AmbertheGirlGamer:
..."You gotta pay to play." And I only do free to play dnd 5e games on roll20 and discord for voice chat. I would never charge my players for something I play for fun and free as a hobby. I mean, cool world, dude but you should have told me it wasn't free to play instead of roping me along. Dang!
That's BS! Not what you said, but the audacity of that GM. I don't want to derail so I'll be quick. I was incredibly fortunate to GM for cash as a 20 something, prior to realizing I hadn't severe limitations. I GMed WAAAAY more for free than if I got paid a dime and hour I would have made 100 times what I made when I was paid. That's scummy, but I guess also more normalized with youtube and other platforms. I've never met someone, and gamed with them, that GMed for money. For me it wasn't worth it, it was like any job, beyond my capacity to deliver consistently, and...it wasn't fun. Just wanted to put that in there since I was approached by friends of my gaming group to GM for, and when I said no, they offered to pay. So for what it's worth, I...that's just ridiculous. That makes me mad that you had that bait and switch, and probably gave him some views. Ugggh. Sorry, that's all I'll say though.
quote:
That was also my only living world dnd game I was in too. After having 3 of my characters get killed off in that game by the dm without any way of resurrection or reincarnation and not wanting my 4th character to die because that game made me scared of combat by myself in dnd, I decided to retire my way of mercy Tiefling monk and leave the game before Singles appreciation day on February 15 of this year.
OMG...that makes my heart sink. I can't speak to 5e D&D, but I played Living Greyhawk in 3.5. I saw some awful GMs that ruined people's ability to appreciate the format. I'm so sorry, not to apologize, but genuinely that's heartbreaking. Not like your beloved pet dying, heartbreaking, but dang, that still hurts to even read.
I was going to reply more on topic, your post just struck me with he first part and gutpunched me with the next. Sorry to go off topic! So much just resonated. I haven't even read further posts yet.
As for "accidentally" adding. I've done that, but that was because John (swapped in name) was in my first game, and I advertised for a second game. John said he'd RTJ. I get a RTJ that is incomplete but same type, same "Class" (caste in Exalted) as John and so I added the user, as I only new John (best) by his character in the first game. It ended up the player I added stayed, on my watch, but left on his own. Meanwhile John was never in jeopardy of being left out. I had them both queued to just agree to allow each other to "do their own thing" and any crossover that occurred was fine, and needed to be fine for the group to work. Like, I had no problem having Not-John in the game, his concept was good enough even if incomplete. I just probably would have been more careful if John hadn't coincidentally cued me to expect that "concept". Anyway, that was one time in 19 years on RPoL, and very specific to a niche style.
I'm glad you, OBorg, realize sometime GMs are ina hurry in the first case, as I sort of agree with you. I've been that player too. Made a paladin and found out we'd be "doing to evil what it deserves" and didn't have the time to get in my second submission. I had typed it up and sent it, but during my writing it, the GM already had his pick.
The second case is likely suspect as mentioned "seatwarmer aka inside invite" or a BS excuse. MY citing me doing it doesn't in any way discredit that statement. To be fair, I did seatwarm for John, and it only took that once to remember to check user names. Never needed to consult that rule since, but still do, since it happened at all.
Sorry you had bad luck though.
Anyway, I got so caught up in the "allowed replies" I forgot where I was. heh...So if you don't mind I'll double post...eh hem.