I'd like to come back and edit this post after we've gotten some themes for requests, and blueprints for the game design and philosophy. For now, let's keep this discussion open ended. Some concepts or topics I may refer you to the "game ads" the IC one, and other topics I may say you look in a another (at that point made) thread. I'll be glad to answer most fielding of questions. I'll also be glad to both answer your question and quote the material. Then next direct you to the read another post with all the other material.

So, what are your replies to what I said in the GM wanted? What are you questions. What are your...thoughts? I may copy and paste those GM wanted posts here, after all, but again, not right now. I'm toasted. Feeling happy, but toasted. Toasted, to me, is like burnt out on the day and exhausted. If I just feel run down, that's exhausted If I just feel like burned out, I'll say I burned myself out. Toasted what I say for the coinciding of the two. I've been all over the place with systems, I talked Exalted, D&D 3.5, D&D 4e, GURPs (which I don't know but am lukring in a military sci fi that's more akin to robocop than matric starwars or voltron. It's like if robocop were merged with pre skynet warfare of Terminator. Really fun, but tedious to learn. Heckm I haven't learned a lick, but I'm intrigued and so they tried to explain but then had to discard most of what they said because I had a question about a term early on. Which just showed how an idea can motivate a person to go through hoops, people think they'd surely have already gone through to be interested in the idea. So I'm toasted. Long day, woke up early (for me) to deal with finances.

TTYL, sorry to unload. lol. I should have lefty it at "It's been a long day" I need to go though. BBS

So this where we'll discuss the early confines and allowances of the game's boundaries and extent.

Sounds good and happy for you to invite any other prospective players as well. Apologies on the delay in my posting, work and personal life a bit hectic atm.

I love the concept of Undermountain and the Mad Wizard even if he isn't an integral part of the campaign.

Do you have any thoughts on alignment? I generally prefer a good or neutral based campaign as I feel the players characters tend to get on a bit better (have played some evil campaigns and back stabbing or just general dislike of the characters tends to grind people down).

Starting Level around 7th? How may characters do you think for a party?

I would prefer good or neutral aligned as well. Neutral gives you some options that good aligned won't for the roguish characters, but that doesn't mean a paladin couldn't work while the roguish character was dealing. Good aligned is sensible for the dwarven access you'll get later in the game.

The game starts at 4th level, but only so far as to get the group together and have a time jump to 7th. I'd want everyone to have a general 4th level sheet, but more importantly the 7th level sheet, which is when the game proper will begin. 4th level will introduce you all to each other and the different NPCs.

I'm wanting four or five PCs. We can make the game work, if we lose players, with only three characters.

One final advantage of neutral alignment, is the hired aid that you can get at certain points. I mention this as a segue to the "fill in" for PCs, and also the red tag.

I will advertise ASAP, if you wish me to. That way we can get closer to start date.

Do you know what class type you'll be playing yet?

It's been a busy 24 hours, and I'm getting back to what should be a normal week for me. It's been chaotic, to put it lightly. So forgive me if I seem a bit out of touch.

Apologies been a bit hectic here as well.

I was thinking of a fighter/rogue style build. I normally prefer the martial classes over magic and trap sense is always good. :)