we soo should :D makes it easier to catch you >.o


which also begs the question, arent we in a crowded market area by the docks?

In reply to Angharad (msg # 109):

Not unless there's a surprise Angharad's riding is also to animal handling -3

Yes you're on the peripheries of a market area, near the docks; from which several streets that lead to and away from it. It is one of these the trio will head.
This message was last edited by the GM at 04:27, Sun 11 Oct 2015.

Am wondering if any of you think my mastering and campaigns lack content and rules knowledge.

To me it seems like we're too early in the campaign for me to have much of an opinion.  I don't think any rules have applied to my thread yet and I've barely scratched the surface of the content in front of Garviaual, so I'm certainly not feeling any lack.

As a Narrativist GM, I consider deep knowledge of the rules as less important than the ability to weave a good story. So far, you have created a tale of intrigue that is certainly holding my attention.

I think you are doing well.

I don't know what this sentence means.

Out of town until sunday night. Im not a competent phone poster so ill be able to follow along but not post anything substantial

In reply to Angharad (msg # 115):

Apologies was tired when posted that, thanks for bringing it to my attention. I've revised it to

Time passes quickly and before you know it Geraldine emerges from the examination room; moving with the other tested who file from the adjoin room. Some of these mill about conversing while most leave the building.

tmnt

I think I am waiting on the GM...

In reply to Mythos Lazarus Abel Yggdrasil (msg # 119):

Your accompanied by Xander to the Ibis, assumed you'd post something along the way. Will post accordingly.

play a game of papers and pay checks with Master Magee as we wile away the time

tmnt
This message was last edited by the player at 04:35, Wed 28 Oct 2015.

group 4... who are the people in that?
This message was last edited by the player at 18:22, Mon 09 Nov 2015.

I am confused. I thought some people had gone off to the location defined in the invitation while others were still milling around in the antechamber where the test was being given.

Have we been recombined?

In reply to Angharad (msg # 124):

Sorry my error, Anyone who intends to accept the offer is at the Hotel
I have amended my the post to clarify any uncertainty, as shown

As the time passes you each prepare for the gathering and make your way to the Hotel. On arriving at the Hotel each is guest is greeted by a doorman, who provides direction to a second level convention room. Entering the room you find there are quite a few perspectives already there, some assess you, others glance in your direction. The room houses at least four score and seven tables, these are laid out around a centrally situated lectern; in preparation for the forthcoming meal, Hotel waiting staff circulate through the guests providing refreshments.

we make our own destiny... or not

I wonder if any of the PCs will step up and make sure they are one of the people Barrack talks to?  I am not going to meta-play by saying they do, as there are so many perspectives here and only 2 pc perspectives the chances are...

well lets just say a beggar would not ask a Noble to join his cause.

In reply to Barrack (msg # 127):

It seems I have my answer...

I was under the impression that I had engaged Barrack in conversation. He asked about my character and the Aeldar. I addressed his question, but he did not followup. Nor have I.

In reply to Angharad (msg # 129):



would you be so kind as to let me know which msg # that is in please?
This message was last edited by the player at 16:23, Fri 20 Nov 2015.

I think I was referring to Message 49. I now see that one is not from you. I thought you joined that interchange in Message 51.

In reply to Angharad (msg # 131):

np we can just get together at this function now we are all here... if somewhat isolated and on our own in this throng of perspectives.

What time of day is it?

In reply to Angharad (msg # 133):

I've amended the thread, which answers this.