There we go. Chatter away.

Bears,

Is another Survival Check needed for Rhydd (or Farwalker) to attempt to recognize the odd round tracks?

Thanks.

Hmm. I was a bit back and forth on this, and in an earlier iteration of the post I straight up gave it away (some of you might have read the post before I managed to update it, and would then know. If so, disregard that information). I'm going to go ahead and say no, Rhydd knows only what I've posted in the thread currently and is unable to fully identify the prints. I'll justify a 17 being insufficient by restating they've been mostly whisked away/filled back in. Whether or not Rhydd has any guesses is up to you.


Give me a History or Arcana check.

As for Skath's response to Mallory's Messaging, I completely forgot to address that when I resolved the rolls. It won't be too much, just a polite nod before retreating back into the barracks. I've updated my post so it's acknowledged in the IC thread. Dannika wouldn't have much to say. Her interaction with Skath has been near none, having only Hlin's negative comment from waaay earlier to base her opinion off of.

Honestly, unless Skath recognizes the spell and knows he can respond to it (or if the magic automatically grants him some comprehension of its function), then it's entirely reasonable he might not think to reply at all.  A nod alone would be perfectly suitable.

Given the situation, I'd preferably take the same roll, then lower the DC if I think the action is better suited to reveal the information you've previously attempted to access (which may be the case here).

Edit: Signing off for today. Good night!
This message was last edited by the GM at 22:06, Mon 04 Oct 2021.

Torgrim Squallborn rolled 7 using 1d20-1 ((8)).

Barring that, want to toss it Mallory's way?

In reply to Mallory Bonheur (msg # 8):

Definitely. I’ll wait and see where a 7 gets him, then he’ll consult the professionals.
This message was last edited by the player at 09:59, Tue 05 Oct 2021.

Well, Farwalker does know her gemstones.