Re: OOC3
I did some more digging to see if I can pin down where the mix-up began. My Core Rulebook has the same verbage as you pointed out but it seems for the better part of a long time it was known that any CMB may be exchanged instead of your standard, run-of-the-mill attack. I googled it and couldn't find anyone that says you couldn't so this must still be a change not many people are aware of. Under how I have known the rules for several years now, you could charge into a disarm, a trip, a grapple, a bullrush.. any of those CMBs since they replace the attack action. A Combat maneuver could substitute a single 'melee attack or ranged attack.' That was relatively simple. Whenever the words assumed the person was 'attacking' it was known you could just assume a disarm or something.
I dont have the PCC:MTT book but apparently within this book, they separate the distinction 'Standard Attack' & 'Melee Attack' effectively defining what you can and cannot do. A 'cleave' for example, is a standard action -not a melee attack- thus you cannot charge into a cleave. Grapple is a standard attack action -not a melee attack- this you cannot charge into a grapple. Deadly stroke is now a standard attack action -not a melee attack- thus you cannot charge into a deadly stroke. But trips, sunders, disarms, and guess what -stunning fist- are all melee attacks.
So why the change? At what point did they have to publish a book to make these distinctions? Did people abuse the charge-grapple and charge-cleave so much they had to change the rules (make the distinction)? If I have a fighter with a big sword and all I do is charge and cleave.. why can I no longer do this? If I am grappling type and I want to charge and grapple someone, why am I no longer allowed? You have rangers with boon companions that get like 6 attacks per turn but I now have to wait two turns to hang on to someone?
Here is my theory- there are some obscure accidental rules that carried over from 3.5 (partially due to their laziness) like if you act before the enemy in the initiative, they are technically flat-footed. Maybe people abused things like that so much they had to make a distinction. Oh Paizo..
Long winded post aside, I am cool with however you rule it. I dont plan to charge into grapples often but in this.. mexican standoff type of scenario, I find it would be the smartest thing Alohan would do. If you want, substitute my stunning fist as that still is a 'melee attack action' and thus still capable of doing at the end of a charge ;)