Wynternight:
Screw AI-generated "art"
It’s not
AI-generated "art", it’s
AI-"generated" art =)
I mean, it’s demonstrably (as its nature in general, if not in specific cases)
derivative. Which is why it’s not a thing that can run amok for long (legally) IMHO.
I’ve heard about “clever” pointy-haired bosses who contracted an artist, got samples, fired the artist and began AI remixing. But ultimately the contract either:
A. includes right to possible remixes — then it sucks for the artist either way, but AI streamlines the process and takes the jobs from a bunch of tracing hacks, or…
B. does not — in which case PHB’s company… does not legally own derivative art, whether it’s made manually, using complicated filters, or using AI.
So, eventually some “big fish” will get upset at being ripped off big time. Or someone will start mass-producing NFTs this way. And then lawyers will be on it like flies on… syrup.
Seeing how the courts work in the Only Place That Matters™ (especially after the case of Anas Abdin), a class action is unlikely to happen sooner than either of these.