Re: IC: Gaither Downport (Alsace) 355-5741
Jim listened to Danica and Thera. He could see Danica's concern for the younger woman, and felt Danica was right, and yet she was also missing something.
He was used to making life and death decisions - and given he was alive and so were most of his past crewmates and patients, he felt confident in his ability to do so in such circumstances. This deliberated process, however, gave him room for doubt. Thera was right about consensus, but veto could also be a good approach when warranted.
He pondered this a moment, uncharacteristically biting his lower lip, before returning Thera's smile, if somewhat weakly. His voice was calm and casual as he finally spoke up.
"Yes, veto power can be democratic - but, only if we all agreed to the process. However, in this instance, Hayden made a unilateral, non-democratic decision on the process. That belied the trust we put in him when we elected him to the titular role of Captain. I'd remind you, our mission has no true rank distinctions. I didn't vote for him to have arbitrary decision making powers for how the group makes decisions."
With bolstered confidence (probably of the CYA variety), he continued, "If anyone has a problem with a veto vote on this - I, for one, am perfectly willing to accept a simple vote."
Underlying this logic was the Doc's fear of being wrong - at least with being outvoted he could have the satisfaction of being able to say 'I told ya so'. Instead he had committed an action that made him responsible - something he was less comfortable with.
"As to crewing, I can operate the power boards and handle Life Support as needed, Nino's got the M-Drive and Ms. Gadron has the Jump. Things get tight, Ms. Aksina and Mr. Charpentier know enough of the basics to lend a hand."
He felt pretty confident he could do as good a job as Orcut in this regards, but less so if others had to fill in for him.
"I would add, while Nino seems a nice enough and motivated fella, and I'm all for giving him a position, calling him Chief Engineer might be a bit over the top - how about we call him Lead Engineer and leave Chief Engineer case we run across someone more experienced at a future port?"