... unless someone wants to buy up into them with their share
Virius would be willing to do this. A 100gp gem carries a lot easier than one hundred coins.
Very true.
Not including the nonmagical armour or any of the magic items if we split things 8 ways (seven party members and one share for the party itself to cover incidentals and whatnot...like the cost of covering the jewelers work in carving up large stones into smaller ones would be an example) it’ll very roughly be just over 500gp at a very rough add up in my head glance and once we have an ‘official’ tally we’ll toss it up like the last one.
Assuming a share for the Party and a 10% fee for cutting the gems (we may try Burne first to avoid this?)
Granted I am not sure if I made all my edits to my master sheet on this particular sheet. And on mobile so can't fully check it.
Kossoth Zan
player, 93 posts
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 03:52
msg #751
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
When she did the two Rubies she only took a 5% cut.
Your spreadsheet looks good minus the fact that you've got the 10% cutting fee and you've got their value added in despite you also having them down under not split with the armour. Like I mentioned though we can deduct the cutting fee from the Party Share since that's what it's there for...covering expenses that all us incur.
Korkas Stonedelver
player, 308 posts
The "Muscle"
AC 7 HP:9/15
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 04:16
msg #752
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
In reply to Kossoth Zan (msg # 751):
Yeah I entered quickly on mobile and then went back and added in the "cut" gems with the 10% fee
Kossoth Zan
player, 94 posts
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 04:25
msg #753
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
Once we know how much she'll 'charge' we'll just reduce it from the 8th share. Hence the numbers should curve upwards to about 500ish except for the party share that will be I'm guessing 300-350ish post cutting cost.
Depending on Virius' gem value it of course will go up as that wasn't in any calculation previously.
Virius Tesh
player, 185 posts
Suloise Envoy from the
Wizardholme of Urnst
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 13:04
msg #754
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
Korkas Stonedelver:
... all my edits to my master sheet ...
Thank you for doing this.
The bean-counting in PbP can be a real chore (and drives me crazy when I DM), it's real nice to have the info in one spot like this, done up nice and succinct.
Stormrider Truesight
player, 180 posts
HP:20/20 SP:8/8
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 14:04
msg #755
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
Yaytyy gold is only useful when it can b spent lol
How do we identify the magic items?
Dungeon Master
GM, 735 posts
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 15:09
msg #756
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
The Gemcutter will charge 5% when breaking stones down into smaller sizes. This makes the gemcutting a pretty lucrative business, when she can charge 5 gold to break down a 100gp value gem, so when breaking down a 1000gp value gem she makes 50 gold. So If you go to her, its 5% to break down gems. (Other commissions or requests will differ.)
Dungeon Master
GM, 738 posts
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 15:18
msg #757
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
I opened up Burne's Tower, and Nira's Gem Store. Anywhere else anyone is going?
Korkas Stonedelver
player, 310 posts
The "Muscle"
AC 7 HP:9/15
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 16:39
msg #758
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
So how are we doing the "party" share of the loot? Is it a full share, half share? Full is easier to work with but if we want to reduce it we can.
I want to get the sheet easy to use. Anyone should be able to copy the master sheet and enter in the appropriate information and pop out what we need.
@DM given that we just did all this loot/coin transfer yesterday in game time will they still be able to accommodate us today after the spider hunt?
Kossoth Zan
player, 96 posts
Whirling Dervish
HP 18 / 20
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 17:10
msg #759
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
I'd say full share since that will allow for a healthy reserve if we need it.
Dungeon Master
GM, 740 posts
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 17:11
msg #760
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
Yes, they will be able to accomdate anything that is under the 800 limit. multiple times.
Korkas Stonedelver
player, 311 posts
The "Muscle"
AC 7 HP:9/15
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 17:27
msg #761
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
Kossoth Zan:
I'd say full share since that will allow for a healthy reserve if we need it.
I am for a full share as well. Is anyone against a full share for the party fund?
Dungeon Master
GM, 741 posts
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 17:38
msg #762
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
Full share makes calculations easier. Plus it will come in handy later when larger party purchases are needed.
Virius Tesh
player, 190 posts
Suloise Envoy from the
Wizardholme of Urnst
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 18:08
msg #763
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
Kossoth:
Make sense? If people want the gems they keep them...
My brain hurts. :) I trust you.
Korkas Stonedelver
player, 312 posts
The "Muscle"
AC 7 HP:9/15
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 18:15
msg #764
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
Okay I updated my Master sheet to do the following:
It adds up the treasure and divides by party members + 1 (for "party fund" split)
It then takes any amount not equally split among the Party Members +1 and divides that equally among the actual party members (So we all will get slightly more than the "party fund")
It then takes out the cost of Gem/Jewelry Cut fees from the Party Fund, showing in a separate cell. Additionally we can add any additional costs the party wants to take from that fund in a separate cell and it reduces the party fund by that amount.
If anyone wants to manually test the numbers go ahead. You can follow the link below to see the full sheet. The master is set so only I can edit it, but anyone can copy it and enter the numbers as needed.
lol, I love messing up all your plans with my plots! hehehe.
GP limit is 800. But Trade... trade works too.
Virius Tesh
player, 192 posts
Suloise Envoy from the
Wizardholme of Urnst
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 18:24
msg #766
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
I don't mind it one bit. I'm actually really enjoying roleplaying the downtime.
@Korkas, all of the gems (including the last ruby from the first encounter) have been converted into the following:
280gp, and 35 separate 100gp stones.
Korkas Stonedelver
player, 313 posts
The "Muscle"
AC 7 HP:9/15
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 18:24
msg #767
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
In reply to Dungeon Master (msg # 765):
The beauty of how I did my sheet is if we don't have to pay a cut fee then we don't include the gems in the cut cell and we just get the total split done quickly :P
Kossoth Zan
player, 98 posts
Whirling Dervish
HP 18 / 20
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 18:25
msg #768
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
Is the 5% fee still in there Dungeon Master but just in the form of her merchant point or is it a straight trade value back and forth?
Korkas Stonedelver
player, 314 posts
The "Muscle"
AC 7 HP:9/15
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 18:25
msg #769
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
Virius Tesh:
I don't mind it one bit. I'm actually really enjoying roleplaying the downtime.
@Korkas, all of the gems (including the last ruby from the first encounter) have been converted into the following:
280gp, and 35 separate 100gp stones.
Feel free to edit the sheet to get final numbers. Anyone can do it :P
Dungeon Master
GM, 746 posts
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 18:27
msg #770
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
Its a strait trade when it comes to trading, no fee. She is trading out older stock of gems she has but haven't been commissioned for anything for newer gems she doesn't have, that might be commissioned, so its a win for her. Shes not really loosing anything, but gaining more options for stuff.
Korkas Stonedelver
player, 315 posts
The "Muscle"
AC 7 HP:9/15
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 18:32
msg #771
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
Korkas Stonedelver:
Virius Tesh:
I don't mind it one bit. I'm actually really enjoying roleplaying the downtime.
@Korkas, all of the gems (including the last ruby from the first encounter) have been converted into the following:
280gp, and 35 separate 100gp stones.
Feel free to edit the sheet to get final numbers. Anyone can do it :P
I should also mention. We only needed to "Cut" 3000 GP worth of Gems. Not sure where they 3500 GP number came from.
But the simple edit to the sheet would be set Cell C17 to 0 as it cost us nothing.
Korkas Stonedelver
player, 316 posts
The "Muscle"
AC 7 HP:9/15
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 18:33
msg #772
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
Here is the new updated totals of what the party split should look like.
You can assume you have a collection of gemstones instead of coinage if you prefer.
Total Value (GP) 3979.97
Total Value of Split (GP): 568.57
Party Fund less Expenses (GP): 493.55
(5x 100 GP Gems each) This message was last edited by the player at 18:34, Fri 14 June 2019.
Korkas Stonedelver
player, 317 posts
The "Muscle"
AC 7 HP:9/15
Fri 14 Jun 2019 at 21:55
msg #773
Re: ▶ OOC Conversations
Forgive my lack of responses today in IC. Work has been busy and aside from what I was able to get done with the Treasure I haven't had much time to respond in depth to anything.
