Re: RP RAELIS: Low Lordship - Tasks
FROM HIGH LORD PAVROSTAN, CALLISTIC TRADE BRANCH:
That is indeed a serious crime.
If it is true, and Aesin did abuse the oath-sword, then he is set for a Class M crime. However, I am not satisfied. Aesin, it seems, had some sort of justification for using the oath-sword.. while we are satisfied that Ruse was proven not to be a psionics user, the Callisti also mentioned - upon my inquisition - that Max did, in fact, lie to Aesin.
But about what? It seems, in this case, that Ruse is both guilty and innocent - and by extension, quite possibly Max. But psionics have nothing to do with this. Aesin only threatened to use the oath-sword.. which is his right as Hound of the Thirty-Fourth Metadistrict. He did not, however, actually activate it. He seemed to have justification, and I am inclined to trust a Low Lord. In this case, I think we will clear Aesin of all charges regarding Callisti abuse, because (a) he threatened, not acted, and (b) he didn't act against the wishes of the Callisti in any way.
Unless you have more evidence, and I am pressed to close this investigation.
FROM HIGH LORD JARFOL, LOCAL ENFORCEMENT BRANCH:
Hmm.
Refused to take Callisti evidence and still attacked Ruse? Was something else in mind? I suggest you take a Callisti to Aesin and make him swear that he attacked solely in self-defense against Max, or that he is not lying about Ruse attacking him first, or at least make him explain his reasoning. Take another Callisti if you need it, but I think you have one already.