In reply to Player 9 (msg # 156):
I see. Interesting. Well, it is supposed to be a border covenant with those issues.
The 5e map keeps the Levant beyond the Sinai Peninsula. Oddly, though, that map also puts Damietta on the Sinai Peninsula, even though it's not at the eastern-most of the Nile river heads. However, LotN is 5e and it says this:
quote:
The Fifth Crusade made landfall in Damietta in 1218, and is preparing for an attack on Cairo. An actively crusader covenant may decide to establish itself in the Nile region in order to dodge the Order’s rules on interference with the mundanes, believing their presence in a land without Tribunal membership frees them from the potential charge of “endangering the Order through my actions,” or “bringing ruin upon my sodales.” Without Hermetic neighbors, without regional residents, they might believe there is no one to accuse them and no place to bring charges, and at first this might well be true. However, their actions may force other covenants in the Roman or Levant Tribunals to send magi to establish a presence in the area. Covenants may have other reasons for seeking the Hermetic frontier. To a covenant tired of political maneuvering or bitter about the limitations of established tradition in a Peripheral Code, the idea of establishing an unsupervised covenant may seem very attractive.
So I think we can stick with LotN and say the Levant Tribunal does not quite stretch this far, but it might well contest the border, which is partly what was desired as a Hook for the border fortress, if I'm not mistaken.