Re: The Action this round
Ok folks,
I sent an rMail to Ealga's player and removed them from the game. I've also finally removed Dena's player from the game too. Strangely enough Dena has actually been logging in a few times over the last week but has continued to ignore PMs and rMails, including offers to come back or even just be moved to lurker if they no longer have the time to play but want to keep up with the game. That frankly annoys me so anyway, they're both gone. We are again back to just 4, and a currently NPCed bruiser.
I'd like to suggest that if you again want to try for another player that we offer one of these characters to the player who wanted to take over Dena the first go around. I suggest this because that person is playing in another game of mine (the pathfinder one I started at the same time as this for the extra players who wanted in to the Whiterock game) and is also GMing there own games or is GMing at least one game here that I'm playing in myself. The person isn't a blazing fast poster or anything but I'd put them in the category most of this group seems to be: steady and reliable. Likely to be fast and frequent at times and slightly slower at others but unlikely to disappear on us as the last two fifths have.
Another option, if the group remains against a take over (and hey, I understand, not a big fan myself), if I could make a character for this player, with input from you guys on what you'd like to see in your party's fifth.
Or we could go back to one of the other replacement candidates and see if they're still interested, though at this point I'm finding myself in less faith in adding unknown elements to what is, I think, a very nice group.
Sorry to be long winded, GM necessity sometimes.
Oh, and let's not let this slow us down. You've just won a very scary combat that almost killed at least your mage and cleric!