It's nice to know that that eleven years, there's still some historical killers and mysteries to cover. They haven't even done Jack the Ripper yet, which left it open for Penny.
Yes, temporal splintering! Let's do that! :D Or just make Penny the Eternal Champion.
Artemis:
ooc: Ok, so my original plan was to leave the baby but Kate has in no uncertain terms asked me to keep it and I can see Penny agrees, lol. I do want my players to be happy and if it is feasible I don't want to be unfair and just say no. So....I need to wrap my head around this as time travel can be such a pain. So in taking the child Penny's history would be completely changed, raised by Kate and not at Darkmoor manor and therefore have nothing in common with her past. Heck, she would probably have an American accent! Technically she is American, at least by her parents ;P Anywho, she would be taken back to 1890 for the time being and babysat by Victoria and only be a minor part of the story. Then, the Penny we know would still exist as a paradox of sorts, out of time in a way as her timeline had been erased but she still survives in this new one? Something kind of similar happened in Fringe actually. Just making sure I understand everything. Now, keep in mind that though this is all feasible, Penny's timeline change WILL result in the deaths of innocent people. It's just the consequence of changing things. You can either do it anyway and face the consequences or you can consider your options and come to the conclusion that it simply must be the way it is. OR I thought about perhaps having Kate come often and visit her throughout her childhood, meeting in the cave on the moors when she is a little girl and old enough to be away from her governess and father and though it would only be periodic at least they would both have some semblance of a relationship with only minor impact on the timeline. Thoughts?
Penny is American? Well now we know this is impossible. :p
Shifting Penny to the modern day would mean that in 2013 she's a baby and wouldn't be playable until the 2030s, while Kate would be twenty-odd years older.
Supernatural in the future would be an amazing concept for another game, but I don't think it suits our
Supernatural: 1890 concept.
Time travel is wholly a fictional thing, so whatever happens is up to you. There's so many different versions of time travel, so you have a lot of options. Some muck about time with no consequences at all, and history is completely fixed. This seems to be the case in
Supernatural, apart from the
Titanic episode, and that took massive rogue angel powers to stop the sinking and change history.
Bingo! Gavin MacLeod, Crowley's son, died in 1723, and his ghost appeared in 2010. Then Abbadon saved him and brought him through time to 2014, where we remains, alive. That makes two Gavins, and so far no apparent change to history (though I expect he'll return at some point). Okay, he had minimal effect on history in 1723, but his ghost in 2010 was key to thwarting Crowley's schemes at the time: Bobby kept his soul, and all that follows would have a big effect on future series history. This seems comparable to having two Pennys in existence.
http://www.supernaturalwiki.co...?title=Gavin_MacLeod
What I proposed in the temporal duplication solution is that we have two timelines smushed together. That is, in timeline A, baby Penny stays in 1863 and is raised as normal into Penny as she is now. In timeline B, baby Penny goes with Kate to 1980 or 2013, and is raised there. These are somehow merged into timeline A+B, which is the way history seems to work in the series (see below), and we have two Pennys: the original, who did all she did from 1863 onwards, so history remains on course, and the baby Penny with her whole future ahead of her. That leaves us with two Pennys in one timeline, and two keys to Belial's cage – a liability, perhaps, but it could mean one to open and one to close, giving us a trick to use against him.
If it's a soul issue, then maybe the soul of future Penny (died 1964, at the age of 101) is reincarnated in the second baby.
On the other hand, the hard sacrifice is kind of a thing in
Supernatural, so it would be hard but fitting. On the other other hand, saying "stuff the tropes, let's do what's right" has kind of been ours. We shouldn't have to accept Belial's scam.
Most of all, I think Artemis picked a very complicated way to set up her plot. :P And in my
Doctor Who game, I killed the PCs in their first adventure and set up the first campaign to undo that, so I know complex temporal shenanigans. :D
This message was last edited by the player at 13:53, Wed 04 Nov 2015.