 |
| ||
|
| Author | Message | Page: 3 2 1 [all][bottom] |
Also, be aware many artists see this as a way to get around their intellectual property rights, and is being seen by many as a way to push artists out of the equation. https://kotaku.com/ai-art-dall...copyright-1849388060 I highly doubt any of this information is going to stop anybody, but at least try to see where artists are coming from. | |||||
Many public facing models like Crayon, DALLE, Midjourney put on filters that weed out copyright or other illegal/NSFW but it's not that the model itself 'can't' do it, but you put checks in place to kick out things. Violence is a big one because nobody wants the publicity of having their AI model publish violent material either. As for the artists, they're kind of SOL. The copyright laws are still being developed but similar issues involving training AI datasets have gone heavily towards the researchers. While the artists didn't give permission to have their work incorporated, training an AI model isn't directly competing with the artists so it typically falls under "Fair Use". In addition if I go to a gallery and see an artist's work and then go home and draw a picture in that same style I'm not breaking the law unless I am directly lifting stuff from their work. AI image generation does not copy work, but is inspired by it. I do agree that there are going to be tons of lawsuits and case law that has to be published and current trends could break against AI researchers providing avenues for artists to get their works out of training sets but honestly, the cat's out of the bag. Even if they stop it tomorrow there are so many open source models floating around that are already trained on these same pieces of art that it's kind of too late. It's equivalent to the RIAA or MPAA trying to crack down on the free share of music or films with the addition that the law is fuzzier because people are trading around not exact copies but music/films "kind of like" existing material. It's interesting to watch and as I work with AI/ML professionally I have a keen interest to stay on top of the case law. tl;dr: So far in the past law suits have not gone in favor of people suing AI researchers so I doubt the artist community will be able to stop it either. Progress marches on etc. etc. | |||||
| |||||
| |||||
Character is a tall, well-built, hybrid Vulcan Orc, trained to play a mandolin and sing to make a living. Training further to be an assassin, he incorporates a lightsaber into his mandolin which he uses to execute his targets. Dressing as a courtier, he frequents the courts of the nobles and plies his trade in the darkness; the only light upon his kills is the glowing blade springing from his mandolin. | |||||
Just for fun I put that entire phrase into a quickie generation and this is what came out: https://labs.openai.com/s/BGhGPIjJz03VUJSUJY4Ymm6D So you get: - Vulcan (pointy ears) - Orc - Playing the mandolin And that's about it. Maybe the other stuff had an impact but at least from our perspective most of the other stuff fell off. https://labs.openai.com/s/TNxNwlQBjAlSyd1TVpQ6n9EF That is another result and you can see it added "dressed as a courtier" and "blade" even though it skipped lightsaber. This is why some engines use weighting so you can have more control over how you pull it in one direction or another. | |||||
If it was rephrased, perhaps, it would be more easily incorporated, but I suspect that 'dressing like a courtier' is rather vague for an AI...a courtier from where? And when? Of what rank? In whose court? All of these could massively impact what 'dressing like a courtier' means, so without specifics to clarify, the AI doesn't really devote much 'effort' to realizing that part of the description. | |||||
Thanks! That last one actually looks pretty good. | |||||
Ex-military captain: https://i.imgur.com/3d6VWo4.jpg Femme Fatale XO: https://i.imgur.com/HoMplee.jpg Grizzled "I'm too old for this" engineer: https://i.imgur.com/MnIdYuo.png Tough no-nonsense orbital drop trooper: https://i.imgur.com/luW7NzD.png Spoiled rich young VIP: https://i.imgur.com/6pbWKVr.png | |||||
extremely attractive gnome female sorceress short black hair skin the color of coffee with cream green eyes red dress carrying a wolf puppy night sky background Feel free to post it here, if you like. This message was last edited by the user at 21:24, Tue 25 Oct 2022. | |||||
Those look really cool! Well done | |||||
So I'm still baking and will look at the results but from the very first batch came this which I thought looked awesome: https://i.imgur.com/Lt39zqk.png Don't know if it necessarily fits but I'm happy it got the wolf pup in there without being an absolute mangle. | |||||
| |||||
Holding the white wolf: https://i.imgur.com/ldaB0R8.png Did I say Green Eyes? I meant green HIGH-lights: https://i.imgur.com/xQkXCNQ.png She's giving you the evil eye: https://i.imgur.com/rs96U0T.png Who's a good boy! You're a good boy: https://i.imgur.com/DZG2Mst.png Golden is the new green: https://i.imgur.com/cVrvr1i.png It looks good but I just imagine her getting up an hour before everyone else to carefully do her eye makeup before the rest of the adventuring party wakes up: https://i.imgur.com/HcH1Qtr.png Fun Fails: Wolves are hard so I just gave your girl some dog ears: https://i.imgur.com/YzsW8Mc.png | |||||
Most of the others don't look enough gnome-like. She's supposed to be only 2 ft 2, so no long neck and even a wolf puppy should seem pretty big in comparison. | |||||
| |||||
One of the things I've found useful is to find a famous celebrity that kinda meets the look you're going for and dump it at the very end with minimum weights to kind of "pull" the picture together. The AI can struggle if you put the celeb too high because most of the pictures it has for celebs are "red carpet" pics that can result in some bizarre (and hilarious) compositions but if you put it at the end so the AI thinks "like this guy...but subtle" it can be useful. I tried it with a few different celebs: Clive Owen: https://i.imgur.com/x2R7QWC.png Jeremy Runner: https://i.imgur.com/gYq9TzN.png The requestor suggested Daniel Craig and I think that was the right call: Some final version: https://i.imgur.com/GuxZvEp.png https://i.imgur.com/rdWF8pS.png https://i.imgur.com/cfOsTUv.png https://i.imgur.com/bNGVX5F.png https://i.imgur.com/XO3UffF.png They all have varying degrees of resemblance but I think are distinct enough that it isn't just "Daniel Craig AS..." maybe more like his his brother or cousin.... | |||||
I may have to add one of these to the character description in the game...I'm still not completely sold on Daniel Craig as an archetype, but it's going to be hard to find someone else that beats some of those! | |||||
| |||||
https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/wiki/index/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Stabl...sion/wiki/tutorials/ | |||||
Right now there are 3 Big Boys in the paid "AI Art As A Service" world: Dreambooth, Midjourney, and NovelAI. NovelAI is known mainly for doing anime styles. Midjourney is primarily known for it's more evocative artistic flair although with the right prompts it can do various styles and photorealistic pictures. Dreambooth is kind of the "steady workhorse" where it doesn't necessarily specialize in anything but it does everything pretty well and also has a lot of features to help the user feed in an image (or images) so it can, say, put you into the picture. Then if you are technically savvy and have a beefy enough computer you can run Stable Diffusion (the main model behind it all) on your local machine or use a Google Colab account to basically borrow free CPU cycles to do your own images but with the INFINITE SETTINGS you need to tweak to do it yourself (the paid services typically take a lot of the settings out of your hands so you just have to focus on the 'prompt'). There are others: DALLE-2 is pretty cool, Craiyon is a freebie one that is fun to play with and more and more are popping up every day but DB, MJ and NA are the three big boys for paid services. As a warning paid AI doesn't look too expensive at first ($15 gets you like 200 images through MJ for example) however it is very addictive and you can burn through a LOT of those credits as you're tweaking and refining prompts. Dreambooth gives you like 50 credits for free as a demo, MJ gives you 25 for free as a trial and I burned through both of those in a couple of hours. | |||||
| |||||
For you fully sighted folks, disregard. | |||||
Me to. | |||||
https://i.imgur.com/nwaaV8z.png https://i.imgur.com/q0BIyqT.png https://i.imgur.com/y5hk5yA.png |
| [top] |