RolePlay onLine RPoL Logo

, welcome to Sci-Fi Worldbuilding: The Game!

10:44, 23rd April 2024 (GMT+0)

OOC Thread.

Posted by The GMFor group 0
The GM
GM, 120 posts
Mon 20 Jun 2022
at 02:05
  • msg #210

Re: OOC Thread

Xadir:
Tell me if i'm an idiot. I am that all the time.

Does it make sense to have chaos and law magic being stats with them being selectively available based on class?


I'm fine with that. I've seen it lately in at least one other game-- "this class has an extra stat"


Xadir:
Hapid Gladiators use mild uses of chaos magic, while say Frogs are more prone to law magic. Allowing different sources of power, some might not be able to use it at all, others in mild ways a 1, others are decent or advanced practitioners a 2, or a 3?

I might just be a fool, and missing the point though.


No I'm fine with it.

So BESIDES the extra stats, how many d'you want at core?
Xadir
player, 58 posts
Mon 20 Jun 2022
at 02:11
  • msg #211

Re: OOC Thread

The GM:
Xadir:
Tell me if i'm an idiot. I am that all the time.

Does it make sense to have chaos and law magic being stats with them being selectively available based on class?


I'm fine with that. I've seen it lately in at least one other game-- "this class has an extra stat"


Xadir:
Hapid Gladiators use mild uses of chaos magic, while say Frogs are more prone to law magic. Allowing different sources of power, some might not be able to use it at all, others in mild ways a 1, others are decent or advanced practitioners a 2, or a 3?

I might just be a fool, and missing the point though.


No I'm fine with it.

So BESIDES the extra stats, how many d'you want at core?

Forceful/Agile/Insightful/Charming

I can try to work with this. Though need to verify.

Forceful would be kicking down the door and taking names
Agile, would be sneaking through the Window, and overhearing their conversations to take those names.
Insightful would be not going there in the first place, bribing the Servants to give me those guys' names.
Charming would be convincing you are on the guest list even though you aren't and having them introduce themselves to you, to learn their names.
The GM
GM, 121 posts
Mon 20 Jun 2022
at 02:28
  • msg #212

Re: OOC Thread

Xadir:
I can try to work with this. Though need to verify.

Forceful would be kicking down the door and taking names
Agile, would be sneaking through the Window, and overhearing their conversations to take those names.


Forceful is strength, taking hits, punching hard, yeah.

Agile is sneaking, stealth, ranged combat, yeah.

Xadir:
Insightful would be not going there in the first place, bribing the Servants to give me those guys' names.


UH, I think that would be Charming, because it'd be convincing the servants to help you out and tell no one they told you.

Insightful would be spotting important details, keeping watch, finding hidden stuff, figuring things out, remembering stuff ("Wait, I heard an old legend about this once... I think their necks are the least-armored part of them...")


Xadir:
Charming would be convincing you are on the guest list even though you aren't and having them introduce themselves to you, to learn their names.


You bet. Persuasion, talking people into stuff
This message was last edited by the GM at 02:29, Mon 20 June 2022.
Xadir
player, 59 posts
Mon 20 Jun 2022
at 02:30
  • msg #213

Re: OOC Thread

The GM:
Xadir:
I can try to work with this. Though need to verify.

Forceful would be kicking down the door and taking names
Agile, would be sneaking through the Window, and overhearing their conversations to take those names.


Forceful is strength, taking hits, punching hard, yeah.

Agile is sneaking, stealth, ranged combat, yeah.

Xadir:
Insightful would be not going there in the first place, bribing the Servants to give me those guys' names.


UH, I think that would be Charming, because it'd be convincing the servants to help you out and tell no one they told you.

Insightful would be spotting important details, keeping watch, finding hidden stuff, figuring things out, remembering stuff ("Wait, I heard an old legend about this once... I think their necks are the least-armored part of them...")


Xadir:
Charming would be convincing you are on the guest list even though you aren't and having them introduce themselves to you, to learn their names.


You bet. Persuasion, talking people into stuff

Ah Ok, so it would be finding out who their Messenger gave invitations through based on their routes, and through that the names.
The GM
GM, 122 posts
Mon 20 Jun 2022
at 14:14
  • msg #214

Re: OOC Thread

Xadir:
Xadir:
Insightful would be not going there in the first place, bribing the Servants to give me those guys' names.


UH, I think that would be Charming, because it'd be convincing the servants to help you out and tell no one they told you.

Insightful would be spotting important details, keeping watch, finding hidden stuff, figuring things out, remembering stuff ("Wait, I heard an old legend about this once... I think their necks are the least-armored part of them...")


Xadir:
Charming would be convincing you are on the guest list even though you aren't and having them introduce themselves to you, to learn their names.


You bet. Persuasion, talking people into stuff

Ah Ok, so it would be finding out who their Messenger gave invitations through based on their routes, and through that the names.
</quote>

Yeah, I think you've got it.

So, any other questions before I go try to start setting something up?
Xadir
player, 60 posts
Mon 20 Jun 2022
at 14:15
  • msg #215

Re: OOC Thread

The GM:
Xadir:
Xadir:
Insightful would be not going there in the first place, bribing the Servants to give me those guys' names.


UH, I think that would be Charming, because it'd be convincing the servants to help you out and tell no one they told you.

Insightful would be spotting important details, keeping watch, finding hidden stuff, figuring things out, remembering stuff ("Wait, I heard an old legend about this once... I think their necks are the least-armored part of them...")


Xadir:
Charming would be convincing you are on the guest list even though you aren't and having them introduce themselves to you, to learn their names.


You bet. Persuasion, talking people into stuff

Ah Ok, so it would be finding out who their Messenger gave invitations through based on their routes, and through that the names.


Yeah, I think you've got it.

So, any other questions before I go try to start setting something up?
</quote>
No I think I got it.
The GM
GM, 123 posts
Mon 20 Jun 2022
at 14:23
  • msg #216

Re: OOC Thread


Okay, well, the other thing I want to make sure of is: will the OTHER three participants be playing? Or not so much?
World's Onward
player, 16 posts
Mon 20 Jun 2022
at 14:29
  • msg #217

Re: OOC Thread

I'm up for playing this game boss
The GM
GM, 124 posts
Mon 20 Jun 2022
at 14:32
  • msg #218

Re: OOC Thread

World's Onward:
I'm up for playing this game boss


Well that's 1... need to hear from 2 more people...
The GM
GM, 125 posts
Tue 21 Jun 2022
at 02:08
  • msg #219

Re: OOC Thread

The GM:
World's Onward:
I'm up for playing this game boss


Well that's 1... need to hear from 2 more people...



Balance. Daryus. Are you gonna play PCs in this world or no?
Daryus
player, 32 posts
Tue 21 Jun 2022
at 02:34
  • msg #220

Re: OOC Thread

It's tempting but I don't think I have room for another active system based game right now. I'm in a handful of D&D things both IRl and on RPoL as it is. It takes most my attention. The casual nature of building the world didn't tax it the way I expect a full game would.
The GM
GM, 126 posts
Tue 21 Jun 2022
at 02:45
  • msg #221

Re: OOC Thread

Daryus:
It's tempting but I don't think I have room for another active system based game right now. I'm in a handful of D&D things both IRl and on RPoL as it is. It takes most my attention. The casual nature of building the world didn't tax it the way I expect a full game would.


Understood.

Yeah, I liked that too. It's why I was able to keep coming back and moving things along as regularly as happened.

So that leaves you, Balance... What do you say?
Xadir
player, 61 posts
Tue 21 Jun 2022
at 03:38
  • msg #222

Re: OOC Thread

Alright, let's head into Sci-Fi then. If everyone is cool with that.
The GM
GM, 127 posts
Tue 21 Jun 2022
at 15:06
  • msg #223

Re: OOC Thread

Xadir:
Alright, let's head into Sci-Fi then. If everyone is cool with that.


What?

I mean, if you want to re-start this experience with sci-fi, I'm fine with that, but I'm hoping to have the game, preferably with Balance.
The GM
GM, 128 posts
Tue 21 Jun 2022
at 21:25
  • msg #224

Re: OOC Thread

The GM:
Xadir:
Alright, let's head into Sci-Fi then. If everyone is cool with that.


What?

I mean, if you want to re-start this experience with sci-fi, I'm fine with that, but I'm hoping to have the game, preferably with Balance.


Balance continues to not reply to the question. I have PMed him.

In the meantime, I will invite the four of you to a new game...

link to another game


SO-- New question-- do the four of you all want to participate in re-starting this experience to make a sci-fi universe?
This message was last edited by the GM at 21:25, Tue 21 June 2022.
World's Onward
player, 17 posts
Tue 21 Jun 2022
at 21:37
  • msg #225

Re: OOC Thread

Uhm, woah, taking this setting to a whole new level. I thought we established this as more of a fantasy setting than modern or even futuristic, but okay, let's do it.
Xadir
player, 62 posts
Tue 21 Jun 2022
at 21:38
  • msg #226

Re: OOC Thread

World's Onward:
Uhm, woah, taking this setting to a whole new level. I thought we established this as more of a fantasy setting than modern or even futuristic, but okay, let's do it.

This world is fantasy they are suggesting Making a new one of these competitions in Sci-Fi.
World's Onward
player, 18 posts
Tue 21 Jun 2022
at 22:37
  • msg #227

Re: OOC Thread

Ah, so making a new world for sci-fi, understood then let's do that too. I'm on board with that.
The GM
GM, 129 posts
Tue 21 Jun 2022
at 22:53
  • msg #228

Re: OOC Thread

World's Onward:
Ah, so making a new world for sci-fi, understood then let's do that too. I'm on board with that.


Yeah. I'll change POWERFUL BEINGS, I think, UNLESS we want SPACE GODS like in Star Trek (there are so many in Star Trek! Q and his ilk! That guy who was, or thought he was, a Greek God! And on, and on, and on...)

I'll change Magic Thing to Super Science Thing... And so on and so on.

I'll set it up soon... maybe tomorrow if I have time.

Daryus, you up for that?

(I'll do the vote-accounting different this time...)
Xadir
player, 63 posts
Tue 21 Jun 2022
at 23:03
  • msg #229

Re: OOC Thread

The GM:
World's Onward:
Ah, so making a new world for sci-fi, understood then let's do that too. I'm on board with that.


Yeah. I'll change POWERFUL BEINGS, I think, UNLESS we want SPACE GODS like in Star Trek (there are so many in Star Trek! Q and his ilk! That guy who was, or thought he was, a Greek God! And on, and on, and on...)

I'll change Magic Thing to Super Science Thing... And so on and so on.

I'll set it up soon... maybe tomorrow if I have time.

Daryus, you up for that?

(I'll do the vote-accounting different this time...)

Powerful Beings can also be Powerful or Influential figures say the a Ceo of a certain company.
Daryus
player, 33 posts
Wed 22 Jun 2022
at 00:18
  • msg #230

Re: OOC Thread

Sci-fi thing sounds fun. I think powerful beings works just tinfe as there are plenty of those in the universe. YOu know, a powerful super computer or a galactic president or a messiah or whatnot.
The GM
GM, 131 posts
Fri 24 Jun 2022
at 20:13
  • msg #231

Re: OOC Thread


Okay folks, I have hidden all the old stuff and replaced the old rules with a new sci-fi set of rules.

This time, I felt for a sci-fi world, Places should come before Creatures/Plants.

So... any comments before I officially open voting?
Balance
player, 17 posts
Sat 25 Jun 2022
at 09:48
  • msg #232

Re: OOC Thread

I'm afraid I decline to play this time.

While I like S ience fiction as much as fantasy, I'm not sur eto have the time this time.
The GM
GM, 132 posts
Sat 25 Jun 2022
at 12:09
  • msg #233

Re: OOC Thread

Balance:
I'm afraid I decline to play this time.

While I like S ience fiction as much as fantasy, I'm not sur eto have the time this time.


So, me and 3 other players (unless someone else drops out).

Is this a problem, or do I need to advertise for more players again?

I'm leaning toward not a big problem?? Am I wrong?
World's Onward
player, 19 posts
Sun 26 Jun 2022
at 00:40
  • msg #234

Re: OOC Thread

Well if we have 4 people than that's fine with me
Sign In