Re: Tristram vs Isigar in Close Quarters
Kaalk's face is not particularly expressive, as faces go, but the elemental's posture seems quite nonplussed as the knight neatly sidesteps its longspear and comes inside its striking range. It recoils from the whirling chain, and looks dumbly at the haft of its now-useless weapon - then back at Tristram. What is it supposed to do?
But then a soft chanting is heard from somewhere behind it, and suddenly, with small cascades of dust, two additional arms emerge from Kaalk's torso. Ah! Now it knows what to do. Leaving its spear jutting out of the arena's floor like an angled sapling with a single steel leaf, Kaalk tears at the human with four sets of claws; then, its sudden surge over, it resumes its prior watchful attitude, one arm snaking out to wrap its claws around the spear's haft.
"Yes, is friend," Isigar answers Tristram's question from somewhere out in the swirling snow. "Is Kaalk - is pebble fighting." Though the Ulutiun is invisible, the smile can be heard in his voice.
Round 3:
[Standard] Cast spell: Girallon's Blessing (self, shared with Kaalk)
[Move] Move (40' speed)
[No action] Hide within the snow's concealment: Hide check 19
Status:
Initiative: 9
AC (Touch AC): 22 (18)
Damage Taken: 0
Damage Dealt: 14
Effects:
Girallon's Blessing: 2 extra arms, 4 claw attacks (50 minutes)
Bull's Strength: +4 Strength (26 rounds)
Produce Flame: 4 minutes
Mage Armor: +4 AC (1 hour)
Obscuring Snow: 30' radius snow, total concealment beyond 5', partial concealment within 5' (pre-cast)
Snowsight: Normal vision in winter weather conditions (pre-cast)
Primal Instinct: +5 to Initiative, Survival (pre-cast)
Heart of Water: Swim, breathe water, invocable freedom of movement (pre-cast)
Final Position: D5 (not visible to Tristram)
Kaalk
Round 3:
[Full-Round] Attack Tristram
Attack 14, miss
Attack 30, hit, damage 11 (should have used modifier +8, not +9, in die roll)
Attack 27, hit, damage 11
Attack 22, hit, damage 11
Rend damage 15
Total: 48 damage
[Free] 0'-adjustment (see note 1)
[Swift] Regain spear (see note 2)
Status:
Initiative: 9
AC (Touch AC): 29 (17) (incl. effects of cover)
Damage Taken: 0
Damage Dealt: 62
Effects:
Girallon's Blessing: 2 extra arms, 4 claw attacks (50 minutes) (shared from Isigar)
Bull's Strength: +4 Strength (26 rounds) (shared from Isigar)
Fist of Stone: +6 Strength for some purposes (7 rounds) (non-stacking with Bull's Strength)
Obscuring Snow: 30' radius snow, total concealment beyond 5', partial concealment within 5' (pre-cast) (shared from Isigar)
Snowsight: Normal vision in winter weather conditions (pre-cast) (shared from Isigar)
Final Position: E8, -5' (visible to Tristram, 20% concealment)
Note 1: Since Kaalk was wading chest-high in earth the entire time, it is unclear whether it ever lost its improved cover. However, if it did get knocked down to regular cover, it should be able to reposition itself with improved cover at the end of its action. The 5'-step concept implies some sort of minor positional adjustment being part of a full-round action; here, there is no 5' (Kaalk never leaves his square), so I call it a "0'-adjustment". (In theory, it is possible - according to one reading of the rules - that Kaalk had only regular cover until its 0'-adjustment at the end of its action, leaving it more vulnerable to, e.g., readied actions or AoOs that interrupted its full attack. But we don't need to face that question here.)
Note 2: Since the spear is not dropped but stays upright, a move action to "pick it up" seems unnecessary - Kaalk merely reaches out an arm and does not need to "bend over". I count grabbing the spear a swift action, akin to quickly manipulating an object on or around one's person (e.g. Penny's flicking the pommel-cover on her flail).
If you'd be interested in a rematch, I would propose the following:
Option A: Isigar does not use Obscuring Snow, and Tristram does not use trip attacks (except reactively in response to a failed trip attack attempt on him).
Option B: Isigar does not bring Kaalk into the arena, and Tristram does not use attacks of opportunity.
Option C: Both of the above.
I think each option balances the handicap imposed on either side, and could pose educational challenges to both parties.