quote:
Hi Bodie! I think I can help. Vine isn't playing only to win; she wants whoever else might win to adopt her policies in the process. She wants to be in the race partly to make sure that the things she focuses on *are* part of the focus, when they might otherwise disappear from the news cycle.
That's far more concise than I've managed so far, and yes.
Functionally she wants a spotlight she can point at the things she cares about because if no one is thinking about an issue that issue is unlikely to change. So long as she's at least theoretically relevant to the race she can elicit reactions from the public and other candidates. She could get more certain control by throwing in with Bodie but a lot of that agency and freedom to maneuver would go away.
As an example if Vine pushes prison reform hard then, even if none of the other candidates started with a stance, they'll have to articulate one. It goes from being a non-issue to a visible issue even if she loses.
quote:
Ok. I get that.
I kinda thought that was the case.
So she has said she wont step down, but from what you’ve said, would it seem reasonable that she would ‘join’ what is more likely a winning team; so that when ‘that team’ wins, she will be within it, with leverage.
She probably (no mind reading) agrees with Bodie on a lot. She might even be willing to work for Bodie afterwards. But her ability to influence the other candidates gets a lot weaker if she isn't a candidate, as does her ability to proverbially 'keep Bodie honest'. Vine knows she can't win, which lets her be a little reckless with her campaign in service to her policy goals.