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Sat 5 Dec 2015
at 08:45
  • msg #400

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Right on all counts, and I immediately thought the Faction as well. Dammit, I wish I could easily get my hands on the Whoniverse faction paradox novels. I'd love to get familiar with them so I could incorporate them into Travcanon.
The Traveller
player, 1285 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Sat 5 Dec 2015
at 08:56
  • msg #401

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Wow, Brimo the Time Witch. I hearby decree that 1st Trav had Adventures in TV 21 comics, dressed in a fringed skirt and cowboy boots and a 10 gallon hat, having wild adventures with Benjamin Franklin and Gooseberry the Goose, going all Annie Oakley with a quantum winchester. Brimo and the Krayloss were her nemeses, because, dammit, Time Witches are cool villains. It was also drawn by Jim Steranko and saw Trav's 1st adventures on Rift's Earth. Also, lots of Kirby Dots, exceedingly weird adventures.

If Trav were to run into Brimo today, she'd be stunned, but kind of overjoyed to see her. "Um, you were kind of a bitch, but it was SO MUCH FUN FIGHTING YOU."*glomp*
Smoke Alarm
player, 1240 posts
BLUE KANGS, BLUE KANGS,
BLUE KANGS ARE BEST!
Sat 5 Dec 2015
at 11:09
  • msg #402

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Within the Whoniverse, the Faction are better when they're not there (fittingly). They kind of devolved from a neutral faction of troublemakers to more generic villains as the other writers took over and creator Lawrence Miles burned and blew up his bridges behind him. Alien Bodies is the best introduction to FP and the original Time War arc, having inspired it and much of what Moffat has done as showrunner.

Not TV 21, but Doctor Who Weekly/Monthly/Magazine, which came later. You have to feel sorry for Brimo, the charges against her were so vague and ridiculous, it's clear she was the victim of a witch hunt, and the punishment unimaginably disproportionate. She finally escapes into a place where she can be happy, though she's gone a bit potty. Then the Fourth Doctor comes, wrecks her shit, and she winds up back in the eternity capsule for another billion-or-so years. Strange story.
The Traveller
player, 1286 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Sat 5 Dec 2015
at 20:27
  • msg #403

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Because Trav lived on Rifts Earth for so long, Trav could easily now get along with old Brimo. "Brimee! Whaddup girl!"
The Traveller
player, 1288 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Thu 10 Dec 2015
at 07:32
  • msg #404

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

And I have just watched Hell Bent.

Two chicks in a TARDIS. Hrm.

If Trav meets Rassilon out there, she will kill him dead. I do hope he regenerates into Timothy Dalton Rassilon.
The Traveller
player, 1289 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Thu 10 Dec 2015
at 14:48
  • msg #405

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Ok, a few thoughts on Hell Bent:

First, Clara should have stayed dead. I hate hate hate this Moffat backsies bullshit. It's dishonest.

I found the entire return of Rassilon to be entirely anticlimactic, as well as the resolution of the entire two season long Clara Oswald arc.

I don't like that the Doctor's relationship and love for a companion was used as a weapon against him. It was like an artificial shot at a particular slice of demographic that loves the show and comes to it  - female fans who love the companion-Doctor narrative. The theme of the entire Doctor-Clara narrative was that the Doctor-female companion relationship was toxic and could be weaponised.

Also - no Romana, and the entire presence of Ohila really nothing but a smug commentator really pissed me off.

All in all, the entire thing left a very bad taste in my mouth.

Going to repeat on my FB.
The Traveller
player, 1290 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Thu 10 Dec 2015
at 16:48
  • msg #406

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

In regards to Hell Bent's possible effects on ATTT, since they never really answered who the Hybrid was, it just might be Phillipe/Warlock/Fortuna/Evers, and the "Lord of Time" behind the Gehennans might be Rassilon himself (although please let it be Timothy Dalton Rassilon, not that other guy.)

I like to think that The Doctor kicked the High Council off of Gallifrey because he was sending them to Trav's tender, tender mercies.
Sereth
player, 890 posts
Thu 10 Dec 2015
at 21:24
  • msg #407

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The problem is, Clara was, like Amy, -not- the companion to fall in love with the Doctor. Until she was. We went from it -never- happening, to every single companion (barring Donna) falling for him. Admittedly, I'm not a fan of that particular storyline regardless, but to go from one extreme to the other creates embitterment. Why not have Rose be the exception? Why have it happen all the time now?

Unlike RTD, Moffatt has shown continuously that he's not a fan of that particular style of romance, so it shouldn't really surprise. Also? With the exception of Adric, no long-term companion has ever died, so that's not that surprising either. And it's no more dishonest than RTD's Season 2 speeches: "Someone is going to die." Or his Season 4 one: "No, really, we mean it this time."
The Traveller
player, 1291 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Thu 10 Dec 2015
at 22:17
  • msg #408

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

It sucks when any writer makes that promise. Instead, he should have dropped her off and left it at that, or let her have a good life with Danny Pink.

I can totally cop to 'lets not have the Doctor do romance'. But it was almost like a direct finger to that portion of the fandom.
This message was last edited by the player at 22:18, Thu 10 Dec 2015.
Sereth
player, 891 posts
Thu 10 Dec 2015
at 22:33
  • msg #409

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I totally understand that. What I think -both- Showrunners are guilty of, is having a section of the fandom they pander to. I think RTD jabbed at the fans who -didn't- want that aspect a number of times. That's not to say Moffatt making you feel that way is acceptable though. It's one reason I'd like a neutral showrunner. Stop handing it from fanboy to fanboy.
The Traveller
player, 1292 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Thu 10 Dec 2015
at 22:58
  • msg #410

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
I totally understand that. What I think -both- Showrunners are guilty of, is having a section of the fandom they pander to. I think RTD jabbed at the fans who -didn't- want that aspect a number of times. That's not to say Moffatt making you feel that way is acceptable though. It's one reason I'd like a neutral showrunner. Stop handing it from fanboy to fanboy.


A showrunner should make all fans feel welcome. If RTD was jabbing, he was wrong, and Moffat jabbing at romance fans was wrong here. Further, romance was part of the initial mandate of the show - RTD made no secret of this when he described in interviews how Buffy The Vampire Slayer was the template for Doctor Who. It's one thing for Moffats seasons not to deal with this, but insulting a big slice of the fan base is obviously responsible for driving viewer figures down to 4 million during prime time, and may well kill the show. Including what fans demand is not pandering, nor is the show property of male or older fans. There's a slider way of dealing with this to make both groups feel included. Moffat needs to leave the show.
Sereth
player, 892 posts
Thu 10 Dec 2015
at 23:29
  • msg #411

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Well he's staying for at least Season 10.

Regardless, when he leaves it should be a proper recruitment for his replacement; not just handing it off to who he wants, which would probably be Gatiss. Get rid of the fanboys and their agendas. That's the only way to try to unite the fandom into one.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1241 posts
BLUE KANGS, BLUE KANGS,
BLUE KANGS ARE BEST!
Fri 11 Dec 2015
at 01:49
  • msg #412

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I did find "Hell Bent" rather disappointing. The return to Gallifrey was good, but it went nowhere. Instead, Moffat did his usual thing of switching stories halfway through. He's said he doesn't like Gallifrey, so why go back at all? Why bring it back to do nothing with it? He's undid its destruction (and I liked that), but I felt he should have left it sleep behind the scenes until a new showrunner actually wanted to do something with it. This is the point where I agree he is stamping his name on all the elements of the series.

Removing Rassilon and the High Council was little more than pruning a hanging plot-thread. If they weren't there, people would wonder. The Hybrid prophecy was also little more than a red herring for fan speculation, for those still hooked on arc words and portents.

I felt the Doctor–Clara thing was more a commentary on the problem of not being able to let go. The Doctor and Clara are friends, and the Doctor feels a responsibility, the "duty of care", not to let a companion die on his watch, or if they do, to save them. His guilt over Katarina and Adric was explored in the novels. A SF or fantasy setting offers ways around death, and its inevitable (and now commonplace) that characters will try to bend the universe to save someone or bring them back (Supernatural, so much). It's exactly what Clara did after Danny died. "Hell Bent" argued that that's a bad idea, that it makes the characters act against their principles, that it negates their choices, that it leads to disaster (as it does in Supernatural, so much). This story was so much a case of forcing the Doctor to respect the companion's wishes regarding death, not going against them as RTD had the Tenth to do Donna. I felt it wasn't necessary: the Doctor should have just accepted Clara's choice, after he didn't with Ashildr and Donna. Ironically, the Doctor comes off as much more mature and wise in the classic series than he does in the new series.

There's also the problem of how to have a companion leave the show when her character can just step on the TARDIS every weekend and still have her own life. Why wouldn't Clara just keep coming back? Again, the classic-series approach of companions living aboard a misguided TARDIS, and the companions often being lost or exiled from their homes, was the best approach.

The romance angle actually began with the TV Movie with Grace, though the classic series hinted at Doctor romance a few times. The comics avoided the teenage girl companion crushing on the handsome young Doctor risk by simply making Izzy gay and Destrii being creepy about it. The novels never tried with Sam or the rest. The Doctor–companion romance really doesn't work. The dynamic between the Doctor and companion has always been the Doctor as teacher or mentor, as a parental figure, and as a friend. I liked that we returned to that with the Twelfth and Clara. Having romance all the time weakens it and ignores the fact that other relationships between men and women are possible.

I'd also like to see a neutral showrunner. Fans do know the series very well, know what's been done and works, and have ideas, but they also have agendas and arguments they try to push through the series. The inmates have been running the asylum for 25 years, and I'm tired of the conflicts they play out.

I've a theory that a Who writer's first novels or short stories show what they will be like as showrunner, what ideas they'll play with, because that's the first time they felt they could do whatever they wanted and could cram it all in. Davies's Damaged Goods had a council housing estate, a Tyler family, domestic melodramas, and the incursion of Gallifreyan warfare. Moffat's "Continuity Errors" has a planet-wide library, temporal shenanigans, and the Doctor altering someone's life through time. Gatiss's Nightshade is a nostalgic recreation of 50s/60s TV SF, while St. Anthony's Fire has alien trench warfare, space cults, and the villain torturing and murdering a kitten to show how evil he is. I dread Gatiss as showrunner, because I'm sure it will be nostalgic, fannish, and backwards-looking, with the tacky horror of The League of Gentlemen.
The Traveller
player, 1293 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Fri 11 Dec 2015
at 05:10
  • msg #413

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Heh, if they would only hire us! :) I like to think I have Trav have a mature handle on how she handles her Companions. Trav in the lore I've created for her has had hundred of Companions, but there's a time when they need to leave. Amanda Khebares I think is a great example of a positive, healthy Companion arc.

I also think that Moffat is playing with the idea of The Doctor as this wrecked, super competent jerk who makes mistakes, which at least for this incarnation is OK. Different incarnations I don't think would have gone as far with Clara.

But then, while I play Trav as heavily damaged from the Time War, she's not crippled and toxic - for example, her processing of the last Dalek and Davros. That catharsis ICly helped her immensely, because, as painful as it was, she decided she didn't want the poison inside of her. She'll still hate Daleks, but she won't be so possessed by that hate. There's a kind of person she wants to be, especially in reaction to The Marshall.

I felt that Face The Raven was a beautiful episode, but Moffat fucking spoiled it - like he did the Time War in 50th.

Would Trav have done the same in that situation? I think Trav would have let Clara go, yes. In her backstory, I'm thinking that 2nd Trav knew Lincoln's fate from history before ever meeting him. Trav has always been about respect for choices, and would have respected Clara's choice.
Zheng Ru
NPC, 14 posts
Fri 11 Dec 2015
at 05:32
  • msg #414

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

"Traveller, every person you have ever known, they are always dying, they are always being born and reborn throughout their lives.  You are not special in this respect.  You simply do so with more faces than most."
The Traveller
player, 1294 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Fri 11 Dec 2015
at 06:43
  • msg #415

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Cue all the feels! :)
Sereth
player, 893 posts
Sat 12 Dec 2015
at 00:59
  • msg #416

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I actually have to say; Clara had no objection to being saved, up until the point the timeline was in danger. Even now, she's talking about 'the long way round', so I'm not really sure the Doctor can be accused of taking away her choice. There are other reasons to be upset with what he did, granted.

As for how different incarnations would have handled it:
Hartnell: Would have let her go. He was never particularly close to any of them after Susan after all.
Troughton: Tougher. I think he would have had a shot, but when it became apparent he couldn't save her -and- the timeline, would have let her go.
Pertwee: Out of all of them, the least likely to do anything, as he was the one most adverse to messing about with time.
T. Baker: She's not Romana, so wouldn't have had any qualms. He would have probably let her go regardless I suspect; due to his relationship with the White Guardian.
Davison: Need you ask? We saw this with Adric.
C. Baker: Eh. I haven't listened to the audios, and the TV stories relationship to his companions was not good or healthy.
McCoy: It probably would have ended up that he'd manipulated the whole thing....
McGann: Pass.
Eccleston: Welllll.. probably would have let her go.
Tennant: Sorry. He would have been just as bad. If not worse. Time Lord Victorious anyone?
Smith: He probably would have let her go.

I've been hating the 'part-time' companion thing since it began with Amy and Rory back in Season 6. It just doesn't work. Every possible reason for writing out a companion fails when they're people he just picks up for an adventure, then takes back, with his suddenly incredibly accurate time machine.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1242 posts
BLUE KANGS, BLUE KANGS,
BLUE KANGS ARE BEST!
Sat 12 Dec 2015
at 02:19
  • msg #417

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Something similar happened with the Sixth Doctor: Peri was basically killed in "Mindwarp", yet she was somehow rescued by the Time Lords and given a new life. The Expanded Universe develops it further along Clara's line, then has it happen several times, as each new writer thinks her fate was too mean and retcons a new one.
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Peri_Brown#Fate

I think giving Clara a new life was unnecessary: there are already dozens of Claras out there, after she was splintered through time (like Scaroth in "City of Death") in "The Name of the Doctor".

I think the only good way to write out a part-time companion is the most mature: they move on from the Doctor. Their life changes, they can't take the danger and stress any more, they have a family and can't spare the time or risk their life any more. The Doctor still visits, but without big adventures. Imagine, a companion finale in which they simply ask the Doctor for no more adventures, but he still visits at various points in their life, then we see a succession of quick scenes: dinners and celebrations, Christmases and such, a wedding, children from babies to kids to teens, then grandchildren and great grandchildren, retirement, old age, a last hurrah in the TARDIS, then dying, a funeral. A whole, long happy life flashing before our eyes, and before the Doctor's eyes. The Doctor, unchanging through the decades as the companion grows old. The Doctor, unchanging, as he watches a friend grow old in a matter of days. It would show exactly what it means to be a time-travelling immortal with short-lived friends in linear time. I think I'd cry.
Sereth
player, 894 posts
Sat 12 Dec 2015
at 02:45
  • msg #418

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke's description of how to write out a part-time companion actually seemed to be the way they were heading with Amy and Rory; until we got 'Angels take Manhattan'. They also kind of toyed with it in School Reunion: "You can be with me for the rest of your life. I can't be with you for the rest of mine." It gave me hope, briefly, that they were going to steer away from the Doctor/Rose thing. It also could really only be done once and have any emotional impact. Yeah, maybe they should have done it with Clara, then return to companions being on the TARDIS full-time.

As for Peri? That whole mess happened from memory as part of the Trial of a Timelord arc; which, for me, was one of the worst ever. Though the Leela write-out was terrible, the actual story was quite good. I can't really think of any redeeming features for Trial of a Timelord, except, maybe, the introduction of the Valeyard. But then he's basically been ignored since then.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1243 posts
BLUE KANGS, BLUE KANGS,
BLUE KANGS ARE BEST!
Sat 12 Dec 2015
at 03:07
  • msg #419

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

"The Mysterious Planet" is good for the era: the Doctor being nice and not insulting/assaulting Peri, with a classic kind of weird Doctor Who world to explore. "Terror of the Vervoids" is also not bad for what it is, even though it is written by Pip & Jane Baker. I find they're the least uncomfortable stories of the Sixth Doctor era, which was often mean, messy, and spiky. But "Mindwarp" is a nasty return to form. "The Ultimate Foe" was originally intended to end on a series cliffhanger, with the Doctor and the Valeyard battling for eternity in the Matrix, and could have been quite good, except author Robert Holmes died, Eric Saward was afraid the BBC would use it as an excuse to cancel the series, and they handed it off to Pip & Jane Baker to do something stupid with.

"The Invasion of Time" would have been better with a few less episodes, specifically a few less episodes of running about ugly sets and a factory pretending to be the TARDIS. And Leela having any kind of relationship with Andred before she decides to settle down with him. She had more of a relationship with Rodan.

It's reassuring that, as much as we grumble the new series stories, the worst are still in the classic series. Well, they had less time, money, and effort then.
Sereth
player, 895 posts
Sat 12 Dec 2015
at 03:12
  • msg #420

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

You're right that the worst are in the classic series; but for me, the best also are. City of Death; most of the Key to Time series; a handful from Troughton and Pertwee (though Troughton's in particular fell into formulaic writing; but some of them are beautiful). Earthshock; and no, not just because it killed Adric. McCoy's when they were good - Curse of Fenric is brilliant for example.

Having said that, I feel... safer with the modern ones. Sure, none might tick all the boxes for me, but there are also very, very few (maybe Love and Monsters) that has me wish I hadn't spent the time watching it.
The Traveller
player, 1301 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Tue 15 Dec 2015
at 18:14
  • msg #421

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Hey, lets not forget that classic 4th Doctor winner, "Robot"!
The Traveller
player, 1302 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Tue 15 Dec 2015
at 18:17
  • msg #422

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

And when Trav finds out that The Doctor put the entire High Council on shuttles and shipped them off, she will REALLY FLIP.

"A dozen of the most dangerous fucking Time Lords who were responsible for the Last Great Fucking Time War, and you gave them a Greyhound ticket to wherever they wanted?"

On the other hand, that's a ready made campaign. Trav knows exactly where she would stick Rassilon - back in the Death Zone, where he belongs. I suspect that the ancient Gallifreyans put him there, because he was so dangerous.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1257 posts
BLUE KANGS, BLUE KANGS,
BLUE KANGS ARE BEST!
Wed 23 Dec 2015
at 06:01
  • msg #423

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

They could have gone to the Needle:
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Needle
Sereth
player, 927 posts
Sat 23 Jan 2016
at 00:17
  • msg #424

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

For Traveller:

Steven Moffatt has announced Season 10 will be his last season.

What concerns me, is that Chris Chibnall has been announced as his successor. I mean, it's not Gattiss but....
Smoke Alarm
player, 1282 posts
Kangs: building high for
happiness since 1987.
Sat 23 Jan 2016
at 00:59
  • msg #425

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

It's not exactly inspiring. Chibnall wrote some of the worst and most mediocre episodes of Doctor Who and Torchwood, but maybe he's improved. On the other hand, he's not one of the old 90s fandom writers, so the inmates are no longer running the asylum, but I don't know what to expect of him. I'm sure Gatiss would have tried to be the Quentin Tarantino of Who showrunners, but Chibnall?

I'm annoyed that there won't be a series in 2016, bar the obligatory Christmas special. We have to wait a whole year and a bit for the next series. :( What's the point of that? So Moffat retires but sticks around another two years? Chibnall has to wait two years for his job? Moffat should probably have left now, as Series 9 pretty much wrapped up everything of his, so it was at least a tidy end-point, giving Chibnall a clean slate to work off.

Moffat, and the new series, had finally gotten to the point where I more-or-less loved what they were doing, and now, off they go.
Sereth
player, 928 posts
Sat 23 Jan 2016
at 01:10
  • msg #426

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Hadn't heard there'd be no series in 2016.

Chibnall was the showrunner of Torchwood except for the one produced in combination with an American network. I'm not a fan.

On the other hand, he is behind Broadchurch, which was successful - but it's really a different style. Sci-fi has it's own method, and none of Chibnall's highly-regarded stuff works as sci-fi. And the only Doctor Who episode of his that I came close to enjoying was 42, and RTD is known to edit all of the episodes under him (except, or so he claims, Moffat's work). But we'll see what happens I guess.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1283 posts
Kangs: building high for
happiness since 1987.
Sat 23 Jan 2016
at 01:22
  • msg #427

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yep, Who's been bumped because apparently Moffat's finale/Series 10 will be an event to rival the Olympics and Eurovision, apparently, and needs a whole year to itself:
http://www.doctorwhonews.net/2...n-as-showrunner.html
Or, more likely, to make way for Class. :(
The Guardian
GM, 1469 posts
Sat 23 Jan 2016
at 01:24
  • msg #428

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Well, it is a whole decade on since "Cyberwoman", so there's that.  His Who scripts never particularly bothered me, bar "Dinosaurs on a Spaceship" which I suspect is largely down to Moffat having a deeply silly idea and farming it off to one of his regulars.

I've liked Moffat a lot as showrunner, but I'm kind of done with every damned thing being about a threat to the Doctor or the Doctor's guilt or checking off fannish bugaboos about the Doctor.

I kind of hoped that the mooted possibility of Peter Harness would have panned out don't throw things don't throw things!  Reason being, that whatever scientific foolishness ended up in his scripts -- and I found "the Moon is an egg" dottily charming, it's just that that should have been his one ridiculous thing in the story -- his stories at least had pretty strong themes to them.

Sereth:
I mean, it's not Gattiss but....

Amen and Hallelujah.  Hopefully we'll be spared another episode of Doctor Who In An Exciting Adventure With Eye Boogers.
Sereth
player, 929 posts
Sat 23 Jan 2016
at 02:17
  • msg #429

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I can't remember the name right now, but the one he did in Series 7A I particularly hated. But I didn't like much of that series; which was a shame as I did like Amy and Rory...
Smoke Alarm
player, 1284 posts
Kangs: building high for
happiness since 1987.
Sat 23 Jan 2016
at 02:46
  • msg #430

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

No amount of time can erase or forgive "Cyberwoman". :p Or the rest of Torchwood, in fact.

Chibnall did "42", "The Hungry Earth"/"Cold Blood", "Dinosaurs on a Spaceship", and "The Power of Three", as well as the "Pond Life" mini-episodes. I've only seen the first three. He gave a whiny interview as a kid about the state of Doctor Who in 1986, which would be interesting to check out again.

I came to like "Kill the Moon", accepting it as all part of the deliberately bizarre, unscientific concept and after the Zygon two-parter, I would have liked Harness as showrunner.


Arthur Darvill made a good Time Lord Master in DC's Legends of Tomorrow.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1285 posts
Kangs: building high for
happiness since 1987.
Sat 23 Jan 2016
at 13:00
  • msg #431

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Here's that 1986 interview. Chibnall's the kid in the yellow tie complaining about the current season not being very good and asking for non-traditional, more adult stories. We have now come full circle.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irIqTPQqgvQ

The full, good-quality version is on "The Ultimate Foe" DVD.
This message was last edited by the player at 23:48, Sat 23 Jan 2016.
The Traveller
player, 1336 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Sat 23 Jan 2016
at 22:49
  • msg #432

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
For Traveller:

Steven Moffatt has announced Season 10 will be his last season.

What concerns me, is that Chris Chibnall has been announced as his successor. I mean, it's not Gattiss but....


I'll leave the analysis to you, my panel of experts.

He seems pretty workman to me.
Stanley Newton
player, 418 posts
Sun 24 Jan 2016
at 13:03
  • msg #433

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Traveller:
I'll leave the analysis to you, my panel of experts.

He seems pretty workman to me.


In my opinion, Moffat has shown that a good writer ≠ good showrunner, so even though Chibnall's episodes have not been amazing, I am cautiously optimistic. I liked 42 and Power of Three(but that should have been a two-parter).

I am really glad that it is not Peter Harness (though maybe he is a way better showrunner than writer). Kill the Moon was so bad, it almost made me stop watching Doctor Who. All of his episodes have had plot holes and stupid things, though I admit that he seems to improve with every episode. He should really learn how to be more subtle with an episode's message and focus more on writing a good story.
Sereth
player, 930 posts
Sun 24 Jan 2016
at 13:19
  • msg #434

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Depends how you define good showrunner. Fans may have opinions, but it's not the fans that determine this really. It's the casual viewer; and they liked his time there.

Power of Three was simply horrible. Not quite as bad as Dinosaurs on a Spaceship, but ye gods. 42 was decent, but not nearly enough to make me reconsider my thoughts given his other episodes, and the fact that he was Showrunner of Torchwood is another black mark.

But still, I'm just relieved it's not Gattiss.
Stanley Newton
player, 419 posts
Sun 24 Jan 2016
at 15:49
  • msg #435

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Sereth:
Depends how you define good showrunner.


Sure, I think Moffat isn't a good showrunner, but that is just my opinion based on my subjective definition of 'good' showrunner. To be fair, I don't really know how big the showrunner's influence is, maybe he has just bad luck with the writers (or their scripts) and things would have been worse with someone else in charge.

I don't think it is possible to find an objective definition of 'good' in this context. 'Really bad' is a lot easier :) (if everyone stops watching and the BBC cancels the show).

Sereth:
Fans may have opinions, but it's not the fans that determine this really. It's the casual viewer; and they liked his time there.


Sorry, but I don't trust casual viewers to be able to determine what is 'good' (not that 'fans' are better). They didn't dislike Kill the Moon enough :P. At least not my 'good', which is a showrunner that is able to producing episodes that reach a certain level of quality, whilst still being fun to watch. Yeah, completely subjective, but I don't feel Moffat has been able to do that. He might be a 'good' showrunner as in 'the show is popular' or the average AI value has increased or whatever, but I wouldn't call him a good showrunner for that.

I think casual viewers tend to be more forgiving of (certain) plot holes and inconsistencies (both continuity and in-episode) than I am. For them the episode is still good despite "X"  whereas for me it ruins the episode.

About the show being popular: I haven't really checked this(so regard it as just a rumour) and it could be due to constantly shifting timeslot, but I have heard that the viewing figures have been steadily declining this series(or maybe since last series).

Everything I said is subjective and a matter of how you define things of course.

Sereth:
Power of Three was simply horrible. Not quite as bad as Dinosaurs on a Spaceship, but ye gods. 42 was decent, but not nearly enough to make me reconsider my thoughts given his other episodes, and the fact that he was Showrunner of Torchwood is another black mark.


I thought Power of Three had an interesting concept and it felt a lot like a RTD era episode, but how everything was resolved was just rushed and bad. That's why I think it would have worked better as a two-parter.

Torchwood S1 is a lot of years ago and my memory is getting worse, but was it really that bad?

Sereth:
But still, I'm just relieved it's not Gattiss.


Why is everyone glad it is not Gatiss? He doesn't really have a 'good' episode, but most of his episodes were 'meh' not actually 'bad', if I recall correctly.(Like I said, my memory is getting worse.)
The Guardian
GM, 1472 posts
Sun 24 Jan 2016
at 17:19
  • msg #436

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Stanley Newton:
Why is everyone glad it is not Gatiss?

For me?  He feels like he has a notion of what makes good Doctor Who that is deeply mired in nostalgia.  Moffat has hardly avoided the same impulses, but he seems like he has been more interested in shaking up the mythology and leaving his stamp on it.

Gatiss seems like he has been more apt to throw in self-indulgent things just because he can, and I would find that worrying.  I actually think his episodes have been better than Chibnall's overall, but where I have no real clue about what direction Chibnall would take the show, my impressions of what Gatiss might do are much clearer and if I'm right about them, I would not want the show to go that way.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1286 posts
Kangs: building high for
happiness since 1987.
Mon 25 Jan 2016
at 01:52
  • msg #437

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Beyond competence and capability at the work involved, what makes a showrunner is largely subjective. I liked Moffat's work post–Series 7b, but disliked what he did before that. Oh, I wish we could return to the classic series model of a script editor and a producer working together to lead the series, collaborating on ideas and reining each other in. As long as they don't despise each other like Eric Saward and John Nathan Turner. That way fans can't pin their dissatisfaction on any one person. :)

Ratings tend to always decline through a series anyway, as people give it a go at the beginning, decide it's not for the them, then trickle away, but come at the beginning of the next.


I'm reading Mark Gatiss's first Who novel right now, the New Adventure Nightshade. Written 1992, set in 1968, but not the fun Sixties. Every page is about people being nostalgic about the past, though, to be fair, their nostalgias come to life and kill them. The whole story is a homage to the old Quatermass serials. In fact, the in-universe equivalent is called "Nightshade", and the retired star actor is a main character, and its TV monsters are manifested. Even the main monster is defined as having always been there, from nowhere but the past. Characters tell each other to never look back, but I don't think Gatiss listened.

To me, that's emblematic of a major strand of Gatiss's work. A Who fan author's first work tends to be indicative of all their ideas, themes, and tones, all thrown out in a rush of fannish enthusiasm, though Gatiss was remarkably controlled here. He does nostalgic recreations of past periods of TV sci-fi and horror, and of classic periods of Who. His The Last of the Gadarene (though I've not yet read it) is apparently more classic Third Doctor era than it ever was on television. The other strand of his work is tacky, grotesque horror, as in The League of Gentlemen and torturing a kitten to death in his second Who novel St. Anthony's Fire. That's why I said he'd be the Quentin Tarantino of Who showrunners: nostalgic and gruesome.

TBH, he'd probably have been a very competent showrunner and I would have liked it, but I don't believe his backwards-looking nature is right for taking the show forward.

Anyway, we got Chibnall instead. A fan let loose on the Doctor Who world at last, he gave us "Day One" and "Cyberwoman", then later "42". I'm not sure he's got any ideas in him.
The Traveller
player, 1390 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Sun 28 Feb 2016
at 22:02
  • msg #438

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I couldnt get Trav's Gallifreyan name into the tool, so I dropped in "The Traveller" instead. Given how Gallifreyans are with titles, it makes sense.

Tool is here - https://gallifreyan-9000.rhcloud.com/#


Smoke Alarm
player, 1343 posts
Kangs: building high for
happiness since 1987.
Tue 1 Mar 2016
at 03:45
  • msg #439

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

It's down now, but I swear "Smoke Alarm" almost made some Puddy-like faces.
The Traveller
player, 1396 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Fri 4 Mar 2016
at 22:40
  • msg #440

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Seems like us:


Stanley Newton
player, 441 posts
Sat 5 Mar 2016
at 22:04
  • msg #441

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

In reply to The Traveller (msg # 440):

I like the Call of Cthulhu one, with the very short wibble,*squish* section.
Stanley Newton
player, 443 posts
Sat 12 Mar 2016
at 11:02
  • msg #442

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Capaldi recently accused the BBC of neglecting Doctor Who by shifting its timeslot around all the time. I think it was very confusing and didn't help the viewing figures, though Capaldi is right that the overnight ratings don't tell the whole story.

Link here: (SPOILER WARNING: It also contains speculation(and a picture) about who the new companion could be.)
http://www.theguardian.com/tv-...cuses-bbc-of-neglect
Smoke Alarm
player, 1397 posts
Kangs: building high for
happiness since 1987.
Mon 25 Apr 2016
at 02:16
  • msg #443

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

So, new companion: Bill played by Pearl Mackie. I have to say, I'm not excited – judging by the promo, she seems to be yet another 21st-century young woman who makes snarky comments about everything. So, like every new series companion ever. I feel the Doctor is now familiar enough to the audience to rely on him and instead try something different or high-concept. But maybe the promo doesn't represent the final concept.
The Guardian
GM, 1619 posts
Mon 25 Apr 2016
at 02:43
  • msg #444

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Au contraire!  Catherine Tate wasn't young!

:p

Seriously though, it feels like Doctor Who is in a weird place to be rocking the boat in terms of format, with a management transition under way and the metrics of viewership, at least, seeming to have veered from "outlandish runaway hit" to "successful cornerstone show."

I do think they're missing a trick in not going with a character from a different native time period.  As grist for satire, dropping such a person onto 201x Earth and examining their bewilderment at our modern notions of normalcy would really be wonderful.

But I think they're extremely wary of being seen to start to cater to a niche sci-fi audience, which in a lot of ways is where the show seems like it went off the rails in the 80s.  It's not like Moffat has been hesitant to go to exotic concepts as regular returning characters (Vastra, Strax, Ashildr, River freaking Song) or to lace these young 21st century women with baked-in skiffy concepts of their own (Amy and Clara).
This message was last edited by the GM at 02:45, Mon 25 Apr 2016.
Sereth
player, 1015 posts
Mon 25 Apr 2016
at 02:51
  • msg #445

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm with Smoke. One of the more popular companions from the classic series was Jamie. granted, another was Sarah-Jane, and one of the most hated (if not the single most hated) was Adric -from a different time period. Though future, not past. Leela was also quite popular and though -technically- she was future, her story function was really like that of a past character.

I do think they need to avoid genius characters though, unless we revert to Team TARDIS.
The Guardian
GM, 1620 posts
Mon 25 Apr 2016
at 02:59
  • msg #446

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Adric would be a good example of the trend to "spice up" the show by making traveling companions out of exotic aliens like hyper-evolved Creatures From The Black Lagoon, Australians, and Americans. :D
Sereth
player, 1016 posts
Mon 25 Apr 2016
at 03:11
  • msg #447

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

.... You had to reference Adric, Tegan and Peri in one post? -shudder-

I'm out.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1398 posts
Kangs: building high for
happiness since 1987.
Mon 25 Apr 2016
at 03:38
  • msg #448

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Doctor Who is always in a state of transition, whether of producer/showrunner or of Doctor, or of companion. I think Doctor Who should always dare to be weird, experimental, and different. It's arguable success and normalcy isn't good for it.

Besides, we now have a truckload of superhero series and movies showing that aliens and time-travellers and mutants are popular and identifiable with both fans and more mainstream audiences, to the point there's no longer a distinction. Even mainstream shows are tossing in SF or fantasy concepts to spice up well-worn genres (like Forever, which failed for a being a bad detective series, not for having an immortal).

But at this point, even a 21st-century male primary companion would be novel.

As a compromise, two companions could work: one modern everyday person as the so-called identification character, and one from elsewhere with the outsider perspective who carries the now-obligatory SF concept.

But one of my favourite companions is a shape-shifting penguin private eye, so what do I know? :D
The Traveller
player, 1431 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Mon 25 Apr 2016
at 05:48
  • msg #449

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Nice thing here is that in this show, we can be experimental. I don't think you'd ever see a Draconian or a Kang in the current run of Who. Stan I could see as a regular secondary companion. As a primary one, Stan would be amazing. Unfortunately, it's a Doctor Who tradition that the companion always be female and cute.

In my imaginary headcanon, I like to think that ATTT is the Doctor Who show that takes the chances that regular Doctor Who can't.
Sereth
player, 1017 posts
Mon 25 Apr 2016
at 06:26
  • msg #450

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The reason the primary companion is female and cute is because the Doctor has always been male. Well the female part anyway.

So with the Traveller being female; Stanley easily fills in primary companion. Smoke probably also primary; whilst Sereth is there to fill in like Harry Sullivan/Ian Chesterton for more physical roles. (Yeah, Tom was physical, but Harry was cast before they knew if that would happen).

Sereth is very much Jamie/Leela except with a few more skills beyond the traditional fighting/wilderness warrior skillset. Having said that, I would truly adore playing a character very primitive compared to Trav, Stan and Sereth. Sereth takes a lot of thought, and so he suffers when I get sick.
The Traveller
player, 1473 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Thu 19 May 2016
at 03:33
  • msg #451

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Guardian:
Adric would be a good example of the trend to "spice up" the show by making traveling companions out of exotic aliens like hyper-evolved Creatures From The Black Lagoon, Australians, and Americans. :D


Coming back to this, Trav is a hyper evolved, exotic Alien American. So is Amanda.
Sereth
player, 1069 posts
Thu 19 May 2016
at 03:41
  • msg #452

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yeah, but the problem with those other three mentioned, is that's all they were. Tegan is an AUstralian. That's her whole reason for being. And Peri likewise, is American. Adric... on paper Adric should have worked. Zoe and Liz Shaw were both geniuses; and they worked. Especially Zoe; who is arguably the most intelligent non-timelord to ever board the TARDIS. In some ways she's even smarter than the Doctor.

The Traveller and Amanda it's just one aspect of their character.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1441 posts
Brave and bold as a Hero
of Draconia can be.
Thu 19 May 2016
at 03:42
  • msg #453

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Technically, Tegan is a Queenslander. ;)
Sereth
player, 1070 posts
Thu 19 May 2016
at 03:44
  • msg #454

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I never picked that up. It certainly explains 'rabbits' as a swear word.
The Traveller
player, 1519 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Tue 31 May 2016
at 00:59
  • msg #455

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Kalath
player, 55 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Tue 31 May 2016
at 01:01
  • msg #456

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Bleah. She's better than Simms, and certainly better than Eric Roberts; but I wasn't overly enamoured of her version of the Master. I also feel they're coming perilously close to the issue that they had with Pertwee and the Master if she's back for another extended run.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1477 posts
Brave and bold as a Hero
of Draconia can be.
Tue 31 May 2016
at 02:29
  • msg #457

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I just hope she isn't shoehorned into another story as she was last season. Making the Master a supporting character in a non-Master story just diminishes and overuses the character.
The Traveller
player, 1521 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Tue 31 May 2016
at 11:43
  • msg #458

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Kinda like Daleks. (runs!)
Kalath
player, 60 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Tue 31 May 2016
at 13:19
  • msg #459

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Given I'm not a fan of the Daleks; even if they stuck to the classic Daleks, I'm not going to argue with that. I think the Daleks when used well can be awesome; but the new series has used them too often.
The Traveller
player, 1524 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Tue 31 May 2016
at 15:21
  • msg #460

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I agree. I felt that the Daleks were at their scariest when there was just one.

I think the Dalek presence in ATTT is perfect - our adventures with both The Mailman and The Last Dalek are perfect examples of how to do it right.
Stanley Newton
player, 485 posts
Wed 1 Jun 2016
at 22:14
  • msg #461

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

They have definitely been using the Daleks too much. They should be saved for special episodes/series finales where they can kill companions or something.
Kalath
player, 71 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Wed 1 Jun 2016
at 22:29
  • msg #462

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

They should just be used sparingly. They shouldn't just be brought out for special episodes; and a long-standing thing of Doctor Who is he always saves his companions. The only long-lasting companion that he failed to save was Adric.
Stanley Newton
player, 486 posts
Wed 1 Jun 2016
at 23:50
  • msg #463

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Kalath:
They should just be used sparingly. They shouldn't just be brought out for special episodes; and a long-standing thing of Doctor Who is he always saves his companions. The only long-lasting companion that he failed to save was Adric.


Yeah, saying special/finales only is a bit too restrictive. I don't think they should include Daleks just because it is a finale or a special and if they have a good idea for an episode then they should just make that episode. You are right that companions in general don't die, not even at the end of a series. I sort of forgot and thought it had happened more often (well Captain Jack was killed by Daleks in a series finale, but he got better so he doesn't count :)).

I do think that the Daleks have lost something over the last few years, maybe it is due to seeing them lose every time or maybe it is just that I have changed. In any case I think they could be made a lot more menacing. One way would be to restrict their appearances to episodes where they can really make a difference, so that when they do show up, you know that they mean business. The example I gave was killing companions in series finales and special episodes, which as you say does not really fit the show, because it doesn't happen that often. I think it could be effective, but maybe it is not for a show like Doctor Who.
Kalath
player, 72 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Wed 1 Jun 2016
at 23:56
  • msg #464

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Honestly, Daleks never really scared me. Cybermen I found much scarier; at least before Ace started killing them with a slingshot.

Power of the Daleks, is reputedly quite scary; but that story is basically all deleted.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1484 posts
Brave and bold as a Hero
of Draconia can be.
Thu 2 Jun 2016
at 01:39
  • msg #465

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I dislike the event-style format of the new series, but that's a problem of virtually all current television. It puts a focus on big flashy events and appearances, not actual quality storytelling. Daleks have been central to that, the thing that makes events, but they've suffered themselves as a result.

The 12th Doctor era has virtually made Daleks an obligatory chore though, getting them out of the way early in the season. Hopefully this means they'll go back to normal.
The Traveller
player, 1536 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Sun 5 Jun 2016
at 06:02
  • msg #466

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Today's Trav factoid:

Blake Lively played Carol Ferris in the Green Lantern 2011 film. In the imaginary franchise history, Lively as Carol was an obvious pick due to not only Mean Girls and her other film roles, but her impeccable nerd cred as the Traveller. Presumably, Lively has distanced herself from the role given how badly Green Lantern flopped, focusing on ATTT and her Traveller role.


This message was last edited by the player at 06:03, Sun 05 June 2016.
The Traveller
player, 1569 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Wed 29 Jun 2016
at 20:38
  • msg #467

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Rumour has it that Cobie Smulders is in negotiations for the role of the 6th Traveller, if Blake Lively doesn't return for another season, and also due to Katye Mulgrew's intense schedule on Orange Is The New Black  -



This message was last edited by the player at 20:51, Wed 29 June 2016.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1720 posts
Brave and bold as a Hero
of Draconia can be.
Tue 27 Dec 2016
at 06:50
  • msg #468

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Has anyone seen "The Return of Doctor Mysterio" yet? I liked it: it was good, straightforward, and fun. Matt Lucas as Nardole was much less annoying than I feared; he was actually a decent character with some clever lines. The superhero concept was also not cringey like it could have been. I also like stories like this where the Doctor is not actually the hero; Doctor Who works rather well when he's a catalyst or enabler for companions and guest characters to be heroes.

I see that the Christmas connection of these Christmas specials is becoming increasingly tenuous. There's a Christmas tree, now never mention Christmas again.
The Guardian
GM, 1975 posts
Tue 27 Dec 2016
at 14:40
  • msg #469

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
I see that the Christmas connection of these Christmas specials is becoming increasingly tenuous. There's a Christmas tree, now never mention Christmas again.

To be fair, Moffat has hewed more closely to seasonal ideas than RTD ever did, and for my money A Christmas Carol is really hard to beat for splicing together Christmas and core ideas of the show.

But then, I'm not sure I have the UK concept of Christmas specials down, anyway.  For US shows they tend to veer either toward Very Special instances of drama shows, or super batshit fantasy episodes for sitcoms.

I guess for this one, the light-hearted genre deconstruction is the sort of thing that might play better to a general audience that hasn't necessarily thought about these jokes before.  For me, it was OK -- there were some clever bits and lines and it was all overwhelmed by being happy just to see Capaldi back.
The Traveller
player, 1778 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Tue 27 Dec 2016
at 19:17
  • msg #470

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I think it was also a light hearted poke at the audience which Dr Who helped to build - the Marvel-DC super hero audience (and which the Doctor could easily step into.) I was watching recent Invasion crossover special for the DC Berlantiverse shows, and the Doctor could easily have stepped in. I could even see Capaldi saying "Barry,Barry, Barry," shaking his head at the Flashpoint shenanigans. In my headcanon, N-Space (Doctor Who world, where Trav and the Doctor live) is just off to the right of Berlantiverse. I occasionally RP Trav on Champions Online, and Trav calls that superhero setting "her vacation spot" that she uses a charged vacuum emboitment to travel to. "You guys have hundreds of super powered defenders. Back home, it's just me, and my companions, most of whom don't have world shaking powers except their good hearts. I get to be ordinary here."

Since Kara mentioned that the Dominators had visited Krypton and knew about dimension and time travel, I like to think that they know about the Doctor and the Traveller, and leave their corner of the cosmos strictly alone. They know what will happen if they meddle.
Kalath
player, 249 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Tue 27 Dec 2016
at 23:16
  • msg #471

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

In reply to The Traveller (msg # 470):

Haven't seen it yet; but don't forget Doctor Who already -has- a 'Dominators' race. Dealt with rather thoroughly by Troughton; but I believe it was implied they were part of a race not just two renegades who were like that.
The Guardian
GM, 1976 posts
Tue 27 Dec 2016
at 23:19
  • msg #472

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Kalath:
Haven't seen it yet; but don't forget Doctor Who already -has- a 'Dominators' race.

Having not followed the DC / CW shows, this is what immediately came to my mind on scanning the post, with all the attendant bewilderment. :)
Smoke Alarm
player, 1721 posts
Brave and bold as a Hero
of Draconia can be.
Tue 27 Dec 2016
at 23:48
  • msg #473

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

"Last Christmas" would be my favourite Christmas special.

Yep, the Dominators are a whole race.


Since the days of Marvel UK doing Doctor Who comics in the 80s and 90s, Doctor Who is canonically a part of the Marvel universe (Marvel canon, that is). The Doctor Who universe has a proper universe number, and a number of lesser-known characters have crossed over. Death's Head most notably began as a Transformer-sized giant before being shrunk by the Seventh Doctor using the Master's TCE, making him the right size for other crossovers. Captain Britain serves Merlin, who IIRC is the same Merlin who is one of the Matrix Lords of the Time Lord's Matrix, alongside Rassilon. Alan Moore's Special Executive time-travelling mercenaries (appearing in Captain Britain) started out working for Gallifrey during an early time war. There's also been a number of throwaway references and in-jokes.

Plus there's the Smoke Alarm and Squirrel Girl crossover comics. :)
The Traveller
player, 1780 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Wed 28 Dec 2016
at 07:25
  • msg #474

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Dominators (who are a race of techno giants) also exists in Rifts.

Gary, you should really check out the Flash and Supergirl, they are delightful.

The Flash, in particular, is all about Mistakes With Time Travel. The spin off show, Legends of Tomorrow, is all about Amateurs Doing Time Travel Who Mostly Get It Right. Mostly.

I'm sure that in the imaginary franchise setting fan fic authors gleeful write tons of awful Doctor Who and Trav/Berlantiverse crossover fic.

"Time Masters? They call themselves Time Masters! Look at this Stan! Dudes with Vortex Manipulator ships and Halloween Adventure robes! Whoooo!" (Halloween Adventure is a chain of costume stores in the US)
Kalath
player, 251 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Wed 28 Dec 2016
at 08:53
  • msg #475

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The most amusing thing, like ever, about Legends of Tomorrow is that Rip Hunter, the only person who actually understands properly the time-ship, is played by Arthur Darvill. And there's a Rory on board...
The Traveller
player, 1782 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Wed 28 Dec 2016
at 16:04
  • msg #476

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

In reply to Kalath (msg # 475):

Oh my Roomie and I were snickering throughout the entire series. We were half expecting 11 and Amy to be around the corner, Amy pulling the fake mustache off of him. "Rory Williams! Stop trolling these impressionable people RIGHT THIS INSTANT." 11: "Time Masters? Rory, 'Time Masters'. Rory, -come on.-" River - "Time Masters! It sounds like something out of a comic book! I like the one who has your name, he has a certain roguish character." Rory - "No don't any of you spoil this for me! They're a team and we do good work and they pay me respect! Please, let me have this one, just this once!"
Kalath
player, 253 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Thu 29 Dec 2016
at 00:32
  • msg #477

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Watching the comic-con panels before seasons 1 and 2 was pretty funny too.

Introducing John Barrowman:
John: Arthur and I, we've been on time-travel shows before. We know how this works...
Smoke Alarm
player, 1724 posts
Brave and bold as a Hero
of Draconia can be.
Thu 29 Dec 2016
at 13:01
  • msg #478

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I like Supergirl, it's great, and The Flash is good but Barry can be so dumb sometimes. Legends of Tomorrow... well, it's watchable, but the storytelling is sloppy and hopeless. There's a lot of opportunities for a better show wasted there. I haven't seen the most recent seasons of all of these though.

Arthur Darvill is good as Rip Hunter. It's like he spent his time on Doctor Who learning to be a Time Lord.


On the preview for the next series of Doctor Who... I see the series has returned to the RTD-era obsession with chips. Rose ate chips. Now Bill serves chips. Chips are a lazy metaphor for a humdrum lower-middle-class life where people eat chips. I like chips, but I don't want them to be the basis of the show's philosophy!
This message was last edited by the player at 13:37, Thu 29 Dec 2016.
Kalath
player, 254 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Thu 29 Dec 2016
at 13:35
  • msg #479

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I quite like it; but then I like Sara and Snart as characters; but I want to slap Ray a lot. What's frustrating about Barry is he's actually -meant- to be smart. Really smart.
Stanley Newton
player, 615 posts
Thu 29 Dec 2016
at 20:53
  • msg #480

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Re: The Return of Doctor Mysterio

It was better than I had expected. The episode didn't really do anything original with the superhero tropes (full of clichés), but overall it was okay, just a fun episode. The origin of the Ghost didn't feel out of place in the show and I liked how they filmed the scene with the call between Grant and Lucy (split screen, also including the Doctor). The design of the aliens was too similar to the snake mercenary thing from last year, but their plan sort of made sense and was a nice reference.
This message was last edited by the player at 20:53, Thu 29 Dec 2016.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1727 posts
Brave and bold as a Hero
of Draconia can be.
Fri 30 Dec 2016
at 04:01
  • msg #481

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yeah, the jokes about superheroes were nothing new. That radiation doesn't give superpowers, but radiation poisoning is an old one.

I liked that Grant was a nanny and the episode equated that with being a superhero. As a guy who babysits regularly, I appreciated that. :)

The alien design didn't make sense: the whole idea is that they open the skull, remove the brain, and place the alien brain inside. However, we then see their heads crack open with goop and pistols, but no brain, so where did it go? Why keep pistols in their heads? There are so many better hiding places, and they weren't even alien rayguns, so they can be concealed and carried normally. The scar across the face is also a dead giveaway, but everyone was blind to it, even the UNIT soldier at the end who should know better.

The line about a zip in the head (the brain aliens don't use zips) made me wonder if Slitheen were originally intended, but couldn't be used for some reason, and the monster was changed but the script otherwise wasn't changed to suit.
Stanley Newton
player, 616 posts
Sat 31 Dec 2016
at 00:06
  • msg #482

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
I liked that Grant was a nanny and the episode equated that with being a superhero. As a guy who babysits regularly, I appreciated that. :)


One of the better moments of the episode.

quote:
The alien design didn't make sense: the whole idea is that they open the skull, remove the brain, and place the alien brain inside. However, we then see their heads crack open with goop and pistols, but no brain, so where did it go? Why keep pistols in their heads? There are so many better hiding places, and they weren't even alien rayguns, so they can be concealed and carried normally. The scar across the face is also a dead giveaway, but everyone was blind to it, even the UNIT soldier at the end who should know better.


Yeah, I don't think that it is explicitly shown in the episode, but I like to believe that the scar becomes more visible over time (headcanon :)). That the two halves slowly slide apart and that when the UNIT soldier looked at his colleague he looked (relatively) normal. Also, UNIT might not know that the aliens are able to transfer in such a short time. Previously it involved six surgeons and presumably a couple of minutes.
This message was last edited by the player at 09:51, Sun 01 Jan 2017.
The Traveller
player, 1814 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Wed 1 Feb 2017
at 00:00
  • msg #483

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Kalath
player, 276 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Wed 1 Feb 2017
at 00:15
  • msg #484

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

... they lost me when they claimed Eccleston left out of fear of staying in the role too long.

Though yes, Capaldi is leaving.
The Traveller
player, 1815 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Wed 1 Feb 2017
at 00:40
  • msg #485

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

And they stuck "female doctor" into the URL strictly for SEO purposes.

I feel they will probably cast a young Tennant style Doctor, because that was popular with the fan base. Le sigh. I liked Capaldi.
Kalath
player, 277 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Wed 1 Feb 2017
at 01:04
  • msg #486

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

To be fair; there's usually a history that they don't play the same style of doctor two doctors in a row. Tennant to Smith arguably was; but other than that...

Having said that, both the last two doctors cast (the War Doctor and Capaldi) have been older. So much so that the War Doctor will now never be seen on screen again as John Hurt died about a week ago aged 77.
The Guardian
GM, 2015 posts
Wed 1 Feb 2017
at 03:16
  • msg #487

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

There is, as yet, one more set that Hurt did with Big Finish to come out.  Those stories have mostly been a mixed bag, but Hurt has done a great job with the character, and it's really a great thing that he embraced the role, being a big name proper actor and all.

I'll echo the disappointment of Trav's player that we only get one more year with Capaldi.  He's just been stunning as the Doctor.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1752 posts
Brave and bold as a Hero
of Draconia can be.
Wed 1 Feb 2017
at 12:27
  • msg #488

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

It's sad, I really liked Capaldi's Doctor and wish he'd done another season or two. Having 2016 as a dead year without him or a season was a total waste. This has been the new series golden age, IMO.

Chris Chibnall and a new Doctor of his choosing... damn it. They're starting (or already have) a tradition of new showrunner with new Doctor of their choosing, but I prefer the classic series approach of overlapping for more continuity.

They can still do old but not abrasive, but I doubt Chibnall will do anything less than blatant fan service and populism.

The female Doctor speculation has been done since Tom Baker left, and I wish the series would finally do it. I doubt Chibnall would take that risk though.
Kalath
player, 280 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Wed 1 Feb 2017
at 12:33
  • msg #489

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

What I'm really not liking, is a habit of every season seems to have either doctor or companion leave. We did get off that with season 5, and kinda 6, though to be fair Amy and Rory did kind of effectively leave near the end. But other than that, every season since the relaunch has had either a new doctor or new companion.

To be fair though, the classic series did mostly do that as well. And their 'showrunner' didn't have quite such an all-encompassing role. Script editor and producers were different, and though I feel script editor is closer to what the showrunner is now, they didn't have quite so much impact; as they didn't choose the stories that were accepted - they were just in charge of making sure that story worked.
The Guardian
GM, 2016 posts
Wed 1 Feb 2017
at 12:42
  • msg #490

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Kalath:
What I'm really not liking, is a habit of every season seems to have either doctor or companion leave. We did get off that with season 5, and kinda 6, though to be fair Amy and Rory did kind of effectively leave near the end. But other than that, every season since the relaunch has had either a new doctor or new companion.

What I really dislike about that is how it dovetails with the mindset of the show runners that a companion leaving, or an actor leaving the role of the Doctor, is the Worst Thing Ever and therefore the series has to be all about that and infused with a corresponding sense of doom.

I have my fingers crossed that Capaldi made his decision late enough in the day that we may not get so much of that this time.
Kalath
player, 281 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Wed 1 Feb 2017
at 12:48
  • msg #491

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Totally agree on that. One of the worst things can be a character staying too long - Tom Baker, great as he is, probably outstayed his welcome by a year or two. But yet, the most they ever did is a single story is about the leaving. Logopolis springs to mind there, but more often than not, they went to the opposite extreme, where the leaving didn't make sense. Hello Leela!
The Guardian
GM, 2017 posts
Wed 1 Feb 2017
at 12:54
  • msg #492

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I mean, I want him to only realize with seconds left on the clock that he has to (potentially) sacrifice his life to cure a planet full of Cheetah People save the universe.  Is that so much to ask?
Kalath
player, 282 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Wed 1 Feb 2017
at 12:59
  • msg #493

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Honestly? Yes. Even in the classic series, the only one that might really fill that wish would have been the Pertwee regeneration into Baker.

Would it be awesome? Oh hell yeah; but I don't think it'll happen. Then again, Ecclestone's regeneration was close to that.
The Traveller
player, 1817 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Wed 1 Feb 2017
at 17:09
  • msg #494

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Its funny you're all talking about this, because while I am not making it inevitable, I am absolutely good with the 5th Traveller giving her life to rebirth Khestartes Delta, subdue the Cheetah virus and save the people she loves. I started playing her in 2007, and for a 10 year run, it will be a fitting capstone. On the other hand, I will push hard for Blonde Trav to make it and keep the finale exciting!

Also, for Smoke Alarm - Trav doesn't know about the Us. So, you're fighting to save them as well!

I will laugh if Capaldi actually regenerates due to the Cheetah virus, because that would be so hilarious and awesome in the imaginary continuity I constructed, with the fans claiming that Lively and Capaldi's Time Lord's regenerated at the same time from the same cause. That is, if, this Traveller does regenerate!
This message was last edited by the player at 17:11, Wed 01 Feb 2017.
The Guardian
GM, 2021 posts
Thu 2 Feb 2017
at 03:46
  • msg #495

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Traveller:
I will laugh if Capaldi actually regenerates due to the Cheetah virus, because that would be so hilarious and awesome in the imaginary continuity I constructed, with the fans claiming that Lively and Capaldi's Time Lord's regenerated at the same time from the same cause. That is, if, this Traveller does regenerate!

I imagine the rumor mill is ablaze with the rumors of how the Doctor Who and ATTT production teams are now fighting each other over potential new lead actors.
Kalath
player, 283 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Thu 2 Feb 2017
at 03:48
  • msg #496

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

.... what, no-one's mentioned that the reason Sereth left, is because the wonderful Samuel L Jackson wanted a crack at playing the Traveller?
The Guardian
GM, 2022 posts
Thu 2 Feb 2017
at 04:00
  • msg #497

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I reckon he's shopping Kitlings on a TARDIS in Hollywood right now.
Kalath
player, 284 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Thu 2 Feb 2017
at 04:37
  • msg #498

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

"Get those god-damned kitlings off my TARDIS!"
The Traveller
player, 1821 posts
I can't not try
Always time to travel!
Thu 2 Feb 2017
at 07:00
  • msg #499

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'd take a crack at that.

"Yes, I was a woman for the past 800 years. You're god damned point?"
Smoke Alarm
player, 1756 posts
Brave and bold as a Hero
of Draconia can be.
Thu 2 Feb 2017
at 08:19
  • msg #500

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Guardian:
What I really dislike about that is how it dovetails with the mindset of the show runners that a companion leaving, or an actor leaving the role of the Doctor, is the Worst Thing Ever and therefore the series has to be all about that and infused with a corresponding sense of doom.


Oh yeah, it seems just about every season has been a doom-laded, portentous arc about someone leaving. It's the curse of modern TV: every series has to have a season arc, with foreshadowing, arching plot, etc. And every time a companion goes, it's an ironclad "never see each other again" thing. As if people can't part on good, voluntary terms, or characters and actors can't have guest appearances later on. Which they do anyway.

Though I suspect the big arc will be largely Moffat writing about Moffat leaving...

Kalath:
Honestly? Yes. Even in the classic series, the only one that might really fill that wish would have been the Pertwee regeneration into Baker.

Would it be awesome? Oh hell yeah; but I don't think it'll happen. Then again, Ecclestone's regeneration was close to that.


Davison's regeneration was similar. Although he was dying all through "The Caves of Androzani" (even held off regeneration during the spaceship crash scene), arguably it wasn't until very near the end when he collected the queen bat's milk that he realised he only had enough for Peri. That was probably the very best regeneration story, IMO. Not for the universe, not for the world, not even an accident. Just to save a friend.

Actually, Tennant's probably qualifies too, but then immediately fails due to the foreshadowing and post-shadowing.
Kalath
player, 285 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Thu 2 Feb 2017
at 08:39
  • msg #501

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Tennant's regeneration into Smith was stupid. After years of stating that "your face may change, but your arrogance is unmistakeable", as it were, now we have "it won't be me. It will be some other person." Oh, that and it was quite clear that "I don't want to go" was much about Tennant as 'the Doctor'. And that 'series of goodbyes' was clearly a homage to the classic doctors often seeing their companions as they regenerated, but by him actually doing it it was... yuck.

I really need to watch Caves of Androzani at some point. Davison really turned me off as the Doctor; as some of his earlier episodes were really crud. I liked Planet of the Spiders as well, but to be fair, Pertwee is probably my favourite doctor. McCoy's was an unfortunately bad regeneration.

For the new series Doctors, I think Eccleston to Tennant was probably the best so far; unless we get to retroactively count McGann into the War Doctor.

Oh, and whilst I'm ranting, this was the big problem with the Angels take Manhattan. For a while, Amy and Rory had been stating they were getting tired of the travelling. So why couldn't they be using that as an excuse? I mean, they still have superphones, so it shouldn't be that difficult to just go away from New York then call the TARDIS. "Hey Doctor, we're in Los Angeles now. Can you come get us?" And then Amy could state "I almost lost Rory forever. My choice... my choice is Rory." Or some such romantic claptrap.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1757 posts
Brave and bold as a Hero
of Draconia can be.
Thu 2 Feb 2017
at 08:55
  • msg #502

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

What?! The Davison Doctor has some of the most annoying companions and bad production, and his Doctor can be a bit limp, but strangely he had some of the best stories ever. "Kinda" and "Snakedance" are brilliant, "Earthshock" is fairly good (at least in comparison), "Enlightenment" is excellent, and "The Caves of Androzani" is one of the best stories ever. It's certainly Davison's best, even if it is his last. Suddenly, at the very end, the entire point of his Doctor stands right out. That era created and perfected both highly philosophical and grim-and-gritty stories for Doctor Who. (The C. Baker era then wasted itself ripping off the Davison era's grim-and-gritty stories, and failed.)
Kalath
player, 286 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Thu 2 Feb 2017
at 09:10
  • msg #503

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

But see, that's the problem with the Davison era. Yes, it does have some good stories. Earthshock actually is very good, and no, it's not because Adric dies. But it also has episodes like Castrovalva and Time-Flight. And some of the worst companions ever - Nyssa was fine, but Tegan, Adric and Turlough were terrible. Peri wasn't bad if you could look past the surface. And can pretend that her accent really does sound American...
The Traveller
player, 1879 posts
Just Regenerated
Am I blue yet?
Wed 29 Mar 2017
at 17:54
  • msg #504

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

So, I'm maudlin about retiring 5th Trav, and excited and hopeful about 6 as she starts her turn.

In the imaginary franchise history,I'm imaging that over the history of what is called the Lively Traveller era (2007 to 2017), Youtubers and bloggers are doing retrospectives of various Traveller story archs, both in the Rifts series (which ran on HBO and where Trav was introduced more as a plot device but became the dominant character, especially as negotiations with Palladium books and Harmony Gold collapsed) and then when ATTT started in 2013, directly produced by BBC Toronto.

So, what story archs do you think were written by Moffat, Davies, Gaiman and other guest writers? I like to think that show runner Sherper wanted to keep his stable of writers and his own vision for the show independent from Stephen Moffat, seeing what happened to characters like River Song and Clara Oswald. This is why the shows have seen so little crossover (not counting incidental crossover, with characters such as Kate Stewart, The Osgoods, Dorium Moldavar, and most recently River Song).

Share your conspiracies as to why there has been no crossovers in the other direction, even though fans have been demanding that characters such as Ru Zheng and Sereth appear alongside of Capaldi's Doctor (one fan wag has stated "BBC Cymru can't afford Sam Jackson and Jet Li!") Some fans even claim with the recent casting of Michelle Yeoh as the 6th Traveller, that ATTT is now the lead show in the franchise.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1819 posts
Queen of the Kitlings
Smoke Alarm is Us now!
Thu 30 Mar 2017
at 02:24
  • msg #505

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Fans on Twitter and the live-post threads on the Gallifrey Base are already looking forward to Michelle Yeoh doing a how-you-do.

Some wags are nicknaming this episode "Crouching Cheetah, Hidden Dragon".

Don't forget, Smoke Alarm was herself a crossover, having first appeared in an Eleventh Doctor episode, the one with the Cybermen written by Gatiss (okay a previous aborted Who game). Though only a supporting character and she apparently died during it, the character was popular enough with fans and writing teams that she was spun off to ATTT and made a companion for the Traveller.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1830 posts
Queen of the Kitlings
Smoke Alarm is Us now!
Mon 10 Apr 2017
at 08:30
  • msg #506

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

So, there's two small bits of news about the next series that have been making the rounds.

Bill will be gay. At this point in the new series, this is the least surprising news ever. Not the first gay companion, after two in the comics, nor the first gay regular in the new series. First gay full-season companion on TV is much less of a milestone. So, shrug.

The John Simm Master is returning. Nooooo! A "The Two Masters"–type story could be interesting, but I'd really like an Ainley or Delgado there, and don't want to see Simm's Master again after the trainwreck of "The End of Time". Alistair Reynolds did this in his 3rd Doctor novel, The Harvest of Time.
Kalath
player, 336 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Mon 10 Apr 2017
at 09:30
  • msg #507

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yeah, the Simm Master is arguably the worst we've had. Delgado is clearly the best in my eyes, but Ainley, especially at first, isn't as bad as his reputation suggests. But Simm was terrible.
Stanley Newton
player, 662 posts
Sat 15 Apr 2017
at 22:07
  • msg #508

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The new episode aired today...

Spoilers for The Pilot

Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)

So what did you think? I thought it was a bit uneven, but okay. The jokes were a bit hit or miss and some felt reused/old. The antagonist was very Moffaty (make people scared of some normal thing, puddles in this case), but better than his other recent attempts. I liked that Bill noticed the TARDIS was too big for the doors/windows, nice characterisation, but that scene also felt a bit familiar.


The Guardian
GM, 2135 posts
Sun 16 Apr 2017
at 20:32
  • msg #509

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Well, we've all seen new companions come on board a number of times (some of us a truly laughable number of times) so there are always going to be things in common.  But I liked it.  The whole thing was about building the relationship between the Doctor and Bill, and it did the job nicely.  Didn't have to be spectacular, and being spectacular would have worked against it a bit.

I really like that initially at least, they have a strong mentor / mentee dynamic going on.  It's sort of the first real opportunity to do this that they've had since the Seventh Doctor & Ace (the Doctor & Rose, or the Doctor & Amy had vastly different things going on) and I'm looking forward to see how it goes.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1854 posts
Queen of the Kitlings
Smoke Alarm is Us now!
Mon 17 Apr 2017
at 01:43
  • msg #510

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I liked it. It started better than the last season did, so I have good hopes for this one.

The chase through the universe felt a bit arbitrary, like the episode was just filling in time. The Daleks seem completely obligatory at this point: sticking some in for the sake of Dalek fans and the media, but it was cute to see Movellans. I liked the brief hop to Sydney, and could tell it was Australia before it was revealed.

For Bill, I felt they were trying to have their cake and eat it too with her being both "lower-class" (works in a canteen, etc.) and higher (goes to university). Fortunately, it just about works, and shows she's curious and ambitious to still attend lectures in her own time, which is why she impresses the Doctor.

It brings back the weird chips obsession the series had with Rose. Bill works in a university canteen, not a fish-and-chip shop. She sells more than just chips.

And yes, I love the teacher/student relationship between the Doctor and Bill. Finally! It's something mature and different that's good to see in the series again. It's also nice that the Doctor's spent 50 years as a university lecturer. He's now Professor Chronotis.

The TARDIS thing is inevitable and will usually play out the same way, and there's rarely the opportunity to do something different. I think Bill's reaction was different though: she didn't immediately go for the automatic "it's bigger on the inside" but exhausted all rational explanations (like the wall of the office was knocked through) like a scientist. The episode kind of did it inverted earlier: Bill noticing the large box wouldn't fit through the small doors.

I hadn't liked Matt Lucas in anything, and I didn't in his first appearance as Nardole. But the character's been toned down and evolved, so he's actually likeable now.

And the Simm Master will have a goatee. Well, it's a small mercy.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1870 posts
Minty fresh
as a Kang could be
Mon 24 Apr 2017
at 02:38
  • msg #511

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Well, I liked "Smile".

Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
Though it needed an edit. It had perhaps a bit too much repetition of what was already known, and the opening scene spoiled the threat for the audience, rather than letting us work it out alongside the Doctor and Bill. They could have introduced one determinedly smiling surviving colonist to give them someone to interact with, as they wandered about alone for a bit too long, and shifted the revelation of the deaths until later.

Stanley Newton
player, 666 posts
Mon 24 Apr 2017
at 20:27
  • msg #512

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I thought "Smile" wasn't as good as "The Pilot", but much better than the writer's previous episode.


Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
The ending was very rushed and I am not sure I agree with the message. I think the story might have worked better as a two-parter, as it was right now, it relied a bit too much on people not knowing things or missing obvious information. They had a map of the ship: how could the Doctor have missed all the cryopods? That you couldn't see your own badge was a nice touch and I liked the ;/ face the robots made.

Smoke Alarm
player, 1877 posts
Minty fresh
as a Kang could be
Wed 26 Apr 2017
at 03:54
  • msg #513

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)


Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
The cryopods were the in the big empty space Bill found on the map, I think. So, it's understandable for the Doctor to miss it, and criminally negligent of whoever designed the ship. :)

Stanley Newton
player, 668 posts
Wed 26 Apr 2017
at 21:57
  • msg #514

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

In reply to Smoke Alarm (msg # 513):


Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
Oh yeah, I had forgotten about the empty space on the map. Whoever made the map should find another job (maybe programming robots :)?).

Smoke Alarm
player, 1879 posts
Minty fresh
as a Kang could be
Thu 27 Apr 2017
at 02:33
  • msg #515

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)


Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
"Smile" had strong overtones of "The Happiness Patrol", with both being about a colony where people are forced to smile and look happy or else be killed by robots. It's also similar to "The Macra Terror" in a way. I guess it's one of those things Who keeps doing.

The message/theme was a bit confused this time: it swung from real emotions versus emoji to slaves and colonists and indigenous races, without resolving the former or setting up the latter.


The Traveller
player, 1940 posts
Just Regenerated
Am I blue yet?
Sun 30 Apr 2017
at 17:46
  • msg #516

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I've seen the 1st two episodes. I really feel like it's being phoned in. Too tired for more in depth analysis. More later.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1887 posts
Minty fresh
as a Kang could be
Mon 1 May 2017
at 01:50
  • msg #517

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I liked "Thin Ice", great story.

I chose "The Mark of the Rani" to accompany it, so they went very well together in themes and setting. I've come to really appreciate pairing a classic serial and a new episode for any evening's viewing, particularly when they share a setting, theme, or threat.

I don't know about being phoned in, no-one seems to be slacking off in any department. Early Series 10 has been a great return to the quality of Series 8 after the wonky start to Series 9. In the Capaldi era, the pacing is slower and the tone more sober, but I feel that's a good thing, it allows a story to develop naturally and focus on its elements. The rush, loudness, and energy of the early years of the new series made it an exhausting blur.
The Guardian
GM, 2161 posts
Mon 1 May 2017
at 03:22
  • msg #518

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Smoke Alarm:
I don't know about being phoned in, no-one seems to be slacking off in any department.

My take is that the three stories so far have stuck to relatively safe storytelling territory, and don't notably feel like Moffat trying to launch another magnum opus to leave his mark on the series... which he has already done multiple times, and which I don't really think we need from him again.  Instead they've merely been well executed stories with Capaldi and Mackie acting their socks off.  I can live with that.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1888 posts
Minty fresh
as a Kang could be
Mon 1 May 2017
at 03:30
  • msg #519

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yeah, I read a review that it was playing it safe after missing last year's season and switching showrunners next season. It's also a return to the early new-series structure of a modern-day story, a future story, and a past story.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1897 posts
Minty fresh
as a Kang could be
Tue 9 May 2017
at 03:14
  • msg #520

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I liked "Knock Knock", it was a nice spooky story. But no part of how it worked made any sense.
The Guardian
GM, 2229 posts
Mon 12 Jun 2017
at 03:57
  • msg #521

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

This week in Always Time To Travel / Doctor Who synchronicity:

(Empress of Mars spoiler:)


Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
So I drop in a random Alpha Centauran in Trav's AMA scene and within a week, ACTUAL ALPHA CENTAURI on the TV

I guess this can't be a coincidence.

...So, any requests?

8-P
The Traveller
player, 1991 posts
Change your view,yourself
Blue and living it
Mon 12 Jun 2017
at 05:57
  • msg #522

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Check the Trav twitter. She would have been livid with him for pulling that stunt at NASA.

As for Alpha Centaurans, I can neither confirm nor deny anything, except that if I did have a line to Moffat, I'd tell him to write good episodes.
This message was last edited by the player at 05:57, Mon 12 June 2017.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1930 posts
Minty fresh
as a Kang could be
Mon 12 Jun 2017
at 07:04
  • msg #523

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

That was amazing. :D

I was trying to picture the voice, figured it was meant to be Queen Victoria but it was all wrong. Then bam! Giant eyeball! I was giggling for ages about that.

They brought in the original voice actress too, Ysanne Churchman, despite being almost 92.

There was a short story in a Decalog collection for the Virgin novels, but after they lost the license for Doctor Who, so the few Who references there were were carefully erased. At one point, there's a description of attacks by strange and horrifying green aliens with tentacles and single bulbous eyes like they were Lovecraftian horrors. Then you realise they're Alpha Centauri and humans are the aggressors.

I liked it, a good clever story. I did a double-feature with The Ice Warriors. It was good to see the Martians again.

I did not like the Monks for the last three episodes. They are the most generic villains, with no motivations or personalities or purpose except to be weird and threatening. They were so boring! Worse than the Silence.


If I had a request for the New Series: Kangs.

Actually: Kandyman. Giant robot made of lollies, brilliant. The New Series can give up being so serious and have some real fun.
This message was last edited by the player at 05:35, Wed 14 June 2017.
Kalath
player, 388 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Mon 12 Jun 2017
at 14:28
  • msg #524

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

In reply to The Guardian (msg # 521):

To be honest, despite being more into classic who than the current series; I think they need to stop dropping in classic-series aliens. They're an appeal to the side of the fanbase that probably aren't as into the new series as is, and, speaking as that side, they have generally disappointed. The Zygons are about the only ones I thought did a good reference.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1931 posts
Minty fresh
as a Kang could be
Tue 13 Jun 2017
at 07:12
  • msg #525

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Eh, I like these appearances. But then, I'm one those classic fans you're describing. :) It's done rarely enough and well enough I don't think it jars. It's a different case for the much-overused Daleks and Cybermen though, who could be used far less.

Unusually, the New Series doesn't seem as confident about using its own recurring monsters. It has disappointingly few that would work in multiple stories, and is strangely shy about re-using the few that do seem to click. Weeping Angels were a one-episode wonder that keep getting dragged back with nothing more to them, but Slitheen and Judoon are iconic for the new series but have barely been seen in Who since. They got much more development in Sarah Jane Adventures.


The next episode, The Eaters of Light with a monster in Roman Britain looks an awful lot like Outlander, a 2008 flop about an alien (Jim Caviezel) landing in Iron Age Norway and fighting a very-similar-looking four-legged bio-luminescent tentacled alien monster.

But it's by Rona Munro, who wrote Survival, so I have much higher hopes.
Kalath
player, 390 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Tue 13 Jun 2017
at 07:49
  • msg #526

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

See, that's the thing. I don't think it's done rarely enough -or- well enough. The Silurians just seemed an excuse to not only address the fact (again!) that Silurians is a really bad name for them, and and explain how sea devils and Silurians aren't -exactly- the same, but yet are. Ice Warriors were disappointing for all the subtle references we got in advance. Sontarans were craptastic in the new series.

But then, I would rather if they were going to do them they did it like they did with the macra, or even the subtle reference to the Sensorites with the Ood. They've chosen the iconic villains because more than just the fans will enjoy it - but it's only the fans that really care about the returning villains anyway; and they'll get just as much, if not more, with, say proper reference to the kitlings of Survival, or even the Gods of Ragnarok; than to ice warriors, or Sontarans, let alone Daleks or Cybermen.

And yes, why not any of the new series monsters being revisited, rather than Weeping Angels (who's mythology gets made a little weirder each time).
The Guardian
GM, 2232 posts
Tue 13 Jun 2017
at 12:20
  • msg #527

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I dunno.  This sort of thing leaves me pretty conflicted, but as a super-jaded paleo-fan I usually come down on the side of "Arrgh, show me something NEW."

I found this episode about 99% uninspiring: it was super-conservative storytelling in a narrative sense, and about all it proved to me was that Mark Gatiss can write completely traditional Doctor Who without egregious errors in his sleep.  I compare it with the Monk episodes, and I think all of those had greater or lesser degrees of sloppy plotting, and yet I'm way more inclined to cut them slack because (at least up until the resolution of The Lie of the Land) they seemed to be aiming higher.  This one... boy.  All I could think was, you have the opportunity to make just a dozen new stories after being away for a year, and this is one that you picked?

The show is in the weird position now that they can "call back" to things that its general audience -- as opposed to the hard core like us -- has never seen.  And that's fair enough; I just wish that if they insisted on going back to the 1970s for aliens, they could have given us a story for today.  But it doesn't seem like they did.
The Traveller
player, 1994 posts
Change your view,yourself
Blue and living it
Tue 13 Jun 2017
at 13:53
  • msg #528

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm just generally hugely disappointed by this season.
Kalath
player, 391 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Tue 13 Jun 2017
at 14:18
  • msg #529

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I prefer the subtle references (eg the Macra in Gridlock; the Ood being part of the Sense-Sphere) than the blatant pulls. And prefer those references to being not necessarily as huge in popular culture as the Daleks/Cybermen/Sontarans etc.
Stanley Newton
player, 697 posts
Tue 13 Jun 2017
at 22:01
  • msg #530

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Traveller:
I'm just generally hugely disappointed by this season.


I think this season started stronger (not perfect, but at least better than the last two). The last couple of episodes with the Monks and now the Empress of Mars had some serious flaws, though. Despite having an extra year to write this, there are still too many plotholes and power of love endings for my taste.

Regarding the Empress of Mars:

The Frozen joke did not work at all. Colonel Godsacre overcoming his cowardice, did it make sense? To me it felt a bit out of the blue. I mean what made him change his mind? I think the episode needed more time (a common problem.)
This message was last edited by the player at 22:01, Tue 13 June 2017.
The Traveller
player, 1995 posts
Change your view,yourself
Blue and living it
Tue 13 Jun 2017
at 22:27
  • msg #531

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I just think with the entire production team flipping with Moffat leaving, they're phoning it in.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1935 posts
Minty fresh
as a Kang could be
Wed 14 Jun 2017
at 05:55
  • msg #532

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Eh, after three episodes of the fricking Monks, I was probably better disposed to The Empress of Mars than I might otherwise have been. Besides, the series needs the straightforward conservative stories to make the stranger stuff work. But this also had the oddity of Victorians vs Ice Warriors, a steampunk and Wells & Verne homage, and a commentary on colonialism (albeit a 100-years-out-of-date and obvious one) to make it above average. The Monk trilogy felt like such classic Moffat it stands out as the more conservative to me.

Though apparently this is the one Gatiss had been trying to do for years, and they only now gave him the opportunity. Makes me wonder how many times it had been knocked back previously.

I think the new-series fans are well enough up on the classic that the series can afford to do these call-backs, better than it could in say the 80s. New fans have the Internet and DVDs and to get very familiar with them. I used to hold classic series screenings for my SF club, but after the new series, they'd basically seen them all already.


I have to admit, I want Australian newsreader Lee Lin Chin as the next Doctor. She has the fashion sense, she has the ability to talk Daleks into killing themselves.
The Traveller
player, 2018 posts
Change your view,yourself
Blue and living it
Fri 23 Jun 2017
at 19:14
  • msg #533

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Wow, fitting shooting in as both a Starfleet captain and as TV's leading female Timelord? Sorry Michelle Gomez fans, the other Michelle has you beat.

She's obviously the hottest woman on SF TV.

How does Michelle Yeoh do it?


This message was last edited by the player at 19:16, Fri 23 June 2017.
The Guardian
GM, 2256 posts
Sat 24 Jun 2017
at 02:47
  • msg #534

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Trav, you've got mail coming over the Transversal Telegraph.



Mako Mori wants her look back.
The Traveller
player, 2019 posts
Change your view,yourself
Blue and living it
Sat 24 Jun 2017
at 04:29
  • msg #535

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Guardian:
Trav, you've got mail coming over the Transversal Telegraph.



Mako Mori wants her look back.


HOLY SHIT I'VE BEEN FOUND OUT.

QUICK GET GIPSY DANGER OUT OF THE TARDIS RALEIGH QUICK


Smoke Alarm
player, 1959 posts
Minty fresh
as a Kang could be
Mon 3 Jul 2017
at 03:07
  • msg #536

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

So, the last two episodes...

Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
I liked World Enough and Time. The origin of the Cybermen (and now they have multiple origins, but the Mondas connection was unclear) was pretty good, and certainly better than the Cybus version in Series 2. It probably borrows a lot from Spare Parts, the Big Finish audio, which was well-received (though I haven't heard it). I wish they'd dedicated a whole story to it, and shown the world outside the hospital that led to this. As it is, it's unfortunately cut down and grafted on to another story about a spaceship and the two Masters (maybe that's fitting for Cybermen).

Bringing back the original Cyberman design (thanks leftover costumes from the Adventure in Time and Space!) shows they really are the creepiest and most effective of all Cyber costumes, with the most obvious organic elements, hidden just out of sight to be really disturbing. It was a shame to see the new series version return after that, far too robotic.

Unfortunately I found The Doctor Falls a bit unclear about what was going on. The people don't even seem to be rescued by the end; they're on a higher deck and in danger of more Cybermen returning in a few days.

Bill was a good companion. Once again the series shies away from actually killing a companion off, instead giving a magical out. It felt like a deus ex machina since it came completely out of nowhere. If water-girl had come back since The Pilot, or if that story had occurred later, they could have developed their relationship and connection. As it is, it's just "Surprise, that girl you knew briefly way back is your soul-mate forever now." It also repeats the exit of Clara and Me from last series: two undying post-death lesbians adventuring through time and space.

And the Doctor's aborted regeneration... Did we really have to go back to "I don't want to go."? The Doctor's reason for this is unexplained and out-of-the-blue, since there's no indication of this before. I mean, I don't want him to go, but what's his reason?

Somehow I knew he was in Antarctica during The Tenth Planet, which I watched last week prior to World Enough.... Then I watched The Five Doctors last night before The Doctor Falls. It's just as well the first Doctor quotes Hurndall's "The original, you might say." line, because David Bradley, like Richard Hurndall, really can't actually do William Hartnell's Doctor either.

BTW, I am really good at picking classic serials to watch before new series episodes in my double-feature nights. :D


The Traveller
player, 2036 posts
Change your view,yourself
Blue and living it
Mon 3 Jul 2017
at 03:28
  • msg #537

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)


Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)

I just saw through the end of the season myself. This series has left me feeling a big sigh. More of the same, very disappointed, and a waste of a terrific actor.


This message was last edited by the player at 03:28, Mon 03 July 2017.
The Traveller
player, 2056 posts
Change your view,yourself
Blue and living it
Sun 16 Jul 2017
at 19:52
  • msg #538

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

SO BLONDE TIME LORDS

*crosses arms*

The fandom demand was overwhelming, but Blake Lively is too busy raising a family and making cupcakes and Michelle Yeoh is killing it over here!

All of the ATTT fans are feeling SO SMUG right now.
This message was last edited by the player at 19:53, Sun 16 July 2017.
The Traveller
player, 2057 posts
Change your view,yourself
Blue and living it
Sun 16 Jul 2017
at 19:54
  • msg #539

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Traveller - "Missy as Mary Poppins. You as a blonde girl. Everyone wants to be me. Sigh!"
Kalath
player, 429 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Mon 17 Jul 2017
at 00:24
  • msg #540

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

My only aggravation is she's a natural brunette.

My only concern is how it is done. There's been such a clamor for it lately, that I can't help but wonder if it's gimmick casting; done to make the fans happy, and that they will overemphasis over the entire series that she's a woman now.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1979 posts
Minty fresh
as a Kang could be
Mon 17 Jul 2017
at 01:18
  • msg #541

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I'm fine with a female Doctor. I'm disappointed she's so young (like Smith, my age). The Doctor needs to show the experience, maturity, and, heh, gravitas the role requires. I think the Doctor–companion relationship has always worked best when the Doctor can serve as a mentor and parental figure to the companion. The companion should be the one carrying the youthful, emotional centre. But my enthusiasm for a female Doctor is more than balancing that.

We're going to hear a lot of stupid complaints from some quarters about it, but the only legitimate argument against it is that the Doctor is one of the few positive male role models around. Making him female loses that. On the other hand, it's ultimately why he should become a woman as well.

I also hope the writing is up to the task, and that she won't just be a lady Tennant.
The Guardian
GM, 2314 posts
Mon 17 Jul 2017
at 02:02
  • msg #542

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Kalath:
My only concern is how it is done. There's been such a clamor for it lately, that I can't help but wonder if it's gimmick casting; done to make the fans happy, and that they will overemphasis over the entire series that she's a woman now.

It probably helps that it is being done as part of a wholesale changeover.  Since I assume no characters are coming back for the new era, there won't be any call to stop and point at it within the show.  The new companion(s) will just meet the Doctor as a woman, and that's that.

I hope and trust that they will not use it for crappy humor like Moffat did with the Master, particularly at first.  Something she has problems getting accustomed to, perhaps, but not the slapstick.  But I think that for it not to be a gimmick, it has to be meaningful -- for every way that the Doctor has evoked a Merlin or a Sherlock or a Loki in the show, she ought to be playing off of female archetypes now, not running away from them.

Smoke Alarm:
The Doctor needs to show the experience, maturity, and, heh, gravitas the role requires. I think the Doctor–companion relationship has always worked best when the Doctor can serve as a mentor and parental figure to the companion. The companion should be the one carrying the youthful, emotional centre. But my enthusiasm for a female Doctor is more than balancing that.

I'm betting that they'll have a companion who's young enough that the right writing and acting can make that dynamic work.

Overall, I am thrilled with how much this says that Chibnall is not willing to stand pat, and that his bosses are supporting him in that.
The Guardian
GM, 2315 posts
Mon 17 Jul 2017
at 02:07
  • msg #543

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Traveller:
The fandom demand was overwhelming, but Blake Lively is too busy raising a family and making cupcakes and Michelle Yeoh is killing it over here!

Idris Elba has flatly refused to comment on rumors that he was sounded out to audition as the Sixth Traveller.
Kalath
player, 432 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Mon 17 Jul 2017
at 02:10
  • msg #544

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Except; that from all accounts, Moffatt was actually the one in charge of choosing the new Doctor.

And archetypes possibly, stereotypes no. We don't need her to repeat Davison's shtick, for example, of 'there should have been another way'. Primarily, if it's an established fact at this point that timelords can change genders when they regenerate, they're a lot less likely to act like typical males, or typical females. It means their 'alienness' really should be the over-riding aspect, not whether they're currently a man or a woman.

And above all, we do not need a repeat of the early-Capaldi stuff of 'why this face?'
The Guardian
GM, 2316 posts
Mon 17 Jul 2017
at 02:12
  • msg #545

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Kalath:
Except; that from all accounts, Moffatt was actually the one in charge of choosing the new Doctor.

Uh, I don't think that's the case.

http://screenrant.com/doctor-w...ale-jodie-whittaker/
Smoke Alarm
player, 1982 posts
Minty fresh
as a Kang could be
Mon 17 Jul 2017
at 02:33
  • msg #546

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I hope they never do the sonic screwdriver joke.
The Traveller
player, 2059 posts
Change your view,yourself
Blue and living it
Mon 17 Jul 2017
at 05:18
  • msg #547

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Kalath:
Except; that from all accounts, Moffatt was actually the one in charge of choosing the new Doctor.

And archetypes possibly, stereotypes no. We don't need her to repeat Davison's shtick, for example, of 'there should have been another way'. Primarily, if it's an established fact at this point that timelords can change genders when they regenerate, they're a lot less likely to act like typical males, or typical females. It means their 'alienness' really should be the over-riding aspect, not whether they're currently a man or a woman.

And above all, we do not need a repeat of the early-Capaldi stuff of 'why this face?'


You need to let go of the 'alien Doctor' thing - fans will reject an alien, non-relatable Doctor. Doctors can be eccentric, but never weird or inhuman. That's a thing for novels. An unrelatable Doctor that is unsympathetic to fans will be rejected by fans. That's also why we will never see the looms on screen and instead we'll see Gallifreyan kids running around. The Doctor being god like and apart from humans will always be a source of angst and pathos, never a point of unrelatability. At worst, the Doctor will always be a kooky human. Also, remember the first rule of SF - the reason why most genre media aliens act human is because we've never met a real alien from space.
Kalath
player, 434 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Mon 17 Jul 2017
at 05:23
  • msg #548

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

You think Tom Baker's Doctor acted human? Or Pertwee's? Barring Capaldi and Tennant as the two outliers, most of the more popular Doctors have been relatively alien. Capaldi was too alien yes; but that certainly doesn't mean we need to go to the other extreme and have them act like a stereotypical woman that we have seen in all sorts of other shows.
The Traveller
player, 2060 posts
Change your view,yourself
Blue and living it
Mon 17 Jul 2017
at 11:37
  • msg #549

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

"Stereotypical woman". As opposed to what, a stereoptypical man?

Think about how you just invalidated everything you just said, and examine your privilege, bro.

Aloof and bullshit is what kills the Doctor as a character. Tennant is what got viewers. Want to keep the franchise alive? Make the character human.
This message was last edited by the player at 11:43, Mon 17 July 2017.
The Guardian
GM, 2317 posts
Mon 17 Jul 2017
at 11:47
  • msg #550

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Folks, I wanted to step in here and encourage everyone not to get personal with this discussion.

We have different opinions going around here and if we want to discuss them, I think that's great, but it's not worth getting mad at each other about.  Positions that we have on these things can, and need to, exist side by side, and no one should get to tell anyone else how to have their fun, or whether they're allowed to be dissatisfied with particular directions in Doctor Who.
Kalath
player, 435 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Mon 17 Jul 2017
at 14:25
  • msg #551

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

All depends on your PoV. In my view, Tennant almost murdered the doctor as a character. And I'm getting rather sick and tired of your constant denigrating of what came before - or more specifically, denigrating the whole concept that someone else might like it. You may not be aware of it, but it's what you do a lot.

The Doctor has never been a stereotypical man, except possibly Tennant. Stereotypes, of any sort, are not good, or healthy explorations of character.
The Traveller
player, 2061 posts
Change your view,yourself
Blue and living it
Mon 17 Jul 2017
at 20:03
  • msg #552

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

And Tennant resurrected the show. Tennant was terrific. I will always adore him and Eccleston. I am not a bad who fan for liking him. Older Doctors were great too. Snide Doctor elitism won't get me to like what you like. Don't insult what I love about who. Real Who fans love all the Doctors. Don't tell me that I'm a bad Who fan because I don't meet your litmus. Not meeting your litmus is not "denigrating what came before." I came in with Pertwee on New Jersey Network public TV in 86! But that era is done and the Doctor was always relatable. He was kooky but never alien.

Switching gears - Trav needs to have a word with this guy - or more specifically the people he mocks!

https://twitter.com/Technicall...s/886189206300655616
The Traveller
player, 2063 posts
Change your view,yourself
Blue and living it
Mon 17 Jul 2017
at 20:53
  • msg #553

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

My Facebook Feed has unanimously decided - Trav's TARDIS is full of bras.

She also has seperate Lingerie and Undies rooms.
Kalath
player, 436 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Mon 17 Jul 2017
at 22:19
  • msg #554

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Actually, I have never said anything about you liking the new series. It's great. But, deliberately or not, you have attacked the fact I still prefer the older doctors.

Regardless, I'm done on this discussion.
Smoke Alarm
player, 1983 posts
Minty fresh
as a Kang could be
Tue 18 Jul 2017
at 03:53
  • msg #555

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I think there's been some misunderstanding and talking at cross-purposes here. Like, what do we mean by "alien"? Is it personality or biology?

I think all Doctors have been "alien" to some degree, even when the 1st Doctor was still assumed to be a human from the future, and even in the New Series with the 9th, 10th, and 11th Doctors, the writers tried to play it up now and then. They're more alien than the 5th Doctor. The definition of "alien" here is, what, habits eccentric by our standards, aloof viewpoints, unusual emotional reactions, strange senses? These have been common to all Doctors, and have only increased in the new series, beginning with Tennant (partially because eccentric heroes have grown quite common in many series). No one called him a Lonely God until the new series. For my part, I'm hoping they tone it down. So the Doctor's never been even remotely like a "normal human", and never will be.

Yet fans clearly still find them relateable. Consider in Star Trek, the most alien was Spock, yet he was the most popular and people had crushes on him. I'd argue Tennant and Smith have been popular because of these alien aspects. They'd be significantly boring without them. So I'd put more faith in what fans would take to. I think what Kalath means is that the Doctor, whatever he or she is, shouldn't look like the stock characters on other TV shows, and I think we can all agree with that.

In any case, every fan has their own conception of the series and their era, usually based on when they got involved, or when they were aged 10. They accept what happened before, like what got them interested, then grow critical of what comes after when it changes. After 54 years, various media, and countless shifts in style, the fandom is wholly fragmented. Which is completely understandable. It's a good thing, IMO, everyone's got a different vision, but never makes for peaceful forum discussions. But it shows there are countless different ways of doing the series, with good and bad aspects. No-one's wrong and the series keeps on changing, with or without its fans. Being a Doctor Who fan teaches an appreciation of time and change. :)
Smoke Alarm
player, 2077 posts
Blue Kangs are,
of course, best.
Fri 10 Nov 2017
at 01:16
  • msg #556

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

http://www.doctorwhonews.net/2...ostume-revealed.html

It seems to be a Sixth Doctor meets Mork inspired design. :)
The Traveller
player, 2189 posts
Change your view,yourself
Blue and living it
Fri 10 Nov 2017
at 02:12
  • msg #557

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Nanoo, nanoo.
The Traveller
player, 2208 posts
Change your view,yourself
Blue and living it
Thu 28 Dec 2017
at 06:14
  • msg #558

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

So, feelings about the Christmas Special?

It made me feel rather warm inside. It was kind yet bittersweet. And the speech at the end was amazing.
The Guardian
GM, 2440 posts
Thu 28 Dec 2017
at 15:02
  • msg #559

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Maybe it was the only thing to do as your last story for the show, but if I needed to be reminded about why I am glad to see Steven Moffat handing over control of the show, this would have done it.  Even when it was being good, and there are some exceptionally lovely bits in it, it was still continuing to do Doctor Who that is all about the myth of the Doctor.  I'd quite like to see the show get back to earning that weight and depth for a while instead of coasting on it.
The Traveller
player, 2209 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Fri 29 Dec 2017
at 02:59
  • msg #560

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

You are not wrong.
Smoke Alarm
player, 2097 posts
Blue Kangs are,
of course, best.
Fri 29 Dec 2017
at 08:07
  • msg #561

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yeah, I definitely agree with that, though it's not really a Moffat issue. Although the classic series had moments of it here and there (7th Doctor especially), it was Davies who entrenched it. Moffat continued it, and I doubt Chiball will change it. At this point, it feels almost obligatory: in "Twice Upon a Time", when all the grandiose titles were read out, the Doctor immediately undercut it with a joke about taking the jokes out. Maybe a certain kind of fan gets excited by it.

But I rather liked the rest of the story, it managed not to rush anything and just savour the moments, and avoided having a villain or main threat. The 12th Doctor era has been good for that. The last-words speech at the end went on a little long though. Only children can hear his name? Okay, I get it: his name is Who. :)

This new thing for holding back regenerations is bugging me. Regeneration used to be imminent and unavoidable. The 5th Doctor delayed it in "The Caves of Androzani" as part of his desperate effort to save Peri while dying of poisoning and, though few fans noticed, it worked well as a plot element. Now it's become this self-indulgent thing for long goodbyes and post-death moping that goes on and on, suggesting the Doctor could just choose not to regenerate and it's not even clear what he's dying of. It takes away the threat of death, especially now the Doctor's on extra lives.
Kalath
player, 489 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Fri 29 Dec 2017
at 08:43
  • msg #562

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Even the third doctor delayed it long enough to return to UNIT. But yes, both cases they were clearly dying - and arguably, in both cases it made their new incarnation a bit crazy, even by his own standards. Tom might be considered now the only classic doctor to give the new series ones a run for their money in the polls, but when he started he really was quite... eccentric, even by the standards already set out. And I don't need to mention Colin...

Eccleston's or Smiths regenerations weren't too bad but Tennant's was pretty horrendous in regards to extending it.
Smoke Alarm
player, 2098 posts
Blue Kangs are,
of course, best.
Fri 29 Dec 2017
at 11:49
  • msg #563

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Oh yeah, I forgot the end of "Planet of the Spiders" (but I usually have a blind spot for that bit; one of my earliest and most often seen serials seen was "Robot"). I think that was more a case of slowly dying of radiation poisoning, prior to the triggering of regeneration.

Hmm, in any case, the 3rd Doctor didn't return to Earth until three weeks later after being lost in the Time Vortex. Paul Cornell made it worse in his NA Love and War (1992): he implied the 3rd Doctor was stuck lying on the console floor unable to move for 10 years, which is shockingly mean.
The Traveller
player, 2210 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sat 30 Dec 2017
at 04:41
  • msg #564

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Has the Doctor ever weaponised regeneration? BlondTrav, backed up against the nearly literal wall, played a thanatos gambit. Also, that particular Traveller, in my playing her over 10 years of IC play, had huge guilt issues from the Time War and was always a touch suicidal. I like to think that Gary and I came together for an exciting ending for that incarnation. This new Traveller is still developing. She's a lot more serene and self accepting than the Blond was, since 5th Trav was the Traveller who immediately followed the Marshall, and then after Louise (5th Trav was *lots* like Louise and was every inch a Rogue Scientist from Rifts, although you guys wouldnt know that.) Both came from worlds of violence.
This message was last edited by the player at 04:42, Sat 30 Dec 2017.
Smoke Alarm
player, 2099 posts
Blue Kangs are,
of course, best.
Sat 30 Dec 2017
at 05:16
  • msg #565

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Weaponised? The end of the 11th Doctor in "The Time of the Doctor" was exactly that – he regenerated and blew up all the bad guys. The novel The Ancestor Cell, which ended the last time war, had a Time Lord suicide bomber powered by regeneration. Both were pretty bloody stupid, IMO. I dislike the wild destruction that now results from regenerations, with the 10th and 12th Doctors wrecking the TARDIS. Why does the Doctor keeping blowing up?! A moment of rebirth and new life should not involve such destruction, especially so such an old friend as the TARDIS.

Back on delayed regenerations, back in 2005 Davies permitted the DWM comics to do a 8th to 9th regeneration, but then forbade depicting the 9th Doctor with anyone but Rose, though he would be travelling with Destrii. Davies's suggestion was to have the Doctor stuck in a blaze of regeneration light obscuring his face for however many stories like a Doctor Strange villain. Which would've been stupid. Because the comics writers had restraint and respect for their wor, they decided to do a walk into the sunset instead. Which left an opening for a lost era of the Time War and the War Doctor and all that followed.
The Traveller
player, 2212 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sat 30 Dec 2017
at 18:49
  • msg #566

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Yeah, I can see that. At least Trav had a purpose - Save sweet boy and the team and try to take the TAROT away from the Beast. I forgot about 11 and how gratuitous that was.

I like the explosion, but I prefer it to be like Eccleston's regeneration - just a big burst of light.
Kalath
player, 490 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Sat 30 Dec 2017
at 23:51
  • msg #567

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Whilst I hated and despised the 11ths (...12ths? 13ths?) regeneration, you can't really say it didn't have a purpose. His whole purpose in the new series is to 'kill the daleks, once and for all'. Whilst I hate the swing we got from Ecclestons version which was that he could only kill the daleks by killing the timelords, and how annoyed he was that they still came back, because it made his sacrifice worthless to the point of deciding the timelords were just as bad as the daleks (though to a certain extent, Moffatt moved away from that), he has always been consistent about wanting to make sure the Daleks stayed dead.

It probably doesn't surprise anyone to hear that I preferred the less-explosive regenerations, with one of my favorite regeneration scene being Pertwees, but at least Eccleston's could play in to 'every regeneration is different'.
Stanley Newton
player, 852 posts
Wed 30 May 2018
at 17:35
  • msg #568

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Twitch is showing a lot of classic Doctor Who episodes for the next couple of weeks (free). It already started yesterday with some first Doctor episodes and the next batch will start in <30 minutes (they show the same block three times a day). For a schedule you can look here
https://www.doctorwho.tv/watch/twitch/#US
The Traveller
player, 2260 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Tue 11 Sep 2018
at 19:36
  • msg #569

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I hope everyone is well. When is the new season of Who coming on?
Smoke Alarm
player, 2162 posts
Blue Kangs are,
of course, best.
Wed 12 Sep 2018
at 01:29
  • msg #570

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

It'll start on the 8th of October.
Smoke Alarm
player, 2179 posts
Blue Kangs are,
of course, best.
Tue 9 Oct 2018
at 01:35
  • msg #571

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

New Doctor Who!

Um... Is anyone else completely underwhelmed? I mean, it's okay, but nothing grabbed me like the last few seasons have done. It was just meh.

Whittaker's Doctor is right in the mold of the Tennant and Smith Doctors, which I suppose is the New Series's Generic Doctor characterisation – the Doctor you write and perform when you can't do anything more distinct. Are they playing it safe because she's the first female Doctor? I hope she grows into it and makes it her own. But damn, I hate that accent. Sorry England.

The direction was a bit sloppy, lacking, I guess, visual continuity. It's not always clear how scenes link up, as characters and things appear and disappear and the focus is on the wrong things. I was confused throughout.

There were way too many characters tagging along with the Doctor as companions/companion substitutes, so they tended to be left standing and watching and asking questions, their characterisation and motives disappearing. The police officer removes her uniform and forgets all about being a police officer. Ryan has a physical disability, which could be interesting, except the sole effect of this is being unable to ride a bike.

Some of the scene set-ups seem bizarre. Why go all the way into the hills to a slippery, sloping, grass track to practice riding a bike? Why did Nan and the old guy leave Ryan in the hills looking for his bike while they went to catch a train without him? Why is the construction site being operated at night in near total darkness? Why did the Doctor and the tentacley thing both land on the same train?

I had more fun watching "Time and the Rani" around it.
This message was last edited by the player at 01:37, Tue 09 Oct 2018.
The Guardian
GM, 2566 posts
Tue 9 Oct 2018
at 03:00
  • msg #572

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The story didn't wow me.  But I think The Christmas Invasion is the only modern intro story that had anything interesting going on as a story.  And I take it as promising that Whittaker was the best thing in it.  I appreciated that the episode was willing to take time for the Doctor to puzzle things out and build contraptions, and even when she sonic'ed things it made sense.  And that the Doctor-as-legend stuff seems to have been dialed down somewhat.
Kalath
player, 499 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Tue 9 Oct 2018
at 09:14
  • msg #573

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

The Guardian:
The story didn't wow me.  But I think The Christmas Invasion is the only modern intro story that had anything interesting going on as a story.  And I take it as promising that Whittaker was the best thing in it.  I appreciated that the episode was willing to take time for the Doctor to puzzle things out and build contraptions, and even when she sonic'ed things it made sense.  And that the Doctor-as-legend stuff seems to have been dialed down somewhat.


I really shouldn't read these, but as I'm waiting till my partner is out of hospital before watching modern-who again...

The Doctor-as-legend is the worst thing ever. It is arguably one of the main, if not the main, reason I prefer the classic series. (And yes, I know that McCoy stories were often a bit like this, but it wasn't quite as bad).
The Traveller
player, 2282 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Wed 10 Oct 2018
at 12:51
  • msg #574

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I found Whittaker's Doctor charming, and I saw that as per much modern television that they were setting up for interpersonal drama with Ryan being the lead, talking about non-visible disabilities. I expect Ryan and Graham to be engaged in friction as they grieve for their loved one's death.

Another thing I really like is how they are setting up to use the Doctor's gender ambiguity to explore genderfluid/queer issues. By definition, the Doctor is now a trans and queer icon, and I love it. As a bi cis male, I have feminine components to my personality and am slightly gender fluid, and this Doctor speaks to me in ways not even Trav does (Trav is more solidly cis, for example.)

Of course, I can't help but be biased because I've been doing the female time lord thing since 2007.

I only like the Doctor-As-Legend (and by extension, Traveller-as-legend) stuff when it's to a degree subverted (like when Trav fucks up and makes mistakes, is unsure of herself, and so on.)

About building stuff - it's *FUN*. I adore it when Trav kitbashes and screws around with stuff, from a player perspective.
This message was last edited by the player at 12:54, Wed 10 Oct 2018.
Smoke Alarm
player, 2181 posts
Blue Kangs are,
of course, best.
Thu 11 Oct 2018
at 03:12
  • msg #575

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

Looking at some reviews, I concede that there were some improvements in the plot: the whole purpose was to save one ordinary person's life, which is a good shift away from the focus on saving the Earth or saving the universe or more arcane plots.

And, as Guardian says, the Doctor-legend confrontation was dialled down, to the point that Tsimsha didn't seem to know or care about it. I get the sense that these things are obligatory and put in to please a certain sort of New Series fan. So, maybe it was just done here as an echo of the past to ease transition, and hopefully they'll move away from it.
The Traveller
player, 2285 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Mon 15 Oct 2018
at 01:53
  • msg #576

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

In reply to Smoke Alarm (msg # 575):

So, the TARDIS now has a muffin button.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWdKtAWdSXg
Smoke Alarm
player, 2188 posts
Building high
for happiness.
Tue 23 Oct 2018
at 12:49
  • msg #577

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

"The Ghost Monument" was another load of boring, but "Rosa" was an improvement, though maybe it tried way too hard to justify itself. It managed not to be an offensive mess about it though, but the lack of any nuanced white characters made it a sledgehammer message.

This time, rather than trusting to ABC's poor streaming quality, I just torrented it (something I could get free, yes). The credits looked so much better, the visuals less murky, so I guess that helped. I could also turn on subtitles to understand everything they're saying

I still like the shift away from overused save-the-world/universe or story-arc-related crap, with the focus of each episode so far being on saving a few people and small events.

Is the Doctor more caring and considerate now because she's female? While it's not a bad trait, I'm not sure that's the best logic.

Whittaker's Doctor still seems too close to the Tennant and Smith New-Series Generic Doctor. Maybe the writers were still thinking of the former Doctors. Still, between that characterisation and the excessive number of companions, I get the impression they feared this Doctor couldn't stand on her own and needed to do what had worked in the past and be obscured by companions.

For accompaniment, I watched "Delta and the Bannerman", because it also involves fake Americans and a bus in the 1950s. :D
The Traveller
player, 2293 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Tue 23 Oct 2018
at 13:04
  • msg #578

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

On a related note, if 13's TARDIS has a Muffin Button, of course Trav still has the Fizzade machine in the control room.
The Traveller
player, 2328 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sat 5 Jan 2019
at 05:53
  • msg #579

Re: OOC (Who Lore & Recent Spoilers)

I just watched the New Year's episode. We did Dalek survivors better. I even suspect that they may have read our PBP Gary. It was still amusing.
The Traveller
player, 2353 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sun 12 May 2019
at 01:05
  • msg #580

A Fortuna Drabble


This message was added to by the player at 01:05, Sun 12 May 2019.
The Traveller
player, 2358 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sat 25 Jan 2020
at 22:02
  • msg #581

A Fortuna Drabble

Hey Fam, new Doctor Who is on. Have we been watching the Episodes?

I absolutely adore O.I want Bluetrav to meet him.
The Guardian
GM, 2651 posts
Sun 26 Jan 2020
at 03:25
  • msg #582

A Fortuna Drabble

I quite hope they do not write him to play bonkers as much as his recent predecessors.  The most I've seen Dhawan is in Iron Fist, where he absolutely *smolders*.
The Traveller
player, 2359 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sun 26 Jan 2020
at 07:27
  • msg #583

A Fortuna Drabble

There is something very sexy about him. And I think he takes most of his cues off of the Simms master.

EDIT - Now, think about this guy having a confrontation with Michelle Yeoh Bluetrav. Holy shit. Blake Lively was my girl for years, but that confrontation would be terrifying (because Yeoh can be scary as shit when she wants to be, and has the acting chops.)

I can assume Always Time To Travel is on hiatus because she's killing it as Mirror Georgiou on Star Trek Discovery.
This message was last edited by the player at 07:33, Sun 26 Jan 2020.
Smoke Alarm
player, 2252 posts
Building high
for happiness.
Sun 26 Jan 2020
at 09:22
  • msg #584

A Fortuna Drabble

I can't even muster a rant against new Doctor Who these days. I'm dragging my heels to watch each episode; the last was "Orphan 55". The stories are just so lazy and pedestrian, trying for nothing more than being like the days of the 10th and early 11th Doctors without doing anything new and just doing a lot less. It's not for the actors; Whittaker's best Doctor was in Attack the Block, Dhawan a better villain in Iron Fist. It's not for having a female Doctor, but the scripts not giving her many real villains or chances to show strength, anger, or authority is telling.

It's just Chibnall is rubbish at this. It's fitting that he first appeared on TV to complain about "Trial of the Time Lord", when he also got a year off to fix things and failed, when he's this generation's Pip & Jane Baker.

Okay, I mustered a rant after all.
This message was last edited by the player at 09:24, Sun 26 Jan 2020.
Kalath
player, 533 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Sun 26 Jan 2020
at 09:32
  • msg #585

A Fortuna Drabble

Chibnall reminds me of one of Marti Noxon - not a bad writer, but not for this style of writing. He has written good stuff - just not for sci-fi.
The Traveller
player, 2360 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sun 26 Jan 2020
at 19:56
  • msg #586

A Fortuna Drabble

Boy, Orphan 55 was bad. Season 11 was merely fine, and Orphan 55 eas such a letdown after Spycraft 1&2. Hoping the next story isnt shit.
The Traveller
player, 2361 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sun 26 Jan 2020
at 19:57
  • msg #587

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

The Guardian:
I quite hope they do not write him to play bonkers as much as his recent predecessors.  The most I've seen Dhawan is in Iron Fist, where he absolutely *smolders*.


Dhawan strikes me as an intelligent actor and he has enough awareness of Who that he will do a good job with the character.
The Traveller
player, 2362 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Wed 29 Jan 2020
at 02:06
  • msg #588

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Have we all seen Episode 5, Fugitive of the Juldoon?
The Guardian
GM, 2652 posts
Wed 29 Jan 2020
at 03:58
  • msg #589

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

I have.

That was... a lot.
The Traveller
player, 2363 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Wed 29 Jan 2020
at 19:38
  • msg #590

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Well, come on, out with it.

I know all of you have opinions and feelings.

I for one love Jo Martin's Doctor, especially that she is a call out to 6, among many other things.
The Traveller
player, 2364 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sun 1 Mar 2020
at 07:03
  • msg #591

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

More Gary being preiscent -

The return of the Cybermen and the Cyber-empire that Gary shows in this game is confirmed as canonical in Season 12, Episode 7. Except a cyber faction is being used to change history. IF we were still playing it could lead to a groovy story line.
The Guardian
GM, 2653 posts
Sun 1 Mar 2020
at 15:02
  • msg #592

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

The idea parked in the back of my mind was that the Cyberiad collective would turn up to the convocation of the Parliament of Time, having been invited there by Trav.  There were going to be three showing up, speaking for different controllers on the Committee guiding the group mind - an old school Eighties model, a 2000s version, and a model with a highly sophisticated humanlike chassis.  Internal conflict among the Committee would have been one of the problems for the PCs to unravel.
The Guardian
GM, 2654 posts
Sun 1 Mar 2020
at 15:06
  • msg #593

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Trawling through old posts on RPG.net some time ago I found this.  It might be amusing for those popping in to look at the thread.  It's from the game that introduced Trav before I took over running it; it's the "TARDIS reveal" for the PC I had in that game, the Shaolin monk Zheng Ru:

***

Ru takes a few slow steps inside the Traveller's TARDIS, gazing wide-eyed off at the incredible span of space visible inside and marveling at the miscellany of strange items contained inside it. Then he feels the placid humming from the central console, and he feels a wide smile spreading over his face as he understands.

He bows deeply to the central console. "You honor me, friend TARDIS."

Then he turns to the Traveller, beaming. "He is a living thing, isn't he? The blue box is his body, and that has a shape and a size and is bounded in space. But he has a spirit, too, that is infinite and transcends the body, even while the body contains it. It is a generous soul, Traveller, that will welcome a stranger within his spirit as your TARDIS does."
The Traveller
player, 2365 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Thu 26 Mar 2020
at 19:50
  • msg #594

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Great to hear from you Gary. I'm at home on Covid lockdown and showing symptoms. Dr Who talk is indeed most welcome.
The Traveller
player, 2366 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Mon 6 Apr 2020
at 23:32
  • msg #595

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Checking in. I am recovering from Covid symptoms and I hope to be OK in about a week. I hope everyone is safe.
Smoke Alarm
player, 2253 posts
Building high
for happiness.
Tue 7 Apr 2020
at 03:00
  • msg #596

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

You actually had it? What was that like?
The Traveller
player, 2367 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Tue 7 Apr 2020
at 17:51
  • msg #597

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Smoke Alarm:
You actually had it? What was that like?


Imagine the most horrible flu you have ever had, including a pneuomonia that struggles not to go away, and multiply it by 10.

Seriously, I feel bad for anyone who has this and has any kind of health issues. I am 53 and relatively healthy and this has kicked my as. STAY INDOORS, WASH YOUR HANDS.
The Guardian
GM, 2655 posts
Wed 8 Apr 2020
at 00:19
  • msg #598

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Ouch.  I'm glad that you seem to have gotten through it, at least.
Smoke Alarm
player, 2254 posts
Building high
for happiness.
Wed 8 Apr 2020
at 02:37
  • msg #599

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Yeah, that's a relief to hear.

I work from home and don't go out much anyway, so I haven't been affected much. But now I really want to go out.
The Guardian
GM, 2656 posts
Wed 8 Apr 2020
at 02:44
  • msg #600

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Until the end of next week, I am the designated victim representative for my team that has to work at our client's office.  However, it's very sparsely populated -- I think the main reason why the client is requiring this is for guaranteed support in case their VPN suddenly melts down -- and I have certainly been keeping sanitation firmly in mind.  They're a major U.S internet provider, so they have some call for being an essential service.

I live in the burbs outside of St. Louis, so I'm able to get a 3 mile walk in while navigating around maybe a half dozen people over the course of it.  So far, so good.
This message was last edited by the GM at 02:45, Wed 08 Apr 2020.
Smoke Alarm
player, 2255 posts
Building high
for happiness.
Wed 8 Apr 2020
at 02:53
  • msg #601

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

I go for walks in the park and play Pokemon Go. I did a raid with a guy from a distance through a fence. Ironically, the park is now full of people who certainly weren't going there before isolation.
Kalath
player, 534 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Wed 8 Apr 2020
at 02:57
  • msg #602

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

We honestly haven't been hit as bad in Australia. Not even here in Sydney - and all the other states finally get their excuse to shut their borders to NSW tourists!

I'm currently working from home, and working for an employer unlikely to downsize during this; but I know more people hit by sudden unemployment than the disease, which sucks.
The Traveller
player, 2368 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Wed 8 Apr 2020
at 04:41
  • msg #603

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Smoke Alarm:
Yeah, that's a relief to hear.

I work from home and don't go out much anyway, so I haven't been affected much. But now I really want to go out.



Follow your locality's isolation guidelines. DO NOT BREAK QUARANTINE. This shit can kill you, and even if you feel healthy, it sheds like no one's business. You are protecting yourself and others by engaging in social distancing and isolation.
The Traveller
player, 2369 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Wed 8 Apr 2020
at 04:43
  • msg #604

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Smoke Alarm:
I go for walks in the park and play Pokemon Go. I did a raid with a guy from a distance through a fence. Ironically, the park is now full of people who certainly weren't going there before isolation.


Again, please engage in social distancing and your locality's isolation guidelines. The fact that your park is filling up with knuckleheads means that this is dangerous to you. Stay inside!
The Traveller
player, 2370 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Wed 8 Apr 2020
at 04:43
  • msg #605

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

And since I have you all here, what do you think of season 12?
Smoke Alarm
player, 2256 posts
Building high
for happiness.
Wed 8 Apr 2020
at 04:59
  • msg #606

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Our government won't go full lockdown, they have a bunch of ever-changing dos and don'ts no one can keep track of. While some people ignore them and go mingle, most people ignore them and go extra safe. I go out for a walk every few days for the exercise, but everyone is pretty good at staying well apart at the park. But being stuck at home is getting more and more people out in the neighbourhood, which is good in a way.

My sister's a teacher, so she's paranoid about catching Covid-19, yet still has Mum over babysitting and homeschooling the kids. I haven't seen my niece and nephew in weeks because of isolation, even though I haven't encountered another human being outside immediate family in months. :(

I've seen up to Praxeus. Chibnall continues to disappoint, and it's a struggle to go on.
The Traveller
player, 2371 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Thu 9 Apr 2020
at 05:54
  • msg #607

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

The scutters are pissed off at Trav for some reason. Happens from time to time.




Smoke Alarm
player, 2257 posts
Building high
for happiness.
Thu 9 Apr 2020
at 05:55
  • msg #608

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Hey, only Smoke Alarm can wallscrawl the talkiphone box!
The Traveller
player, 2372 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Thu 9 Apr 2020
at 16:34
  • msg #609

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

The scutters are on strike! And if a Kang can do it it must be OK
The Traveller
player, 2373 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sat 11 Apr 2020
at 00:53
  • msg #610

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Smoke Alarm gets an honorable mention in the RIFTS game I am in -

Lewis DiBono:
Lew looks to Ethan, then at everyone else.  Don't anyone go wandering about.  This ship is far larger than you can imagine and you WILL get lost.  I've been in here before, and I'm not sure I won't get lost.


"Everyone, hand me your phones and coms."  Those who do so get a quick mod to their phones, so they are now superphones. "Now your phones can talk anywhere in time and space, at least in this dimension. You could be in the Thundercloud galaxy and I could be in Michigan and you can reach me. And that guy there? Number 17? That scutter is the usual guide. He'll take you down to the bedrooms, the lounge, the library and the dispensary. If a door has anything posted or spraypainted that says "DON'T GO IN", "DONT TUCH" or "DO NO ENTER", trust me, its for your own good. Also, you may see occasional graphiti and arrows - my companion Smoke Alarm put them there. Follow them and they'll bring you back here. You can also always call me." She smiles.
Smoke Alarm
player, 2258 posts
Building high
for happiness.
Sat 11 Apr 2020
at 00:58
  • msg #611

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

:D Smoke Alarm made the talkiphone shapeship and sound, I eyespy.
The Traveller
player, 2374 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sat 11 Apr 2020
at 01:00
  • msg #612

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Smoke Alarm:
:D Smoke Alarm made the talkiphone shapeship and sound, I eyespy.


Talkiphone box is always Smoke Alarm or any Blue Kang's home.
Smoke Alarm
player, 2259 posts
Building high
for happiness.
Sat 11 Apr 2020
at 01:02
  • msg #613

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Don't forget the Blue Kangs are Best wallscrawls!
Kalath
player, 535 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Sat 11 Apr 2020
at 01:33
  • msg #614

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

I'd say imagine if Sereth left something behind, but he's too organised to forget something.
Smoke Alarm
player, 2260 posts
Building high
for happiness.
Sat 11 Apr 2020
at 01:34
  • msg #615

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Unless it was deliberate!
Kalath
player, 536 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Sat 11 Apr 2020
at 01:37
  • msg #616

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Gaah, miss playing this game.
The Traveller
player, 2375 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sat 11 Apr 2020
at 01:56
  • msg #617

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Hint hint, Gary!
The Traveller
player, 2376 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sat 11 Apr 2020
at 01:57
  • msg #618

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Kalath:
I'd say imagine if Sereth left something behind, but he's too organised to forget something.


I can imagine him leaving behind artwork, histories, a warrior's shrine, something samurai-esque.
The Guardian
GM, 2657 posts
Sat 11 Apr 2020
at 02:01
  • msg #619

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

The Traveller:
Hint hint, Gary!

I've missed running it more than once.  At the time, trying to keep it breathing had burned me out quite a bit.

The PCs were great, and I loved all the "Travcanon" meta commentary about how the game proper were stories in an actual show.
Smoke Alarm
player, 2261 posts
Building high
for happiness.
Sat 11 Apr 2020
at 02:14
  • msg #620

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

This was one of my best games, with my favourite character. So many good memories and fun times. :)
The Traveller
player, 2377 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sat 11 Apr 2020
at 17:47
  • msg #621

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Travcanon - Because Michelle Yeoh is also busy with her new Star Trek show and other projects, ATTT has been put on haitus.

Blake Lively has been making noises on social media about coming back for fill in episodes. She's shot back against canon-monkeys. "This is Doctor Who! We don't need to make sense!" Both Yeoh and Lively has been supportive of Jodie Whittacker and Jo Martin. Chris Bell, one of the writers at BBC Toronto, has categorically stated that Jo Martin's Doctor is *not* Trav in some form of disguise.

The ATTT Team has said that the latest revelations at the end of Season 12 of Doctor Who would have no effect on Trav Lore, at least for now.

Blake Lively on Sacha Dawan - "Oh dear god, so sexy. But Blonde Trav would have drilled him point blank." On Twitter Yeoh opined, "I would love to act opposite Sacha Dawan. Make it happen, BBC Toronto!"

A new RIFTS animated series is running on HBO. Its unclear where this fits in Travlore, but Blake Lively is voicing the 5th Traveller opposite a large cast. However, explicitly call-outs in dialogue have been made to ATTT, with fan-favorite Smoke Alarm being mentioned specifically.
This message was last edited by the player at 17:50, Sat 11 Apr 2020.
The Guardian
GM, 2658 posts
Sat 11 Apr 2020
at 22:30
  • msg #622

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

The Traveller:
The ATTT Team has said that the latest revelations at the end of Season 12 of Doctor Who would have no effect on Trav Lore, at least for now.

At least they

Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
re-destroyed Gallifrey.  Though it won't stick, more's the pity.  Why does everyone want these terrible, terrible people to be in the universe?  I'll take the Parliament of Time, thanks.

I was unhappy that Chibnall swerved back to lean on big revelations about the personal lore of the Doctor.  However, if he was going to do that, I do admire his chutzpah.

Particularly in flipping the bird to Morbius Doctors deniers. :)


The Traveller
player, 2378 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sat 11 Apr 2020
at 23:04
  • msg #623

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

The Guardian:
The Traveller:
The ATTT Team has said that the latest revelations at the end of Season 12 of Doctor Who would have no effect on Trav Lore, at least for now.

At least they

Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
re-destroyed Gallifrey.  Though it won't stick, more's the pity.  Why does everyone want these terrible, terrible people to be in the universe?  I'll take the Parliament of Time, thanks.

I was unhappy that Chibnall swerved back to lean on big revelations about the personal lore of the Doctor.  However, if he was going to do that, I do admire his chutzpah.

Particularly in flipping the bird to Morbius Doctors deniers. :)




Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)


I like the idea that the Marshall doesnt like this interference with history, not one bit. The Master's destruction of Gallifrey is interfering with the Time War.

But we have more than enough of our own story. Trav and the Beast need to have their shown down. The fate of the Phaidon still needs to be determined.



Kalath
player, 537 posts
Always Time to...
Hunt!
Sun 12 Apr 2020
at 11:12
  • msg #624

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

I'll be honest, I was never particularly fond of the OOC banter about this really being a TV show. It took me out of the game, and made it harder for me to care about the characters. Just like I'm not really fond of shows that consistently break the fourth wall - I acknowledge a lot of people like it, but for me it distracts from my imemersion factor a bit - easier if it had been it's own thread rather than as part of the who spoilers category.

Also, I've kind of given up on the new series. It's always been a tricky balance to maintain between preferring the classic series but able to enjoy the new series for what it offered, but Chibnall makes it really hard to balance, for me. Won't go more into it than this, as I know some of you really prefer the new series, and I don't like the classic vs new arguments that I see cropping up all over the place.
Smoke Alarm
player, 2262 posts
Building high
for happiness.
Sun 12 Apr 2020
at 11:16
  • msg #625

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

I can understand that.

The new series issue was solved for me – I took so long watching it, it's no longer on ABC iView. So, I missed the rest of the season, but eh.
The Traveller
player, 2421 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Thu 14 Dec 2023
at 23:20
  • msg #626

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Im moving talk about spoilers here, as per Kalath's request.

Keith Patrick Harris was so fucking amazing as The Toymaker.

I really enjoyed the 3 specials, the last one most of all.

So, when is Trav getting her Bi-Generation?

"IM BACK BABY"
The Traveller
player, 2422 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Mon 1 Jan 2024
at 00:44
  • msg #627

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Trav wants the new TARDIS. Not gonna like. I bet even you like it Kalath!
The Guardian
GM, 2671 posts
Mon 1 Jan 2024
at 01:24
  • msg #628

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

It kind of reminds me of a TARDIS interior picture that you'd posted a long time ago and I sort of have the same problem with it -- it's huge and impressive and there's no useful reason I can see for it to be that big.  They're going to have some split-second operation to pull off that's going to fail because it takes too long to run from the door to the console :)

What I want out of a TARDIS interior is MORE ROOMS.  You needn't even build anything, just use doors to connect up lots of repurposed sets or found locations.
The Traveller
player, 2423 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Mon 1 Jan 2024
at 07:49
  • msg #629

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

True. true. But still, I like the new console and it was pretty joyous seeing Tennant run around the thing.
The Traveller
player, 2424 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Mon 15 Jan 2024
at 09:23
  • msg #630

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Happy 2024, Travellers!
The Traveller
player, 2425 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Wed 17 Jan 2024
at 21:13
  • msg #631

Re: A Fortuna Drabble

Mr Boots has gone viral


The Traveller
player, 2426 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Tue 23 Jan 2024
at 19:25
  • msg #632

Trav Cosplay

"I wanted to cosplay Boobie but I also just saw Barbie. Smoke sweety, are there Pink Kangs?"


Smoke Alarm
player, 2272 posts
Building high
for happiness.
Wed 24 Jan 2024
at 02:08
  • msg #633

Trav Cosplay

I did mention a Pink Kang tribe at some point.

That reminds me of Romana's costume in Destiny of the Daleks, which is blatantly the Doctor's costume but in pink and white.
The Traveller
player, 2427 posts
Not always nice
But always kind
Sat 20 Apr 2024
at 20:10
  • msg #634

Checking in!

Checking in. Hope everyone is well.

I want to run something but I haven't been successful with recent efforts.

What gaming are folks doing?
The Guardian
GM, 2672 posts
Tue 23 Apr 2024
at 02:03
  • msg #635

Checking in!

Currently playing Flying Circus in PbP and running it for my IRL group.  It's a hoot.
Sign In