RolePlay onLine RPoL Logo

, welcome to Dark Shadows: A New Time Band

14:04, 2nd May 2024 (GMT+0)

OOC.

Posted by TheyFor group 0
Prof. Everett Willoughby
player, 1 post
Sat 25 Nov 2017
at 07:25
  • msg #5

OOC

I think in Ghastly Affair classes can be interpreted in many different ways. No two Scholars or Innocents are the same! So I'm okay with characters having the same class.
Player 4
player, 3 posts
Sat 25 Nov 2017
at 07:50
  • msg #6

OOC

I like my character as she's coming along.
They
GM, 5 posts
Sat 25 Nov 2017
at 10:14
  • msg #7

OOC

Okay by my count I think we have, so far:

--A Magician
--A True Innocent
--An Everyperson (I'm being gender-neutral)
--A Libertine

That's all I'm sure of so far but we might have another player considering a Magician...? It's not pinned down yet...

So far I think we might have 7 players so far... still working with people individually, some showed up just now...

EDIT: ALSO: the question has been raised of what time we will start in, as in what era.

Time travel is/was very Dark Shadows... I was thinking of starting in the present and then moving back in time... but what do YOU guys want? What century do you want to spend the most time in? (Don't go back past the 17th century though.) I'm flexible, and want to do what the majority of the group wants...
This message was last edited by the GM at 10:16, Sat 25 Nov 2017.
Prof. Everett Willoughby
player, 2 posts
Sat 25 Nov 2017
at 10:28
  • msg #8

OOC

One vote for starting in the 1960s like the original series
Player 4
player, 4 posts
Sat 25 Nov 2017
at 14:10
  • msg #9

OOC

With dueling and other things from earlier times I suggest 1800 more or less. So it kind of fits the angry torch wielding mobs with guns and pointy weapons as an option. And it would have a good period feel.
They
GM, 6 posts
Sat 25 Nov 2017
at 15:46
  • msg #10

OOC

In reply to Player 4 (msg # 9):


1966 is definitely a Dark Shadows thing, and 1795 or so is a different Dark Shadows thing... let's hear some more votes...
Father Kyle McCree
player, 2 posts
True Innocent
AC: 0
Sat 25 Nov 2017
at 19:02
  • msg #11

OOC

I'm content on both, both settings lack the super tech like phones and Internet that make the horror genre falter, So having it set whenever works. I think the 1960's are fine. If we go back as far as 1795 I think most of us will be out of our element. The 60's gives us good background to work with, Vietnam War, Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon, bunch of Presidential things happening with those three. 64 Mustang came out! That is always a plus. Better to have some vehicles than Horse and Buggy.
They
GM, 7 posts
Sat 25 Nov 2017
at 19:23
  • msg #12

OOC

In reply to Father Kyle McCree (msg # 11):

Somehow, though, Collinsport always seems very cut off from the rest of the world, and the present... I don't think a TV set, for example, was shown at any point in the entire show... like there weren't any in Collinsport
Player 4
player, 5 posts
Sat 25 Nov 2017
at 19:34
  • msg #13

OOC

It might be nice to stick it in a mystical bubble in the realms of reality as in once you pass the borders of the town you go back in many ways over a century such as no TV, radio and a very conservative community in many ways. Your a mad scientist lets break out the torches, weapons and bible and dust off the big cross on a pole and lets purge this evil kind of lot.
Prof. Everett Willoughby
player, 3 posts
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 07:03
  • msg #14

OOC

Did the show ever reference anything political or any events from history?

I like the idea of being in a strange, anachronistic "mystical bubble". There is some contemporary technology (if we are playing the 1960s), but it doesn't play a crucial role in the game.
They
GM, 8 posts
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 12:50
  • msg #15

Re: OOC

Prof. Everett Willoughby:
Did the show ever reference anything political or any events from history?


Not really... except that:
--I think I recall that the Collins family helped organize armed resistance to England during the Revolutionary war, and
--In the very old days before that Collinsport had at least one witch trial... (of course, it kept having them after people were supposed to have historically stopped having witch trials, too...)

That's it. That is the total references to anything in history-- or the events of the 20th century (which is now our history) that I can think of the show ever mentioning.

quote:
I like the idea of being in a strange, anachronistic "mystical bubble". There is some contemporary technology (if we are playing the 1960s), but it doesn't play a crucial role in the game.


Yeah there are cars in Dark Shadows, though we seldom literally see one... there are phones... there are one or two radios... there are certainly automatic pistols, you can hardly open a spare drawer in Collinwood without finding some kind of handy murder weapon... but that's about it. The band posters in the young boy's room are actually the biggest hint that there's a modern world outside Collinsport.

The Blue Whale has a jukebox with a couple of jazzy little numbers, and the fashions are embarrasingly up to date, I suppose I'll add. But really, that's about it as far as awareness that one decade is not like another decade. If it weren't for the clothes, the hairstyles, and the way people talk, one would hardly be able to pin down one decade from another in a given century.



On another note, I say to all players: please fill out your character sheets if you haven't already. Many of you have not. If I somehow forgot to unlock anyone's sheet, let me know.
This message was last edited by the GM at 13:09, Sun 26 Nov 2017.
Player 4
player, 6 posts
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 16:04
  • msg #16

Re: OOC

I'm busy today I'll finish my sheet later tonight at the latest by Monday.
They
GM, 10 posts
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 17:41
  • msg #17

Re: OOC

In reply to Player 4 (msg # 16):

Understood, that should be fine.
Prof. Everett Willoughby
player, 4 posts
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 18:03
  • msg #18

Re: OOC

I think I have all the important things marked down on my sheet.
They
GM, 11 posts
Sun 26 Nov 2017
at 18:29
  • msg #19

Re: OOC

In reply to Prof. Everett Willoughby (msg # 18):

Yes, you do, but add character description of what other characters see when they look at Willoughby...
Player 6
player, 1 post
Mon 27 Nov 2017
at 04:23
  • msg #20

Re: OOC

Hello everyone! I'm your local smuggler and commercial fishing captain, Harriet MacLeod. Most folk call her Harry. Debated between Everywoman and Bandit, but in my mind Bandit is more a Robin hood figure, and I'm not sure that really fits my concept. Everywoman allows Harry to have a legitimate occupation as well as being a smuggler, and the beauty of the class is that you can have a dozen of them and they'll all be different enough that no one has to worry overmuch about niche protection. Bandit might work better were the game set initially in the past, but I'm not sure how to trowel a Robin Hood type into 1960s New England.
Prof. Everett Willoughby
player, 5 posts
Mon 27 Nov 2017
at 05:17
  • msg #21

Re: OOC

I'm afraid the only 1960s Robin Hood I can imagine off the bat is a hippy cult leader / serial killer...
Player 6
player, 2 posts
Mon 27 Nov 2017
at 05:39
  • msg #22

Re: OOC

In reply to Prof. Everett Willoughby (msg # 21):

I was thinking of someone like Phoolan Devi, personally.

History.com:
Although she stood less than five feet tall, this Indian 'Bandit Queen' garnered quite an imposing reputation. Born into a poor low-caste family in 1963, Phoolan Devi was married when she was only 11 years old to a man three times her own age who brutally beat her. She escaped his abuse only to be imprisoned for a crime she did not commit when she returned to her home village. Ostracized by her community, she fell under control of a band of dacoits (organized criminals) and, later, was brutally gang-raped for weeks by a rival gang of upper-caste Thakurs. She soon assumed leadership of her own gang, which carried out a series of robberies and kidnappings of upper-caste villagers, and on Valentine’s Day in 1981, Devi ordered the execution of 22 upper-caste Hindu men to avenge her abuse and degradation in what became known as the Behmai massacre. Although Indian authorities dispute as myth the notion that Phoolan Devi robbed from the rich to give to the poor, her actions were widely perceived to be justified by the poor and downtrodden, who heralded her as a hero (some even believed her to be an incarnation of the Hindu goddess Durga). In 1983, she surrendered to authorities and spent 11 years in jail. Two years after her release, she was elected to the Indian Parliament, vowing to 'protect the weaker sections' of society and promising to provide drinking water, electricity, schools and hospitals to the poor while fighting for women’s equal rights. She was gunned down outside her home in Delhi in 2001.

Prof. Everett Willoughby
player, 6 posts
Mon 27 Nov 2017
at 06:49
  • msg #23

Re: OOC

Player 6:
In reply to Prof. Everett Willoughby (msg # 21):

I was thinking of someone like Phoolan Devi, personally.

History.com:
Although she stood less than five feet tall, this Indian 'Bandit Queen' garnered quite an imposing reputation. Born into a poor low-caste family in 1963, Phoolan Devi was married when she was only 11 years old to a man three times her own age who brutally beat her. She escaped his abuse only to be imprisoned for a crime she did not commit when she returned to her home village. Ostracized by her community, she fell under control of a band of dacoits (organized criminals) and, later, was brutally gang-raped for weeks by a rival gang of upper-caste Thakurs. She soon assumed leadership of her own gang, which carried out a series of robberies and kidnappings of upper-caste villagers, and on Valentine’s Day in 1981, Devi ordered the execution of 22 upper-caste Hindu men to avenge her abuse and degradation in what became known as the Behmai massacre. Although Indian authorities dispute as myth the notion that Phoolan Devi robbed from the rich to give to the poor, her actions were widely perceived to be justified by the poor and downtrodden, who heralded her as a hero (some even believed her to be an incarnation of the Hindu goddess Durga). In 1983, she surrendered to authorities and spent 11 years in jail. Two years after her release, she was elected to the Indian Parliament, vowing to 'protect the weaker sections' of society and promising to provide drinking water, electricity, schools and hospitals to the poor while fighting for women’s equal rights. She was gunned down outside her home in Delhi in 2001.

Interesting! Haven't heard about her before
Player 4
player, 7 posts
Tue 28 Nov 2017
at 06:58
  • msg #24

Re: OOC

Sorry, got sick, food poisoning.
They
GM, 12 posts
Wed 29 Nov 2017
at 23:26
  • msg #25

Re: OOC

"Player 5" has bowed out due to workload at work increasing, but wants to come back someday. Everyone else, fill out your entire character sheets, and fill in "character description..." email me if you have questions that need to be answered...
Prof. Everett Willoughby
player, 7 posts
Thu 30 Nov 2017
at 07:35
  • msg #26

Re: OOC

So, what's the final decision on starting era?
Bigby Macintyre
player, 1 post
Thu 30 Nov 2017
at 08:18
  • msg #27

Re: OOC

Player 4:
Sorry, got sick, food poisoning.

Oh that's quite alright, Dearie.

Also Prof, I'm unbais but equally interested.
They
GM, 13 posts
Thu 30 Nov 2017
at 14:58
  • msg #28

Re: OOC

In reply to Prof. Everett Willoughby (msg # 26):

Based on the limited feedback I've gotten, I'm thinking of starting 1966 and then moving back in time to 1795. Anyone object?

Frankly, right now, I just want to get all players' character sheets and character descriptions fully filled in...
Player 4
player, 8 posts
Thu 30 Nov 2017
at 15:43
  • msg #29

Re: OOC

Done unless you want background in there someplace.
Sign In