Re: OOC and stuff
Once upon a time, in a country that shall remain unnamed, a certain prominent politician built his presidential (*) campaign on the promise of lowering taxes. Upon being elected, he set out to do just that.
Now, as you probably know, from a budgetary standpoint, every law or decree that requires a financial backing (such as, say, funding hospitals and schools, or building new infrastructure) is required to provide said backing in some form. You can't just say "we are hiring more teachers", you have to explain where that money is coming from in your budget.
Similarly, when you are proposing a reduction of your income, you have to explan how you plan to compensate for that reduction.
So, he proposed his tax reform, which was promptly approved - by the same parliament and senate that had been elected with him, and had therefore campaigned with him on the same platform.
The key point of the reform were the tax cuts, which were exactly as he had promised. The required financial backing? It was procured by raising taxes, of course. And yes, they were, by and large, the same taxes that were being cut on another page of the same reform.
If you don't quite understand how that is possible, well, during that same term, the Minister of Economy was able to make the same money appear in the budget of two (possible three) fiscal years.
Oy vey...
(*) Technically, I suppose the correct term would be "prime ministerial" or some such, but that's a bit of a mouthful.