In reply to Kelsey Sarah Champlain (msg # 730):
Abbot is good with support weapons, so is Tremblay. Treblay is competant with signals, too.
Interesting trivia, this was from a post by a US Marine about Canadian soldiers:
quote:
You may be interested to know that one Marine I knew had been a former
Canadian Forces infantryman. He was Native American, and so being
technically ov a soverign nation that extended across the US/Canada border,
had been given permission to leave the CF and join the Marines so that he
could go to Iraq, and had been in a Scout Sniper platoon (which is
basically a unit of apprentice Scout Snipers training and hoping to be good
enough to be such). He had found the Marines much less demanding than
service in a CF infantry battalion. Partially it was for practical
military reasons: For example, he had been expected to know how to operate
every weapon in his company proficiently, as well as the radio, in Canada.
In the US things are more specialised. Only radio operators usually touch
radios, and only some people will learn all the support weapons.
Partially it was for impractical ones: He found the CF far more strict
about keeping your uniforms pressed, and he'd had to keep his boots
polished. We had tan, rough finished boots, and so didn't polish them. He
said keeping his uniforms neat up north had taken a couple of hours every
day. He preferred the US Marines (he'd hated polishing his boots!) but
seemed to regards the CF as a bit more professional, if, paradoxically, a
bit more concerned with trivia.
I'd heard this as well, but it's hard to know how to integrate this without lavishing additional CPs on Canadian soldiers. But we can say for RP purposes that the CF personnel (that is, everyone but Tremblay, Williams and Andrews) can use the radio, at least, if not as technically proficiently as a trained signaller.
Tony