RolePlay onLine RPoL Logo

, welcome to The Colosseum (DnD 3.5)

20:36, 2nd May 2024 (GMT+0)

OOC.

Posted by GM Marcus AttiliusFor group 0
Solitude
player, 1469 posts
Come my friends...
CR19
Mon 16 Mar 2015
at 15:46
  • msg #383

Re: OOC

GM Cassia Gaia:
2): we've decided to create an new Epic Bracket, with the interest of giving our current very high level characters something to do. The rules are as follows (and are subject to change, if something comes up that we didn't see):
Everyone may make one character starting at level 21. As double checking 21 levels of character is a long process to begin with, don't expect to rebuild or routinely ditch your epic character for a new one. Please think long and hard about it. I can assist with this if you wish, I enjoy making characters.
Characters started at level 5 and leveled up normally do not count against this limit of one epic character.


This sounds great! I second that some people do this and Solitude would be happy to be their canon fodder!
Thorn Fury
player, 1113 posts
(CR 11) You never know...
... what's going to hurt.
Tue 17 Mar 2015
at 18:56
  • msg #384

Re: OOC

Good idea, I will maybe do one once I have more time to play and create it ! ;)
Yangash the Bloody
player, 278 posts
ECL9
Wed 18 Mar 2015
at 00:38
  • msg #385

Re: OOC

Sorry, I forgot to mention that I'll be out of town from yeasterday until next Tuesday, so please pardon my absence for the time being. I'll get back to you guys once I'm back.

-Yangash, Jazal, and Soluna
Antaeus
player, 388 posts
ECL 9
Wed 18 Mar 2015
at 01:20
  • msg #386

Re: OOC

NO problem.
GM Cassia Gaia
GM, 267 posts
Fri 20 Mar 2015
at 10:33
  • msg #387

Re: OOC

expect updates tomorrow...
Yangash the Bloody
player, 279 posts
ECL9
Wed 25 Mar 2015
at 07:58
  • msg #388

Re: OOC

So here's something i just thought of.

Employing a Tower Shield imposes a -2 penalty to attack rolls because of it's encumberance. This is because a tower shield, while very effective at protecting you, is to large to wield easily because it is describe as being almost as big as you.

This correlates pretty much exactly to the rules for using inappropriately sized weapons, imposing a -2 penalty per size category you are outside of your own size.

What this means to me is that a Tower shield functions as a shield 1 size too large for the player wielding it as standard. What would happen then, if say i were to as a medium character, purchase a Tower Shield sized for a halfling? Would this mean i'm now using a tower shield of appropriate size and the -2 penalty associated with it is now removed, giving me all the benefits of the tower shield but none of the attack penalty draw backs? Or am i simply now down to -4 to attack because even though the tower shield is inappropriately sized to begin with, a medium character wielding a small tower shield is also considered inappropriate sizing.

What if i were Antaeus and had big hulky giant blood coursing through my veins allowing me to use weapons one size category above my size category at no penalty?
Antaeus
player, 389 posts
ECL 9
Wed 25 Mar 2015
at 08:21
  • msg #389

Re: OOC

Another thing. If you use an armor, or a Tower shield for that matter, that you do not have proficiency in, you impose the ACP as a penalty to your attacks while using it. Even if a shield is animated. Correct?
GM Cassia Gaia
GM, 276 posts
Wed 25 Mar 2015
at 10:26
  • msg #390

Re: OOC

What this means to me is that a Tower shield functions as a shield 1 size too large for the player wielding it as standard. What would happen then, if say i were to as a medium character, purchase a Tower Shield sized for a halfling? Would this mean i'm now using a tower shield of appropriate size and the -2 penalty associated with it is now removed, giving me all the benefits of the tower shield but none of the attack penalty draw backs? Or am i simply now down to -4 to attack because even though the tower shield is inappropriately sized to begin with, a medium character wielding a small tower shield is also considered inappropriate sizing.
Or it means that a tower shield is cumbersome to use due to its shape and design, not its size, which is why the proficiency for tower shields is separate from the proficiency for other shields. Thus trying to use a tower shield not sized for you would apply additional penalties. Shields and armor grant AC independently of the size of the user or the item, even though armor sized for a colossal creature would probably be many feet thick. Too much logic breaks D&D.

Another tract: If a tower shield's size is what granted the +4 AC, why would using a smaller shield grant the same protection? Wouldn't it drop down to +2, the same as a heavy shield (which is roughly half the size of a tower shield, following how size categories work)

quote:
Another thing. If you use an armor, or a Tower shield for that matter, that you do not have proficiency in, you impose the ACP as a penalty to your attacks while using it. Even if a shield is animated. Correct?

Yes.
Yangash the Bloody
player, 322 posts
ECL9
Sun 2 Aug 2015
at 03:20
  • msg #391

Re: OOC

So.... this place kinda died off didn't it?
Antaeus
player, 438 posts
ECL 9
Sun 2 Aug 2015
at 03:53
  • msg #392

Re: OOC

Feels like it.
Yangash the Bloody
player, 323 posts
ECL9
Sun 2 Aug 2015
at 03:57
  • msg #393

Re: OOC

That's unfortunate. It sure was a blast beating the everloving crap out of you time and time again.
Antaeus
player, 439 posts
ECL 9
Sun 2 Aug 2015
at 06:09
  • msg #394

Re: OOC

Only on the plank, and only when you had the initiative advantage. And you bloody well know it.....
Yangash the Bloody
player, 324 posts
ECL9
Sun 2 Aug 2015
at 06:32
  • msg #395

Re: OOC

Antaeus:
Only on the plank, and only when you had the initiative advantage. And you bloody well know it.....

Hey, i take my victories where i can get them ;P
GM Gaius Primus
GM, 1 post
Fri 7 Aug 2015
at 18:05
  • msg #396

Re: OOC

This game is not dead, only taking a pause as it always does in summer times. ;)

Will be back as soon as possible ! :)
Yangash the Bloody
player, 325 posts
ECL9
Fri 7 Aug 2015
at 21:57
  • msg #397

Re: OOC

WooHoo!1!!!

Can Antaeus and I go ahead and get our match closed out. XD

Duel #1259
Melvin
player, 557 posts
CR9
Fri 7 Aug 2015
at 23:14
  • msg #398

Re: OOC

GM Gaius Primus:
This game is not dead, only taking a pause as it always does in summer times. ;)

Will be back as soon as possible ! :)


Not Dead?
I haven't had a DM respond to me for months on this site.
Ever since the main DM left, this site his done absolutely nothing.
It needs a revamp of DMs or needs to close.
GM Titus Valerio
GM, 430 posts
Sat 8 Aug 2015
at 19:25
  • msg #399

Re: OOC

Melvin:
GM Gaius Primus:
This game is not dead, only taking a pause as it always does in summer times. ;)

Will be back as soon as possible ! :)


Not Dead?
I haven't had a DM respond to me for months on this site.
Ever since the main DM left, this site his done absolutely nothing.
It needs a revamp of DMs or needs to close.


We added GM Gaius Primus to take over as lead GM.

To explain the situation, the original GM still handled quite a bit until the three of us took over. We had never planned on having exclusive control over the arena - we all initially helped in a limited capacity. We tried to step up and provide the maintenance this game required ourselves but due to school and our careers or military service we knew we were not able to sufficiently maintain things here and began looking for someone to take the lead from us.

We're going to attempt to resurrect this game when Gaius is ready to take over.

We don't plan on deleting the game. If you'd rather be removed to avoid seeing this pop up, I can certainly help with that.
Antaeus
player, 440 posts
ECL 9
Sun 9 Aug 2015
at 06:53
  • msg #400

Re: OOC

I'm staying.
Melvin
player, 558 posts
CR9
Tue 29 Sep 2015
at 21:51
  • msg #401

Re: OOC

Is this site starting up again?
I will offer to be a DM to help keep it alive.
I would like to change the rules around a bit to make it more interesting. The biggest problem is fighting the same people over and over again. Don't know how but would like to brainstorm with the people running the site on how to get out of that scenario.

Maybe a character can exist at different levels. Takes out the character progression but may be worth it.

Maybe a person can have multiple characters but not have to start at 5th with every one. One could start at 5th, another at 10th, and another at 15th. These characters can gain experience but the player can always introduce another character starting at any of these levels. We could max out the number of characters a person has based on a level range. For instance, they could only have two characters within 4 levels of each other.

Thoughts?
Yangash the Bloody
player, 326 posts
ECL9
Wed 30 Sep 2015
at 03:51
  • msg #402

Re: OOC

I plan on sticking around.
Melvin
player, 559 posts
CR9
Sat 21 May 2016
at 00:07
  • msg #403

Re: OOC

hello?
Yangash the Bloody
player, 327 posts
ECL9
Sat 21 May 2016
at 00:11
  • msg #404

Re: OOC

Howdy!
Tel'adrel
NPC, 701 posts
The Spider
Stygian Order - CR 15
Sat 21 May 2016
at 00:46
  • msg #405

Re: OOC

In theory we were going to have someone try and revive during the summer. Not sure.

If anyone wants to try to revive, let me know.
Antaeus
player, 441 posts
ECL 9
Sat 21 May 2016
at 05:55
  • msg #406

Re: OOC

Still around, but no way I could run this. Too many things I don't know.
Elestra
player, 67 posts
ECL 5
Mon 23 May 2016
at 02:39
  • msg #407

Re: OOC

It might be a bit ambitious to revive this game as is,, due to the declining player interest and fighting the same characters over and over. Might I suggest a tournament format, so that we at least have different characters to fight every season?

I wouldn't mind helping out in some of the GM roles, but really I'm mainly interested as a player.
Sign In