Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
"Erection that Won't Go Down."
Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
After graduating college, I moved from small town in Texas to Washington, D.C. where I worked for little money and with little sleep in an effort to bring then Senator John Kerry to the Presidency as the Assistant Director of a campaign office. It was the kind of job in which I sometimes worked 90-100 hours per week and occasionally slept on the floor at work. Needless to say, the campaign was not a success - and I know that no matter how much loss people feel when their candidate loses, it's magnified a hundred fold for those folks on the campaign.Ā Republican or Democrat, I'll always have an open heart for a campaigner that lost.
I mention this to say that I also know about getting over it as much as anyone does, brushing aside that tremendous sense of loss, and carrying on. Our country isn't the work of fiction we've created in our heads with our anthems and our legends, but a real place where many things are great and also many things are not. A periodic political setback isn't the end of the world. It's a reset. It's the continuation of an ongoing struggle.
But even after that tremendous sense of loss I felt after my blood, sweat, tears, and life went into a national campaign, I never felt afraid of the Bush Administration. I disagreed vehemently with them on everything imaginable, but neither Bush nor his supporters made me fearful. There are dignified men and women of honor with whom I would certainly have deeply and passionately disagreed about matters of policy who could have been participating in this contest - and I wouldn't have been happy with their election, but I also wouldn't have been afraid.
There still would have been a great sense of loss if those people had eventually prevailed in the election, but it wouldn't have been the sense of fear and anxiety that I have today. I was never afraid after either of George W. Bush's elections, and I didn't feel afraid of McCain or Romney winning either. But we didn't get a John Kasich, or a Jeb Bush, or a Marco Rubio.Ā This isn't a John McCain or a Mitt Romney or a George H.W. Bush, or a Ronald Reagan, or even a George W. Bush. I would have passionately disagreed with any of those men on matters of policy, but I wouldn't have feared living under their administrations.
This isn't the usual "Oh, your side lost, just get over it, everything will be ok and you'll be back to fight another cycle!" type of situation.Ā Trust me, I know that: I'm a born and raised Texan, and I vote every single Presidential and midterm and state and local election. The candidates I support almost always lose. I know how to get over it, and I know when everything will be alright.
The fact is that I live now as an ethnic minority in a country that voted to install a leader that has himself with his own diminutive hands retweeted the propaganda of White Supremacist groups and has been in fact endorsed by the KKK. I don't fear Trump himself, but the people who now feel empowered and vindicated by his election. I speak not of the traditional conservatives who didn't want Hillary, but of the people who already doing these things:
https://medium.com/@seanokane/...d58381001#.hwtembntr
As Martin Lawrence and Will Smith say in Bad Boys 2, "Shit just got real."
Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
I'm blessed to have friends and coworkers from a wide variety of ethnic and cultural backgrounds. I also have a number of dear friends who are gay. What this election has meant for them, and the seeming validation it's provided for people who harbor ignorant, hateful ideas, is nothing short of horrific. Since Tuesday, I've been stuck in a persistent cycle of fear, anger, and shock.
One thing I've struggled with, in particular, has been communicating with my daughter about it. As a single father, this event has reinforced, with terrible clarity, the great importance of passing on the right values to our children, of making certain that they recognize, and most importantly live out a love and respect for all people. In addition, for her, I've felt a real need to explain that some of the recent messages that have surfaced regarding what makes women valuable, and what constitutes appropriate interactions between the genders, have been entirely, irrefutably wrong. Just because a misogynist collected the most electoral votes, it doesn't mean that his views should be accepted, no matter how many people gave him a pass by voting for him. Far from it.
In that respect, the letter Aaron Sorkin penned to his daughter Roxy pretty much nails my perspective on the election, both with regard to its result, and with respect to what needs to be done going forward.
http://www.vanityfair.com/holl...mbid=social_facebook
Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
I make no predictions, mostly because while I sincerely believe Trump is Clodios reincarnated at this point, Clodios never controlled all the legions.
There's a lot of people making fun of the Hillary voters right now, and while I admit it's fun watching some sanctimonious people who hurled racial epithets at the one Trump supporter in my office get their comeuppance, I am not so stupid as to think those people represent those who preferred Clinton any more than I believe that supposed basket of deplorables represents 25% of the US population or indeed any significant portion of anyone's political base. For the record I don't think most Trump supporters really understand their candidate either, they're just angry and they don't know why. I have some theories, but I'll put that aside.
Full disclosure that I don't agree with the popular narrative of what everyone says Trump is going to do, mostly because from what I've seen of the man, I don't think he has any desire or incentive to do it as they say. I realize I'm alone in that opinion, but I will clarify I don't think he's a good man, he's just not the man he's imagined to be in the popular conscience. I think he represents a very different set of problems than what people think he does.
But I am not making fun of the Hillary voters, even though I don't agree with their interpretation of this situation at all, because the concern is genuine even if the understanding of what has occurred is flawed and you shouldn't poke fun at people who are genuinely upset. It just doesn't help anything.
What I am going to say is I hope this will clue in the majority of the US population. See, the thing is... Trump is not the problem, he is the result of the problem. Hear me out.
The problem is the corruption in the republic is at an all time high. Probably the best example I can use here, since I'm only going to use one for the sake of brevity, was that the candidate the Democrats actually wanted was Bernie Sanders, and he was edged out by a corrupt establishment that didn't care what the people wanted.
http://observer.com/2016/07/wi...ndermined-democracy/
The thing is, this is so much bigger than Sanders (Sanders was weak willed and didn't raise the hell about this he should have, and the wikileaks exposed so many more things about Clinton, but I'm not going to go into them all here). Every. Single. Presidential. Election. Is. Corrupt. Both parties.
Corruption comes home to roost, is the problem. If the people can't get what they want (i.e. Bernie Sanders), they resort to the Populists, and Populists seldom actually deliver anything good for anybody. Sure they're disruptive and they make people feel good but they don't actually accomplish anything, well intentioned or not.
This corruption problem is big, and decades old, and in a weird way I'm glad this happened because maybe I won't be so alone over here any more carrying the banner that says "The Democrats and the Republicans are not Your Friends." I'm only sad it had to get to this scale, and I'm sadder still that most people won't see it for what it is.
Trump is Clodius (or perhaps William Jennings Bryan). He's not a great human being (to be fair he's never claimed to be), but he's far smarter and more clever than his loud mouthed buffoonish personality suggests. He saw a way to turn the corruption on its head, infiltrated the establishment when he found a weak point (Republicans have had absolutely nobody that excited the voters for decades now), and then rode a wave of Populist discontent straight to the White House.
So what's my point? I finally hope the left will realize what the right failed to realize. Ron Paul failed and the Tea Party initiative was infiltrated and disarmed by the establishment almost instantly. So I'm choosing to be an optimist.
We have to stop worshiping at the altar of political ideology and start looking at how dysfunctional this system actually is. Else, what you will continue to get is Clodios, and Clodios will invariably incur the wrath of the elite, which will lead to collapse one way or the other.
Sadly, my instinct tells me the majority will sit in the cave and double down on what lead us here.
Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
In short, it is not possible to have a safe country for all citizens without legal justice*, and legal justice* is impossible without social justice, as a corrupt society cannot produce laws* better than itself. What you have here is a would-be dictator waving simple soloutions for complex problems, and a lot of people who've never thought to question their media or beliefs going "well, I don't much like him, but I understand his plan. Shoot some individual bankers/criminals/whoever, great. Not like there's a system producing them."
Passive hatred, the blind enablement of moral abomination, is what gives active hatred its inertia. Take Belle, for instance - she probably doesn't consider herself homophobic, but considers it normal and fine to talk about homosexuality as though it's "adult", a kink, like Satan jumps out and sprinkles glitter on some heterosexual person and *poof* ...and that sort of "they're not really a different kind of people, they're broken normals" attitude leads to little kids, who know nothing about sex or lust or kinks, who just don't know why they haven't read a fairy tale where the prince marries the other prince** (but pick up that they've said a Bad Thing when they ask about it), internalising that they are Bad Things. So there's the seeds of depression, self-hatred, and hatred of others like themselves that literally kills queerfolk sown in that tender soil.
Twenty Belles, none of them actively going after this child with a baseball bat, all of them just making sure no positive representation reaches non-adults, and that kid will be affected even if their own parent never denies them two-prince books (thanks to the inertia of two hundred Belles never writing them, and two thousand condemning any that are written, there are none to get). The same goes for anything. Look up "doll experiment" on YouTube and see if it doesn't break your heart.
Enough casual, "harmless", everyday unexamined bigotry, enough watering-down and quasi-intellectual voicing of "two sides to the story" when one is actually not sane from the point of view of any compassionate human being (the uninvited Devil's Advocate derailment/exhaustion tactic), and you grow active bigots. I'm not claiming I'm not, say, racist...we live in societies set up by and for a particular race; it's literally inevitable that our upbringings leave us with stuff we never see the effects of because we're not trained to look...but we can choose to be less so, to believe those below us, educate ourselves and fight for progress into a fairer world where more people are freed up to invent, create, cure and improve everyone's lives...or we can choose to sit on our arses and apathetically be racist, sexist, etc. because it's traditional, comfortable, and a whole lot easier to stigmatise and laugh at people for caring/acting decently than it is to care/act decently and build healthy relationships with non-kin.
*or functional anarchy
**if the kid is really lucky, he develops an interest in fairy tales, myths and legends, and lucks into the original Arthurian legends, where Lancelot very nearly marries a prince.
Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
-Thunderwalker, I shared your comments (anonymously) with some friends of mine as I think it's spot on. Hope you don't mind. Thank you for sharing.
-Trace, I may share that letter with my daughter. Thanks for sharing. I also need to show her the last two minutes of Clinton's concession.
-Belle, Sanders raised a lot of hell. I was a huge Sanders supporter (as you know), but at some point he had to get out of the way. He took it as far as he could. Turns out if he'd gotten out sooner, we wouldn't be in this situation.
-In my mind, there are only a few things that are irreversible for humanity as a whole. We are now closer to both nuclear war and a complete destruction of the environment upon which we depend to live. This isn't just about having a few more bucks in someone's pocket.
-If you guys need somewhere to go, join me in SoCal. Every race, creed, orientation, etc. is represented, welcomed, and appreciated. The only potential violence here is actually against the white minority, though that is extremely remote. California is talking about secession. Jump across the border before it's too late. Also, we now have legal marijuana.
-Aimee, sadly there is no chance the EC reverses course with such a gap. Had it been 269-269, maybe. And welcome back.
-Tan, yeah. Guns. Frightening. We haven't seen anything like that yet (it's all been nonviolent bigotry so far) but who knows. Hopefully that won't some to pass.
-# Caliexit! We would be the 6th largest economy in the world all by ourselves.
Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
Clinton cheated to beat Bernie. If Clinton had beat Sanders legitimately (and not taken money from Saudi Arabia, and other shady stuff), she probably would have won. That kind of reputation for corruption made the undecided voters decide the wild card was a better choice than the known crook. Her karma caught up to her.
When people in high places do things like that, it just undermines the whole system because our system relies on good faith and letting different ideas compete freely. We don't have a system there that happens.
John Adams said our Constitution is inadequate for an immoral people and he was right.
Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
Well, I expected some insanity (sadly) when the lunatic fringes of each side lashed out, but it keeps coming. People have lost their everloving minds. When children are resorting to this, it's just... ugh.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAym1xh94_E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfJenokrmb4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hdH5TtjnLw
http://dailycaller.com/2016/11...ump-supporter-video/
http://metro.co.uk/2016/11/10/...voted-trump-6248405/
They keep this up, there'll be another 16 minute compilation video of post election Trump supporter beatings. But again, Clodios' supporters didn't fare well either, so it goes to figure. At least no one has been killed yet. But do we have to drag innocent children into this? That's depressing.
And I figured this would start happening too.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016...rump-supporters.html
http://www.mediaite.com/online...by-man-in-trump-hat/
That's just sad. Predictable, but sad. Okay, I'm officially going to take a break from trying to unpack the election now.
Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
That isn't to say the the discourse hasn't gotten progressively worse over the last eight years, but it's something of a one-sided escalation in response to the candidacy and the presidency of Barack Obama.
- The "Tea Party" movement arises in response to the candidacy of Barack Obama, but many of their complaints could have been equally assessed against President Bush, though never came up during the eight years of his administration. A coincidental timing that they decided to get upset only when a person of color sought office, of course.
- Obama (who would be considered a moderate Republican maybe thirty years ago) is labeled as a 'socialist' (though nobody seems to have conceded how stupid that was, even in the face of having an actual socialist run for president this year)
- Obama's citizenship and status as an American is called into question, as well as his religion. (Trump played a significant role in this, but was aided by many elected Republicans)
- Obamacare, a massive giveaway to the private sector, is labeled as socialism and subjected to constant attempts to repeal it.
- Most or all Obama initiatives are shot down, appointments stalled and fought tooth and nail, culminating in the longest ever vacancy on the Supreme Court
Now, a large part of this is due to or exacerbated by institutional problems with the political process, mainly in Congress. Congressman have two year terms, which is horrendously short. They are constantly campaigning. And if they are seen as not tough enough or not conservative enough, they will be challenged and later be defeated by someone even more conservative - for the crime of working with the other party or not opposing every single thing Obama wants. So in order to remain in power, they have to keep getting more and more extreme, or they will get tossed out. And since they are constantly campaigning...this just gets worse and worse. And a lot of these primaries happen in midterm years, so only the most hardcore faithful show up to vote. [This could theoretically be a problem for Democrats too, but it doesn't seem to have been as bad so far. But it's possible that after eight years of complete denial and refusal to cooperate on anything, that they'll decide it's time to do the same now that they're the opposition party.]
A lot of the videos the Stray shared earlier involve mechanisms that could help with this problem. Additionally, I would say that there should be an increase in the length of each term in Congress, and the imposition of term limits. If parties had more control, that might actually be beneficial overall, as they could raise the bar for sitting members to be open to primary challenges, so that there would be a chance to govern, and not just a need to be constantly campaigning and trying to be more entrenched and require a refusal to work across the aisle.
Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
People keep throwing red herrings into the mix with this election imho, but for the sake of clarity I'll simply lay out how I see it.
I know I keep harping on it, but it's reminding me ever more of the saga of the Roman demagogue, whose ascent to power was accompanied by his supporters physically attacking his opponents. I wonder if Clodios had modern media back then if this same thing would have happened.
I was discussing this with a Trump supporter playing Overwatch last night, who took the comparison as compliment until I reminded him that Clodios' aggravation of the status quo led to the collapse of the republic and the emergence of the empire, and a lot of people killed to ultimately usher in something that didn't end well, to use his understatement. Populism is one of those things that only sounds good; you need a true revolution or an actual reform, a disrupt-or only makes the disenfranchised feel good; it doesn't actually solve the problem because a demagogue has no actual plan of action, parroting what people want to hear is a tactic but not a plan. Unfortunately, just like in Rome, the corruption has come home to roost because it is so deep the system offers no meaningful course of action for the unsatisfied and thus is too broken to resist a populist uprising.
What baffles me more than anything though is that the left, who love to complain about the wide disparity between rich and poor (sometimes articulately and sometimes not), can't put 2 and 2 together here and just don't understand what happened: you put the people in the position of supporting your obvious corruption or throwing a monkey wrench into the system, and of course when you do that they will give you the middle finger and pull the figurative Trump lever. They don't actually support him, they just know the alternative is more of what they're unhappy with so they elect to cast the die with the populist. And to be fair, Hillary is no more or less a crook than her contemporaries. Trump is probably a crook too but he's not a political crook. But Clinton got exposed at a critical time like it was laser guided karma; you can't just keep doing that forever and not expect consequences.
And they're not alone, the establishment conservatives are just as clueless and don't understand how Trump got their ticket. Hello? How about the fact you've abandoned nearly all of your values and become a parody of your own ideology, and are just as corrupt as your opponents? I know a lot of Republicans, and while this isn't a meaningful sample, it still says something to me that they all considered W Bush a weak and ineffectual leader, and they only voted for him because he wasn't "the other guy" and that's the best you've offered for a long time. The Tea Party only happened after Bush because at that point, they wouldn't lose any standing with their own establishment by lodging their complaints. None of them are happy with the GOP. You can't keep going on "we're not them" forever.
This was a long time coming. Ever escalating levels of cowardice and broken systems got us here.
In a weird way I suppose this was inevitable, the comparisons between the US and Rome have been evident for decades now and no one seemed to care. Those who do not study are doomed to repeat.
I await Annius Milo to surface now. And eventually, Caesar. But I hope I'm wrong.
And for the record I'm all for reform to make the larger parties work for it, it's the only way a fiscally conservative transparency craving small "l" libertarian like me will ever matter in US politics. I can't really vote for what I believe in because usually I'd wind up helping my least favorite candidate.
Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)quote:Any other opinion, any other way of looking at the world, is unacceptable. We don't debate any more because the left won the cultural war. So if you're on the right, you're a freak. You're evil, you're racist, you're stupid, you are a basket of deplorables. How do you think people are going to vote if you talk to them like that?
...
If you are against the prevailing view, you are attacked for raising your opinion.
It's like he can ready my damn mind. I couldn't agree more.
Anyone remember this?
quote:There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That's an entitlement. The government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what. And I mean the president starts off with 48, 49... he starts off with a huge number. These are people who pay no income tax. Forty-seven percent of Americans pay no income tax. So our message of low taxes doesn't connect. So he'll be out there talking about tax cuts for the rich. ... My job is not to worry about those people. I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives. What I have to do is convince the 5–10% in the center that are independents, that are thoughtful, that look at voting one way or the other depending upon in some cases emotion, whether they like the guy or not.
It's an asinine thing to say isn't it? But of course Romney won the election so... oh right. He didn't.
I only knew one Republican very well at the time that election was going on, and he was a realtor. He told me once "I can't sell a house by convincing people it's the only alternative to an inferior house. I have to coax out from them what it is they actually need and want and then explain why my product will satisfy them, and if what I have isn't going to work for them I have to get to work and find something that will work for them instead. That's why we're going to lose this election."
Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
Some people got their feelings hurt when they were called out for racism, so they voted for a KKK-endorsed candidate who frequently retweeted White Supremacist groups. What's the chance they weren't racists in the beginning?
I guess we're supposed to coddle racists and normalize their views, instead of challenging them?
Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
What intrigues me is that Trump rejected David Duke's endorsement yet he is considered the be endorsed by the KKK. Well... what else can Trump reasonably do but say he doesn't want or need such an endorsement? It is not under Trump's control what opinion the KKK expresses.
The double standard was something I noted personally: Clinton praised Robert Byrd and is not considered to be a racist, yet when Trent Lott did the same thing with Strom Thurmond he was accused of racism.
Using accusations of racism as your weapon of choice is just too shaky politically. The only racism I personally saw irl in this whole thing was against a Trump supporter and one of my favorite YouTube pundits who criticized both candidates and refused to vote for either of them. So what am I supposed to think? My experience and perspective is as valuable as anyone else's.
But I don't call Clinton supporters racists because they're not responsible for these acts as a group. It would be very small minded to just call a huge group of people I don't know racists because some of them surely are. Isn't that the right attitude to have? Yet when I extend that same attitude to Trump supporters or Pro Brexit voters people freak out. Why?
I try to live by the notion of do unto others as you would want them to do unto you, and I don't like it when people willfully take everything I say in the worst possible light. If you're going to be charitable to people who are culturally, politically, ethnically or sexually different from you, and imho you should be because this is a good way to be tolerant, you should be very careful about excluding any group from that same worldview.
It is a wonderful tool. When the state banned gay marriages I got into a discussion because I was against the ban and got into a contentious discussion just like this one with supporters of the ban whose principal argument was that those who proposed gay marriages were people of poor character pushing a sinister agenda. By playing the Devil's Advocate with them and arguing that the opponents of the ban had wholly different motives, I was able to hold my ground in that discussion and hopefully make some people think maybe there's another side to the issue. Now I realize at the end of the day those people think I am a piece of human garbage still, but that's everyone on this planet. If you try to please everyone by holding popular opinions without questioning them, you're morally hollow and everyone will see it.
Again this is the reason I try to be charitable to people I disagree with. By virtue of their disagreement with me, they have demonstrated some thought about the topic as have I, and if we genuinely exchange conflicting ideas we will both move closer to a more advanced understanding. Not in the moment mind you but over time. The people we are now is not the people we will be in the future.
By the same logic that Muslims are not terrorists Trump voters are not racists, imho.
Now I am not saying I love everyone and everything. Far from it. But I demand a standard of proof before presupposition I should hate anyone. And I do hate some people, like those men in Long Island who kidnapped and raped a 12 year old.
Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
For example...
Giddy white nationalists hail Trump choosing Steve Bannon as his ‘minister of propaganda’
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/1...nster-of-propaganda/
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/1...ew-chief-strategist/
That is Trump's choice to put this POS in a high position. Nobody else's. As for Trump himself, anyone who says 1000s of Muslims from NJ where celebrating after 9/11:
https://www.washingtonpost.com...ted-the-911-attacks/
and not one news source can even show this event-that is an example of someone ginning up fear for political use. Someone who does not care about how much suffering that hate will cause. For example the trump inspired hate crimes from over this weekend alone...
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/1...the-list-is-growing/
Spoiler text: (Highlight or hover over the text to view)
Hey, Mr Marshal? What does Matt know about the Harrowed?
16:59, Today: Secret Roll: Matthew Broaddale rolled 3,10 using d6,d6, rerolling max with rolls of 3,(6+4)10. Know Occult, regarding Harrowed.